‘No food, job or phones': Afrikaner ‘refugee' family ‘stranded' in US
An Afrikaner 'refugee' family in the US has been left 'stranded' with no food, money or a phone. Image via Pixabay
An Afrikaner 'refugee' family has reportedly been left stranded in the US, and is appealing for help on Facebook.
The startling revelation was made by a South African expat on TikTok.
Two groups of white South Africans have taken up 'refugee status' in the US in recent weeks, as part of a programme open to 'persecuted' people.
AFRIKANER 'REFUGEES' LEFT STRANDED?
On her TikTok account, South African expat @catmpt revealed that she had come across an Afrikaner 'refugee' family in dire need of help.
The family of four was reportedly stranded at a hotel in Montana without food, money, or a cellphone. Instead, they had reached out to a Facebook group for help.
The woman said of the 'refugees': 'They were understanding that they would be arriving here for complete assistance. People thought they would be arriving at a house, a job, medical insurance, and other things. It isn't that way at all.
She added: 'Because of the political situation, they are really struggling to get jobs'.
The woman revealed that she had left South Africa more than a decade ago, but had gone through a lengthy process. She also criticised Afrikaner 'refugees' for having unrealistic expectations.
She continued, 'One side of me is like, 'F**k that. 'My husband and I went through all of the red tape, and we got our visas…we've got our green card. We've been here ten years. We did everything the right way.
'Here, these people, regardless of what they were promised, just came here expecting everything'.
Under the post, the woman added that she was assisting the family with a car as she was a 'humanitarian'.
@catpmt What would you do? #traumatok #southafricanrefugees #southafricatiktok #tsek #anxiety #livingintheusa ♬ original sound – Cat's Tales
NO HELP FROM SA EMBASSY
Last month, the Department of International Relations (DIRCO) stated that South African 'refugees' in the US would not have access to any diplomatic assistance whilst abroad.
The 'persecuted' South Africans would instead be assisted by the US Refugee Admissions Programme (USRAP), which was signed as an Executive Order by President Donald Trump.
As part of the Afrikaner Act, the group was also given Priority-2 refugee status, which provides them with start-up assistance like money, jobs, and even a house.
CAN THEY RETURN TO SA?
According to DIRCO spokesperson Chrispin Phiri, refugees 'simply can't return home for a braai and go back'.
He added: 'Even the word itself refugee suggests that you are seeking refuge from a particular country.
'You can't be seeking refugee status, then go back home, have a braai, then go back. It defeats the purpose of you being protected and a refugee of a particular country,' he said
For Afrikaner 'refugees' hoping to return home willingly for good, voluntary repatriation is always an option. Organisations like the UNHCR help those who wish to travel back to their countries by providing financial assistance.
DIRCO added that 'refugees' would be welcomed back as citizens. However, they would have to revoke their status in order for this to happen.
DO YOU THINK AFRIKANER 'REFUGEES' WERE UNREALISTIC ABOUT EXPECTING A BETTER LIFE IN THE US?
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Follow The South African on Facebook for the latest breaking news, polls - and more!
Tags: afrikaner refugee Featured Important
Post navigation
Next Article
Previous
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
36 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
IFP praises police for swift response in murder, attempted murder case of its members
JOHANNESBURG - The Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) has praised police for its swift response in the shooting of its members, saying this should be extended to every South African, not just high-profile ones. On Thursday, two people appeared at the Palm Ridge Magistrates Court for the murder and attempted murders of three IFP members. ALSO READ: - IFP suspects shooting of members is related to external political motives - 2 suspects in murder of IFP MP Khethamabala Sithole abandon bail bids - Police offer R60k for info on remaining suspect in IFP MP Khethamabala Sithole's murder On 31 May, IFP's former Member of Parliament (MP), Petros Sithole, was fatally shot while leading a branch meeting at the Buyafuthi Hostel in Katlehong, east of Johannesburg. Alco Ngobese and Sambulo Nxumalo were also shot but survived. It took less than a week for police to arrest the men suspected of being behind the shooting. Gauteng police have also issued a R60,000 reward for any information leading to the successful arrest and conviction of the third suspect, Zamani Ngila Ximba. The party's provincial chairperson, Bonginkosi Dhlamini, said all murder cases should be handled like this. 'This one, we think, is a catalyst for how we think police should work. With this case, there is one thing we have seen, when the case is removed from local police station and taken to province and national, there is progress. So, there is an issue with your local police because they have got relationships with criminals.' The matter returns to court on 29 July.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Ukrainian Operatives in South Africa: The War Arrives Quietly
Ukrainian military intelligence is conducting covert operations in South Africa, revealing a complex web of international relations and security implications that challenge the nation's sovereignty. Image: IOL / Ron AI On June 6, 2025, veteran Washington Post columnist David Ignatius published a revealing exposé that sent shockwaves through diplomatic and intelligence communities. Citing high-level intelligence sources, Ignatius confirmed what has long been whispered in strategic circles. Ukrainian military intelligence (GUR) has been conducting covert operations in South Africa. These include surveillance, disruption of alleged weapons shipments to Russia, and even consideration of attacks on Russian naval assets in Cape Town. Ignatius is no ordinary columnist. He has deep ties to the United States intelligence establishment. His columns often mirror the thinking of the CIA and are used to signal key geopolitical developments. When Ignatius puts something in print, it carries the weight of the security apparatus behind it. According to the article, GUR operatives tracked the Russian cargo ship Lady R to Simon's Town naval base in December 2022. They claimed the vessel was there to receive South African arms destined for Russia. It was GUR, not U.S. intelligence, that first delivered this claim to the American government. The U.S. ambassador in Pretoria went public months later. The damage to South Africa's international credibility was immediate. The public inquiry later found no evidence of wrongdoing, but the diplomatic blow had already landed. Ignatius goes further. He states that GUR agents also disrupted a weapons transfer involving a Russian cargo plane in 2022. In August 2023, when the Russian training ship Smolnyy docked in Cape Town, some GUR officers reportedly considered launching an attack. The operation was ultimately abandoned, but the plan itself was real. Against this backdrop, the South African Government of National Unity quietly moved to grant visa-free entry to holders of Ukrainian diplomatic, official, and service passports. This was first publicly announced by Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber of the Democratic Alliance on 27 October 2024. The waiver was said to apply only to official travel and still required the President's formal ratification. Nonetheless, by March 2025, the visa exemptions were operational without any press release, public announcement, or parliamentary debate. The GNU, in its current formation, had already been established months before this announcement. It is under this coalition government—led by President Cyril Ramaphosa and supported by DA power brokers—that the visa waiver was implemented. The implications of this move are serious. Ukrainian operatives now have legal access to South African soil under diplomatic protection. There is no indication that they are being vetted, tracked, or restricted in their activities. GUR chief Lt. Gen. Kyrylo Budanov has stated plainly that Ukraine conducts operations anywhere Russian interests exist. In an interview with Ignatius, Budanov explained: 'We've offered a plan aimed at reduction of Russian potential. It encompasses a lot of aspects, like the military industry, critical military targets, their airfields, their command-and-control posts.' Regarding Africa, Budanov was even more explicit. 'We conduct such operations aimed at reducing Russian military potential anywhere where it's possible. Why should Africa be an exception?' Ukraine has already struck Russian-linked positions in Mali and the Central African Republic. In July 2023, a GUR-orchestrated strike reportedly killed 84 Wagner Group fighters and 47 Malian soldiers. This is the same military intelligence now welcomed into South Africa with open diplomatic channels. President Ramaphosa has said nothing about these developments. There has been no statement from the Presidency addressing the security risk. When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky visited South Africa in early 2025, the visit was accompanied by the usual diplomatic messaging and limited media coverage. Official photos were released, and standard statements of cooperation were made, but there was little substance beyond the choreography. What stood out was what remained unsaid. There was no press conference, no detailed communiqués, and no public articulation of strategic agreements. Beneath the surface of diplomatic protocol, a quiet shift was taking place. The Democratic Alliance, which now holds significant sway in the GNU, has long aligned itself with NATO positions. Its figures have repeatedly voiced support for Ukraine in the ongoing war. Leon Schreiber's announcement of the visa-free arrangement fits into this pattern. The DA has inserted itself into foreign policy at the highest level, without public mandate or parliamentary oversight. There are reasons to believe that Ukrainian operations in South Africa go beyond surveillance. The disruptions to Russian cargo and naval vessels indicate a direct role in undermining South Africa's cooperation with Russia. This serves the interests of the United States and NATO, not the South African public. The goal is to fracture BRICS alignment and weaken Russia's partnerships across the continent. The DA's growing influence over security, immigration, and foreign policy within the GNU allows for decisions that align with Western strategic interests. This is compounded by Ramaphosa's ideological ambiguity and his growing proximity to pro-Western actors. The ANC's historical orientation has been diluted. What remains is a compromised posture and a government incapable of articulating or defending an independent foreign policy. There are also long-standing connections between white right-wing networks in South Africa and Ukraine. After 1994, several individuals linked to the apartheid security state relocated to Eastern Europe. Ukraine's far-right nationalist structures, which absorbed neo-Nazi formations into state security after the 2014 Maidan coup, provided fertile ground for ideological and logistical integration. Many of these actors now travel freely between South Africa and Ukraine, with no public scrutiny or security checks. South Africa's intelligence architecture is fragmented. There has been no formal protest to the Ukrainian ambassador. No inquiry has been launched into the GUR's confirmed activities. The Presidency has not responded to revelations in the Washington Post. The visa agreement has not been revisited. Under the UN Charter, hostile operations by one state against another on foreign soil constitute a breach of international peace and security. South Africa has previously cited this principle to avoid escalation in conflicts like Myanmar and the Democratic Republic of Congo. That logic has not been applied to Ukraine. South Africa now finds itself as an unacknowledged battleground in the West's proxy war with Russia. The infiltration is legalised through visa exemptions. The sabotage is framed as intelligence work. The silence is interpreted as compliance. This is the opening chapter in an ongoing investigation. The next instalment will explore how Ukraine's intelligence war dovetails with American and Israeli regime change strategies aimed at dismantling what remains of the ANC-SACP legacy. South Africa's sovereignty is on the line—and the fight is already under way. * Gillian Schutte is a South African writer, filmmaker, and critical-race scholar known for her radical critiques of neoliberalism, whiteness, and donor-driven media. Her work centres African liberation, social justice, and revolutionary thought. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Taking unemployment lessons from a bank boss who can't count?
There is no way that SA's unemployment rate is only 10%. More than 8.2 million people were unemployed in the first three months of this year, 237 000 more than the three months before. But if Capitec CEO Gerrie Fourie is to be believed, most of those don't count. Fourie said this week that the unemployment crisis, which swallows more than one in four people in this country (43.15%), is being inflated and 'is actually around 10%'. He claimed this is because official government statistics exclude those who sell amagwinya and others who rent out their backrooms to put food on the table. He said these hustles are comparable to employment and encouraged entrepreneurship. While most observers will tell you that small and medium business development should be the priority and entrepreneurship is essential to our economic future, surely we shouldn't be encouraging bylaw violations in our grand quest to create jobs? Is suburban decay just job creation? Both townships and suburbs are battling mushrooming land grabs and room renting as the demand for housing in urban areas continues to grow. Away from official statistics, just driving down the road or turning on the tap will show you how much of a strain this has on already frail infrastructure. Illegal connections are found on many streets, hastily built rooms are erected without plans, approvals, or necessary skill, and spaza shops are opened with little regard for food safety. If the millionaire rode down the same street, he might have to dodge the unroadworthy school transport drivers who pack the future generation into a taxi like sardines to maximise profit. We have laws that prohibit these kinds of 'hustles' to protect infrastructure and people's lives. Such criminality should be policed, not encouraged. ALSO READ: A VIEW OF THE WEEK: So what if there is a shack in the back? Making the informal formal Fourie has repeated the call for the unemployment stats to include the informal sector, like other developing nations have. This has been on the request list for 30 years and has been blue-ticked by the government because the sector is so fluid. Defining what sector falls under the informal economy is also problematic and requires regulations. But where do we start regulating and enforcing rules on the taxi industry, or on Tannie Marie selling doilies on Facebook? And what about those in the illicit market? If the person begging for money at a robot is employed, then does that make the drug dealer sharing the corner employed too? Giving government a pass The problem with watering down the definition of employment is that it downplays the government's failures in addressing inequality and job creation. There are dedicated ministries to labour, employment, and small businesses, and yet the scourge of joblessness continues. Instead of holding the government accountable, it gives the impression that SA's job market is far better than it actually is. This may help corporates like Fourie sell a good image when trying to secure international deals, but it invalidates and silences the poor in the country that these businesses are built on the back of. Allowing a corporate bigwig to tweak what employment means is as concerning as sending a billionaire to the White House to present government policy. Sadly, like when Johann Rupert went to visit Donald Trump last month, that has already happened. NOW READ: A VIEW OF THE WEEK: Don't give BEE bully Musk your lunch money
