logo
The Naval Academy Thinks Midshipmen Can't Handle the Truth

The Naval Academy Thinks Midshipmen Can't Handle the Truth

New York Times19-04-2025

For the past four years, I have been delivering a series of lectures on the virtues of Stoicism to midshipmen at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., and I was supposed to continue this on April 14 to the entire sophomore class on the theme of wisdom.
Roughly an hour before my talk was to begin, I received a call: Would I refrain from any mention in my remarks of the recent removal of 381 supposedly controversial books from the Nimitz library on campus? My slides had been sent up the chain of command at the school, which was now, as it was explained to me, extremely worried about reprisals if my talk appeared to flout Executive Order 14151 ('Ending Radical and Wasteful Government D.E.I. Programs and Preferencing.')
When I declined, my lecture — as well as a planned speech before the Navy football team, with whom my books on Stoicism are popular was canceled. (The academy 'made a schedule change that aligns with its mission of preparing midshipmen for careers of service,' a Navy spokesperson told Times Opinion. 'The Naval Academy is an apolitical institution.')
Had I been allowed to go ahead, this is the story I was going to tell the class:
In the fall of 1961, a young naval officer named James Stockdale, a graduate of the Naval Academy and future Medal of Honor recipient who went on to be a vice admiral, began a course at Stanford he had eagerly anticipated on Marxist theory. 'We read no criticisms of Marxism,' he recounted later, 'only primary sources. All year we read the works of Marx and Lenin.'
It might seem unusual that the Navy would send Stockdale, then a 36-year-old fighter pilot, to get a master's degree in the social sciences, but he knew why he was there. Writing home to his parents that year, he reminded them of a lesson they had instilled in him, 'You really can't do well competing against something you don't understand as well as something you can.'
At the time, Marxism was not just an abstract academic subject, but the ideological foundation of America's greatest geopolitical enemy. The stakes were high. The Soviets were pushing a vision of global Communism and the conflict in Vietnam was flashing hot, the North Vietnamese fueled by a ruthless mix of dogma and revolutionary zeal. 'Marxism' was, like today, also a culture war boogeyman used by politicians and demagogues.
Just a few short years after completing his studies, in September 1965, Stockdale was shot down over Thanh Hoa in North Vietnam, and as he parachuted into what he knew would be imprisonment and possibly death, his mind turned to the philosophy of Epictetus, which he had been introduced to by a professor at Stanford.
He would spend the next seven years in various states of solitary confinement and enduring brutal torture. His captors, sensing perhaps his knowledge as a pilot of the 'Gulf of Tonkin incident,' a manufactured confrontation with North Vietnamese forces that led to greater U.S. involvement in Vietnam, sought desperately to break him. Stockdale drew on the Stoicism of Epictetus, but he also leveraged his knowledge of the practices and the mind-set of his oppressors.
'In Hanoi, I understood more about Marxist theory than my interrogator did,' Stockdale explained. 'I was able to say to that interrogator, 'That's not what Lenin said; you're a deviationist.'''
In his writings and speeches after his return from the prison known as the Hanoi Hilton, Stockdale often referred to what he called 'extortion environments,' which he used to describe his experience as a captive. He and his fellow P.O.W.s were asked to answer simple questions or perform seemingly innocuous tasks, like appear in videos, and if they declined, there would be consequences.
No one at the Naval Academy intimated any consequences for me, of course, but it felt extortionary all the same. I had to choose between my message or my continued welcome at an institution it has been one of the honors of my life with which to speak at.
As an author, I believe deeply in the power of books. As a bookstore owner in Texas, I have spoken up about book banning many times already. More important was the topic of my address: the virtue of wisdom.
As I explained repeatedly to my hosts, I had no interest in embarrassing anyone or discussing politics directly. I understand the immense pressures they are under, especially the military employees, and I did not want to cause them trouble. I did, however, feel it was essential to make the point that the pursuit of wisdom is impossible without engaging with (and challenging) uncomfortable ideas.
Seneca, the Stoic philosopher, used a military metaphor to make this very argument. We ought to read, he said, 'like a spy in the enemy's camp.' This is what Stockdale was doing when he studied Marxism on the Navy's dime. It is what Seneca was doing when he read and liberally quoted from Epicurus, the head of a rival philosophical school.
The current administration is by no means unique in its desire to suppress ideas it doesn't like or thinks dangerous. As I intended to explain to the midshipmen, there was considerable political pressure in the 1950s over what books were carried in the libraries of federal installations. Asked if he would ban communist books from American embassies, Eisenhower resisted.
'Generally speaking,' he told a reporter from The New York Herald Tribune at a news conference shortly after his inauguration, 'my idea is that censorship and hiding solves nothing.' He explained that he wished more Americans had read Hitler and Stalin in the previous years, because it might have helped anticipate the oncoming threats. He concluded, 'Let's educate ourselves if we are going to run a free government.'
The men and women at the Naval Academy will go on to lead combat missions, to command aircraft carriers, to pilot nuclear-armed submarines and run enormous organizations. We will soon entrust them with incredible responsibilities and power. But we fear they'll be hoodwinked or brainwashed by certain books?
Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' was not one of the books removed from the Naval Academy library, and as heinous as that book is, it should be accessible to scholars and students of history. However, this makes the removal of Maya Angelou's 'I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings' inexplicable. Whatever one thinks of D.E.I., we are not talking about the writings of external enemies here, but in many cases, art, serious scholarship and legitimate criticism of America's past. One of the removed books is about Black soldiers in World War II, another is about how women killed in the Holocaust are portrayed, another is a reimagining of Kafka called 'The Last White Man.' No one at any public institution should have to fear losing their job for pushing back on such an obvious overreach, let alone those tasked with defending our freedom. Yet here we are.
The decision by the academy's leaders to not protest the original order — which I believe flies in the face of basic academic freedoms and common sense — has put them in the now even stickier position of trying to suppress criticism of that decision. 'Compromises pile up when you're in a pressure situation in the hands of a skilled extortionist,' Stockdale reminds us. I felt I could not, in good conscience, lecture these future leaders and warriors on the virtue of courage and doing the right thing, as I did in 2023 and 2024, and fold when asked not to mention such an egregious and fundamentally anti-wisdom course of action.
In many moments, many understandable moments, Stockdale had an opportunity to do the expedient thing as a P.O.W. He could have compromised. He could have obeyed. It would have saved him considerable pain, prevented the injuries that deprived him of full use of his leg for the rest of his life and perhaps even returned him home sooner to his family. He chose not to do that. He rejected the extortionary choice and stood on principle.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Office of the Mayor releases statement on name change to Fort Gordon
Office of the Mayor releases statement on name change to Fort Gordon

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Office of the Mayor releases statement on name change to Fort Gordon

AUGUSTA, Ga. (WJBF) – Augusta Mayor Garnett Johnson released a statement Wednesday afternoon concerning the name change of the military installation, Fort Gordon. Fort Gordon, which was changed to Fort Eisenhower 2023, has now been named for Medal of Honor recipient Master Sgt. Gary I. Gordon after President Donald Trump made an announcement Tuesday. 'While we believe the Fort Eisenhower name was a fitting tribute, given President Dwight D. Eisenhower's deep personal connection to Augusta, at the same time, we are proud to honor the legacy of Fort Gordon's new namesake, Master Sergeant Gary I. Gordon,' Johnson said. 'A true American hero and Medal of Honor recipient, Master Sergeant Gordon's valor and sacrifice during the Battle of Mogadishu represent the highest ideals of service. His name carries great meaning, and we are honored to have his legacy forever tied to our region.' The name change was effective immediately. Mayor Johnson said the base will continue to remain a 'vital part of Augusta's identity and plays an essential role in national defense, cybersecurity, and innovation.' 'We are proud of the enduring partnership between the City of Augusta and the installation,and we will continue to support our military community with unwavering dedication,' he said. 'Together, we look ahead with deep respect for the past, confidence in our shared future, and gratitude for all who serve.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Pics: Navy JAG officer threatens Jan 6 and ICE agents: Report
Pics: Navy JAG officer threatens Jan 6 and ICE agents: Report

American Military News

timean hour ago

  • American Military News

Pics: Navy JAG officer threatens Jan 6 and ICE agents: Report

A U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General (JAG) Officer has been accused of allegedly threatening January 6 and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in a Saturday post on social media. According to The Daily Caller, U.S. Navy JAG Officer Benjamin France allegedly tweeted, 'And we will hunt down every J6 and ICE agent again,' on Saturday. In a Tuesday post on X, formerly Twitter, Sam Shoemate, a retired U.S. Army Chief Warrant Officer 2 and a current intelligence officer, shared a screenshot of France's tweet. 'Meet Benjamin France, aka 'Benny.' Benny made a comment threatening to 'hunt down every J6 and ICE agent' three days ago on X,' Shoemate wrote. 'Why should we care that Benny is threatening federal agents? Because Benny is an active duty Navy JAG Officer.' In addition to sharing the screenshot of France's threat against January 6 and ICE agents, the intelligence officer also shared pictures of France's profile on LinkedIn, which feature a professional headshot of the JAG officer and a photo of France being sworn into the U.S. Navy JAG Corps. Shoemate explained that after France was 'identified and called out' on social media, he 'nuked' his social media account. Sharing screenshots of France's X account, Shoemate tweeted, 'Normally I wouldn't care about comments like this, but since Benny decided to threaten federal agents, I'll post his comments directed @SecDef as an added bonus.' READ MORE: Fmr. Navy second-in-command convicted of bribery One of the screenshots shared by Shoemate includes a set of posts directed against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Defense Department Press Secretary Kingsley Cortes. In one post, France allegedly claimed that both Hegseth and Cortes 'are a joke at the DOD.' 'An 0-4 guardsman should never be in charge of all American forces,' France added. 'An embarrassment to the military and the nation.' In another post, France wrote, 'Can't wait for your ass to eventually be fired when Hegseth eventually drinks himself into a coma. You worthless piece of sh-t.' Shoemate explained that the JAG officer's chain of command was notified regarding the threats France allegedly posted on social media. 'This kind of threatening behavior towards agents, who are already under fire, simply cannot be allowed, especially from an officer whose job is to provide legal advice to his command and holds sway over policy that affects potentially thousands of sailors,' Shoemate tweeted. A U.S. Navy spokesperson confirmed to The Daily Caller that the Navy is aware of the JAG officer's alleged social media posts and that the Navy is currently looking into the situation.

'Deeply Negative Message': Relatives of Fort Gregg-Adams' Namesakes React to Trump Renaming
'Deeply Negative Message': Relatives of Fort Gregg-Adams' Namesakes React to Trump Renaming

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Deeply Negative Message': Relatives of Fort Gregg-Adams' Namesakes React to Trump Renaming

Relatives of the late Lt. Gen. Arthur Gregg and Lt. Col. Charity Adams-Earley anticipated it, but when President Donald Trump announced their parents' names would be stripped from the Virginia base, they were still surprised. Trump, in front of a crowd of Army soldiers Tuesday at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, said "for a little breaking news" that his administration would be removing the name Fort Gregg-Adams, which was bestowed on the base in 2023, and returning it to Fort Lee, originally named in honor of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, who commanded troops of the slave-holding South during the Civil War. In a follow-up statement from the Army, it became clear that the base would not be explicitly named for the leader of the Confederate troops but instead for Pvt. Fitz Lee, a Buffalo soldier awarded the Medal of Honor for bravery in combat during the Spanish-American War. Read Next: Bragg Soldiers Who Cheered Trump's Political Attacks While in Uniform Were Checked for Allegiance, Appearance In all, the Trump administration is restoring the names of nine Army bases that shed Confederate namesakes in 2023 following an independent commission review directed by Congress. In each case, the administration found service members to use as namesakes who shared the names of the Confederate Civil War-era figures that were removed. The latest renaming was designed to sidestep the law passed by Congress ordering the removal of names honoring Confederates who fought to secede from the U.S. However, in Trump's speech at Fort Bragg, he specifically mentioned "Robert E. Lee." It was seen as a slight to the descendants of Gregg and Adams-Earley. Stanley Earley, the son of the soldier who served as the highest-ranking Black female officer in World War II, told that while he wasn't shocked at the change, he was "surprised" as well as "disappointed and upset" by the sudden announcement. "The naming of Fort Gregg-Adams sent a powerful positive message to the future," Earley told in an interview Wednesday. "Undoing it sends an even stronger, deeply negative message." Just two years ago, Fort Lee was renamed for Gregg -- the first Black brigadier general in the U.S. Army Quartermaster Corps and the first Black lieutenant general in the Army -- as well as Adams-Earley, who was the first Black officer in what would later become the Women's Army Corps prior to her death in 2002. It was a particularly powerful moment for Alicia Collier, Gregg's daughter. He was one of the first service members in recent history to have a base named after him while he was still alive. He died in August at the age of 96. "It's very disheartening," Collier told on Wednesday. "My father worked his entire life trying to move the Army and, as a result, the nation forward, and now we're watching it slip backwards." Collier and Earley both first spoke to in February, expressing worries that their parents' names could be removed from the Virginia base under Trump's Department of Defense. Both previously praised the intensive review process of the Naming Commission, which was created by Congress to make recommendations on base names and ultimately landed on their parents' histories to honor. Notably, neither said anything negative regarding Pvt. Lee, whose name will now adorn the Virginia base. The Spanish-American War hero was born just 25 miles away from the base in Dinwiddie County, Virginia, according to the Congressional Medal of Honor Society's database. "During a coastal assault in Cuba, Lee voluntarily disembarked under direct enemy fire to rescue wounded comrades from the battlefield," the Army's statement said. Ultimately, it's the legal technicalities that are concerning to the relatives of Gregg and Adams, as well as Trump's own admission during the speech that it was to honor "Robert E. Lee." "I think that the intent is that we're still honoring the original Robert E. Lee," Collier said. "It's a very interesting way to work around." Neither Collier nor Earley said they had been contacted by government or military officials prior to Tuesday's announcement by Trump. Earley said he was caught off guard, in part, because in late April, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson honored the 6888th Central Postal Directory Battalion, known as the Six Triple Eight commanded by Adams, with a Congressional Gold Medal. Johnson praised "the incomparable Lt. Col. Charity Adams-Earley who guided her unit" and commended her "unshakable grace and resolve," according to a copy of his remarks. In a few weeks, Earley was surprised that sentiment seemed to change. "They just had the Congressional Gold Medal session for the Six Triple Eight, and there were so many positive statements about the unit and my mother and what they did," Earley said. "It's a little bit surprising." The renaming of the bases is just the latest in a wide range of Trump administration actions removing historical ties. Earlier this month, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the Navy to rename a ship that honored Harvey Milk, a gay rights icon, and other ship names are reportedly under review. Given the cultural shift by the administration, both of the descendants said it's not clear what the next steps forward would be. "There isn't really any recourse that's likely to be successful, so I guess we'll just have to move forward and hope that maybe, at the very least the original decision to rename, and that Charity Adams' and Arthur Gregg's names, will still be a part of our history and that we won't erase it," Collier said. Related: Their Relatives Were Black Heroes. They Fear the Military Won't Celebrate Their Stories Anymore.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store