
Breaking: Robinhood's RWA Proposal Could Bring Wall Street Onchain
Robinhood Seeks To Bring Wallstreet Onchain (Photo Illustration by Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via ... More Getty Images)
Robinhood submitted a 42-page SEC proposal to create a federal framework for tokenized real-world assets, aiming to modernize U.S. securities markets.
For years, the financial world has talked about tokenizing real-world assets (RWAs). RWA tokenization is projected to become a $30 trillion market by 2030, according to research from The Trading View. This surge is driven by rising institutional interest in onchain financial products, offering faster settlement, greater transparency, and broader asset access.
The vision has always been tantalizing: frictionless trading of everything from Treasury bills to real estate, recorded transparently on a blockchain, available to all. But despite the headlines and hype, most of the progress has been confined to controlled pilots, sandboxes, and siloed platforms—largely disconnected from the regulated core of finance.
That may be about to change.
Robinhood submitted a formal 42-page proposal to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting the creation of a federal regulatory framework for the issuance and trading of tokenized RWAs. This is more than just a compliance tweak—it's a structural rethinking of how assets can be issued, settled, and tracked in the U.S. financial system. If accepted, it could signal the beginning of a scalable, legally sound foundation for tokenized markets in America.
Robinhood's proposal introduces some of the most important legal infrastructure yet seen in the RWA space. It calls for a unified national framework to replace the fragmented, state-by-state compliance approach that currently governs securities. It proposes that tokens representing assets—like equities or government bonds—should be legally equivalent to the underlying asset, not classified as derivatives or synthetic products.
That one change, if approved, would eliminate the need for duplicate systems and ambiguous ownership rights. It would also allow broker-dealers like Robinhood to custody and trade tokenized assets using existing regulatory guardrails, not separate, uncertain structures.
The platform, dubbed the Real World Asset Exchange (RRE), would feature off-chain matching for speed and on-chain settlement for transparency. It integrates identity verification and anti-money-laundering tools via Jumio and Chainalysis, designed to meet global KYC/AML requirements.
The proposal embeds laundering tools via Jumio and Chainalysis, designed to meet global KYC/AML ... More requirements. (Photo by Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
In blockchain, technical innovation tends to outpace regulatory acceptance. But this time, the real advance is on the legal side. Robinhood isn't inventing new technology—it's anchoring existing capabilities to firm legal ground. By seeking asset-token equivalence and regulatory interoperability, the company is building what could become a common framework not just for startups and DeFi protocols, but for banks, hedge funds, and asset managers as well.
Crypto expert and founder of Quantum Economics, Mati Greenspan put it plainly: 'This proposal could mark the first time a U.S.-regulated broker has laid out a viable path for bringing trillions of dollars in assets onchain—without compromising regulatory integrity. If the SEC embraces this, it's a signal to the world that tokenization has a legitimate seat at the traditional finance table.'
Mati Greenspan, Founder of Quantum Economics
It's a move that marries innovation with institutional comfort—something the crypto industry has long struggled to do.
Robinhood is best known for its role in the GameStop saga and the explosion of retail trading and meme coins. But this proposal shows a different face of the company—one positioning itself as a serious infrastructure player in the next phase of digital finance.
Its RRE platform wouldn't be a sideshow to equities trading. It would offer 24/7 access to tokenized assets that reflect the diversity of global capital markets—from funds and bonds to commodities and real estate.
Robinhood is best known for its role in the GameStop saga and the explosion of retail trading. ... More (Photo by Olivier DOULIERY / AFP) (Photo by OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images)
This marks a transition for Robinhood, from a mobile brokerage to a potential regulatory blueprint builder. It also potentially creates a new revenue model based on trading, custody, and compliance services in tokenized markets—distinct from the spread-based retail model of its early years.
Of course, not every bold proposal reshapes the system. The SEC has yet to respond, and the agency has historically taken a cautious—often adversarial—approach to digital assets. Token equivalence could raise new questions about taxation, investor protections, and international jurisdictional conflicts. Even with legal clarity, there's no guarantee of adoption by other institutions. Some might still prefer existing frameworks and settlement rails for reasons of trust, scale, or inertia.
Moreover, the current U.S. regulatory climate remains divided. Without legislative alignment between the SEC and other bodies like the CFTC, there's still a risk that even well-designed frameworks could be undermined by fragmented enforcement or political pushback.
There's also the broader question of market timing. Institutional capital has warmed to tokenization in theory, but many remain on the sidelines awaiting proof points at scale. If Robinhood launches the RRE platform without significant asset partners or volume, it may struggle to prove immediate utility—regardless of regulatory progress.
Still, even if the SEC drags its feet, the importance of Robinhood's proposal shouldn't be underestimated. It's the first full-throated attempt by a major U.S. broker to bring tokenized RWAs into the mainstream—and to do so by rewriting the rules of engagement. Whether the SEC accepts the blueprint in its current form or sends it back with revisions, the very act of submitting it moves the conversation forward.
If approved, Robinhood will gain more than first-mover advantage. It will help define what 'compliant tokenization' means in the U.S.—and give other players the legal scaffolding to follow.
That's what the RWA space has been missing: not another blockchain, not another asset wrapper, but a bridge to real regulation. Robinhood may have just laid the first stone.
Did you enjoy this story about Robinhood and RWA? Don't miss my next one: Use the blue follow button at the top of the article near my byline to follow more of my work
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
21 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Most Jobs Growth Came From Health Care, Hospitality, Home-Aide Roles
The lion's share of new jobs created in May came from just three sectors, according to the Labor Department's monthly employment report. Health care: 62,000 new jobs Social assistance: 16,000 new jobs Leisure and hospitality: 48,000 new jobs. Hiring meanwhile was broadly flat in most other industries, and federal government employment declined—it's down by 59,000 since January. Demand for temporary help workers dropped too last month, a sign companies are turning more cautious on hiring. Analysts noted that the narrow breadth of job gains in May suggests slowing employment in key cyclical sectors of the economy.

Associated Press
21 minutes ago
- Associated Press
RBGLY Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC Securities Fraud Lawsuit
NEW YORK, June 7, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of American Depositary Shares ('ADSs') of Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC (OTC: RBGLY) between January 13, 2021 through July 28, 2024, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 4, 2025. For more information, submit a form, email attorney Phillip Kim, or give us a call at 866-767-3653. So What: If you purchased Reckitt ADSs you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. What to do next: To join the Reckitt class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 4, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, during the Class Period, defendants failed to warn investors and consumers: (1) that preterm infants were at an increased risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis ('NEC') by consuming Reckitt's cow's milk-based formula, Enfamil; (2) of the attendant impact on Reckitt's sales of Enfamil and Reckitt's exposure to legal claims; and (3) as a result of the above, defendants' positive statements about Reckitt's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Reckitt action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P. A.

Associated Press
21 minutes ago
- Associated Press
ROSEN, GLOBAL INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Avis Budget Group, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 7, 2025) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Avis Budget Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CAR) between February 16, 2024 and February 10, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), of the important June 24, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Avis Budget securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Avis Budget class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than June 24, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, during the Class Period, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Avis Budget crafted and implemented a plan to significantly accelerate its fleet rotation in the fourth quarter of 2024; (2) the foregoing acceleration shortened the useful life of the majority of Avis Budget's vehicles in the Americas segment, thereby reducing their recoverable value; (3) as a result, Avis Budget would be forced to recognize billions of dollars in impairment charges and incur substantial losses; (4) all the foregoing was likely to, and did, have a significant negative impact on Avis Budget's financial results; (5) accordingly, Avis Budget's financial and/or business prospects were overstated; and (6) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Avis Budget class action, go to call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: or on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ------------------------------- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] To view the source version of this press release, please visit