Law Change Better Protecting Children's Rights In Sexual Violence Cases Welcomed
Chief Children's Commissioner Dr Claire Achmad says legislation passed last night to strengthen protections for young victims of sexual violence is a step in the right direction.
The Victims of Sexual Violence Bill amends the law so that children under the age of 12 cannot be questioned about whether they consented to sex.
'It was wrong that this provision was still in our law, so I'm pleased the Government led work to change this. It's positive too, that there was support from many parties across Parliament for this change. When it comes to children and their rights, the best thing the Government and Parliament can do is to work together, putting children first. This is a good example of this,' says Dr Achmad.
The Chief Children's Commissioner says that better protections for victims of sexual violence have been a long time coming.
'I've had the privilege of meeting with children and young people throughout New Zealand who are victim-survivors of sexual violence, and they talk to me about the systemic change that's needed to protect their rights and help them heal.
'While there's still much more to do, so that no child experiences sexual violence of any form, I strongly welcome the changes passed last night. They are important steps towards strengthening the rights of children and young people in court processes.
'I acknowledge the immense courage of victims, especially mokopuna survivors of sexual assault, who shared their lived experience to help shape the legislation,' she says.
'The changes to the law that recognise that mokopuna cannot consent to abuse, and that they should not be questioned or challenged about whether they consented to sex, are crucial to keeping them safe from re-traumatisation.'
In its submission to Parliament on the Bill, Mana Mokopuna – Children and Young People's Commission supported the Bill's overarching goal to amend the Crimes Act 1961 to give victim survivors of sexual assault more agency in court processes.
'I also advocated for stronger protections for mokopuna aged 12-16 years in these court processes, and training and education for the legal sector and judiciary to ensure they apply the legislation as intended,' says Dr Achmad.
'I hope that the changes passed last night signal continued commitment and action to recognise the rights and wellbeing of children and young people in all court processes affecting them.
'Supporting mokopuna to have agency in these processes and to be recognised as the children that they are is so important – both upholding their rights and in ensuring they can begin their healing journey,' she says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
32 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Personal attacks by minister also attacks on democracy
Our select committee process is the most important democratic institution in our Parliament. It is the way the public has a say in making laws. Select committees enhance transparency, accountability and public participation in governance. Their work strengthens the legislative process, improves the law and reinforces our trust in our democratic institutions. It is the only time between elections where parliamentarians must listen to ordinary people talk to them about the impact of policy decisions on their lives and families. It is the only scrutiny you and I have over future law. We do not get to decide the law, but we do get to have our say about it. That is part of the representative government arrangements. We give our representatives the right to decide for us, as long as they have the obligation to listen to us and take our views into account. This is why there is such a strong push for submissions to select committees. Without the public submissions to select committees, legislation would be even more prone to political manipulation and poor drafting, leading to more uncertainty and increased costs. When select committees issue the invitation to submit, they are committing to an open democracy and inviting scrutiny and transparency. This process reinforces democratic legitimacy. If the government does not open itself to scrutiny, how can it argue it has consent to govern? New Zealand's parliamentary select committee process is fundamental to our view of democracy and good government. While there is always room for improvement, the select committee system remains one of the most robust mechanisms for safeguarding democratic values in Aotearoa New Zealand. This means that when ministers attack members of the public who are engaging with the select committee process, they are also attacking our democracy. This is not an exaggeration. Without unfettered access to the select committee process, you and I are locked out of our only mechanism to scrutinise future law. It does not matter who you vote for. It does not matter what political ''side'' you consider yourself on. Your access to select committees should never be threatened. But this is where we now find ourselves. A senior minister has launched public, and very personal, attacks on some people, myself included, who make submissions to a select committee. This raises many questions. One is why would the person who has ultimate authority over the content of the Bill feel the need to personally attack those who disagree with it? This is not the action of someone confident in their rationale. A confident minister would allow the select committee process to proceed without trying to hinder or constrain it. A confident minister would welcome, rather than complain about, the public's engagement with their proposed legislation. Only a minister who fears the critique would personally attack the critics. Which suggests a second question: why such a minister would fear for the passage of the proposed legislation? In the case of the Regulatory Standards Bill, it is unclear why the minister is so anxious. The Bill is the subject of the coalition agreement between Act New Zealand and National, so National's support is guaranteed. The New Zealand First agreement requires it to support the policy proposals in the Act agreement, so NZ First will also have to vote for the Bill. Because of these political deals, the Bill will pass. So the only concern must be about the content of the Bill. The Bill might pass but the content of the Bill is open to change based on the submissions. And the anxiety of the minister over the submissions strongly suggests that these criticisms have legitimacy. The critiques have been well-traversed. One is that the Bill leaves open the opportunity for corporate entities to sue the government for regulation and legislation that does not meet the Bill's narrow principles. This is not as unlikely as some assume. Corporate entities have similar rights to those of natural persons and the fear of litigation by companies has led to a chilling effect on some good public policy protections. The Bill does not protect the government from such litigation. Another critique is that the Bill will constrain government and local government regulation and bylaw-making powers. This concern has been expressed by our own Dunedin City Council this week as it defends local decision-making and local democracy. And, of course, that the Bill is itself contrary to the rule of law it proposes to promote, because it excludes the Crown's constitutional obligations under te Tiriti o Waitangi. The rule of law is not confined to concerns of private property. The rule of law includes constitutional protections, like those found in te Tiriti, and in democratic processes, like our select committees. You will judge yourself as to the legitimacy of the deputy prime minister making ad hominem attacks against policy critics. But make no mistake, his attacks against individuals just disguise his attacks against democracy. ■Metiria Stanton Turei is a senior law lecturer at the University of Otago and a former Green Party MP and co-leader.
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
New Law To Give Victims Final Say Over Sex Offenders' Name Suppressions
Parliament has unanimously passed legislation that will ensure the courts cannot issue a permanent name suppression order for an adult convicted of a sexual offence, unless the victim agrees to it. The Victims of Sexual Violence Bill had its third reading late on Wednesday night. It also amends the law so that children under the age of 12 will not be able to be questioned about whether they consented to sex. The Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said this made it crystal clear children could not consent to abuse. New Zealand was now moving into line with many other countries in outlawing it. "It was well overdue and needed to be done." The law further closes what Goldsmith said was a legislative gap, by ensuring the victims of all sexual crimes, including intimate visual recordings offences, were automatically given name suppression. "These changes will help ensure victims of sexual violence and their needs are returned to the heart of the justice system. We've been clear from day one that victims are our priority as we work to restore law and order," Goldsmith said in a media release. He said at present victims' views on suppression only had to be taken into account by the courts. Long battles over name suppression retraumatised victims, as did the inability to discuss what happened to them and to warn others. Goldsmith told Morning Report he was concerned about people who had gone through the court process and then found there was a permanent name suppression for an offender and there was no opportunity to talk about their experience and most importantly, warn others. "We're talking about people who have been convicted of sexual crimes and they need to be named and held to account." While the legal profession had expressed some concern around reducing the powers of judges, he said it was a significant change focused on the needs of victims and a chance to do things differently. Police Minister Mark Mitchell spoke on behalf of the Justice Minister during the third reading. "It is abhorrent that the law allows questions about whether children enjoyed or agreed to sexual activity. We're fixing that. "It is unconscionable that victims feel silenced by our laws especially when they've braved the scrutiny of the court process to prove their case. We're fixing that too." Mitchell said victims had been clear that name suppression settings had disempowered victims, prevented them from speaking out about their experiences and warning others. New Zealanders also believed the way children were questioned in court was unacceptable, Mitchell said. MP Kahurangi Carter spoke in favour of the bill on behalf of the Green Party. "I know that we all feel this really heavily for victims under 12. It seems so obvious. "I'm glad today we're bringing our legislation, our laws into line with what is right." Goldsmith recognised some victims would not want to make the decision about name suppression themselves. In those cases, the decision would rest with the courts. He believed the changes would assist in ensuring 20,000 fewer victims of violent crime by 2029. While the bill was passed unanimously, there were no Te Pāti Māori MPs in the House at the time.
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
Parliament unites in grief as tributes flow for Takutai Tarsh Kemp
Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp. Photo: RNZ / Simon Rogers In her final hours, Takutai Tarsh Kemp was calling members of her community, offering her service to the kaupapa. In her final speech to Parliament - just days earlier - the Tāmaki Makaurau MP spoke of fairness and manaakitanga: "Te Pāti Māori leaves no one behind." That was how MPs remembered Kemp on Thursday : a servant leader, a beautiful soul, a champion for her people. The news broke shortly after 8am, as MPs were going about their usual business. As the justice committee closed its session at 9am, chair Andrew Bayly noted they would not reconvene due to "information we've just received". That information came as a shock to many of those who worked alongside Kemp. Kemp had been open about her battle with kidney disease , announcing it in July last year. Some at Parliament knew her health had been faltering. But Kemp was in the building just the day before, attending Question Time, and she had spoken with passion in the debating chamber the day before that. On Wednesday, she had sat and talked with Labour's Peeni Henare and his youth MP for an hour, reflecting on their relationship as both rivals and comrades. Labour MP Peeni Henare speaks at Parliament as MPs honour Takutai Tarsh Kemp. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Te Pāti Māori's MPs were not at Parliament on Thursday, which also happened to be the first day since the end of the co-leaders three-week suspension. Instead, the caucus understandably disbanded to be with whānau. They spoke as a caucus earlier that morning; co-leader Rawiri Waititi described emotions as being raw. President John Tamihere notified others across Parliament. In the afternoon, MPs from other parties convened to pay tribute , a procedure now sadly familiar to them following the death of Fa'anānā Efeso Collins in February last year. The flags flew at half mast; a floral tribute sat at Kemp's desk in the chamber. A tribute in Parliament House after the death of Tāmaki Makaurau MP Takutai Tarsh Kemp of Te Pāti Māori on 26 June, 2025. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone As in the aftermath of Collins' passing, MPs put their differences aside, sharing their reflections and experiences. They clutched earpieces to the sides of their heads to hear the speeches translated as many spoke predominately in te reo: National's Tama Potaka, Henare, the Greens' Teanau Tuiono, and NZ First's Shane Jones. National's Tama Potaka speaks in Parliament, as MPs remember Takutai Tarsh Kemp. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone The speeches touched on her legacy - her advocacy for young people and South Auckland. Potaka dubbed Kemp "rangatira" of "rangatahi" and captain of the dance crew, a reference to her time at the top of Hip Hop International NZ. Greens' co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick spoke of her conviction: "[She] knew who she was, where she came from, and what she was fighting for." Chloe Swarbrick speaks at a tribute for Te Pati Māori MP Takutai Tarsh Kemp after her death on 26 June, 2025. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone And ACT's David Seymour echoed the sentiment: "She left no doubt about what she was here to do and who she was here to serve." A recurring theme was the unity felt in grief - the politics put aside. Temporarily forgotten was the fierce battle over the Tāmaki Makaurau seat in 2023, similarly, the serious allegations levelled over the Manurewa marae and its handling of private data. Swarbrick acknowledged how "love and integrity" could be great stabilisers at such times. Jones paid respect to Kemp's contribution. "Yes, politics is a contest, but at the base of politics is the pursuit of humanity," he said. New Zealand First MP Shane Jones speaks at a tribute for Te Pati Māori MP Takutai Tarsh Kemp after her death on 26 June, 2025. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone But it was Labour's Willie Jackson who best articulated the "special moment" as speakers put their disagreements on pause. In many ways, he said, it captured the nature of Māori politics. "We just can go to war sometimes... we can destroy each other, and then - you wouldn't think it was the same people - we'll be having a cup of tea and a kai out the back at the marae." Labour MPs (from left) Carmel Sepuloni, Willie Jackson, and Peeni Henare speak at Parliament on the death of Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Tarsh Kemp. Photo: RNZ / Sam Rillstone Jackson pointed to Henare's evident emotion - his lament - alongside the passionate Tāmaki Makaurau contest. "That's the difference with Māori politics," Jackson said. "We will always be tied by our toto, by our whakapapa, and by our identity." Kemp's death will now trigger a by-election in that Tāmaki Makaurau electorate - and MPs may well go to war once more - but that is a consideration for another day. The tributes closed with a waiata, Whakaaria Mai, the whole House on its feet, and then a moment's silence before Parliament rose early. On the floor of the House, there were hugs and hongi, Henare the most frequent recipient, as he held a tissue to his face and wiped away tears. Unity in grief. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
