2020 Santiam Canyon fire not caused by downed power lines, ODF says
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — A newly released Oregon Department of Forestry says that downed power lines were not the cause of the deadly Santiam Canyon Fire in Sept. 2020.
Investigators determined that the cause of the fire was embers from the Beachie Creek Fire.
'The Santiam Canyon Wildfire Event is comprised of 19 reports of fire located within the protection boundaries of ODF's North Cascade District. Seven of which were caused by down powerlines but determined to not contribute to the spread of large fires in the Santiam Canyon. The seven ignitions were suppressed by residents and/or other fire personnel,' the report said. 'The remaining 12 reports of fire were determined to be caused by embers from the Beachie Creek Fire. The Oregon Department of Forestry did not investigate the Beachie Creek Fire because the U.S. Forest Service has jurisdiction over the fire.'
Nine people died and over 5,000 homes were destroyed in the Santiam Canyon Fire, which burned nearly 2,000 square miles.
'We recognize the trauma that many Oregonians experienced during the Labor Day Fires, which is why the department is dedicated to making sure these investigations, and every investigation, are thorough and a complete picture of what happened,' ODF Deputy of Fire Operations Kyle Williams said.
PacificCorp, the parent company of Pacific Power has faced a and has paid out to victims of the fires. In their response to the report, the power company said that the findings supported their 'longstanding assertion that electrical equipment was not the cause of widespread property damage in the Santiam Canyon during the 2020 wildfires.'
'The report confirms PacifiCorp's long-held position that any wildfire ignitions linked to the company's electrical equipment in the Santiam Canyon did not contribute to the widespread devastation that occurred when the Beachie Creek fire tore through the canyon,' said Pacific Power President Ryan Flynn. 'While we continue to recognize that the 2020 wildfires were undeniably tragic, the thorough investigation by ODF provides important context and details absent during the trial proceedings.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use
A lawsuit seeking the development of in-home psilocybin services for individuals with disabilities in Oregon will continue after a U.S. district court denied a motion to dismiss on May 30. The case could set an important precedent for future drug laws and accessibility for all Americans, including those with disabilities. In 2020, 56 percent of Oregonians voted in favor of the Oregon Psilocybin Services Act (Measure 109), which directed the Oregon Health Authority to license and regulate psilocybin products and services for individuals aged 21 and older. While a handful of cities in the U.S. had previously decriminalized psilocybin, Oregon was the first state to both decriminalize and create a legal regulatory framework for its supervised use. After two years of rule drafting, the OHA began accepting applications in 2023 for licensed psilocybin service centers, which are regulated facilities where psilocybin can be administered. Rather than focus on selling a product, service centers are geared toward health and wellness and are designed to offer support before, during, and after psilocybin use by licensed service facilitators. This model opened up psilocybin use for most Oregon residents but makes accessing psilocybin services impossible for individuals unable to leave home because of a disability. To fix this oversight in the law, four practitioners licensed by the state to guide people through psilocybin experiences have alleged that the current OHA process fails to reasonably accommodate those with disabilities as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Cusker et al v. OHA was filed after the OHA denied the plaintiffs' request for a process to be developed for in-home psilocybin services to people with disabilities who are unable to visit service centers. In response to the request, state attorneys argued that "there is no legal pathway to make accommodations for psilocybin to be consumed outside of a licensed service center" and that Measure 109 "would need to be amended for accommodations to be permitted." Although the measure only allows the use of psilocybin under facilitator supervision at a service center—which has to comply with specific location requirements, including stipulations prohibiting a center from being located within "the limits of an incorporated city or town" or in areas "zoned exclusively for residential use"—others believe the OHA has the authority and flexibility needed to interpret the language consistent with ADA requirements. But the OHA has declined to address the issue through rule making. The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon since the claim revolves around the OHA violating the ADA, a federal law. While psilocybin was decriminalized and legally regulated under Oregon law, it remains classified as a Schedule I controlled substance under the federal Controlled Substances Act. The OHA filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that the federal court lacked jurisdiction to decide the case because plaintiffs were asking the court to violate both state and federal law. The federal court would have to order the OHA to break federal law if it required the agency to produce, possess, or administer a Schedule I drug. The OHA also argued that the court would have to order a violation of Oregon's Controlled Substances Act if it required the agency to dispense psilocybin outside of a service center. Ultimately, the court denied the OHA's motion to dismiss, relying on case law involving a non-ADA-compliant marijuana dispensary. In Smith v. 116 S Market LLC (2020), Michael Smith, who is paraplegic, encountered difficulty accessing a dispensary due to a lack of accessible parking spaces, uneven ground between the parking lot and entry, and a noncompliant ramp. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Smith, granting him $4,000 in statutory damages for each encounter, under the rationale that the decision did not force the dispensary owner to distribute a Schedule I drug but merely required ADA compliance—which does not violate federal law. By adopting this reasoning, Cusker will be able to move forward. The post New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use appeared first on
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge orders ICE not to remove trans migrant seeking asylum from Washington detention facility
A federal judge in Oregon on Tuesday issued an order barring Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from removing a Mexican asylum seeker from a Washington detention facility, according to local reports. The migrant, a 24-year-old transgender woman identified as "O-J-M" in court documents, was arrested outside a Portland courtroom on Monday and transferred to the Northwest ICE Processing Center in Tacoma, Washington. U.S. District Court Judge Amy Baggio, a President Joe Biden appointee, also demanded that ICE provide the exact date and time of the removal from Portland and explain why it was deemed immediately necessary. Federal Judge Refuses To Reconsider Order To Facilitate Deportee's Return To Us Baggio's order was prompted after O-J-M's attorneys said they were not aware of their client's location and filed a habeas petition, a legal request asking a court to determine whether a person's detention or imprisonment is lawful. The migrant's attorney, Stephen Manning, of Immigrant Law Group, told Opb that O-J-M was processed into the Tacoma detention center, but he had not been granted access to her since her transfer. Read On The Fox News App Her attorneys said O-J-M was abducted and raped in Mexico because of her gender identity and sexual orientation and was seeking asylum on those grounds. "They threatened to kill her because O-J-M is a transgender woman," her habeas petition states, per OPB. "Fearing for her life, she fled and sought asylum in the United States in September 2023." Us Judge Accuses Trump Admin Of 'Manufacturing Chaos' In South Sudan Deportations, Escalating Feud Oregon sanctuary laws prevent it from having long-term immigration detention facilities, and -- aside from temporary holding cells at the Portland ICE office -- the nearest immigration detention center is the Tacoma facility. OPB reported that O-J-M sought asylum at a port of entry along the California-Mexico border, where she was arrested, detained and released. Since then, O-J-M has attended ICE check-ins and filed her formal asylum claim in February. In April, immigration officials began removal proceedings against O-J-M, the outlet reports, citing the migrant's attorneys. Manning told Willamette Weekly that his client had not committed a crime while in the U.S. During a mandatory court hearing for her asylum case in Portland on Monday, ICE attorneys moved to dismiss O-J-M's case entirely—effectively stripping her of both the case and the legal protections it provided. Afterward, ICE agents apprehended O-J-M. That led to Innovation Law Lab Attorney Jordan Cunnings, who also represents O-J-M, saying the arrest was a "dangerous attempt by ICE to circumvent due process, speed up deportations, and eviscerate the right to asylum." "This unethical behavior goes against the values we hold as Oregonians, ensuring that everyone is welcomed and included in our state," Cunnings said, per Koin. Portland Mayor Keith Wilson said that the city "stands unwavering in its commitment to sanctuary policies," adding that Portland "will not obstruct lawful federal enforcement operations," per Willamette Weekly. Fox News Digital has reached out to ICE and Homeland Security for article source: Federal judge orders ICE not to remove trans migrant seeking asylum from Washington detention facility
Fox News
5 days ago
- Fox News
Federal judge orders ICE not to remove trans migrant seeking asylum from Washington detention facility
A federal judge in Oregon on Tuesday issued an order barring Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from removing a Mexican asylum seeker from a Washington detention facility, according to local reports. The migrant, a 24-year-old transgender woman identified as "O-J-M" in court documents, was arrested outside a Portland courtroom on Monday and transferred to the Northwest ICE Processing Center in Tacoma, Washington. U.S. District Court Judge Amy Baggio, a President Joe Biden appointee, also demanded that ICE provide the exact date and time of the removal from Portland and explain why it was deemed immediately necessary. Baggio's order was prompted after O-J-M's attorneys said they were not aware of their client's location and filed a habeas petition, a legal request asking a court to determine whether a person's detention or imprisonment is lawful. The migrant's attorney, Stephen Manning, of Immigrant Law Group, told OPB that O-J-M was processed into the Tacoma detention center, but he had not been granted access to her since her transfer. Her attorneys said O-J-M was abducted and raped in Mexico because of her gender identity and sexual orientation and was seeking asylum on those grounds. "They threatened to kill her because O-J-M is a transgender woman," her habeas petition states, per OPB. "Fearing for her life, she fled and sought asylum in the United States in September 2023." Oregon sanctuary laws prevent it from having long-term immigration detention facilities, and -- aside from temporary holding cells at the Portland ICE office -- the nearest immigration detention center is the Tacoma facility. OPB reported that O-J-M sought asylum at a port of entry along the California-Mexico border, where she was arrested, detained and released. Since then, O-J-M has attended ICE check-ins and filed her formal asylum claim in February. In April, immigration officials began removal proceedings against O-J-M, the outlet reports, citing the migrant's attorneys. Manning told Willamette Weekly that his client had not committed a crime while in the U.S. During a mandatory court hearing for her asylum case in Portland on Monday, ICE attorneys moved to dismiss O-J-M's case entirely—effectively stripping her of both the case and the legal protections it provided. Afterward, ICE agents apprehended O-J-M. That led to Innovation Law Lab Attorney Jordan Cunnings, who also represents O-J-M, saying the arrest was a "dangerous attempt by ICE to circumvent due process, speed up deportations, and eviscerate the right to asylum." "This unethical behavior goes against the values we hold as Oregonians, ensuring that everyone is welcomed and included in our state," Cunnings said, per KOIN. Portland Mayor Keith Wilson said that the city "stands unwavering in its commitment to sanctuary policies," adding that Portland "will not obstruct lawful federal enforcement operations," per Willamette Weekly. Fox News Digital has reached out to ICE and Homeland Security for comment.
