logo
Pakistan steeped in fanaticism, terrorism: India tells UNSC meeting

Pakistan steeped in fanaticism, terrorism: India tells UNSC meeting

The Hindu23-07-2025
India told a United Nations Security Council meeting presided over by Pakistan that there should be a 'serious cost' to nations who foment cross-border terrorism, as it described the neighbouring country as a 'serial borrower' steeped in 'fanaticism'.
'As we debate promoting international peace and security, it is essential to recognise that there are some fundamental principles which need to be universally respected. One of them is zero tolerance for terrorism,' India's Permanent Representative to the U.N. Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish said.
#IndiaAtUN
PR @AmbHarishP delivered 🇮🇳's statement at the @UN Security Council High Level Open Debate on Promoting International Peace and Security through Multilateralism and Peaceful Settlement of Disputes. @MEAIndia@IndianDiplomacypic.twitter.com/A3jp6ojkJy — India at UN, NY (@IndiaUNNewYork) July 22, 2025
Mr. Harish delivered the national statement on Tuesday (July 22, 2025) at the U.N. Security Council high-level open debate on 'Promoting International Peace and Security through Multilateralism and Peaceful Settlement of Disputes' held under Pakistan's presidency of the 15-nation Council for July.
Pakistan Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar presided over the open debate that was also addressed by U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.
In his remarks to the debate in his national capacity, Mr. Dar raised the issue of Jammu and Kashmir as well as the Indus Waters Treaty.
In the wake of the Pahalgam attack, India decided that the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 would be held in abeyance until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism. Türkiye also made a reference to Jammu and Kashmir in its statement at the open debate.
Giving a strong response to Mr. Dar's remarks, Mr. Harish said that the Indian sub-continent offers a 'stark contrast' in terms of progress, prosperity and development models. 'On the one hand, there is India, which is a mature democracy, a surging economy and a pluralistic and inclusive society. At the other extreme is Pakistan, steeped in fanaticism and terrorism and a serial borrower from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).'
In May this year, the IMF had approved disbursement of about one billion dollars to Pakistan under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF), bringing total disbursements under the arrangement to about $2.1 billion.
In his statement in the UNSC chamber, Mr. Harish spoke about the Pahalgam terror attack for which The Resistance Front, a front for Pakistan-based terror organisation Lashkar-e-Taiba, had claimed responsibility.
Mr. Harish emphasised that there should be a 'serious cost' to states who 'violate the spirit of good neighbourliness and international relations by fomenting cross-border terrorism.'
'It ill behoves a member of the Council to offer homilies while indulging in practices that are unacceptable to the international community,' the Indian envoy said.
He said that consequent to the gruesome terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22 that led to the killing of 26 tourists, and based on the April 25 UNSC statement, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
In the UNSC statement, Council members had underlined the need to hold perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of this reprehensible act of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice.
Mr. Harish said India's response was focused, measured, and non-escalatory in nature. 'On achieving its primary objectives, a cessation of military activities was directly concluded at the request of Pakistan,' he said.
Earlier, Acting U.S. Representative Ambassador Dorothy Shea said at the meeting that in the past three months alone, U.S. leadership delivered 'de-escalations' between Israel and Iran, between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, and between India and Pakistan.
'The United States, under President Trump's leadership, played an important role in encouraging the parties to reach these resolutions, which we applaud and support,' Ms. Shea said.
Mr. Harish stressed that in recent decades, the nature of conflicts has transformed, with a 'proliferation of non-state actors, often proposed and propped up as proxies by state actors; and cross-border funding, arms trafficking, training of terrorists, and spread of radical ideologies, facilitated by modern digital and communication technologies.'
He said that on the question of peaceful settlement of disputes, Chapter VI of the U.N. Charter begins with a recognition that it is the 'parties to a dispute' who must first of all seek a solution by peaceful means of their own choice.
'National ownership and consent of parties are central to any efforts to achieve peaceful resolution of conflicts,' he said.
Mr. Harish underlined that there cannot be one standard approach to dispute resolution. 'The changing circumstances and context also need to be taken into account while considering any such efforts.'
Mr. Harish said that there are growing doubts about the multilateral system, especially the United Nations and serious question marks over the representativeness of the Security Council must be addressed urgently. 'In this context, India is proud to have facilitated the inclusion of the African Union in the G-20 platform during its Presidency. The continuing U.N. Security Council impasse also shows the increasing challenges to the efficiency and effectiveness of the U.N. Security Council,' he said. Pakistan is currently a non-permanent member of the 15-nation Council for the 2025-26 term.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Noted American Economist Said U.S. Wants A ‘Weaker' India; How His Prediction On Trump And Trade Deal Is Now Coming True
Why Noted American Economist Said U.S. Wants A ‘Weaker' India; How His Prediction On Trump And Trade Deal Is Now Coming True

India.com

time8 minutes ago

  • India.com

Why Noted American Economist Said U.S. Wants A ‘Weaker' India; How His Prediction On Trump And Trade Deal Is Now Coming True

Washington/New Delhi: Sharing his views on India-U.S. trade relations, American economist Jeffrey Sachs expressed strong doubts about the possibility of a successful deal between the two countries. He said he would be very surprised if India managed to secure any trade deal with the United States because the U.S. government had no real interest in India's progress and aimed to keep the country weak. 'If India manages to strike a deal with the United States, I would be extremely surprised. This government (President Donald Trump's) does not care about India's well-being,' he told journalist Shweta Punj at the 'Rising Bharat Summit' hosted by Moneycontrol in April this year. Four months later, in August, the United States imposed a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods. The relationship between Washington and New Delhi has slid into a phase few predicted, but Sachs saw it coming. Once dismissed by some as exaggerated, his warning now feels eerily close to today's headlines. Trump's administration has made no secret of its stance, sanctions, public remarks criticising India's oil trade with Russia and repeated pressure over the India-Pakistan standoff. These moves, according to experts, chip away at India's autonomy and challenge the framework of sovereign diplomacy. India was among the few countries to engage early with Trump's White House for a trade agreement. The talks dragged on and nothing concrete emerged. The gap widened. Sachs tried to explain why, not with jargon but blunt words. 'America wants to use India against China. But make no mistake, this government has no interest in a stronger India,' he said. He asked people to trust what he had seen up close. 'Donald Trump is not going to open American doors to Indian manufacturers. This is a game and a strategic design to replace China, yes. But not with India,' he said. He called India a successful economy, not once but thrice. 'Very, very, very successful,' he said. He spoke of a future where India grows even stronger. In that future, Sachs said, America will not like what it sees, just as it does not like China now. Even if India opens its agriculture sector to U.S. companies, he said, the result would be the same. 'Trump will never let Indian goods flood the U.S. market. His whole idea is to block low-cost manufacturers. He is not going to let India replace China,' he said. Sachs did not stop at trade. He pointed to the larger structure, which is the global supply chain. 'They want India to help crush China. But they do not want India inside the system either. Not now. Not ever,' he added. He urged India to keep its options open. 'Never close the door to China or Russia because America's game is to prevent the rise of a strong India,' he said. Now, in August, his words feel less like a theory and more like a lived truth.

Despite US pressure, Russian oil tankers unload at Indian refineries
Despite US pressure, Russian oil tankers unload at Indian refineries

Business Standard

time8 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Despite US pressure, Russian oil tankers unload at Indian refineries

More tankers are poised to discharge another 2.2 million barrels of Urals in the coming hours Bloomberg By Weilun Soon and Rakesh Sharma At least four tankers discharged millions of barrels of Russian crude at Indian refineries at the weekend, a sign the closely scrutinised deliveries are continuing as normal, even as the US ramps up pressure on the South Asian country to stop purchases. Oil traders and shipping companies have been waiting for direction from New Delhi on whether supplies from Moscow will be allowed to continue after US President Donald Trump last week threatened punitive action to curb trade with Russia. Over the weekend, a senior aide accused India of effectively funding President Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine. Washington's tough demands, coming after a surprise 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports to the US, threw private and state-owned refineries' purchase plans into disarray. Still, India hasn't asked refiners to stop Russian crude imports, according to people familiar with the matter. Three Aframaxes — the Achilles, Elyte and Horae — unloaded nearly 2.2 million barrels of Urals crude, a key Russian grade, to private processors Nayara Energy Ltd and Reliance Industries Ltd over the weekend after a slight delay, ship-tracking data show. The Mikati, also an Aframax, delivered more than 720,000 barrels of Russia's Varandey crude on a two-stop journey that included deliveries to refineries in Kochi and Mangalore. State-run Bharat Petroleum Corp Ltd owns the Kochi refinery, while Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd. is majority owned by state-run Oil and Natural Gas Corp Ltd. More tankers are poised to discharge another 2.2 million barrels of Urals in the coming hours, with Minion and Destan now at Sikka, a terminal operated by Reliance. Aldebaran is due to unload across the gulf at Mundra. While Bloomberg News couldn't immediately determine the buyer, the Mundra port serves both government-run Indian Oil Corp Ltd. and HPCL-Mittal Energy Ltd, partially owned by state-run Hindustan Petroleum Corp Ltd. Reliance, the largest buyer of Russian Urals, has a long-term deal with Russian producer Rosneft PJSC that would ensure it can get those barrels over several years. India's appetite for discounted Russian crude, and its position as the single largest buyer of Moscow's seaborne oil, has long been a pain point for the US and Western allies. Scrutiny has increased in recent weeks, even before Trump's latest comments. Nayara was sanctioned by the European Union on July 18 for its links to Russia, prompting the processor to cut run rates and pushing trade partners to seek supplies elsewhere.

SC issues notice on challenge to section 9 of Citizenship Act over automatic termination of Indian citizenship
SC issues notice on challenge to section 9 of Citizenship Act over automatic termination of Indian citizenship

United News of India

time20 minutes ago

  • United News of India

SC issues notice on challenge to section 9 of Citizenship Act over automatic termination of Indian citizenship

New Delhi, Aug 4 (UNI) The Supreme Court today issued notice on a plea challenging the constitutional validity of Section 9 of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which provides for the automatic termination of Indian citizenship upon the voluntary acquisition of foreign citizenship. A Bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi tagged the matter with a pending case, Dr Radhika Thappeta v. Union of India, which raises a similar issue concerning revocation of Overseas Citizenship of India (OCI) status. The Court also issued notice on an interim application filed by the petitioner seeking protection from being required to renounce Indian citizenship in order to acquire foreign citizenship, while the constitutional challenge to Section 9 is under consideration. The petition was filed by Sanjay Gundlagutta Reddy, a US-based Economics professor of Indian origin, who, despite living in New York for several years, continues to identify as an Indian citizen. He argues that Section 9(1) is arbitrary, disproportionate, and violates fundamental constitutional rights, particularly the right to equality and personal liberty. During the hearing, Justice Surya Kant initially questioned the petitioner's counsel Advocate Warisha Farasat, asking, 'You are an eminent person. But what grievance is there…if you are so keen for Indian citizenship, you surrender the foreign citizenship and get the Indian one?' However, after hearing her submissions including reference to a previous case where the Supreme Court had granted interim relief on similar grounds the Bench agreed to issue notice and listed the matter for hearing after two weeks. Key arguments in the Petition are that Section 9 imposes a 'Hobson's choice' on Indians abroad, either acquire foreign citizenship and lose Indian nationality or retain Indian citizenship at great personal and professional cost. It fails to consider the global mobility and dual loyalty of Indian-origin individuals who maintain cultural and emotional ties with India The provision does not offer any discretionary or adjudicatory mechanism, resulting in automatic cessation of citizenship. The petitioner highlights that non-citizens globally face precarious legal status, with risks of deportation and limited access to rights. The petition, filed through Advocate-on-Record Yashwant Singh, seeks a reconsideration of India's citizenship framework to better align with contemporary realities of global Indian diaspora. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for Indian-origin individuals across the world, particularly in how India defines and regulates its citizenship laws in a globalized era. UNI SNG RN

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store