logo
Scientists raise red flag over emerging threat killing off iconic desert species: 'Even these beautifully adapted desert plants have their limits'

Scientists raise red flag over emerging threat killing off iconic desert species: 'Even these beautifully adapted desert plants have their limits'

Yahoo04-06-2025
An American desert icon is dying off in the southwestern United States. Experts say record-setting summers and intense droughts in Arizona are causing a well-known succulent to struggle.
The saguaro cactus is synonymous with the Sonoran Desert, the region where it grows best. The slow-growing species is hardy and, despite longtime rumors of disease, resistant to blight. According to the National Park Service, the cactus is most affected by frost and drought.
Over the last five years, people have noticed saguaros dying off. The Phoenix Desert Botanical Garden reports that its collection of around 1,000 cacti has been reduced to nearly 800.
"But it's certainly a truth that even these beautifully adapted desert plants have their limits," Kimberlie McCue, chief science officer at the Desert Botanical Garden, told Fox10 Phoenix.
The deaths of saguaro cacti point to a broader problem affecting the southwestern United States.
The Arizona Department of Water Resources recently released a report showing April 2020 through March 2025 ranks as the third hottest and fourth driest time period on record for the state.
April 2025 was mildly better for precipitation, but the region remains in a drought. With 99.34% of the state experiencing some stage of drought, the risk of wildfires increases dramatically.
Not only can wildfires threaten human habitats and the environment at large, but they also pose a significant threat to human health due to smoke exposure.
Right now, the state of Arizona's drought management plan relies heavily on monitoring conditions and asking the public to reduce water usage.
As for the saguaro cactus, local wildlife organizations are working on conservation efforts. The Desert Botanical Garden has a saguaro seed bank to assist neighbors with starting cactus gardens at home to eventually be planted outside.
Do you worry about air pollution in and around your home?
Yes — always
Yes — often
Yes — sometimes
No — never
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HHS workers accuse RFK Jr. of stoking violence against them
HHS workers accuse RFK Jr. of stoking violence against them

Axios

time2 hours ago

  • Axios

HHS workers accuse RFK Jr. of stoking violence against them

More than 750 current and former federal health workers on Wednesday accused HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of contributing to harassment and violence against government employees they said manifested itself in the Aug. 8 attack on CDC's Atlanta headquarters. Why it matters: The workers, in a letter to Kennedy and members of Congress, called on Kennedy to publicly disavow and stop spreading inaccurate and misleading claims about vaccines, disease transmission and public health institutions. They're also asking him to affirm CDC's non-partisan and scientific integrity. HHS should improve emergency procedures and alerts, and take "vigorous action" to remove material online that targets federal workers, including "DEI watchlists," the letter states. The letter asks for a response from Kennedy by Sept. 2. What they're saying: The letter charges Kennedy as being " complicit in dismantling America's public health infrastructure and endangering the nation's health by repeatedly spreading inaccurate health information." Actions like ousting members of a CDC vaccine advisory board, questioning the safety of measles vaccine and terminating critical CDC workers "have contributed to the harassment and violence experienced by CDC staff," the workers wrote. "The deliberate destruction of trust in America's public health workforce puts lives at risk. We urge you to act in the best interest of the American people—your friends, your families, and yourselves," the letter states.

Before You Commit to Fellowship, Consider This
Before You Commit to Fellowship, Consider This

Medscape

time2 hours ago

  • Medscape

Before You Commit to Fellowship, Consider This

This transcript has been edited for clarity. Are you thinking about doing a fellowship? Here are five key questions to ask yourself. First, do you genuinely love the subspecialty or are you feeling pressured to keep going because everyone else is? Second, does the fellowship align with your long-term career goals, whether that's academic medicine, private practice, or a niche clinical role? Third, will it significantly impact your lifestyle or your income? Is that a tradeoff that's worth it to you? Fourth, are you ready to commit to more years of training, or are you already feeling burned out and ready to be done? Finally, have you explored all your options within general practice?Sometimes you can tailor your career without additional training. A fellowship can be incredibly rewarding, but it should be a strategic choice and not just the default next step.

Trump's First Term Degraded Military Health. His Second Must Rebuild It
Trump's First Term Degraded Military Health. His Second Must Rebuild It

Forbes

time3 hours ago

  • Forbes

Trump's First Term Degraded Military Health. His Second Must Rebuild It

Recently, Senators McConnell (R-KY) and Coons (D-DE) cosponsored a bill to invest more than $850 billion to strengthen our nation's defense industrial base, upgrade its shipbuilding capabilities, replenish munitions, and support key allies. Although these are worthy goals, Congress and the White House must not overlook the system that safeguards the health of American warfighters - our military's most important asset. Last March, the Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS), made pointed remarks at the outset of a hearing on stabilizing the military health system: America's Military Health System Is Unique Unlike the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or private healthcare systems, military health must always be ready to deploy uniformed healthcare professionals anywhere in the world in support 0f U.S. combat operations and other missions, including peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance. To enable this work, the MHS maintains a network of stateside military hospitals and clinics, supplemented by healthcare purchased from private doctors and healthcare systems to treat active-duty service members, their family members, and military retirees. This second mission reinforces the first. The clinical duties that military doctors, nurses, and other health professionals perform in stateside military hospitals helps keep their skills sharp between deployments. It also allows them to teach and inspire the next generation of military healthcare professionals. In times of conflict, military hospitals receive and treat complex casualties. Finally, the high-quality care to wounded, ill and injured servicemembers as well as their families and military retirees helps the DoD recruit and retain its 'all-volunteer' force. Healthy Forces Are Vital For Battlefield Success Military health has played a key role in American history since the founding of our republic. In the Winter of 1777, General George Washington ordered the inoculation of the Continental Army against smallpox. It was the first time in history that an Army was immunized by command order. Washington also instituted policies on camp cleanliness and took other actions to preserve his army's fighting strength. The principles he established still guide military medicine to this day. Health protection is so important to preserving fighting strength that the U.S. military monitors every unit's 'disease and non-battle injury (DNBI)' rates to evaluate the quality of its leadership and medical support. This discipline paid off in Afghanistan and Iraq. Despite logistical challenges and austere conditions, military medicine drove rates of DNBIs and deaths from severe battlefield wounds to the lowest levels in the history of warfare. It's one of the most remarkable achievements in the history of American medicine. Many of the innovations they pioneered have been adopted by civilian healthcare. Post-War Decisions Eroded Hard-Won Gains Instead of recognizing the value of military health, budget officials in the Pentagon viewed the MHS as little more than an HMO for beneficiaries. As the wars wound down, they began siphoning military health funding and positions for other DoD priorities. As a result, spending on military healthcare flattened, and is now far behind healthcare spending in the VA and our nation overall. During Trump's first term, the Pentagon compounded this error by directing military families and retirees to go elsewhere for treatment. Then, as visits and hospital admissions fell, they downsized or closed many military clinics and hospitals. Even top hospitals, such as Walter Reed and Naval Medical Center San Diego, were left underfunded, understaffed, and underutilized. This weakened the link between stateside care and battlefield care. By the time the Joint Chiefs of Staff realized that privatization had gone too far, the damage was done. In 2023, then Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks issued a directive to reverse course and begin restoring the MHS. What About Now? Today, different leaders are in charge. In the past, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has advocated diverting military and veteran healthcare benefits to enhance the Pentagon's "war-fighting capability." Military and veterans' healthcare IS a warfighting capability. It's a major reason why American servicemembers fight so hard, accept such risks and reenlist to do it again. Until recently, they knew that every time they were deployed, their families would be cared for by doctors and nurses who understood the stresses of military life. They were also confident that if anyone in their unit became ill or was wounded in battle, they'd receive the best healthcare in the world, expert rehabilitation, and if needed, long-term care. If the Pentagon resumes its push to privatize the military health system, it will harm the health of our armed forces and diminish their battlefield performance. Two former Hegseth aides said as much in a recent New York Times op-ed: Why You and Trump Should Care About Military Health Although most Americans give little thought to military health, servicemembers, veterans and military retirees know better. If any member of your family, a friend, or a neighbor currently serves in uniform, you should care. If one or more of your children or grandchildren are considering military service, you should care. If you value any of the numerous advances military health has contributed to American medicine throughout our nation's history, you should care. As Commander-in-Chief of our nation's armed forces, President Trump should care, and direct Defense Secretary Hegseth and his senior staff to rebuild our nation's military health system.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store