
Trump Environmental Protection Agency moves to repeal finding that allows climate regulation
greenhouse gas emissions
and fight climate change.
The proposed
Environmental Protection Agency
rule rescinds a 2009 declaration that determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Technology
others
Project Management
Finance
Degree
Data Science
Management
Public Policy
Artificial Intelligence
Others
Cybersecurity
MCA
CXO
healthcare
Data Science
Healthcare
MBA
Operations Management
Product Management
Leadership
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
12 Weeks
MIT xPRO
CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
The "endangerment finding" is the legal underpinning of a host of climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants and other pollution sources that are heating the planet.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the proposed rule change on a podcast ahead of an official announcement set for Tuesday in Indiana.
Repealing the endangerment finding "will be the largest deregulatory action in the history of America," Zeldin said on the Ruthless podcast.
Live Events
Zeldin called for a rewrite of the endangerment finding in March as part of a series of environmental rollbacks announced at the same time in what Zeldin said was "the greatest day of deregulation in American history.'' A total of 31 key environmental rules on topics from clean air to clean water and climate change would be rolled back or repealed under Zeldin's plan.
He singled out the endangerment finding as "the Holy Grail of the climate change religion" and said he was thrilled to end it "as the EPA does its part to usher in the Golden Age of American success.''
Tailpipe emission limits also targeted The EPA also called for rescinding limits on tailpipe emissions that were designed to encourage automakers to build and sell more electric vehicles. The transportation sector is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States.
Three former EPA leaders have criticized Zeldin, saying his March proposal would endanger the lives of millions of Americans and abandon the agency's dual mission to protect the environment and human health.
"If there's an endangerment finding to be found anywhere, it should be found on this administration because what they're doing is so contrary to what the Environmental Protection Agency is about," Christine Todd Whitman, who led EPA under Republican President George W. Bush, said after Zeldin's plan was made public.
The EPA proposal follows an executive order from Trump that directed the agency to submit a report "on the legality and continuing applicability" of the endangerment finding.
Conservatives and some congressional Republicans hailed the initial plan, calling it a way to undo economically damaging rules to regulate greenhouse gases.
But environmental groups, legal experts and Democrats said any attempt to repeal or roll back the endangerment finding would be an uphill task with slim chance of success. The finding came two years after a 2007 Supreme Court ruling holding that the EPA has authority to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act.
Passing court muster could be an issue David Doniger, a climate expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, said it was virtually "impossible to think that the EPA could develop a contradictory finding (to the 2009 standard) that would stand up in court."
Doniger and other critics accused Trump's Republican administration of using potential repeal of the endangerment finding as a "kill shot'' that would allow him to make all climate regulations invalid. If finalized, repeal of the endangerment finding would erase current limits on greenhouse gas pollution from cars, factories, power plants and other sources and could prevent future administrations from proposing rules to tackle climate change.
"The Endangerment Finding is the legal foundation that underpins vital protections for millions of people from the severe threats of climate change, and the Clean Car and Truck Standards are among the most important and effective protections to address the largest U.S. source of climate-causing pollution,'' said Peter Zalzal, associate vice president of the Environmental Defense Fund.
"Attacking these safeguards is manifestly inconsistent with EPA's responsibility to protect Americans' health and well-being,'' he said. "It is callous, dangerous and a breach of our government's responsibility to protect the American people from this devastating pollution."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
25 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump frustrated with India trade talks, sees 25% tariff as remedy: White House aide
US President Donald Trump is 'frustrated' with the progress of trade deal talks with India and believes that imposing a 25 per cent tariff will 'remedy' the situation. The tariff on Indian goods is set to take effect on August 1, after Washington and New Delhi failed to finalise an interim trade agreement before Trump's self-imposed August 1 deadline.'Well, India has had a market that's been pretty much closed to American products, and we've been wide open to theirs. And I think President Trump is frustrated with the progress we've made with India, but feels that a 25 per cent tariff will address and remedy the situation in a way that's good for the American people,' said White House economic adviser Kevin also announced an additional penalty, criticising India for its continued purchases of oil and military equipment from Russia. In a post on Truth Social, he wrote: 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country. Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD! INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25%, PLUS A PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE, STARTING ON AUGUST FIRST. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. MAGA!'The decision comes after the failure to reach an interim trade deal, with Trump reportedly dissatisfied with the outcomes secured by his negotiators. 'What's going to happen is that India is going to cut their prices to the US in order to maintain their market share,' Hassett added. 'Then they might reconsider their practices, which have led to this higher rate. And over time, I would guess the Indian firms will be onshoring production in the US, and Indians might even open their markets more to us, so that we reconsider a future trade deal.'INDIA'S RESPONSE TO TRUMP'S 25% TARIFFIn response, India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry stated that it is assessing the impact of the US move, but emphasised that national interest remains paramount. "The Government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs. The Government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements, including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK,' the ministry reiterated its commitment to working toward a 'reciprocally advantageous trade agreement,' but with Trump escalating pressure tactics, the path forward remains uncertain.- Ends


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Won't let anyone attack the dollar': Trump says US in talks with India after 25% tariff bombshell
US President Donald Trump said that the United States is negotiating with India after announcing a sweeping 25% tariff on Indian imports starting August 1. Speaking to reporters, Trump said India has 'one of the highest tariffs in the world,' but signalled that New Delhi may be willing to 'substantially reduce tariffs' as talks continue. Show more Show less


Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Kamala Harris announces she will not run for California governor in 2026
Former US vice president Kamala Harris ruled out running for governor of California on Wednesday, in a statement that offered little explanation for her decision but warned that the nation was in "a moment of crisis." Kamala Harris represented the Golden State in the Senate and has served as its attorney general.(File/AFP) The Democrat -- defeated last year by Donald Trump in a tumultuous presidential election -- had been mulling a run for the governorship of her home state in 2026, with Democratic incumbent Gavin Newsom stepping down. She had set an end-of-summer deadline for announcing her plans after leaving Washington in January. "I love this state, its people, and its promise. It is my home. But after deep reflection, I've decided that I will not run for governor in this election," Harris said in a statement. Harris, 60, would have been the favorite had she thrown her hat in the ring -- she was the state's top choice, according to polling earlier in July from the University of California, Irvine -- yet she offered no explanation for her decision. Her retreat from the gubernatorial contest means she could in theory decide to try again for the White House in 2028. The political world had been in suspense about the former vice president's plans since her loss to Trump, when she came into the race late to replace an ailing president Joe Biden atop the Democratic ticket. While she was out of the limelight, Harris had been reaching out to longtime supporters and donors to gauge enthusiasm for her candidacy to run the country's most populous state, and one of the world's largest economies. She represented the Golden State in the Senate and has served as its attorney general, and was seen as having the advantage of wide name recognition that would help with setting up a deep campaign war chest. Harris said the country was in a "moment of crisis" caused by politics, government and US institutions failing the American people. She called for "fresh thinking -- committed to our same values and principles, but not bound by the same playbook." "I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly, and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans," she added. The election for the next California governor takes place on November 3 next year. Republican businessman Rick Caruso came a distant second to Harris in the UC Irvine poll -- but 40 percent of respondents said they were not yet sure who they wanted to replace Newsom. The sitting governor cannot run again and is seen as a leading potential Democratic candidate for the next presidential election.