logo
Will the US Federal Reserve bow to Trump or wait for ‘decisive evidence' before cutting rates?

Will the US Federal Reserve bow to Trump or wait for ‘decisive evidence' before cutting rates?

Malay Mail07-05-2025

WASHINGTON, May 7 — The US Federal Reserve faces a tough choice today as it contends with President Donald Trump's tariff rollout: prioritise tackling inflation by holding interest rates high, do nothing, or stimulate growth and employment by cutting them.
Analysts and investors overwhelmingly think the Fed will choose to sit tight, preferring to wait and see how the new levies affect the US economy before moving on rates.
'It's an unfavourable mix for the Federal Reserve,' Nationwide chief economist Kathy Bostjancic told AFP.
'They're going to see upward price pressures at the same time when economic growth is slowing,' she said. 'And then they'll have to put a weight on what do they believe?'
The US central bank has a dual mandate from Congress to act independently to achieve stable prices and maximum sustainable employment, which it does mainly by raising and lowering the level of its key short-term lending rate.
That acts as either a throttle or a brake for demand in the US economy, and feeds through into borrowing costs for everything from car loans to mortgages.
Futures traders see a probability of more than 95 per cent that the Fed will make no cuts this week, according to data from financial services company CME Group.
'Decisive evidence'
Last month, Trump introduced steep levies on China and lower 'baseline' levies of 10 per cent on goods from most other countries, sparking weeks of turbulence in the financial markets.
The White House also introduced higher tariffs on dozens of other trading partners, and then abruptly paused them until July to give the US time to renegotiate existing trade arrangements.
Data published in recent weeks point to an economic contraction in the first quarter of the year, as consumers and businesses stocked up on imports ahead of the introduction of the new measures.
At the same time, the unemployment rate has hovered close to historic lows, and the inflation rate has trended towards — but remained just above — the Fed's long-term target of two per cent.
'We continue to think that Fed officials will be willing to 'look through' tariff related goods inflation and cut policy rates to support the labour market,' economists at Citi bank wrote in a recent investor note.
'But that will not occur until they see decisive evidence in hard data that labour markets are loosening,' they added.
Other analysts, including those at Deutsche Bank, expect the Fed will pause for longer to see how the economic picture unfolds over the coming months.
If, as is widely expected, the Fed sits tight this week, its baseline rate will remain at between 4.25 per cent and 4.50 per cent, where it has sat since December 2024.
'Neither good nor bad enough'
'Incoming data are neither good nor bad enough to force the FOMC to reveal its intentions,' Steve Englander, Standard Chartered bank's head of North America macro strategy, wrote in a note to clients, referring to the bank's rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell will likely try to make 'very little news' during his regular press conference after the rate decision is published, said Bostjancic from Nationwide.
Powell will likely face additional questions about the Trump administration's support for his leadership of the independent central bank, given public criticism levelled at him and the Fed by senior government officials — including the president.
'He should lower them,' Trump said of Powell and the interest rates in an interview published over the weekend, repeating his past criticism of the Fed chair while insisting he had no plans to try to fire him before his term ends next year.
'By commenting publicly on what the Fed should do, they potentially undermine...the public's perception of the institution's commitment to price stability,' former Fed economist Rodney Ramcharan wrote in a note shared with AFP.
'If the Fed were to cut rates, markets could perceive that decision as 'political' rather than a reaction to actual economic conditions,' he added. — AFP

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World Bank to end ban on nuclear energy projects, still debating upstream gas
World Bank to end ban on nuclear energy projects, still debating upstream gas

The Sun

time36 minutes ago

  • The Sun

World Bank to end ban on nuclear energy projects, still debating upstream gas

WASHINGTON: The World Bank's board has agreed to end a longstanding ban on funding nuclear energy projects in developing countries as part of a broader push to meet rising electricity needs, the bank's president Ajay Banga said on Wednesday. Banga outlined the bank's revised energy strategy in an email to staff after what he called a constructive discussion with the board on Tuesday. He said the board was not yet in agreement on whether the bank should engage in funding the production of natural gas, and if so, under what circumstances. The global development bank, which lends at low rates to help countries build everything from flood barriers to railroads, decided in 2013 to stop funding nuclear power projects. It announced in 2017 it would stop funding upstream oil and gas projects beginning in 2019, although it would still consider gas projects in the poorest countries. The nuclear issue was agreed fairly easily by board members, but several countries, including Germany, France and Britain, did not fully support changing the bank's approach to embrace upstream natural gas projects, sources familiar with the discussion said. "While the issues are complex, we've made real progress toward a clear path forward on delivering electricity as a driver of development," Banga said, adding that further discussion was required on the issue of upstream gas projects. Banga has championed a shift in the bank's energy policy since taking office in June 2023, arguing the bank should pursue an "all of the above" approach to help countries meet rising electricity needs and advance development goals. In his memo, he noted that electricity demand was expected to more than double in developing countries by 2035, which would require more than doubling today's annual investment of $280 billion in generation, grids and storage. The Trump administration has been pushing hard for ending the ban on nuclear energy projects since taking office. The U.S. is the bank's single largest shareholder - at 15.83%, followed by Japan with 7% and China with close to 6% - and the bank's decision to broaden its approach to energy projects will likely please President Donald Trump, who withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement and its emission-reduction targets as one of his first acts in January. Twenty-eight countries already use commercial nuclear power, with 10 more ready to start and another 10 potentially ready by 2030, according to the Energy for Growth Hub and Third Way. Banga said the World Bank Group would work closely with the International Atomic Energy Agency to strengthen its ability to advise on nuclear non-proliferation safeguards, safety, security and regulatory frameworks. The bank would support efforts to extend the life of existing nuclear reactors, along with grid upgrades. It would also work to accelerate the potential of small modular reactors. ENERGY MIX Trump administration officials and some development experts say developing countries should not be blocked from using inexpensive power to expand their economies while advanced economies like Germany continue to burn fossil fuels. But climate activists worry that funding more nuclear and natural gas projects will divert funds away from urgently needed efforts by developing countries to adapt to climate change and benefit from abundant alternative energy sources such as solar. "Net zero does not mean fossil fuel free. It means, still, that there will be 20% energy coming from fossil fuels," said Mia Mottley, prime minister of Barbados. "We know natural gas is that clean fuel." Banga said the bank's revised strategy would allow countries to determine the best energy mix, with some choosing solar, wind, geothermal or hydroelectric power, while others might opt for natural gas or, over time, nuclear. He said the bank would continue to advise on and finance midstream and downstream natural gas projects when they represented the least-cost option, aligned with development plans, minimized risk and did not constrain renewables. The bank would further study evolving technologies like carbon capture and ocean energy, Banga said, adding it aimed to simplify reviews and approvals. Banga said the bank would continue advising on and financing the retirement of coal plants, supporting carbon capture for industry and power generation, but not for enhanced oil recovery, which can typically secure commercial financing.

Trump: Willing to extend July 8 deadline for trade talks, but not likely necessary
Trump: Willing to extend July 8 deadline for trade talks, but not likely necessary

The Sun

time36 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Trump: Willing to extend July 8 deadline for trade talks, but not likely necessary

WASHINGTON: U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday he would be willing to extend a July 8 deadline for completing trade talks with countries before higher U.S. tariffs take effect, but did not believe that would be necessary. Trump, speaking to reporters before a performance of "Les Miserables" at the Kennedy Center, said trade negotiations were continuing with about 15 countries, including South Korea, Japan and the European Union. He said the U.S. would send out letters in one to two weeks outlining the terms of trade deals to dozens of other countries, which they could embrace or reject.

World Bank Lifts Ban on Nuclear Energy Funding for Developing Nations
World Bank Lifts Ban on Nuclear Energy Funding for Developing Nations

The Sun

time37 minutes ago

  • The Sun

World Bank Lifts Ban on Nuclear Energy Funding for Developing Nations

WASHINGTON: The World Bank's board has agreed to end a longstanding ban on funding nuclear energy projects in developing countries as part of a broader push to meet rising electricity needs, the bank's president Ajay Banga said on Wednesday. Banga outlined the bank's revised energy strategy in an email to staff after what he called a constructive discussion with the board on Tuesday. He said the board was not yet in agreement on whether the bank should engage in funding the production of natural gas, and if so, under what circumstances. The global development bank, which lends at low rates to help countries build everything from flood barriers to railroads, decided in 2013 to stop funding nuclear power projects. It announced in 2017 it would stop funding upstream oil and gas projects beginning in 2019, although it would still consider gas projects in the poorest countries. The nuclear issue was agreed fairly easily by board members, but several countries, including Germany, France and Britain, did not fully support changing the bank's approach to embrace upstream natural gas projects, sources familiar with the discussion said. "While the issues are complex, we've made real progress toward a clear path forward on delivering electricity as a driver of development," Banga said, adding that further discussion was required on the issue of upstream gas projects. Banga has championed a shift in the bank's energy policy since taking office in June 2023, arguing the bank should pursue an "all of the above" approach to help countries meet rising electricity needs and advance development goals. In his memo, he noted that electricity demand was expected to more than double in developing countries by 2035, which would require more than doubling today's annual investment of $280 billion in generation, grids and storage. The Trump administration has been pushing hard for ending the ban on nuclear energy projects since taking office. The U.S. is the bank's single largest shareholder - at 15.83%, followed by Japan with 7% and China with close to 6% - and the bank's decision to broaden its approach to energy projects will likely please President Donald Trump, who withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement and its emission-reduction targets as one of his first acts in January. Twenty-eight countries already use commercial nuclear power, with 10 more ready to start and another 10 potentially ready by 2030, according to the Energy for Growth Hub and Third Way. Banga said the World Bank Group would work closely with the International Atomic Energy Agency to strengthen its ability to advise on nuclear non-proliferation safeguards, safety, security and regulatory frameworks. The bank would support efforts to extend the life of existing nuclear reactors, along with grid upgrades. It would also work to accelerate the potential of small modular reactors. ENERGY MIX Trump administration officials and some development experts say developing countries should not be blocked from using inexpensive power to expand their economies while advanced economies like Germany continue to burn fossil fuels. But climate activists worry that funding more nuclear and natural gas projects will divert funds away from urgently needed efforts by developing countries to adapt to climate change and benefit from abundant alternative energy sources such as solar. "Net zero does not mean fossil fuel free. It means, still, that there will be 20% energy coming from fossil fuels," said Mia Mottley, prime minister of Barbados. "We know natural gas is that clean fuel." Banga said the bank's revised strategy would allow countries to determine the best energy mix, with some choosing solar, wind, geothermal or hydroelectric power, while others might opt for natural gas or, over time, nuclear. He said the bank would continue to advise on and finance midstream and downstream natural gas projects when they represented the least-cost option, aligned with development plans, minimized risk and did not constrain renewables. The bank would further study evolving technologies like carbon capture and ocean energy, Banga said, adding it aimed to simplify reviews and approvals. Banga said the bank would continue advising on and financing the retirement of coal plants, supporting carbon capture for industry and power generation, but not for enhanced oil recovery, which can typically secure commercial financing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store