Sand mining to resume in Kerala rivers after long gap of nine years
The SOP is based on the directives issued by the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Supreme Court and the National Green Tribunal. Under this, District Survey Reports are to be prepared for districts where mining is planned. It should be prepared by an agency approved by the National Accreditation Board for Education and Training.
The state has so far prepared DSRs for 11 districts with the support of NABET-approved CSIR-NIIST. Of them, four were approved by the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) and the remaining are under different stages of review.
The report has information on the mining potential of rivers in the districts and their environmental impact. The primary data would be the sand auditing report for each district prepared earlier under government supervision.
So far, audits have been conducted for 32 of the 44 rivers. Of them, 17 rivers in 10 districts were recommended for restricted mining activities. They are Mogral, Uppala, Shiriya,Chandragiri, Valapattanam, Perumba, Sreekandapuram, Mahe, Kadalundi, Chaliyar, Bharathappuzha, Muvattupuzha, Periyar, Manimala, Pampa, Achankovil and Kulathupuzha.
Rules amendment
After the SOP, the state mining and geology department should give a letter of intent. Since existing mines and mineral rules do not provide for an LoI, an amendment should be brought to it. Following this, the RDO of a district can apply for environmental clearance.
Based on the clearance, the mining and geology department will issue permits for mining from each river. As per the present plan, mining activities would be under the supervision of the Kadavu committee formed for specific banks of a river. The committee to be constituted by the district collector will have the grama panchayat president or the municipal chairperson as its ex-officio president and LSGI secretary as ex-officio secretary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Gaming industry gears up to challenge Centre's gaming bill in court
As senior executives from the industry huddle together to chart their next move in a fight for survival, legal luminaries see the law being contested in court on standpoints ranging from constitutional protection to the right to trade, and more. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In the aftermath of the Lok Sabha passing the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 , senior executives of companies in this space are huddling together and deciding on next steps, which will include approaching the courts against the proposed and lawyers told ET that the legal challenges will look to test the Supreme Court 's stance on skill-based gaming against the proposed per the bill, the definition of online real money gaming looks to lump together skill-based games and chance-based games under a single regulatory net, and this could endanger skill-based operators, which have so far survived legal scrutiny.'The Punjab and Haryana High Court was actually the first to say back in 2017 that fantasy sports should be treated as a game of skill. Since then, the Supreme Court has repeatedly turned down review petitions challenging that view. But the new law has changed the game completely…acting almost like a killswitch for the industry. Plans are being finalised to challenge the bill in court,' a senior executive proposed law, which also seeks to set up a regulator to decide which games can legally operate, risks stripping that protection from fantasy sports, rummy, e-poker, and other skill-led formats offered by companies such as Dream11, Gameskraft, Games 24x7, Pokerbaazi, Rupee, and Winzo Games, people said.'While typically any new statute passed by parliament gets tested on its own merits, in this case, given past protections, especially in the context of games of skill, there could be a degree of overlap that gets tested,' said Mihir Rale, partner, Cyril Amarchand whether real money gaming companies will have constitutional protection, Rale said, 'This appears to be virtually an existential question for the sector. That factor alone demands a degree of care and scrutiny to be applied to its passage and judicial oversight that will likely follow.''The key question is whether this is the only way that public interest can be served and no other measure that preserves businesses or jobs while effectively remedying public harm is possible,' he a letter to home minister Amit Shah on Tuesday, India's leading online gaming industry associations urged his intervention in the government's move to introduce legislation to ban real-money games, warning that it could cripple the sector, cost the exchequer nearly Rs 20,000 crore annually, and drive millions of users to unsafe offshore a joint letter to the home minister, the All India Gaming Federation (AIGF), E-Gaming Federation (EGF), and the Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports (FIFS) said the bill, which seeks to prohibit all online games with a monetary component, including those based on skill, would 'strike a death knell' for the industry.'While an Act of Parliament can override earlier Supreme Court rulings by changing the definition of gambling, such a law must still survive constitutional scrutiny, and a blanket prohibition is open to being struck down as disproportionate and arbitrary,' Nazneen Ichhaporia, partner, ANB Legal, online gaming industry employs more than 200,000 people, has attracted Rs 25,000 crore in foreign direct investment (FDI), and contributes over Rs 20,000 crore in annual tax revenues, they bill also seeks to curb online real money gaming by declaring any advertisement or promotion of such games as an offence, while also banning the facilitation of any transaction or authorisation of funds by banks or financial institutions for such a central legislation, the government has moved away from fragmented state regulations on gambling and betting – by looking to ban real money games in one fell swoop.'Gaming is a state subject under the Constitution, and there could be an argument that prohibiting an entire sector that has been in existence for years and contributes revenue is a violation of Article 19(1)(g) (which accords the right to trade). However, the Union government seems to have relied on…its power to regulate the internet and interstate commerce. We will certainly see this being debated in the courts on constitutional grounds,' said Aprajita Rana, partner at corporate law firm AZB & Partners.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Online gaming companies prepare for legal battle against new bill
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills In the aftermath of the Lok Sabha passing the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 , senior executives of companies in this space are huddling together and deciding on next steps, which will include approaching the courts against the proposed and lawyers told ET that the legal challenges will look to test the Supreme Court 's stance on skill-based gaming against the proposed per the bill, the definition of online real money gaming looks to lump together skill-based games and chance-based games under a single regulatory net, and this could endanger skill-based operators, which have so far survived legal scrutiny.'The Punjab and Haryana High Court was actually the first to say back in 2017 that fantasy sports should be treated as a game of skill. Since then, the Supreme Court has repeatedly turned down review petitions challenging that view. But the new law has changed the game completely…acting almost like a killswitch for the industry. Plans are being finalised to challenge the bill in court,' a senior executive proposed law, which also seeks to set up a regulator to decide which games can legally operate, risks stripping that protection from fantasy sports, rummy, e-poker, and other skill-led formats offered by companies such as Dream11, Gameskraft, Games 24x7, Pokerbaazi, Rupee, and Winzo Games, people said.'While typically any new statute passed by parliament gets tested on its own merits, in this case, given past protections, especially in the context of games of skill, there could be a degree of overlap that gets tested,' said Mihir Rale, partner, Cyril Amarchand whether real money gaming companies will have constitutional protection, Rale said, 'This appears to be virtually an existential question for the sector. That factor alone demands a degree of care and scrutiny to be applied to its passage and judicial oversight that will likely follow.''The key question is whether this is the only way that public interest can be served and no other measure that preserves businesses or jobs while effectively remedying public harm is possible,' he a letter to home minister Amit Shah on Tuesday, India's leading online gaming industry associations urged his intervention in the government's move to introduce legislation to ban real-money games, warning that it could cripple the sector, cost the exchequer nearly Rs 20,000 crore annually, and drive millions of users to unsafe offshore a joint letter to the home minister, the All India Gaming Federation (AIGF), E-Gaming Federation (EGF), and the Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports (FIFS) said the bill, which seeks to prohibit all online games with a monetary component, including those based on skill, would 'strike a death knell' for the industry.'While an Act of Parliament can override earlier Supreme Court rulings by changing the definition of gambling, such a law must still survive constitutional scrutiny, and a blanket prohibition is open to being struck down as disproportionate and arbitrary,' Nazneen Ichhaporia, partner, ANB Legal, online gaming industry employs more than 200,000 people, has attracted Rs 25,000 crore in foreign direct investment (FDI), and contributes over Rs 20,000 crore in annual tax revenues, they bill also seeks to curb online real money gaming by declaring any advertisement or promotion of such games as an offence, while also banning the facilitation of any transaction or authorisation of funds by banks or financial institutions for such a central legislation, the government has moved away from fragmented state regulations on gambling and betting – by looking to ban real money games in one fell swoop.'Gaming is a state subject under the Constitution, and there could be an argument that prohibiting an entire sector that has been in existence for years and contributes revenue is a violation of Article 19(1)(g) (which accords the right to trade). However, the Union government seems to have relied on…its power to regulate the internet and interstate commerce. We will certainly see this being debated in the courts on constitutional grounds,' said Aprajita Rana, partner at corporate law firm AZB & Partners.
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
IBC as a preventive for funds diversion
The Supreme Court ruling annulling its earlier order on the liquidation of Bhushan Steel under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) reignited the debate on the credibility and transparency of the existing corporate debt resolution framework. On May 2, the Supreme Court ordered the liquidation of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd., marking one of the most significant tests of the IBC since its enactment in 2016. In that order, the court revoked the resolution plan by JSW Steel and directed the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to initiate liquidation proceedings. The order, which was based on the finding that the resolution plan had procedural flaws and violated the IBC, was annulled on July 31. With promoters and creditors locked in courtroom battles, a key question arises: Does the bankruptcy law have hidden benefits? The prophylactic effects of such legislation often go unnoticed. A well-implemented bankruptcy law can act as an effective deterrent because the penalties arising out of bankruptcy accrue privately to the managers and lead to a large reduction in the need to conduct deep financial audits. (Mint) An important consideration in the context of India is the effect of the IBC reforms on how managers divert resources. The last decade saw several high-profile cases of fund diversions, leading to financial distress at firms and adverse consequences for their lenders. Can stronger creditor rights reduce fund diversion? The standard approach of using large-scale financial audits to achieve reductions in fund diversions is very costly and is unlikely to work given the fact that auditors are hired by the firms. A well-implemented bankruptcy law can act as an effective deterrent because the penalties arising out of bankruptcy accrue privately to the managers and lead to a large reduction in the need to conduct deep financial audits. Such hidden effects would, therefore, be a panacea to any country that cannot conduct large-scale audits every so often. A well-functioning bankruptcy law is, therefore, a substitute for the costly, time-consuming, and highly uncertain process of financial audits. The effect and the underlying mechanisms are tested in a research paper by the author of this article, along with Prasanna Gai, Akshat Singh, and Asha Sundaram. We studied the impact of the IBC reform within Indian business groups, focusing on financially distressed firms. Indeed, IBC does reduce fund diversions (using suspect Related Party Transactions, or RPTs, as a proxy). The strongest effect of the reform was seen in the form of reduced related party loan outflows — a clear indication of a reduction in fund diversion. What explains this change? The IBC law contains provisions that act in both directions — for creditors to force firms to reduce diversions as well as for firms to willingly reduce diversions to avoid bankruptcy. On the creditors' side, higher and quicker expected recoveries would make them more willing to initiate insolvency proceedings against firms. A streamlined, time-bound resolution process and the establishment of specialised courts (NCLTs and the appellate courts) further increase creditors' hopes of higher recoveries. On the firms' side, the fact that the control of the company shifts to a professional resolution manager upon admission of insolvency disincentivises managers when it comes to fund diversion. This threat in itself makes pre-default fund diversion a much costlier proposition. The research finds that after IBC, firms voluntarily reduced fund diversions and repaid banks. This is an ideal outcome, given the lower costs associated with voluntary changes in behaviour. Firms relied on internal funds by cutting back on dividends and related-party payments to reduce bank debt. However, there was no improvement in firm profitability, sales or investment after the reform, indicating that the reduction in dividends and RPTs was a result of improved financial discipline rather than firm performance. For the policy to continue to generate sound financial behaviour over time, the threat of penalty under bankruptcy must be sustained. The fact that most cases under IBC do not adhere to the prescribed timelines is not ideal. In line with this hypothesis, in the study, the most pronounced effects were observed in the first two years following the reform. The signs of early deterrence were strong as financial RPTs ceased altogether in many cases. By 2019, the effect weakened, becoming smaller and more uncertain, hinting that the law's grip may have loosened over time. The early outcomes from the IBC are promising and encouraging, though they also highlight the areas that require sustained attention. Amidst this, allowing creditors to start the insolvency process outside the court system — under the new Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill — is a much welcome provision. Ensuring timely resolution, strengthening creditor rights, and addressing practices that undermine transparency can contribute to building a more resilient corporate insolvency framework. Gautham Udupa is with the Centre for Advanced Financial Research and Learning (CAFRAL), Mumbai. The views expressed are personal
