Coke and Pepsi both announced new drinks. Here's what's in them.
Coca-Cola and PepsiCo both announced new beverages. Coke says it will add a new soda made with real cane sugar this fall, while Pepsi is hopping on the prebiotic soda bandwagon with the launch of Pepsi Prebiotic Cola.
Here is what to expect from each of the longtime beverage rivals' new offerings, and when you might be able to buy one for yourself.
McDonald's: New cheeseburger option added to McValue Meal Deal
Coca-Cola rolling out new drink using cane sugar
Coca-Cola said in its second-quarter earnings release on July 22 that it "plans to launch an offering made with U.S. cane sugar to expand its Trademark Coca-Cola product range."
The beverage giant made the announcement after President Donald Trump proclaimed on July 16 that Coca-Cola had agreed to use real cane sugar for its soda beverages sold in the U.S.
Coca-Cola stopped short of switching all U.S. drinks to cane sugar, instead offering an alternative to its standard U.S. beverages, which are made with high fructose corn syrup.
"I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so," Trump wrote on Truth Social July 16. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them – You'll see. It's just better!"
Coca-Cola currently uses high fructose corn syrup to sweeten its U.S. products while cane sugar is used in other countries, including Mexico, fueling a long-running debate on whether Mexican Coke is better than Coke in the U.S.
'We appreciate the President's enthusiasm for our Coca-Cola brand," James Quincey said during the earnings call. "This edition is designed to complement our strong core portfolio and offer more choice across occasions and preferences.'
Trump's announcement, in part, supports Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s efforts to move U.S. food production and consumption away from ingredients such as artificial dyes. While his Make America Healthy Again agenda has deemed both sweeteners unhealthy, some scientists say sugar has some nutritional benefits over high fructose corn syrup.
Pepsi joins prebiotic soda boom
Pepsi says its newly announced Prebiotic Cola will be available online starting this fall and in retail stores in early 2026. The drink will be available in Original Cola and Cherry Vanilla flavors, according to a news release, and each 12-ounce can will contain five grams of cane sugar, 30 calories and three grams of prebiotic fiber.
Prebiotic soda has boomed in recent years with popular brands such as Poppi, Olipop and Bloom. The soft drinks, served in bright, colorful cans, are promoted as healthy for the gut and better for consumers than traditional sodas. While dietitians agree with the latter, the drinks shouldn't be expected to cure gut health on their own.
Pepsi Prebiotic Cola comes just a few months after PepsiCo announced the acquisition of Poppi for $1.95 billion and Coca-Cola announced Simply Pop, its own line of prebiotic soft drinks.
Prebiotics are plant fibers that serve as food for the body's microbiome – the body's good bacteria, according to the Cleveland Clinic.
Most prebiotic sodas contain between two to nine grams of prebiotic fiber per can, while the recommended daily value for fiber is 25 to 38 grams per day, the Cleveland Clinic states.
'Always looking for opportunities'
When asked about Coca-Cola's new cane sugar drink and Pepsi's prebiotic beverage on the July 22 earnings call, Quincey noted how the industry is "always looking for opportunities to innovate," even if those innovations don't always pan out.
"I don't think just us, but I think the industry, given its size, its attractiveness and its growth potential, we're always looking for opportunities to innovate and see where there's an intersection of new ideas and where consumer preferences are evolving toward remembering that actually most innovations don't work in the long run," Quincey said on the Coca-Cola earnings call.
"But it's a good sign that the industry, including ourselves, are trying lots of different things," Quincey said.
Gabe Hauari is a national trending news reporter at USA TODAY. You can follow him on X @GabeHauari or email him at Gdhauari@gannett.com.
Mike Snider is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider & @mikegsnider.bsky.social & @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com
Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Watch live: Trump touts new AI framework, signs executive orders
President Trump will deliver the keynote address at a White House artificial intelligence summit, just hours after the administration unveiled a new framework for its AI policy. The 28-page ' AI Action Plan ' places a heavy emphasis on boosting U.S. innovation, building out data center infrastructure and promoting American technology abroad. The president is also expected to sign executive orders from the White House. The event is scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.
The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Supreme Court lets Trump fire federal product safety commissioners, liberal justices dissent
The Supreme Court on Wednesday paved the way for President Trump to fire three members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — the second time the justices have allowed Trump's terminations at independent agencies to go into effect. The emergency order lifts a lower court's ruling that determined the firings were unlawful and effectively ordered the reinstatement of commissioners Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Saric and Richard Trumka Jr. as the litigation progresses. The majority pointed to its May emergency ruling greenlighting Trump firing members of two other independent agencies, saying the CPSC did not differ in 'any pertinent respect.' 'Although our interim orders are not conclusive as to the merits, they inform how a court should exercise its equitable discretion in like cases,' the unsigned order reads. The three justices appointed by Democratic presidents publicly dissented, saying their colleagues had 'negated Congress's choice of agency bipartisanship and independence.' 'By means of such actions, this Court may facilitate the permanent transfer of authority, piece by piece by piece, from one branch of Government to another. Respectfully, I dissent,' wrote Justice Elena Kagan, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson. The decision marks an immediate victory for the Trump administration, which has looked to vastly expand executive power since Trump returned to the White House. The administration has sought to eviscerate removal protections for members of independent agencies throughout the government, pushing back on a 90-year-old Supreme Court precedent that cleared the way for Congress to establish those protections. The new order marks the second time the justices have intervened to permit Trump's firings of independent agency leaders. In May, the justices cleared the way for Trump to fire National Labor Relations Board member Gwynne Wilcox and Merit Systems Protection Board member Cathy Harris. Solicitor General D. John Sauer said lower courts still haven't gotten the message, including when U.S. District Judge Matthew Maddox later blocked Trump's termination of the three CPSC members. Sauer urged the Supreme Court to firmly settle the issue by leapfrogging the lower courts to take up the CPSC case on their normal docket. 'This case illustrates that the sooner this Court resolves the merits of this application and decides foundational questions about the scope of the President's removal authority, the better,' Sauer wrote in the application. The majority declined to do so, instead sending the case back to the lower courts. But Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Trump's second appointee to the court, said he would've taken that additional step. He warned his colleagues may leave 'extended uncertainty and confusion' about whether the court will overrule the precedent. 'Moreover, when the question is whether to narrow or overrule one of this Court's precedents rather than how to resolve an open or disputed question of federal law, further percolation in the lower courts is not particularly useful,' Kavanaugh wrote. The CPSC commissioners, appointed by former President Biden, were let go earlier this year. Trump did not purport to have cause to fire them, despite federal law providing independent agencies across the federal bureaucracy with for-cause removal protections. CPSC commissioners cannot be fired by the president except for 'neglect of duty or malfeasance in office' under federal law. Similar setups exist for a handful of other agencies, providing a degree of independence from the political impulses of the White House. The commissioners, represented by consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, urged the justices to stay out of the case. 'The government now asks this Court to disrupt the status quo and enter a stay that would prevent the Commissioners from serving in the roles that the district court held they are entitled to occupy and that they have in fact been occupying for the last month. The government cannot establish its entitlement to this extraordinary relief,' the group's attorneys wrote in court filings.
The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
DC has highest threshold for top 1 percent
The nation's capital emerged as the location with the highest threshold to be the top one percent of earners, a new study found. The new study by personal finance site SmartAsset analyzed households that bring in enough money annually to be considered among the top one percent of earners in each state and the nation's capital. The study was based on the 2022 tax return data, the latest available from the IRS, and adjusted for 2025 dollars. The study found the District of Columbia has the highest necessary threshold to rank as a top earner, where a household needs an income of about $1.07 million, according to SmartAsset. Only about 3,300 households in D.C. qualify. There's only one other location where it takes more than $1 million to fall under the category. Connecticut falls in a close second, whose residents must earn roughly $1.06 annually to be in the top 1 percent. Nationwide, there are about 1.5 million households that bring in enough income to be among the top one percent if earners in their state. The average threshold to rank among the nation's top earners is $731,000 — and in 11 states and the District of Columbia, you'll need more than that. West Virginia proved to be the state with the lowest income needed to be considered the top one percent of earners in the state. There, residents would need to earn $416,300 annually to fall under the category, and about 7,300 households fall into that category. Only three other states — Mississippi, New Mexico, and Kentucky — would have a household income under half a million dollars push a household into the top earners group. SmartAsset this year also found that a single person living in the nation's largest cities would need an income of at least $85,000 to 'live comfortably,' and a family of four would need about $200,000 to do the same. The data comes as inflation continues to put more pressure on households nationwide. While President Trump has pressed for lower interest rates, economists warn such a move could drive inflation higher. Trump insisted, though, that inflation has settled, and he is pressing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates. Still, Americans are largely happy with the way Trump has handled inflation as he marks six months into his second term, with 64 percent in a CBS News/YouGov poll released Sunday saying they disapprove of how the president is handling the issue.
