
EPA proposes allowing use of Dicamba weed killer on some crops
Advertisement
Dicamba became one of the most widely used herbicides on the market after agribusiness companies such as Monsanto released genetically engineered seeds that could tolerate it in 2016. The idea was that farmers could spray their fields with dicamba and weeds would wilt while the crops would survive.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Dicamba-tolerant seeds were developed in response to growing weed tolerance to another widely used herbicide, glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup.
Starting in the 1990s, Monsanto marketed genetically engineered 'Roundup Ready' crop seeds alongside the popular herbicide Roundup. This line of corn, cotton and soy seeds was bred to resist glyphosate, and by 2011 more than 90% of soybeans grown in the U.S. were genetically engineered.
The EPA's decision drew an immediate rebuke from the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental advocacy group that has sued over the use of dicamba. In a statement, Nathan Donley, the group's environmental health science director said, 'this is what happens when pesticide oversight is controlled by industry lobbyists.'
Advertisement
Last month, Kyle Kunkler, a former soybean industry lobbyist who has been a vocal proponent of dicamba, joined the EPA's Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention as its deputy assistant administrator.
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


E&E News
8 hours ago
- E&E News
Court OKs Trump plan to curtail unions at EPA, Interior, DOE
A federal appeals court cleared the way last week for the Trump administration to pursue plans to end collective bargaining for employees at the Interior and Energy departments, EPA and other agencies, even as unions are challenging the changes in court. On Friday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals paused a lower court order that prevented the administration from enforcing President Donald Trump's March executive order barring collective bargaining at more than two dozen agencies and sub-agencies based on national security concerns. The new order, an emergency stay, is in effect while the challenges to the EO works its way through the courts. Advertisement 'Whatever harm to collective bargaining rights that Plaintiffs will experience due to a stay is mitigated by the direction to agencies to refrain from terminating collective bargaining agreements until litigation has concluded,' the court said in an unsigned order.


E&E News
8 hours ago
- E&E News
EPA to defend Biden-era lead drinking water rule
The Trump administration will defend a Biden-era drinking water regulation that mandates the replacement of virtually all lead pipes by 2037, EPA said Monday. In a short legal filing, the Justice Department said it will allow litigation to continue on the regulation, which was paused in February by the Trump administration. Water utilities have sued to overturn the rule. Still, the department and an EPA spokesperson stopped short of saying whether the administration planned to tweak the rule, one of the last major environmental regulations of the Biden administration. Advertisement 'DOJ is now moving forward with the process of defending the rule. At the same time, EPA will develop new tools and information to support practical implementation flexibilities and regulatory clarity,' the EPA spokesperson said in an email, adding that next steps would be announced 'in the coming months.'


E&E News
13 hours ago
- E&E News
‘Alligator Alcatraz' faces NEPA challenge over Everglades impacts
A federal judge will dust for Trump administration fingerprints this week on Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention center that critics say has spoiled a remote stretch of the Everglades. What's found at a court hearing Wednesday will shape the future of the facility abruptly plunked in the middle of Big Cypress National Preserve to bolster the administration's mass deportation campaign. The Center for Biological Diversity and the Friends of the Everglades contend that the site anticipated to eventually house upward of 5,000 detainees falls under the National Environmental Policy Act and so requires a full-bore environmental study. Advertisement 'We've had to piece together the impacts, because the state of Florida has not done any environmental impact analysis,' Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades, said in an interview.