logo
Albanese prepares to walk into 94-seat majority after Labor's landslide win as Parliament resumes

Albanese prepares to walk into 94-seat majority after Labor's landslide win as Parliament resumes

West Australian5 days ago
Anthony Albanese has called for discipline from his team as Parliament returns, promising to deliver on election commitments that will 'make a real, practical difference to people's lives.'
The Prime Minister urged his expanded party room to stay focused for the next three-year term so it can go on to repeat the 94-seat majority they gained in Labor's thumping victory at the May election.
He and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley sought to enliven their colleagues and strike a fresh tone in meetings in Canberra on Monday ahead of the first sitting of the 48th Parliament.
While Mr Albanese was focused on his majority, Ms Ley's party room pep talk needed extra energy following opinion polls that showed the Coalition fell further than their diabolical election primary under her predecessor Peter Dutton.
Privately, Liberals were downbeat about the 29 per cent primary in the polls, although Ms Ley's backers said her 'likeability' rating, higher than the PM's in the Resolve survey, gave her something to work with in winning over voters.
In a morale booster to a disenfranchised party room, the new Opposition Leader declared the Coalition wouldn't be walked over or deterred in the face of Labor's super-sized majority against their historical low of 43 seats.
Ms Ley vowed in her first address she would support 'constructive policies' but warned Labor her team would fight 'every step of the way' against them if they weren't in the national interest.
'We won't be judged by the headlines of the day, what we will be judged by is what we offer the Australian people at the next election, and Australians deserve the strongest possible opposition,' she said.
'Mr Albanese is giving interviews and he's suggesting that we should just get out of the way. Well, we won't be getting out of the way.
'It's going to be a big week, it's going to be a big fortnight, and we're taking the fight up to the government every single day, right across this country, every minute.'
Despite the Canberra winter chill, Mr Albanese had a spring in his step as he walked to work yesterday from the nearby Lodge, accompanied by his son Nathan.
The show of humility will contrast with his dominance of parliament that will become starkly clear when a wave of red takes over more than half the House of Representative seats on Tuesday.
He lauded the hard work of each individual to get there but cautioned that everyone needed to continue to pull together.
'If we maintain that sense of discipline, sense of purpose, clear idea about why we are here — to represent people in our electorate, but also represent the national interest in promoting the Labor values of fairness, of aspiration and opportunity for all — there is no reason why every single one of you can't just be returned to the next Parliament but can't be added to as well,' he said.
Mr Albanese said his government was determined to implement a 'positive agenda'.
'Part of that is standing up for Australia's national interests, progressive patriotism,' he said.
Although Ms Ley has a less unwieldy party room in terms of size, she has a tougher job than the Prime Minister to keep the Coalition from fracturing.
Nationals veteran Barnaby Joyce told breakfast television the Opposition should be looking for 'binary issues' to pick fights over — including the net-zero emissions commitment.
'If you try and work on nuances and ameliorations and sort of views of a different issue, that's not good,' he told Sunrise.
'And that's why such issues such as net zero, I say, look, find a point of division.'
Labor's agenda will be bigger than publicly flagged when official business kicks off on Wednesday after formalities on Tuesday, with ministers putting forward 14 bills for approval in caucus.
Top of the agenda will be a 20 per cent cut to student debt, tougher action against childcare providers, and laws to protect penalty rates.
Mr Albanese promised the cut to university and vocational debts in his first pre-election headland speech in November and the policy was popular among younger voters.
The Coalition is yet to decide its position but several shadow ministers believe given the clear mandate — and conscious of the need to win back younger people — it should wave the bill through.
Finance Minister Katy Gallagher said there was a 'sense of urgency' to passing the childcare reforms after shocking allegations of abuse across centres in Melbourne, but admitted with a short parliamentary timeline it would be a challenge.
'The Prime Minister has made clear he would like legislation through this fortnight, and that will be one of my jobs to try to do that,' she told ABC.
'We only have two (full) sitting days — not many. On Wednesday and Thursday, and not much of that is Government business time.'
There's also a raft of first speeches, with the planned timetable pushing through 19 of the 32 new lower house members this week and the rest next week, taking up at least 16 hours of debating time. The Senate has 10 first speeches to get through, mostly scheduled for next week.
Other legislation on the agenda includes rule changes for Defence Housing to allow the agency to help house American submariners based in WA during the roll out of AUKUS, a bid to make ASIO's compulsory questioning powers permanent instead of sunsetting in early September, changes to the new aged care system before its delayed start in November, and the easing of tariffs on UAE products to implement the free trade deal struck earlier this year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australian farmers desperate for answers over unrealised capital gains tax as Jim Chalmers works to overhaul super
Australian farmers desperate for answers over unrealised capital gains tax as Jim Chalmers works to overhaul super

7NEWS

time37 minutes ago

  • 7NEWS

Australian farmers desperate for answers over unrealised capital gains tax as Jim Chalmers works to overhaul super

Should you be required to pay tax on money that you haven't earned yet? That's the question being asked around a new tax brought in as part of the federal government's changes to superannuation. Treasurer Jim Chalmers is looking to overhaul the way super is taxed, changing concessions for super balances over $3 million. But the sticking point for farmers and farming families is the new tax on unrealised capital gains. This new tax will mean if an asset held in super goes up in value, the account holder will be required to pay tax on that increase. With the threshold for this change set at $3 million, it is being sold as a 'rich people tax' but that doesn't show the whole picture. Jack Neilson, a cattle farmer from western Queensland, said the new tax was going to hurt hard-working Australians — 'especially in agriculture'. 'Jim Chalmers needs to realise he's not just catching the yacht-owning yuppies with this $3 million rich people tax that they are trying to sell it as,' Neilson said. Neilson pointed to the difficulties in getting young people into agriculture, calling it a 'minefield'. 'What a lot of farming families do is that, mum and dad, the operators put the actual property into a self-managed super fund,' he said. 'That way it is then leased to the next generation so that the next generation gets going and starts their farming careers, essentially, and mum and dad still make, a little bit of an income.' Nationals Leader David Littleproud told farmers were doing what they could to keep their property in their family. 'Farmers' properties are their superannuation,' he said. 'And that's why when self-managed super funds came in, many farming families put their properties into these self-managed super funds, because that was a way — a vehicle — for them to be able to bring the next generation through.' The unpredictable nature of income as a farmer has raised questions about the practicality of paying tax on unrealised gains as an increase in the value of the land doesn't directly point to an increase in income for a farmer. Katie Nash, a farmer and rural advocate, has also questioned the policy. 'If the land value goes up but the income stays the same, how are they supposed to pay the tax without selling the farm?' she said. 'How are they supposed to survive that?' However not everyone is sympathetic to the situation. Graeme Samuel AC, a professor at Monash University's Business School in Melbourne, said putting property into super wasn't about inheritance — but tax avoidance. 'For those that are caught with unrealised gains, what I'd say is question number one: how did you get into this position in the first place? Why did you put these assets into a super fund? And be honest about it, don't give us the myth that it's all about providing for the next generation, because that's what family discretionary trusts are designed to do,' he said. The National Farmers' Federation estimates around 3,500 farmers will be directly impacted by the new tax. And they maintain that where income is made, tax should be paid. But when the gains are unrealised, they argue the tax just doesn't seem fair or justified. President of the National Farmers Federation David Jochinke said the law was going to force families to sell up. 'It just baffles me why we're even talking about something where we haven't got either the capacity to pay, or it's going to force family farms to have to sell an asset that not only the parents require for their retirement,' he said. 'It also takes away from that family farming unit, which we all know needs to stick together — especially in tough times — to survive.' Jochinke wants the government to reconsider the legislation. 'The principle of having to pay a tax on an uncystallised asset is completely wrong and what we consider un-Australian,' he said. 'Let's actually have a talk about how we can manage superannuation when the assets crystallise, when farmers have got the cash to pay. And that's what we're just calling for. Let's make this a common sense piece of legislation, not a ridiculous one.' Sarah Tulloch, a farmer from NSW who has seen first-hand the impact of the pressures farmers, said she was worried about adding another pressure on the industry. 'They will lose a lot more than just their properties. There's farmers committing suicide daily just with what they've got going on at the moment with droughts and floods,' she said. 'To add this extra pressure, for people who are already doing it tough ... yeah, it's just not going to have good consequences.' Treasurer Jim Chalmers has repeatedly said he is committed to an overhaul on super taxation, saying it will make a meaningful difference in funding other priorities. reached out to the federal government in response to the concerns from farmers and farming families. 'We listen respectfully to the NFF and farmers but this is a modest change, introduced in a methodical way, that won't affect the vast majority of Australians,' a spokesperson said. 'Our changes only apply to about half a per cent of people with more than $3 million in super, who will still get generous tax concessions, just slightly less generous ones. The changes are all about making our superannuation system fairer and more sustainable.'

‘Ridiculous': Hong Kong places bounty on Australian professor
‘Ridiculous': Hong Kong places bounty on Australian professor

Sydney Morning Herald

time40 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

‘Ridiculous': Hong Kong places bounty on Australian professor

An Australian pro-democracy academic has labelled a warrant for his arrest by Hong Kong's national security police as 'ridiculous', as authorities there pursue 19 overseas-based members of what they describe as a subversive organisation. University of Technology Sydney China studies professor Dr Feng Chongyi – who in 2017 was detained for 10 days while on a research trip to China – now has a bounty on him over his involvement in an unofficial pro-democracy group, Hong Kong Parliament. He is accused of helping to organise or participate in the largely Canada-based group, which authorities in Hong Kong say aimed to subvert state power under a national security law that China imposed on the territory in 2020, following months of pro-democracy protests the year before. Feng and the others are accused of having launched a referendum or run as candidates in the unofficial 'Hong Kong Parliament' group, which authorities say aims at achieving self-determination and drafting a 'Hong Kong constitution'. Hong Kong police said the organisation sought to overthrow the governments of China and Hong Kong by unlawful means, that they were still investigating, and further arrests could follow. Loading Regarding its 'election' process, the Hong Kong Parliament group has said on social media that it drew about 15,700 valid votes through mobile app and online voting systems. It said the candidates and elected members came from around the world including Taiwan, Thailand, Australia, the US, Canada and the UK. Feng isn't from Hong Kong, but said he had agreed to join the group as an academic. 'It's certainly ridiculous, it does not offend me in any sense … they've got the power, they've got the influence overseas, they want to control everything even overseas,' Feng told this masthead on Saturday.

‘Ridiculous': Hong Kong places bounty on Australian professor
‘Ridiculous': Hong Kong places bounty on Australian professor

The Age

time40 minutes ago

  • The Age

‘Ridiculous': Hong Kong places bounty on Australian professor

An Australian pro-democracy academic has labelled a warrant for his arrest by Hong Kong's national security police as 'ridiculous', as authorities there pursue 19 overseas-based members of what they describe as a subversive organisation. University of Technology Sydney China studies professor Dr Feng Chongyi – who in 2017 was detained for 10 days while on a research trip to China – now has a bounty on him over his involvement in an unofficial pro-democracy group, Hong Kong Parliament. He is accused of helping to organise or participate in the largely Canada-based group, which authorities in Hong Kong say aimed to subvert state power under a national security law that China imposed on the territory in 2020, following months of pro-democracy protests the year before. Feng and the others are accused of having launched a referendum or run as candidates in the unofficial 'Hong Kong Parliament' group, which authorities say aims at achieving self-determination and drafting a 'Hong Kong constitution'. Hong Kong police said the organisation sought to overthrow the governments of China and Hong Kong by unlawful means, that they were still investigating, and further arrests could follow. Loading Regarding its 'election' process, the Hong Kong Parliament group has said on social media that it drew about 15,700 valid votes through mobile app and online voting systems. It said the candidates and elected members came from around the world including Taiwan, Thailand, Australia, the US, Canada and the UK. Feng isn't from Hong Kong, but said he had agreed to join the group as an academic. 'It's certainly ridiculous, it does not offend me in any sense … they've got the power, they've got the influence overseas, they want to control everything even overseas,' Feng told this masthead on Saturday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store