Sydney is a peaceful city. Law and order should prevail. Not gangs
The brazenness is unprecedented. The 1980s gangland wars portrayed in the television miniseries Blue Murder and based on the novel In the Line of Fire by a former Herald editor-in-chief Darren Goodsir were fought under a kind of code of dishonour that combatants killed one another with no collateral damage.
Fast-forward four decades, and the public is in the line of fire. To make matters worse, warring gangs have outsourced the killings to young thugs who shoot, burn and run with callous indifference, both to their victims and the lives of others.
An innocent woman is fighting for life after being caught in the crossfire of a gangland shooting in Sydney's west, while detectives probe possible links to a spiralling turf war, burnt-out getaway cars, and reports that her assailants were respondents to a $50 'hitman-for-hire' job posted online.
The daylight use of guns at Auburn's M Brothers Turkish restaurant on Monday is linked to infighting within the Alameddine crime clan and resulted in the innocent waitress being shot twice in the back, a senior member of the notorious crime group Samimjan Azari being hit in the arm and shoulder, while his bodyguard took a bullet in the face.
It was the fourth attempt to assassinate Azari.
He survived an attack at Brighton-Le-Sands last February. Three weeks ago, he was sitting with two others in a Toyota ute in Woodville Road, Granville, when a gunman opened fire and killed Alameddine associate Dawwod Zakaria and wounded Parramatta solicitor Sylvan Singh. Last week, he was the target of another planned hit in Rozelle, only to flee before a shot could be fired.
NSW Police had tackled gang warfare but were required to move resources to Strike Force Pearl, targeting antisemitism, until establishing Taskforce Falcon to crack down on escalating gangland violence after the Toyota shooting.
The system is hardly helping.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
15 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Diversion scheme failures show summit response is needed
It has been four months since the co-chairs of the Minns government's Drug Summit, former deputy premier Carmel Tebbutt and former opposition leader John Brogden, handed down their final report. An election promise styled after Bob Carr's 1999 summit, last year's Drug Summit heard evidence from drug researchers, services, users and their families, as well as international perspectives on harm minimisation. Its co-chairs made 56 recommendations, including reforms to the state's drug court diversion scheme which, as Max Maddison reports in today's Sun-Herald, data suggests is continuing to be applied inconsistently by local police commands across the state. After a coalition of social services organisations called for the state government to urgently implement the summit's recommendations in late June, Health Minister Ryan Park said there would be a response by the end of the year. In today's story, Police Minister Yasmin Catley is promising one 'in the coming weeks'. But the failure of the state's diversion scheme demonstrates the difficulty with implementing changes to drug policy, which depends on various agencies working together to tackle a societal ill that does not fit solely within any of their remits. Take the state's pill testing trial, which began at music festivals last summer following an urgent recommendation from the Drug Summit's co-chairs ahead of their final report. Loading Even with the trial under way, Minns has been reluctant to stop the use of drug detection dogs at trial sites, despite this being specifically recommended by Tebbutt and Brogden, after receiving rafts of expert evidence. 'I'm not prepared to say in relation to this big music festival … if you're going to ingest drugs, the police aren't going to be there. I think that would send the wrong message,' the premier said in response to questions about the presence of sniffer dogs at Sydney Olympic Park's Midnight Mafia festival in April, which also hosted a pill testing tent.
The Age
15 hours ago
- The Age
Diversion scheme failures show summit response is needed
It has been four months since the co-chairs of the Minns government's Drug Summit, former deputy premier Carmel Tebbutt and former opposition leader John Brogden, handed down their final report. An election promise styled after Bob Carr's 1999 summit, last year's Drug Summit heard evidence from drug researchers, services, users and their families, as well as international perspectives on harm minimisation. Its co-chairs made 56 recommendations, including reforms to the state's drug court diversion scheme which, as Max Maddison reports in today's Sun-Herald, data suggests is continuing to be applied inconsistently by local police commands across the state. After a coalition of social services organisations called for the state government to urgently implement the summit's recommendations in late June, Health Minister Ryan Park said there would be a response by the end of the year. In today's story, Police Minister Yasmin Catley is promising one 'in the coming weeks'. But the failure of the state's diversion scheme demonstrates the difficulty with implementing changes to drug policy, which depends on various agencies working together to tackle a societal ill that does not fit solely within any of their remits. Take the state's pill testing trial, which began at music festivals last summer following an urgent recommendation from the Drug Summit's co-chairs ahead of their final report. Loading Even with the trial under way, Minns has been reluctant to stop the use of drug detection dogs at trial sites, despite this being specifically recommended by Tebbutt and Brogden, after receiving rafts of expert evidence. 'I'm not prepared to say in relation to this big music festival … if you're going to ingest drugs, the police aren't going to be there. I think that would send the wrong message,' the premier said in response to questions about the presence of sniffer dogs at Sydney Olympic Park's Midnight Mafia festival in April, which also hosted a pill testing tent.
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Why do the rich always have to be so loud about it?
Does anybody who is honest ever buy a Lamborghini? The only time the car rates a mention in the pages of this newspaper, it seems, are in stories written by the crime reporter. The person in question often also owns a Rolex watch. And a gold chain. Perhaps the police could triangulate the owners of all three and arrest the lot on 'suspicion of … well, just suspicion'. Conspicuous consumption, of course, is back in fashion: witness the Bezos wedding. As sequels go, Jeff in Venice was even sadder than Death in Venice. A man notorious for underpaying his workers – and for making them walk at a near-jog called 'Amazon pace' – wanted to show off the wealth that had resulted. He also made sure it was in sight of the cameras, so the world could see his triumph. Meanwhile, there were reports this week about the funeral, some months ago, of a Melbourne criminal. It's emerged that his body was transferred, at the last minute, into a golden coffin. His friends, apparently, thought the wooden one in which he'd been delivered sent the wrong message. Appearances are everything, it seems, even when you are dead. The wealthy didn't always behave like this. Many decades ago, as the Herald's correspondent in the UK, I had the chance to interview the occasional member of the aristocracy. Over time, I developed what I called 'the threadbare carpet index', which enabled me to guess the wealth and status of my subject to the nearest fraction of a baronet. The more threadbare the carpet, the larger the estate. If you could see the floorboards through the holes, they'd own half of Scotland. They all drove beaten-up Land Rovers, right up to and including the Queen. If I were lucky enough to score a cup of tea, the accompanying biscuits would be a supermarket own-brand. The blokes had patches sewn onto their jackets to cover the bit where the elbows had worked their way through. I guess they were just saving up to pay for new plumbing in the east wing, but I still found the attitude refreshing. You had the feeling they'd rather drop dead than buy a new shirt. Maybe they agreed with Henry David Thoreau: 'Beware all enterprises which require new clothes'. This was long before the era of the $100,000 handbag, but had I predicted its existence, they'd have laughed out loud. They would regard such an object as 'vulgar' or 'ostentatious' and, moreover, a sign that the purchaser had lost their tiny mind. In fact, the more useless watches have become – superseded by our devices – the more they have become a signifier of wealth. I wonder, sometimes, whether those so keen on ostentatious consumption are aware that not everyone is cheering them on in the manner they so keenly desire. When an expensive sports car pulls up next to you at the traffic lights, a young man at the wheel, what's your first thought?
