logo
There's an invader turning huge swathes of Britain into deserts – and these dead zones are spreading

There's an invader turning huge swathes of Britain into deserts – and these dead zones are spreading

The Guardian09-06-2025
Deserts are spreading across great tracts of Britain, yet few people seem to have noticed, and fewer still appear to care. It is one of those astonishing situations I keep encountering: in which vast, systemic problems – in this case, I believe, covering thousands of square kilometres – hide in plain sight.
I realise that many people, on reading that first sentence, will suspect I've finally flipped. Where, pray, are those rolling sand dunes or sere stony wastes? But there are many kinds of desert, and not all of them are dry. In fact, those spreading across Britain are clustered in the wettest places. Yet they harbour fewer species than some dry deserts do, and are just as hostile to humans. Another useful term is terrestrial dead zones.
What I'm talking about are the places now dominated by a single plant species, called Molinia caerulea or purple moor-grass. Over the past 50 years, it has swarmed across vast upland areas: in much of Wales, on Dartmoor, Exmoor, in the Pennines, Peak District, North York Moors, Yorkshire Dales and many parts of Scotland. Molinia wastes are dismal places, grey-brown for much of the year, in which only the wind moves. As I know from bitter experience, you can explore them all day and see scarcely a bird or even an insect.
Not that you would wish to walk there. The grass forms high tussocks through which it is almost impossible to push. As it happens, most of the places that have succumbed to Molinia monoculture are 'access land'. Much of the pittance of England and Wales in which we are allowed to walk freely has become inaccessible. In a great victory a fortnight ago, the supreme court ruled that we have a right to wild camp on Dartmoor. But on many parts of the moor, you wouldn't want to exercise it. As soon as the grass takes hold, all opportunities for enjoyment and employment cease.
Molinia challenges the definition of an invasive species. The term is supposed to refer only to non-native organisms. But while it has always been part of our upland flora, it appears to have spread further and faster than any introduced plant in the UK, and with greater ecological consequences. It is uncontrolled by herbivores, disease or natural successional processes (transitions to other plant communities). In fact, it stops these processes in their tracks.
Given the scale of the problem, it is remarkably little studied and discussed. I cannot find even a reliable estimate of the area affected: the most recent in England is nearly 10 years old, and I can discover none for Wales or Scotland. But in the southern Cambrian Mountains alone, judging by a combination of my walks and satellite imagery, there appears to be a dead zone covering roughly 300 sq km, in which little but this one species grows. Most of central Dartmoor is now Molinia desert, and just as disheartening and hard to traverse.
Why is this happening? It seems to be a combination of forces. One is 'headage payments': subsidies that were issued in the second half of the 20th century, which paid farmers for the number of animals they kept. They created an incentive to cram the land with as many sheep and cattle as possible. This, in combination with burning moorland to produce fresh shoots for the livestock to eat, seems in some places to have pushed ecosystems beyond their tipping points. Even, as in parts of the Cambrians, where there have been no sheep grazing for 40 years, as there's nothing left to eat (sheep will scarcely touch Molinia), there has been no recovery.
Another likely factor is nitrogen deposition. Nitrogen compounds rain down on Britain's habitats at a rate of roughly 29kg per hectare per year. They are produced by livestock farming, traffic and industry. Drainage (largely for farming) also appears to accelerate the spread: Molinia thrives as peat dries out.
The Dartmoor ecologist and nature campaigner Tony Whitehead tells me that the degradation of peat caused by drainage, excavation, burning and grazing pressure is likely to be the primary accelerant. Burning in particular – carried out by sheep farmers on Dartmoor and Exmoor and by grouse shoots on northern English moors and in Scotland – favours the plant. While other species are destroyed, Molinia is protected by its deep roots and tussocks, which guard its buds.
Various solutions are proposed, but few are satisfactory. One approach is to blast the grass with the herbicide glyphosate. It works for a while, but leaves an even grimmer waste, likely to be colonised again by Molinia. Others propose yet more burning, and/or grazing with cattle or ponies: temporary 'solutions' that look like blood-letting to cure anaemia. Whitehead has watched what happens: the animals graze around the edges of the Molinia, eating only small amounts, while continuing to knock back other plant species. After early summer, they won't touch the stuff, as its nutritional value declines steeply. A new report by the government agency Natural England states that livestock grazing is not required to protect the main habitat type – blanket mire – that Molinia threatens.
Rewetting the land, by blocking drains and building bunds and perhaps, as one team is attempting, planting clumps of sphagnum moss among the grass, in order to restore the peat, seems to be the only means of reviving blanket mire. It also makes the land less prone to fire. In other places, we should be encouraging the return of trees, through planting and excluding livestock. Most of the areas overtaken by Molinia have a temperature and moisture range that would favour temperate rainforest: a vanishingly rare, rich and complex habitat. As the trees mature, they should shade out the grass. In some wet areas, I'd like to see the return of water-tolerant species such as alder, downy birch and willow, to restore upland carr, another rich and scarce habitat.
But anyone who wants to rewild upland ecosystems hits a wall of vested interests – mostly sheep farmers and grouse moor owners – who, like the commercial fishing sector, insist on doing the wrong thing until it destroys their own industry. Where is the urgent government programme? Where is there even official acknowledgment that we have a problem? To fix something, first you must see it.
George Monbiot is a Guardian columnist
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brits urged to check their change for rare Queen Elizabeth coin
Brits urged to check their change for rare Queen Elizabeth coin

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Brits urged to check their change for rare Queen Elizabeth coin

The Royal Mint has announced the release of the final batch of Queen Elizabeth II £1 coins into circulation across the UK. Over 23 million coins bearing the late Queen are being introduced alongside 7.5 million new £1 coins featuring King Charles III. These 2022-dated Elizabeth II coins are set to become the rarest £1 denomination in active circulation. This dual release, totalling almost 31 million coins, marks a historic transition for UK coinage, symbolising the shift from Britain's longest-reigning monarch to her successor. All UK coins bearing Queen Elizabeth II's portrait will remain legal tender, and the public is encouraged to check their change for these new coins.

Parents getting steamy in sauna, poolside boozing & some very stinky tasks… lifeguard reveals swimming pool secrets
Parents getting steamy in sauna, poolside boozing & some very stinky tasks… lifeguard reveals swimming pool secrets

The Sun

time3 hours ago

  • The Sun

Parents getting steamy in sauna, poolside boozing & some very stinky tasks… lifeguard reveals swimming pool secrets

THE air thick with chlorine, the deafening echo of children's shrieks and the chaotic splash of a cannonball: it's a quintessential school holiday afternoon at the local pool. For almost a quarter of UK parents, a trip like this is a go-to activity, especially on a wet day. 6 But from his high tower, our secret lifeguard watches the goings-on with an ever-increasing sense of dread. Here, he reveals a shocking truth - it's not the over-excited kids who are the problem, but their utterly filthy and entitled parents. GETTING FRISKY IN THE STEAM ROOM OUR pool has lovely steam room facilities, but some parents who use it can get a bit carried away. I've caught one pair sneaking off for some hanky-panky, leaving me to watch their offspring while they're at it. You always know if they have plans to get it on - there's a telltale smirk on their face and they look around furtively, waiting until it's empty. If the pool's quiet I'll sometimes signal to get one of the other attendants to burst in after a few minutes to catch them in the act as it makes us laugh. Ultimately, we ask them to stop and if they keep doing it we'd kick them out, but it's never come to that. At my last pool I worked a few times at events hired out by naturists - because I got paid double - and those swimmers were always much better behaved and really did just enjoy swimming in the nude, it wasn't about the sex. CHANGING ROOM FILTH AS well as life guard duties, it's my job to check on the changing rooms and do some light cleaning. But that shouldn't involve picking up stinky nappies from the cubicles, or from the floor beside the bin - it's particularly galling when that bin is empty. The clever way you can ensure your paddling pool is kept warm On one occasion I was walking through the changing room and a dirty swimming nappy was kicked out from under the door right in front of me. I kicked it straight back in and told them to deal with it. It was disgusting. I can't stand those kind of parents - they're nothing but entitled and rude. THANK GOODNESS FOR CHLORINE 6 EVERY now and then a child will have an accident in the pool - it's gross, but it happens. It's bad enough when I have to get human waste out of the water, though at least I have a fishing net to do it. If it's easily contained we get everyone out and wait for a short time before re-opening. Probably not long enough. Once, we failed to spot a 'floater' and when we re-opened the next morning and went to fish it out, it disintegrated and let's just say it wasn't a pretty sight. We had to close the pool while it worked through the filter system and the chlorine did its stuff. Some parents were up in arms that they'd have to wait for a couple of hours so it was safe to go back in the water - they never seem to realise that we only have rules for their own safety. BOOZY PARENTS BREAK THE RULES 6 PARENTS who are supposedly watching their children but sit scrolling through their phones - and lie when they're caught out - are the worst. On several occasions I've asked mums to put their phones away but they often argue back and claim they're 'checking something important', when in actual fact I've watched them for the past 15 minutes. We ban people from bringing their own food into the spectators' seats and I usually turn a blind eye if they're giving their children a snack. But I did draw the line recently when one mum smuggled in a whole McDonalds meal - not least because I could hear other children whining to their mums, asking for one too. I had to nip that one in the bud quickly. They always try to pull the innocent, 'I didn't know' card, despite the huge signs telling them food is banned. It's particularly annoying when I absolutely know they know, because I have to pull them up on it week after week. We also ban alcohol, but I often find empty cans of ready-made cocktails and even a few empty wine bottles when I've been clearing out the bins. That might explain why some couples end up making out in broad daylight on the loungers right by the pool. LETTING KIDS RULE THE ROOST 6 The sort of parents who see me as a glorified babysitter hired to watch over their kids only while they please themselves are infuriating. They often sit there gossiping as their kids run around – we ask them to walk because the floor is so slippery. I've lost count of the amount of kids I've seen go flying, and their mothers belatedly clutch them to their chest and look at me as if it's my fault they can't control their little darlings. But equally annoying are the over-indulgent ones. They're the ones who don't get their kids out of the pool in time, saying 'oh you can have five more minutes', meaning the pool shuts late or they let them barge in front of the other kids on the queue for the slide. The worst one was a kid who got halfway down the slide and started clambering back up, several times. The mother stood at the bottom saying: 'Come on now Tom, let someone else have a turn'. It took all my will power not to pull him off myself. I didn't blame him, he was only around three years old and having fun and his mum should have read him the riot act. STAFF SEX IN SAUNA I love my job - despite only getting into it because it paid better than working in a fast food restaurant. We're mostly students so we have some pretty riotous staff outings. Whilst I don't take advantage of the empty leisure centre after hours though for skinny dipping - I can guess how many people pee in the pool and have no intention of paddling round in that - I have had sex in the sauna with one of my fellow life guards. So yes, it's not just parents who are badly behaved, I admit. It was the end of a long day and we'd been clearing up all the rubbish and needed some fun! We'd had a couple of kisses at staff parties before and one thing led to another. It was a great stress reliever. We weren't the first of our gang to do it and I doubt we'll be the last. It felt great to finally be the ones breaking the rules. Sadly, I don't seem to get chatted up by the yummy mummies. MOANING MINNIES WORKING here has made me realise quite how much people will moan and complain. Our pool is good value, especially when compared to many holiday activities. A year ago we put up our fees by 20p per child and you'd have thought we were committing daylight robbery the way the mums moaned – and that was despite the fact that toddlers go free. It's crazy. There's one particularly entitled woman I've taken a real dislike to. We provide free shoe covers at the entrance to the pool but she always insists on wearing her shoes without using them. And then she has the cheek to complain the floor is dirty. We all look out for her and signal when she's on the warpath – by making a throat slit motion with our hands. SQUARING UP I'm always diplomatic though as I'm on a zero hour contract and want to keep being given shifts and the sort of people who moan at me, will soon complain to my manager too. The only person I've actually kicked out was a particularly rude teenager who squared up to me, looking for a fight after I told him to stop vaping. The regulars always complain that it's too busy during the school holidays – but I get that. Their lovely peaceful swim is completely disrupted – but they tend to come early in the morning to avoid the crowds – wish I could work out a way to avoid them too.

Revealed: The most popular baby names in YOUR area - as figures suggest up to 9% of boys now get called Muhammad in parts of country
Revealed: The most popular baby names in YOUR area - as figures suggest up to 9% of boys now get called Muhammad in parts of country

Daily Mail​

time9 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Revealed: The most popular baby names in YOUR area - as figures suggest up to 9% of boys now get called Muhammad in parts of country

The Daily Mail's new search tool reveals the most popular boys' and girls' names in your area. Simply type in your postcode below to find out. Our tool – built with Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures released last month – also lists the ten most common names across your wider region. For example, Alexander topped the tables for boys born in Kensington and Chelsea. Across London as a whole, however, Muhammad was by far the most popular, with 1,044 boys given that name. Noah (595) ranked second. Daily Mail analysis suggests nearly 9 per cent of boys born in parts of England and Wales last year were named Muhammad. Muhammad, or the slightly different spelling of Mohammed, was the most common name in 33 of 318 authorities. It was trumped only by Oliver, which was crowned the most popular in 109 areas. This is despite Muhammad being the most popular name nationwide. The same ONS data, spanning England and Wales, revealed 5,721 boys were given the specific spelling of Muhammad in 2024. That marked an increase of 23 per cent in a year. Noah came in second, with Oliver in third, just as they did in 2023. In Pendle, just outside Bradford, the same statistics suggested 8.9 per cent of boys born in 2024 were named Muhammad – the highest rate in England and Wales. Blackburn with Darwen (8.6 per cent) and Bradford (7.4 per cent) followed in second and third spot. The figures were calculated using separate birth statistics published by the ONS. The ONS only shared the most popular name for each authority, meaning the exact number of boys born called Muhammad is unknown in the majority of areas. Moshe, a Hebrew name referring to the biblical figure of Moses, proved the most popular boys' name in the London borough of Hackney. Nineteen boys were given this name – or a one per cent share of the 1,865 live male births recorded there in 2024. Mohammed, a different spelling to the one crowned most popular in 2024, entered the top 100 boys' names for England and Wales 100 years ago, debuting at 91st in 1924. Its prevalence dropped considerably in the lead up to and during WW2 but began to rise in the 1960s. That particular iteration of the name was the only one to appear in the ONS' top 100 data from 1924 until Mohammad joined in the early 1980s. Muhammad, now the most popular of the trio, first broke into the top 100 in the mid-1980s and has seen the fastest growth of all three iterations since. The name means praiseworthy' or 'commendable' and stems from the Arabic word 'hamad', meaning 'to praise'. The spelling is shared with the founder of Islam – the prophet Muhammad. Other spellings listed in the ONS report include: Mohamad, Muhamad, Muhamed, Mohammod. Hyphenated variations include Muhammad-Ibrahim and Muhammad-Adam. Increasing sizes of Muslim communities across the UK fuelled by immigration, as well as the popularity of sporting figures such as Mo Farah and Mohamed Salah are likely to have sparked the increase. The ONS only provides figures based on the exact spelling and do not group names, as some groupings are subjective and not straightforward. For example, if multiple spelling were grouped under one umbrella name, Theodore (8th in 2024, 2,761 and Theo (12th in 2024, 2,387) would be far above Noah. 2023 marked the second time just one spelling of the Muhammad topped the charts on its own. For girls, Olivia took the top spot again, with 2,761 namings making it the undisputed queen of girls names for nine years running. Amelia came in at number two for the second year in a row, with 2,448 namings and Lily, which sat in fourth spot last year, ranked third (2,185). Royal names have continued to fall in popularity on the whole. George ranked sixth with 3,257 babies being given the name and William came in 27th. Louis came in 47th for boys and Charlotte ranked 23rd for girls. Names given to baby boys less than five times in 2024 include Yanky, Teddy-Bear, Awesome and Beckham. Names given to baby girls less than five times include Orchid, Poem, Sicily and Everest.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store