Taking unemployment lessons from a bank boss who can't count?
There is no way that SA's unemployment rate is only 10%.
More than 8.2 million people were unemployed in the first three months of this year, 237 000 more than the three months before. But if Capitec CEO Gerrie Fourie is to be believed, most of those don't count.
Fourie said this week that the unemployment crisis, which swallows more than one in four people in this country (43.15%), is being inflated and 'is actually around 10%'.
He claimed this is because official government statistics exclude those who sell amagwinya and others who rent out their backrooms to put food on the table.
He said these hustles are comparable to employment and encouraged entrepreneurship.
While most observers will tell you that small and medium business development should be the priority and entrepreneurship is essential to our economic future, surely we shouldn't be encouraging bylaw violations in our grand quest to create jobs?
Is suburban decay just job creation?
Both townships and suburbs are battling mushrooming land grabs and room renting as the demand for housing in urban areas continues to grow. Away from official statistics, just driving down the road or turning on the tap will show you how much of a strain this has on already frail infrastructure.
Illegal connections are found on many streets, hastily built rooms are erected without plans, approvals, or necessary skill, and spaza shops are opened with little regard for food safety.
If the millionaire rode down the same street, he might have to dodge the unroadworthy school transport drivers who pack the future generation into a taxi like sardines to maximise profit.
We have laws that prohibit these kinds of 'hustles' to protect infrastructure and people's lives.
Such criminality should be policed, not encouraged.
ALSO READ: A VIEW OF THE WEEK: So what if there is a shack in the back?
Making the informal formal
Fourie has repeated the call for the unemployment stats to include the informal sector, like other developing nations have.
This has been on the request list for 30 years and has been blue-ticked by the government because the sector is so fluid. Defining what sector falls under the informal economy is also problematic and requires regulations. But where do we start regulating and enforcing rules on the taxi industry, or on Tannie Marie selling doilies on Facebook?
And what about those in the illicit market? If the person begging for money at a robot is employed, then does that make the drug dealer sharing the corner employed too?
Giving government a pass
The problem with watering down the definition of employment is that it downplays the government's failures in addressing inequality and job creation.
There are dedicated ministries to labour, employment, and small businesses, and yet the scourge of joblessness continues.
Instead of holding the government accountable, it gives the impression that SA's job market is far better than it actually is. This may help corporates like Fourie sell a good image when trying to secure international deals, but it invalidates and silences the poor in the country that these businesses are built on the back of.
Allowing a corporate bigwig to tweak what employment means is as concerning as sending a billionaire to the White House to present government policy.
Sadly, like when Johann Rupert went to visit Donald Trump last month, that has already happened.
NOW READ: A VIEW OF THE WEEK: Don't give BEE bully Musk your lunch money
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
9 hours ago
- The South African
'No refugees are hungry': Backlash after 'struggling' family report
US intelligence analyst Chris Wyatts has rubbished reports of an Afrikaner 'refugee' family who were allegedly left stranded in a motel without access to a phone, car, or food. The retired army colonel shared his views hours after a TikToker's claims about the family went viral. In recent weeks, two groups of white South Africans have taken up US President Donald Trump's offer of refugee resettlement on the grounds of 'unjust racial discrimination'. The programme is open to all racial minorities who have been 'persecuted' in SA. In a social media post, Chris Wyatt rubbished a TikToker's claims that an Afrikaner 'refugee' family of four had been 'stranded' at a motel in Montana after arriving in the US in recent weeks. The female TikToker – @catmpt – claimed that she had come across the family's woes in a Facebook group for South Africans living in the US. According to the woman, the 'refugees' reportedly did not have food, money, or a cellphone. She said of the family and the group of 'refugees': 'They understood that they would be arriving here for complete assistance. People thought they would be arriving at a house, a job, medical insurance, and other things. It isn't that way at all. She added: 'Because of the political situation, they are really struggling to get jobs'. She added: 'Here, these people, regardless of what they were promised, just came here expecting everything'. Responding to the woman – who has since deleted her TikTok videos – Wyatt said: 'Tell me which refugees are not getting assistance? 'It's ludicrous! They've been here for three weeks. People live in South Africa for 17 years without a job in some cases…you don't know anything. You're repeating nonsense. You're opinions mean nothing.' Wyatt added that many in the first group of 'refugees' now reportedly had social security numbers, and one had a car and a job already. That person arrived at an apartment stocked with food. He added, 'No refugees are going hungry, and no refugees are suffering in motels. Most of them should be in their permanent housing, as per the way the system works.' @colonelchriswyatt Why are people spreading these lies? #southafrica #refugee #program #ramaphosa ♬ original sound – Colonel Chris Wyatt In another video, Chris Wyatt urged South Africans who had applied for the refugee resettlement programme to exercise their patience while awaiting feedback. He also claimed that the programme was still open despite the public's uncertainty about the 'falling out' between US President Donald Trump and South African-born former right-hand man Elon Musk. He said, 'Do you seriously think this happens overnight? Here is some advice for anxious and impatient people: get on with your lives. When the call comes, the call comes. 'It's getting incredibly frustrating. People are being offered the most amazing gift possible under the unbelievable circumstances – where no one gave a c**p and completely ignored your plight – to become quite demanding. He added, 'Honestly, you have very unrealistic expectations about how the world works. 'You had no offer [before]. You're not paying for this. We, the American taxpayers, are paying for this….you're not entitled to this. It's not a right, it's a gift'. @edlin1344 Has the South Africa Refugee Program stopped NO#edlin1344 ♬ original sound – Edlin Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
The real story behind South Africa's unemployment figures
South Africa's unemployment rate has risen to 32.9%. Image: File SOUTH Africa's unemployment rate is a lightning rod for political debate, economic anxiety, and public frustration. In the wake of Capitec CEO Gerrie Fourie's claim that the 'real' unemployment rate is closer to 10%, far below Statistics South Africa's official 32.9%, the national conversation has reignited. Critics of Statistics South Africa (StatsSA) suggest that the official figures are not just technical measures but political artefacts that erase the economic activity of millions in the informal sector. But does this criticism stand up to scrutiny? The answer is more nuanced than the headlines suggest. Capitec CEO, Gerrie Fourie. Image: Supplied Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Why Would Anyone Overstate Unemployment? Let's start with the most provocative claim: that StatsSA and the government have a motive to overstate unemployment. This accusation defies both political logic and institutional practice. High unemployment is a political liability, not an asset. It invites criticism, undermines investor confidence, and puts government performance under the microscope. If there were any incentive, it would be to understate the problem, not exaggerate it. A trend we see in a number of African countries where the official unemployment rates are so low they defy logic and reality. StatsSA is an independent institution that, while not perfect, has a lot of credibility. Its data is scrutinised by economists, international agencies, and the media. Any manipulation or systematic bias would be quickly exposed by these watchdogs. In reality, the agency's credibility depends on its objectivity and adherence to global standards. Does StatsSA Ignore Informal Work? The Evidence Says No A central argument in the current debate is that StatsSA's methodology 'renders millions invisible' by failing to count informal work. This is simply not true. StatsSA's Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS) is designed to capture all forms of work, including informal jobs, self-employment, and unregistered businesses. The QLFS asks about any activity, formal or informal, that brings in income, whether it's selling vetkoek, running a backyard salon, or hustling as a car guard. If you worked for at least an hour in the reference week, you're counted as employed. Both current and former statisticians-general have clarified that informal work is counted, as required by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) standards. Recent Stats SA research confirms that the informal sector employs about 19.5% of the workforce, nearly one in five jobs. This includes street vendors, home-based businesses, and unregistered enterprises, all of which sustain households and fuel local economies. Comparing Apples and Oranges: International Context The arguments supporting Fourie's claims point to countries like India, Brazil, and Zimbabwe, where unemployment rates are low despite massive informality, and suggest South Africa is an outlier. But this comparison ignores key differences: Economic Structure: South Africa's informal sector is smaller than in many developing countries, partly due to regulatory and historical factors. In India, almost any economic activity, no matter how marginal, is counted as employment, even if it's not enough to survive on. Definitions Matter: Some countries use looser criteria for employment, counting sporadic or survivalist activity as work. South Africa's approach is more rigorous, aiming to distinguish between meaningful employment and mere survivalism. Policy Hostility: South Africa's informal sector faces regulatory barriers, policing, and licensing bottlenecks that suppress its growth, unlike in countries where informality is the norm and often the only option. Is the Quarterly Unemployment Report Flawed? StatsSA's quarterly unemployment report is not methodologically flawed. There is also no evidence that it is politically manipulated. The agency publishes detailed methodological notes, welcomes peer review, and its data aligns with other indicators of economic hardship, like sluggish GDP growth, high poverty, and social grant dependency. If millions of informal workers were being missed, we'd see glaring inconsistencies elsewhere, which we do not. The QLFS is transparent about its limitations and is constantly evolving. For instance, the latest data shows that while formal sector employment decreased, informal sector employment actually increased by 17,000 in the first quarter of 2025. This demonstrates that informal work is not only counted but also tracked over time. The Real Issue: Structural Barriers, Not Statistical Tricks The real challenge is not statistical invisibility but structural exclusion. South Africa's informal sector is not as robust as in other developing countries. Regulatory barriers, monopolistic competition, and a lack of support mean that informal work is often precarious and low-paid. The country's economic structure is dominated by large corporations, making it hard for micro-enterprises to thrive. Even where state policy recognises informal activity, it rarely dismantles the barriers that prevent informal traders from scaling up. The shift in informal enterprises toward home-based operations and the stagnation of licensing reveal a sector that is surviving under constant threat, not thriving. Hybrid Measurement: A Welcome Innovation, Not a Silver Bullet Calls to supplement survey data with financial transaction records and digital platform data are valid and should be explored. Capitec's own data on township transactions could offer valuable insights. But these are refinements, not fundamental corrections. The current statistics are not a 'mirage'; they are a sober reflection of a society where too many are locked out of meaningful work, formal or informal. Let's Fix the Economy, Not the Messenger It is true that black South Africans face disproportionately high unemployment rates and that the legacy of apartheid continues to shape economic opportunity. But this is not the result of statistical erasure; it is a reflection of structural realities. StatsSA's data exposes these inequalities; it does not create them. Nco Dube a political economist, businessman, and social commentator. Image: Supplied
The Citizen
14 hours ago
- The Citizen
Google rejects Meta's app store age-verification push
As Europe cracks down on online content for minors, Google argues Meta's solution would create new dangers instead of solving old ones. American tech heavyweight Google on Friday reiterated its opposition to verifying the age of a device's user through the app stores built into operating systems, calling a proposal from Facebook and Instagram parent Meta 'ineffective'. Age restrictions and the European regulatory push Limiting access to age-restricted content online is a live issue in Europe, with France battling pornography sites over its newly-introduced requirement that they check users' ages. Paris is also one of several capitals pressing Brussels to introduce Europe-wide regulations cutting off access to social networks for under-15s over concerns including addiction, cyberbullying and hate speech. Basing age verification on details from a device's app store 'would require the sharing of granular age band data with millions of developers… who don't need it', such as producers of uncontroversial apps like flashlights, Google wrote in a blog post. Risk to children 'We have strong concerns about the risks this 'solution' would pose to children,' it added. The search giant's Play Store is a part of the Android operating system, by far the most widely-used around the globe. Google said that using app store data to verify ages would also leave major ways people access content online unprotected for the underage, such as desktop computers or shared family devices. ALSO READ: Google takes issue with Competition Commission market inquiry report Apple — whose own App Store is loaded on every device running its iOS operating system, such as iPhones and iPads — has also pushed back against Meta's proposal. The back and forth 'The right place to address the dangers of age-restricted content online is the limited set of websites and apps that host that content,' the iPhone maker said in a February document. 'Implementing age verification at the operating system or app store level will help ensure that we create an ecosystem that's safe for teens,' the Facebook owner's safety chief Antigone Davis told Euronews in February. Meta has since launched a campaign for European regulation to require the measure. Europe's Digital Services Act (DSA), which came into force last year, says it is up to platforms like Meta's to verify the age of their users — not providers of operating systems or app stores. Google said that changing to the latter system — which has also been pushed by Pornhub parent company Aylo — would mean 'reengineering the protocols that have defined the decentralized web in ways that are hard to fully predict'. NOW READ: WATCH: Meta Teen accounts launched in SA
