
How Europe is cracking down on migrants with deportations in DAYS while soft-touch Starmer lets 50,000 cross channel
With public anger growing over soaring entries to their nations, more leaders are taking a harsher stance on migration - and dishing out swift deportations.
Advertisement
12
Migrants onboard a boat during a rescue operation, before their boat capsized on the open sea, off Greece, June 14, 2023
Credit: Reuters
12
Migrant workers arrive for the morning shift at the Fincantieri ship yards
Credit: Chris Eades
12
Numerous countries are taking a tougher stance on migration
Credit: Dan Charity
It comes as Sir Keir Starmer passed the damning milestone of 50,000 people crossing the Channel in small boats under his watch.
This is despite pledges from Labour to cut net migration to the UK when they entered office last year.
Home Office stats show arrivals this year are 47 per cent higher than the same point in 2024 and 67 per cent higher than in 2023.
Some 474 people arrived on Monday, taking the total since Starmer's landslide to 50,271.
Advertisement
Sir Keir did not repeat his predecessor Rishi Sunak's pledge to "stop the boats" - instead proposing to "smash the gangs" smuggling people into Britain as his solution.
But the PM has come under increasing pressure to lower immigration numbers amid growing discontent - with Downing Street admitting "there's clearly much more to do".
A Sun investigation uncovered a string of generous perks offered to small boat migrants - including discounts on martial arts classes and dinghy days out plus £1 Aston Villa match tickets for kids.
Meanwhile, governments in Europe are cracking down and booting migrants out at swift speeds.
Advertisement
PORTUGAL
On Friday, dozens of migrants landed at an Algarve beach - but were immediately detained.
A total of 38 people arrived on the small wooden boat, but they were quickly rounded up by cops.
And many have been hauled before court in a lightning crackdown.
12
Advertisement
Illegal migrant LIVE STREAMS step by step channel crossing & boasts 'my dream was to come here' from 4 star asylum hotel
Authorities said: "The migrants were in a debilitated state and in need of medical care, showing signs of dehydration and hypothermia."
But 31 of the 38 were taken to court the following day where a judge gave them 20 days to voluntarily return to Morocco.
Portugal's government has vowed to crack down hard on migration.
Prime Minister Luís Montenegro's government issued thousands of deportation orders during a tight election campaign earlier this year amid surging popularity for the far-right Chega party.
Advertisement
"This is a case of Montenegro becoming Trumpian," said opposition politician Pedro Nuno Santos during the campaign.
12
Dozens of migrants arrived at an Algarve beach
Credit: X
12
Far-right party Chega president André Ventura addresses followers
Credit: Getty
GREECE
Greece's Conservative-led government has pledged to bring in a "disincentive-based policy" to deter migrants.
Advertisement
Migration Minister Thanos Plevris recently told Skai TV: "From now on, the government will follow a policy of drastically reducing benefits."
He even pointed to the menus given to migrants at camps, which he called "hotel-like".
The government even went as far as to suspend processing asylum applications from North Africa for three months amid a surge in arrivals.
Many of them had arrived on Crete, Greece's largest island.
Advertisement
But the deputy mayor Eleni Zervoudaki told The Sun: "From the moral side it's illegal and it's not right, but from the other side I can understand the government is searching for a way to stop illegal immigration."
The hairline stance taken by the Greek government has paid dividends - with numbers of arrivals nosediving since the move.
12
A shipwreck of a boat is stranded at a shore in the northern part of Lesbos island
Credit: Reuters
12
A migrant reacts with emotion after arriving on Lesbos in 2020
Credit: Alamy
Advertisement
GERMANY
Under former Chancellor Angela Merkel, Germany famously adopted an "open door" that saw tens of thousands of people arrive in the country.
But fast-forward to 2025, and Berlin is taking a much stricter stance on the matter.
New Chancellor Friedrich Merz vowed to crack down on illegal immigration upon entering office.
The open door order has now been revoked, undocumented asylum seekers are being pushed back, and far more cops deployed to the German border.
Advertisement
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has confirmed that the measures will continue to remain in place.
12
German federal police checks car arriving at the German-Polish border
Credit: Getty
POLAND
Not content to simply police their border, Polish authorities have announced that fences will be built to prevent illegal migration.
Prime Minister Donald Tusk didn't mince words earlier this year when he said: "Anyone who visits Poland, takes advantage of our hospitality and brutally violates the law will be deported from Poland."
Advertisement
Poland has also carried out brutal immigration raids involving 26,000 police officers and 1,000 border guards.
Nearly 1,500 migrants were detained in the raids between February 13 and 14.
Karol Nawrocki won the Polish presidency this summer on a campaign that targeted refugees and migrants.
His key slogan was "Poland first, Poles first".
Advertisement
12
Polish Border Guards check a vehicle at Polish-German border
Credit: Reuters
ITALY
Italy has taken an increasingly muscular approach to immigration over the past few years.
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni claims Italy under her watch has become a "model to follow" for other nations.
The country even took the unprecedented step to ground a reconnaissance plane used by a German migrant rescue charity.
Advertisement
NGO Sea-Watch hit back at Italy over the move, calling it "a new escalation in the Italian government's fight against civilian human rights observation in the Mediterranean".
Italy is also trying to establish an offshore asylum processing system in Albania.
Sir Keir Starmer once said he showed "great interest" in this prospective deal.
In the UK, anger at illegal migration is focused on expensive asylum hotels and private housing being used to put up Channel crossers.
Advertisement
12
Italian police officers stand at the entrance of a recently build Italian-run migrant centre
Credit: AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Mirror
a minute ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Defence Forces to increase patrols to combat Russian ships in Irish waters
The Defence Forces are to increase both air and naval patrols to combat Russian ships on illegal manoeuvres in Irish waters. The revelation was made by the Defence Minister Simon Harris as part of a new National Maritime Security Strategy that is currently being finalised. The Government will also speed up the €300 million purchase of a new radar defence system for the State along with sonar capability for its fleet. Four out of our eight naval ships are in operation at the moment but the pressure is now on to hire more recruits to get them all back out to sea. The Irish military has also signed up to the EU's Common Information Sharing Environment system which will help track all vessels coming in and out of our Atlantic Waters up to 200 miles off the west coast. The Government has been coming under increasing pressure from other European states to invest more money in defence and to keep a far closer eye on Russian activities in Irish territorial waters. It follows a year after various Russian ships made secret inclusions into the Exclusive Irish Economic Zone, as it is known, and acted suspiciously around the various international sea cables that come ashore off the west coast. Ireland is the main point linking the internet between Europe and the United States. Mr Harris has assured the public he is taking the Russian threat seriously. He said in a series of replies to parliamentary questions about Russia's activities in Irish water: "The Defence Forces routinely monitor foreign vessels with both Naval Service Assets and Air Corps maritime patrol aircraft as well as remote monitoring on a 24/7 basis from the Naval Operations Command Centre in Haulbowline. Tanaiste Simon Harris "It should be noted that foreign vessels transiting Irish waters must do so in compliance with international law and may be subject to sighting and observation by the Naval Service and Air Corps without their innocent passage being infringed. "In relation to additional measures being introduced to strengthen maritime security and surveillance, My Department is working to deliver Ireland's first ever National Maritime Security Strategy. "The aim of the strategy is, amongst other things, to enhance our maritime domain awareness and to protect our critical infrastructure." Troops marching during Tanaiste Simon Harris's visit to Camp Shamrock. (Image: PA) During the past two years the Air Corps has brought into service two state-of-the-art Airbus C295 Maritime Patrol Aircraft. The Navy has also started using the P70 Class ship to further help and enable more sea operations. The new intelligence deal with the EU will also result in more secure information being shared with Ireland. Mr Harris added: "This EU programme enables structured and secure information sharing among EU maritime authorities both civil and military, allowing for more effective operations at sea amid new and evolving maritime threats." Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Starmer maintains Ukraine ceasefire is 'viable' ahead of London meeting with Zelenskyy
UK PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer will meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in London today Thursday, his office said, ahead of the key US-Russia summit in Alaska. Zelenskyy is to arrive at 9.30am at Downing Street, the prime minister's office said. Starmer has maintained there was now a 'viable' chance for a Ukraine ceasefire. Putin and Trump will meet tomorrow at an air base in Alaska, the first time the Russian leader has been permitted on Western soil since his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine which has killed tens of thousands of people. Advertisement With such high stakes, all sides were pushing hard in the hours before the meeting. Zelenskyy, who has refused to surrender territory to Russia, spoke on thje phone with Trump yesterday, as did European leaders who voiced confidence afterward that the US leader would seek a ceasefire rather than concessions by Kyiv. Trump himself sent mixed messages, saying that he could quickly organize a three-way summit afterward with both Zelenskyy and Putin but also warning of his impatience with Putin. 'There may be no second meeting because, if I feel that it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we are not going to have a second meeting,' Trump told reporters. Russia, Trump said, would face 'severe consequences' if it does not halt its offensive. But Trump said: 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one,' involving both Putin and Zelenskyy. Related Reads Macron calls for the inclusion of Ukraine in planned talks between Putin and Trump next week Trump and Putin have agreed to meet in the next few days Putin pitched the meeting after Trump threatened sanctions on Russia. Trump has already ramped up tariffs on India, which has become a key buyer of Russian energy. Zelenskyy, after being berated by Trump at a February meeting in the White House, has publicly supported US diplomacy but made clear his deep skepticism. 'I have told my colleagues – the US president and our European friends – that Putin definitely does not want peace,' Zelenskyy said. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who welcomed Zelenskyy in Berlin, said Ukraine is ready to negotiate 'on territorial issues' but stressed that legal recognition of Russian occupations 'would not be up for debate.' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte declared: 'The ball is now in Putin's court.'


RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
What's at stake for Europe at the Trump-Putin summit on Ukraine?
Analysis: The build-up to the summit highlights European doubts and concerns about Russia's sincerity to halt aggression in Ukraine The end of the Cold War was once greeted in Europe as " the end of history". Both Naziism and communism - extreme ideologies that had caused violent turmoil and oppression during the 20th century – had collapsed. Liberal democracy had persevered and was unrivalled by the 1990s. Western governments viewed liberal political and economic reform as vital to nurture peace and security in post-communist Europe. An enlarged security community covering much of the northern hemisphere " from Vancouver to Vladivostok" was an active political aspiration to reduce risks from violent conflict. Institutionalised through the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), this community aimed to enshrine the principles of the Helsinki Final Act agreed in 1975, most notably exclusive adherence to peaceful conflict resolution and no border changes by military force. All has changed. This vision for a pan-European security order defined by enduring peace has been shattered by Russia's military aggression, first in Georgia in 2008 and subsequently in Ukraine after 2014, with Moscow escalating its offensive in 2022. Ukrainians have suffered the most by far, but this war has also caused many reverberations that weaken wider security in Europe. When campaigning for a second US presidential term in 2024, Donald Trump claimed that he would resolve the war in Ukraine " in one day". But after his second term began in January 2025, Trump's administration has instead grappled with many arduous complications inflicted by Russia's aggression. In recent days, Trump has outlined his exploratory expectations for the US-Russia summit with Russia's president Vladimir Putin in Alaska this week. Describing the summit as a " feel-out meeting", Trump claims that he is seeking a measure on Putin's seriousness for peace in Ukraine. His US administration describes the summit as a " listening exercise". Efforts to assist peace in Ukraine must be welcomed once these efforts are sincere. From RTÉ News' Behind the Story podcast, why meeting Trump in Alaska is 'handing Putin victory' But the build-up to the summit highlights many continuing doubts on Putin's sincerity to halt Russian aggression. In Kyiv, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy has raised concerns that Putin is "bluffing"about his intent to make peace. In Brussels, EU leaders fear that Putin will gain a diplomatic advantage over Trump to slowly ease Russia closer to the strategic aims it defined when it escalated its war in Ukraine in 2022. These aims included a forceful overthrow of the Ukrainian government; stifling stronger links between Ukraine and the EU and NATO; and consolidating a sphere of influence to insulate Russia's authoritarianism from the West's liberal democratic influences. Putin is considered to have got the better of Trump at the Helsinki Summit between the two presidents in 2018. After this meeting, Trump appeared to publicly support the Russian president's view that Moscow had not interfered in the 2016 US presidential election, despite contrary information communicated to him by America's own security agencies. Seeking to avoid being out-manoeuvred by Putin again, Trump has threatened "very severe consequences", meaning further sanctions will be proposed, should Russia refuse to take US peace efforts seriously. Missing the military power that converts into diplomatic clout, the EU is forced to watch a summit that will likely impact its future security from the sidelines. Trump has discussed " land swapping" as a means to settle the conflict while insisting that such arrangements can only be confirmed by direct negotiations between Ukraine and Russia. De jure border change is unacceptable for Ukraine. However, Kyiv might still painfully accept some de facto compromises understood as temporary until future political circumstances change to allow Ukraine to restore full functional sovereignty within borders benchmarked from its independence in 1991. From RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland, 26 EU leaders say Ukraine should have freedom to decide its future Should Russia retain de facto military control over territories in eastern Ukraine, a large risk remains that Moscow will use this presence to slowly grind away to coerce and undermine Kyiv in its aims to accelerate Ukraine's democratisation and EU integration. The Trump administration has frustrated Ukrainian attempts to gain a clear pathway towards NATO accession. According to US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, "the United States does not believe that NATO membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement". The Alaska summit also offers Putin an opportunity to propose limitations on Ukraine's future military strength as a condition for Russia's consent to progress settlement talks. Washington is Ukraine's most important military supplier, handing Trump some leverage to pressure Zelenskyy to accept limits on Ukraine's future defence capabilities. This would undercut Ukraine's potential for independent deterrence but with Russia remaining free to replenish its military power to threaten Ukraine again. Observing developments on Ukraine, EU member states at the bloc's frontline with Russia remain concerned that Putin will skilfully manipulate Trump's peace efforts to instead piecemeal towards the aggressive aims he originally revealed in 2022. Should Russia gain such momentum, EU governments in Finland, the Baltic states and Poland anticipate that Moscow's military aggression will only gain further impetus. From RTÉ Radio 1's This Week, Prof Donnacha Ó Beacháin from DCU on whether Russia is ready to end the war in Ukraine or is simply stalling for time Putin's mistakes directed Russia into an unexpectedly long and attritional military campaign where a staggering one million Russian soldiers have died by 2025. However, a negotiated reprieve in Ukraine matched with Trump's ambivalent commitment to NATO will have retrieved Putin's ambitions to eventually challenge the alliance. If a frozen conflict is the most likely compromise to emerge from current negotiations on Ukraine, tensions simmering at the fault line that Russia has created there will endure to undermine European security. Unpredictable and unstable, this order contrasts starkly with optimistic aspirations of peace "from Vancouver to Vladivostok" expressed after the Cold War. In the sentiments of Finnish president Alexander Stubb, Europe's " holiday from history" is now over.