This trust has increased shareholder payouts at more than triple the rate of inflation
Questor is The Telegraph's stock-picking column, helping you decode the markets and offering insights on where to invest.
Investors in the UK's small and mid-cap companies have endured a sustained period of truly abysmal performance. Having reached all-time highs in 2021, the FTSE 250 and FTSE Small-Cap indices subsequently slumped and currently trade 13pc and 9pc below their respective peaks. By contrast, the FTSE 100 index reached a new record high this year and currently trades just 2pc below it.
In Questor's view, however, small and mid-cap stocks are now poised for a comeback. The UK economy's long-term outlook is becoming increasingly upbeat, with inflation due to fall to the Bank of England's 2pc target following a temporary rise in the short run. This should allow for a brisk pace of interest rate cuts that boost the economy's performance and create operating conditions that are more conducive to profit growth.
Since small and mid-cap companies listed in the UK typically have significantly greater exposure to the domestic economy than their larger peers, they are likely to be the biggest beneficiaries of an improving economic outlook – and trading on dirt-cheap valuations after their recent demise, we are highly optimistic about their prospects over the long run.
As a result, the JPMorgan UK Small Cap Growth & Income investment trust becomes the latest addition to our income portfolio. Although it has a rather humdrum historic yield of 3.1pc, its prospective income return currently amounts to roughly 4.4pc as a result of an updated policy that aims to pay 4pc of net assets as a dividend each year.
Over the past three years, the trust's shareholder payouts have risen at an annualised rate of 21pc. This compares favourably to an inflation rate that has averaged a heady 6.3pc over the same period.
Clearly, a dividend policy that pays out a fixed percentage of net assets each year is likely to equate to a highly changeable income stream for investors. This is especially the case given the trust's focus on smaller companies, whose share prices are inherently volatile. With a gearing ratio of just under 11pc, too, its share price could fluctuate to a significantly greater extent than the wider stock market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
KKR drops out of Thames Water equity raise process
June 3 (Reuters) - Britain's Thames Water said on Tuesday that KKR (KKR.N), opens new tab has told the utility that it would not proceed with its equity injection plans, and that the U.S. private equity firm's preferred partner status has now lapsed.
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
BP needs to scrap its Big Oil mentality, and its buybacks: Bousso
LONDON, June 3 - BP has jumped from crisis to crisis in recent years, severely eroding the British firm's stature as one of the world's leading oil companies. Given the increasingly challenging dynamics in today's oil market, BP may finally need to accept that it is no longer a true oil major and can't keep managing cash like one. The exclusive Big Oil club of Exxon Mobil (XOM.N), opens new tab, Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab, Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab, TotalEnergies ( opens new tab and BP (BP.L), opens new tab has for decades been synonymous with sprawling upstream and downstream oil and gas operations, solid balance sheets and long-term strategies that have helped generate sizeable, stable shareholder returns. But BP hasn't ticked most of these boxes for years, having dealt with a succession of crises over the past 15 years that have slashed its market cap and left it financially vulnerable and lacking clear strategic direction. Most recently, a failed foray into renewables and a management scandal saddled the company with a ballooning debt pile as it struggles to revert back to oil and gas. CEO Murray Auchincloss acknowledged the need for change when he unveiled in February a fundamental strategy reset that includes reducing spending to below $15 billion to 2027, cutting up to $5 billion in costs and selling $20 billion of assets in an effort to boost performance and rein in ballooning debt. The plan also reset the rate of shareholder returns to 30-40% of operating cash flow. But the reset has done little to alleviate investor concerns. BP's shares have declined by 18% since the strategy update, underperforming rivals. Piling on the pressure, activist shareholder Elliott Management, which has recently built a 5% position in the company, has indicated it wants BP to cut spending even more. There is, therefore, clearly a need for deeper change. While it may be challenging for the 116-year-old company to admit that it can no longer carry the same financial heft it once did, accepting reality will offer the company's leadership an opportunity to reduce some of its commitments to investors, particularly its share repurchase programme. All energy majors today have multi-billion-dollar buyback programmes that send capital back to shareholders, helping to attract investors who may be wary about the future of fossil fuel demand. But BP's buybacks feel like a luxury that is out of synch with its financial woes. In its first quarter results released in February, BP said it would buy back $750 million over the following three months. That was lower than the $1.75 billion in the previous three months, but even at this reduced rate, this would still total $3 billion per year. That doesn't seem prudent, especially given the 20% drop in oil prices to around $65 a barrel this year and the darkening economic outlook. Auchincloss' financial objectives assume a Brent oil price of $70, meaning the Canadian CEO will most likely struggle to meet his targets without borrowing further. Removing the annual $3 billion buyback would certainly upset investors, but it would go a long way towards reducing BP's net debt to between $14 and $18 billion by 2027, compared with $27 billion at the end of March 2025. The 'ground zero' of BP's financial decline was the deadly 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, which generated $69 billion in clean-up and legal costs, opens new tab. The company continues to pay out over $1 billion per year in settlements. The financial shock forced BP to sell billions of dollars of assets and issue huge amounts of debt to foot the bill. Its market value dropped to around $77 billion today compared to $180 billion in 2010. BP's debt-to-capitalization ratio, known as gearing, reached 25.7% at the end of the first quarter of 2025, significantly higher than those of other oil majors, including Shell's 19% or Chevron's 14%. And, importantly, BP's current $27 billion net debt figure omits several major liabilities held on its books. This includes $17 billion in hybrid bonds, an instrument that has qualities of both equity and debt, including a coupon that must be paid or accrued. While companies may issue hybrids for many reasons, including maintaining flexibility, they often do so in part because rating agencies do not treat hybrids as regular debt, which flatters the issuer's leverage ratios. Anish Kapadia, director of energy at Palissy Advisors, calculated BP's adjusted net debt hit $86 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2025, when including net debt, hybrids, Gulf of Mexico liabilities, leases and other provisions. Ultimately, cutting the buybacks should enable BP to tame its huge debt pile and repair its balance sheet faster. That, in turn, should create a strong foundation for rebuilding investor confidence. The departure of current BP Chairman Helge Lund in the coming months could be a good opportunity for the company to consider such radical change. It's unclear who will take this job, but one qualification for whoever succeeds Lund should be a much-needed sense of financial realism. Want to receive my column in your inbox every Thursday, along with additional energy insights and trending stories? Sign up for my Power Up newsletter here.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Fundamental reset' needed for UK's water industry
The water sector in England and Wales needs a 'fundamental reset' after being plagued with 'deep-rooted, systemic' failures, according to a new report. In an interim report published on Tuesday, the Independent Water Commission calls for a 'fundamental strengthening and rebalancing' of Ofwat's regulatory role, calling for the watchdog to adopt a more supervisory approach to its oversight of water firms. This could include benchmarking companies against one another to justify customer bills and assess efficiency. It also urges the Government to provide clearer direction, proposes greater regional decision-making around local water systems and emphasises the need for a greater focus on long-term, responsible investment and ownership within the industry. Independent Water Commission chairman Sir Jon Cunliffe said he had heard a 'strong and powerful consensus' that the system was not working for everyone. 'There is no simple, single change, no matter how radical, that will deliver the fundamental reset that is needed for the water sector,' he said. 'We have heard of deep-rooted, systemic and interlocking failures over the years – failure in Government's strategy and planning for the future, failure in regulation to protect both the billpayer and the environment and failure by some water companies and their owners to act in the public, as well as their private, interest. 'My view is that all of these issues need to be tackled to rebuild public trust and make the system fit for the future. We anticipate that this will require new legislation.' New national infrastructure and resilience standards are also under consideration, requiring companies to regularly report on the health of their assets. 'This means companies do not just fix failures when they fail, but responsibly plan for the long-term condition and resilience of these critical assets,' the report said. The report also highlighted the need for the sector to 'attract and retain' long-term investors but acknowledged this would require restoring investor confidence in both the sector and its regulators. 'I believe that ambitious reforms across these complex and connected set of issues are sorely needed,' Sir John said. Legislation around water was 'complex' and 'inconsistent in places', according to the interim report which said the legislation has evolved in a 'piecemeal fashion over a long period of time', with 'currently around 80 pieces of legislation covering the sector'. 'The commission is considering options to move from the complex planning process we have now to a regional 'systems planning' approach in England,' the report said. 'It means bringing decisions on water systems, such as where new infrastructure is built or how pollution from different sources should be tackled, closer to the communities who depend on them.' More than 50,000 responses from the public, campaigners, industry and the regulators were sent in to the commission's call for evidence which ran between February and April. The commission's full conclusions and detailed recommendations will be published later in the summer.
