UK ministers urged to do more to protect new drivers in road safety overhaul
Ministers are considering cutting the drink-drive limit in England and Wales and introducing mandatory eye tests for older drivers, the Times reported on Monday. The proposals also reportedly include tougher penalties for uninsured driving and failing to wear a seatbelt – but not measures to stop inexperienced drivers being responsible for the safety of groups of their friends.
On Great Britain's roads last year, 1,633 people were killed and almost 28,000 seriously injured in traffic incidents; and numbers have remained relatively constant after a large drop between 2000 and 2010.
'The time has come for a bold and proactive approach to road safety. This strategy is much overdue as road deaths have plateaued over the last decade,' said the AA's president Edmund King.
'We believe these new measures will not only modernise our approach to saving lives but also provide renewed momentum in making our roads safer for everyone.'
Vision checks for older drivers and targeting drink and drug drivers are 'practical steps that can make a real difference', he said. But failing to introduce limits on new drivers transporting peer-age passengers for six months was 'a major oversight', he added.
Nicholas Lyes, the director of policy and standards at the road safety charity IAM RoadSmart, said: 'Given progress on reducing fatal and serious collisions has stalled in recent years, we welcome the UK government's ambition to publish an updated road safety strategy with the reported measures being a step in the right direction.
'While many drivers over the age of 70 are safe and competent, health issues and confidence can have an impact on driving abilities, so it is sensible to review whether changes need to be made.
'We would also support reducing the drink-drive limit in England and Wales, alongside measures to target drug-driving. However, these would require significantly more backing for roads policing teams to effectively enforce new laws.'
A Labour source said: 'At the end of the last Labour government, the number of people killed and seriously injured on our roads was at a record low, but numbers have remained stubbornly high under successive Conservative governments.
'In no other circumstance would we accept 1,600 people dying, with thousands more seriously injured, costing the NHS more than £2bn per year.'
Meanwhile, the number of people killed in drink-driving incidents has increased over the past decade, reaching a 13-year high in 2022 and prompting concern that existing road safety measures are no longer working.
Under the plans being considered by the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, the drink-drive limit in England and Wales could be brought in line with Scotland and the rest of Europe with a cut from 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100ml of breath to 22 micrograms.
The UK is one of only three European countries to rely on self-reporting of eyesight problems that affect driving, leading ministers to consider compulsory eye tests every three years for drivers aged older than 70, and a driving ban for those who fail.
Other proposals are reported to include allowing the police to bring prosecutions for drug-driving on the basis of roadside saliva tests, rather than blood tests, as increasing numbers of drivers are being caught with drugs in their system.
The Labour source added the government would 'deliver the first road safety strategy in a decade, imposing tougher penalties on those breaking the law, protecting road users and restoring order to our roads'.
The strategy is due to be published in the autumn, and all proposals will be subject to consultation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Motorist, 71, wins bizarre FIVE-year legal battle with major parking firm – over £1 ticket he had already paid
A 71-YEAR-OLD motorist has emerged victorious from a bizarre five-year legal battle over a £1 parking ticket. Nigel Richardson took on Euro Car Parks in court after the firm pursued him over the £1 debt for nearly half a decade. 6 6 The semi-retired former business owner has since claimed victory in the David and Goliath battle after taking on a barrister while representing himself at Leicester County Court on July 11. Nigel parked his VW Golf in Syston, Leicestershire back in 2020 but had no change on him and the card payment machines weren't working. He paid for his parking using a mobile phone but then received no notification telling him the payment had been successful. Mr Richardson wrote to the firm to explain what had happened and that he might owe them a quid, they responded by slapping him with a £100 fine. Later, Nigel found the receipt for his payment and thought that would be the end of the matter. Over the next four years however he was hounded by debt collection companies, receiving letters threatening him with court action. The fine more than doubled to £230 as well with Nigel refusing to back down. At court Mr Richardson took on a barrister himself and was awarded £200 in compensation by a judge who agreed he had been unfairly fined. Nigel then had to pay court costs of £180 leaving him just £20 better off after the five-year dispute. Nigel of Rearsby, Leicestershire, said: "A win is a win. Driver gets instant karma after lobbing £50 parking ticket on the floor "The simple thing would have been to just pay the fine but I knew I had nothing wrong. "I made every effort to buy a ticket but their machines weren't accepting card payments and I wasn't going to be bullied into paying the fine. " When I used the app I had notification the money had come out. I even tried to call a number to do it over the phone but that didn't work either. "I went to the shop to try and get change but they were closed early on a Wednesday, so I didn't know what more I could do. 6 6 "I know what these companies can be like so I even contacted them to explain what happened and to see if I could pay the £1 if the app hadn't worked. "But the next thing I know a fine comes through and then you have to start an appeals process. "But then I found the receipt for the £1 which had gone to my junk folder - so I thought great, here's the proof there's no debt to pay. "But even when I pointed that out, they said I hadn't raised this at the appeal stage, so they kept on. "Various debt collection companies and solicitors started sending threatening letters warning about county court proceedings. "When I wrote to DCB Legal, who were pursuing the debt, I told them I'd got the receipt now and they said it was up to Euro Car Parks to drop it. "I wrote to Euro Car Parks and they told me it was up to DCB. "DCB said they would see me in court, so I said, 'bring it on' and I launched a counterclaim. "I had the bit between my teeth by then and there was no way I was going to give up." Nigel later revealed that the firm said they would drop the case if he agreed to pay £60 and sign a confidentiality agreement. 6 6 When confronted with the offer Mr Richardson said no to the parking company. He said: "I said no and I knew at this point they were starting to back down as the next thing I know they were talking about dropping the entire case. "But after four years and a lot of my time, I thought I was entitled to some compensation so we ended up in court. "They offered me £130 but I decided to go to court instead as I had spent many hours writing letters. "I looked up what a junior barrister charges and its like £100 an hour so I decided to claim for £2,480 which I think was very reasonable as I'd spent about 100 hours representing myself. "In court the judge asked the Euro Car Parks barrister why I was being pursued for a debt I didn't owe and he said he 'hadn't been instructed about that'. "He was fumbling through his documents and looking at his phone for an answer but that was all he could say. "In the end the compensation was settled at £200 but after paying £180 costs I only ended up with £20." about the principle."
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos counter-sue Spurs over deal linked to Harry Kane transfer
Ineos is counter-suing Tottenham Hotspur for more than £1m after accusing them of holding sponsorship talks with Audi linked to the sale of Harry Kane to Bayern Munich. As revealed by Telegraph Sport, Spurs are suing Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Ineos Automotive Limited for more than £11m over allegations it breached a five-year, minimum £17.5m deal signed in 2022 for the club to promote the firm's Grenadier as their 'official 4x4 vehicle partner'. The contract was terminated on March 11 by Tottenham, who launched legal action in June claiming Ineos failed to pay a £5m-plus annual instalment due on Dec 1, having earlier not paid an inflation-related figure of almost £500,000. According to the 'particulars of claim' submitted by Spurs, the club are also seeking a minimum of £5,275,974 in damages after the deal was ended with more than two years left to run. In a defence and counter-claim submitted to the High Court last week, Ineos said: 'The particulars of claim make no mention of a highly significant series of events by which the club, unbeknown to Ineos, started negotiating with a major competitor to Ineos with the intention of granting rights to that competitor which were exclusive to Ineos under the agreement.' It added: 'On or around 3 August 2023 (i.e. early in contract year two), Todd Kline of the club ('Mr Kline') indicated to Ashley Reed of Ineos ('Mr Reed') that the club had been in discussions with the German car manufacturer Audi AG ('Audi') in connection with rights which were the same as, or substantially similar to, the rights granted to Ineos under the agreement and/or the club had been negotiating with Audi in respect of rights which were exclusive to Ineos under clause 4 of the agreement. According to Mr Kline, the discussions and/or negotiations related to a proposed transfer of the club's player Harry Kane ('Mr Kane') to the German club FC Bayern Munich ('Bayern Munich').' Ineos' defence went to state that this commercial partnership had 'not materialised' but also said 'this sequence of events ultimately resulted in the parties agreeing that Ineos could terminate the agreement with effect from the end of year three of the contract term'. It added: 'In the circumstances, it is the club which owes Ineos more than £1 million for failing to provide any rights to Ineos in the final part of year three.' Contract row Tottenham's particulars of claim laid out details of a contract the club said involved annual payments starting at £2.125m in year one and increasing to £4.6 million in year five, all plus VAT and index-linked to the rate of inflation. Spurs said they were also claiming interest and 'further or other relief as the court thinks fit'. The club declined to comment on their lawsuit. An Ineos spokesperson said: 'Ineos Automotive was a partner of Tottenham Hotspur from 2022, expanding on a partnership agreement that Ineos Group had in place with the club since 2020. 'We had a contractual right to terminate our partnership contract and in December 2024 exercised that right.' When news of the legal action first emerged in December, Ratcliffe's firm told Telegraph Sport: 'Like any business, we have to be diligent in how we operate and where we invest marketing budgets. It's completely normal for partnerships to be reviewed on a regular basis, and we've decided that the partnership wasn't working out for us. We have the right to terminate the partnership.' Spurs' claim was lodged less than a month after they beat Ratcliffe's United in the Europa League final to secure a place in the Champions League. Cutting ties Tottenham and Ineos had been in partnership since the petrochemicals company was named as the club's 'official hand-sanitiser supplier' during the coronavirus crisis. Ineos, however, has been cutting ties with a number of leading sports organisations in recent months, notably Sir Ben Ainslie's sailing team and the All Blacks rugby union team. Telegraph Sport revealed in February that New Zealand Rugby was also taking legal action against Ineos for an alleged breach of contract after a six-year deal to 2027 ended early, although an agreement was subsequently reached. Ineos has said that it is being forced into cost-cutting by Europe's 'extreme' green carbon taxes and has issued warnings over what it called the 'deindustrialisation' of the continent. Ratcliffe also blamed energy prices and carbon taxes earlier this year for forcing the closure of Ineos's synthetic ethanol plant at Grangemouth in Scotland, resulting in the loss of 80 direct roles and an estimated 500 indirect jobs. Significant financial measures have already been introduced at United since Ratcliffe bought a 27.7 per cent minority stake in December 2023, including increased ticket prices and the loss of hundreds of staff. Upon the announcement of the Grenadier deal in 2022, Spurs had said: 'Our partnership with Ineos Grenadier represents the coming together of an innovative British brand with an iconic London football club – both of whom are committed to pushing boundaries and daring to do things differently, while staying true to authentic values and traditions.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
This European country is about to test 93mph speed limits on motorways
Drivers in one European country will soon be able to legally travel at speeds of up to 93mph on a section of motorway as part of a new trial. It will be used as an assessment to see if the higher limit can cut journey times on a 31-mile (50km) stretch without impacting road safety. Due to arrive within weeks, it will be the first time that a European Union nation has implemented a 150kmh speed limit on motorways in a move that has triggered plenty of excitement, especially among petrol heads. But it has also raised a few eyebrows, given neighbouring countries have recently lowered their speed limits on pollution grounds. The D3 section of motorway from Prague towards the Linz corridor in Austria will test a 150kmh variable speed limit. Motorists can only legally drive faster in Europe on the derestricted sections of Germany's Autobahn. This will only be in place during optimal conditions, with 42 digital speed sign gantries - like the ones Britons see on 'smart' motorways - allowing for the limit to be reduced back to 130kmh (81mph) during bad weather. The variable speed limit on the D3 is a pilot scheme that was due to be put in place from the end of the summer holidays towards the close of September. However, the higher 150kmh limit is now expected to be implemented from the beginning of October on the section between Planá nad Lužnicí (Tábor) and České Budějovice due to delays installing the electronic overhead signage. 'There were issues with the procurement procedure – the submission deadline had to be extended due to numerous enquiries,' Radek Mátl, head of the Czech Road and Motorway Directorate (ŘSD), told news channel ČT24 in an interview in July. The installation will reportedly cost 55million Czech Koruna, which is around £2million. The 50km stretch has been chosen because it is relatively new and has few curves. But the 150kmh limit won't be in place all the time. In fact, the existing maximum 130kmh will continue to be the default. Only when conditions are favourable will operators up the limit to 150, which will be during clear conditions when roads are dry, congestion levels are low and there are no roadworks taking place. 'The conditions must be absolutely ideal,' said Jan Rýdl, a spokesperson for the ŘSD. 'There must be no queues, no slippery surfaces, and no reduced visibility.' The system will be controlled from the National Traffic Information Centre. Czech ministers have said the pilot will be used to gather real-world evidence regarding the increase. Transport chief Martin Kupka says the trial will help gauge public reaction and, most crucially of all, test if incident volumes increase. If the pilot is a success, the Czech Republic would consider extending variable 150kmh limits, with the ŘSD already identifying other motorway sections where it could be implemented, such as the D1 between Přerov and Ostrava or on the D11 near Hradec Králové. However, the ŘSD intends first to analyse the results of the test phase on the D3 and said it will revert to the current 130kmh limit if crash statistics rise. The move has come about following amendments to the law passed in 2023. The last time the speed limit on Czech motorways was raised was 28 years ago when it was upped from 120kmh (75mph) in 1997. Most drivers in the Czech Republic have backed the increase in the maximum speed limit on this section. However, road safety experts have warned that they could be problematic for inexperienced and untrained drivers. The move is also a major contrast to other countries where motorway limits have been slashed rather than increased. In neighbouring Austria, the Government trialled 140kmh (87mph) limits on a motorway between Vienna and Salzburg between 2018 to 2020. However, it was scrapped after roadside measurements suggested there had been a significant increase in CO2 emissions as a result. In the Netherlands, ministers lowered the maximum speed to 100kmh (62mph) during the day in 2020 for similar environmental reasons. But, in April this year, Dutch transport authorities partially reversed this move to allow some stretches to reinstate the previous 130kmh limit during daylight hours. Earlier this month, German police revealed that a speeding driver had been caught travelling on the Autobahn at a staggering 200mph - more than 124mph over the limit . The motorist, whose identity has not been made public, was hauled over during a routine check on the A2 highway near Burg, west of Berlin, on 28 July. Police in Magdeburg said the driver was hit with a €900 (£784) fine, handed a three-month driving ban, and had two points taken off their licence. The car was identified travelling at a 'highest record speed' by a stationary radar system known as an Enforcement Trailer. A display on the device showed what police called 'the highest record speed'.
