Change of guardat US consulate
Speaking about his stint in Mumbai, Hankey said, "It's been a great privilege serving as the US Consul General in Mumbai to further US-India partnership in western India. I've been honored in helping deepen cooperation in technology and innovation to foster economic growth and prosperity in both countries.
I leave with immense gratitude for the warmth and friendship extended to me, and great confidence in the bright future of the US-India partnership." TNN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
5 hours ago
- India Today
Russia warns US, South Korea, Japan against security alliance targeting North Korea
Russia's foreign minister on Saturday warned the US, South Korea and Japan against forming a security partnership targeting North Korea as he visited his country's ally for talks on further solidifying their booming military and other Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov spoke in North Korea's eastern Wonsan city, where he met the country's leader, Kim Jong Un, and conveyed greetings from President Vladimir between Russia and North Korea have been flourishing in recent years, with North Korea supplying troops and ammunition to support Russia's war against Ukraine in return for military and economic assistance. That has raised concerns among South Korea, the US, and others that Russia might also transfer to North Korea sensitive technologies that can increase the danger of its nuclear and missile programs. Speaking with reporters after a meeting with his North Korean counterpart Choe Son Hui, Lavrov accused the US, South Korea and Japan of what he called their military buildups around North Korea.'We warn against exploiting these ties to build alliances directed against anyone, including North Korea and, of course, Russia,' he said, according to Russia's state Tass news US, South Korea and Japan have been expanding or restoring their trilateral military exercises in response to North Korea's advancing nuclear program. On Friday, the three countries held a joint air drill involving U.S. nuclear-capable bombers near the Korean Peninsula, as their top military officers met in Seoul and urged North Korea to cease all unlawful activities that threaten regional Korea views major US-led military drills as invasion rehearsals. It has long argued that it's forced to develop nuclear weapons to defend itself from US, military said Russia understands North Korea's decision to seek nuclear weapons. "The technologies used by North Korea are the result of the work of its own scientists. We respect North Korea's aspirations and understand the reasons why it is pursuing nuclear development,' Lavrov said, according to their meeting, Choe reiterated that North Korea 'unconditionally' supports Russia's fight against Ukraine, as Lavrov repeated Russia's gratitude for the contribution that North Korean troops made in efforts to repel a Ukrainian incursion into Russia's Kursk border city, the meeting venue, is where North Korea recently opened a mammoth beach resort that it says can accommodate nearly 20,000 his comments at the start of his meeting with Choe, Lavrov said that 'I am sure that Russian tourists will be increasingly eager to come here. We will do everything we can to facilitate this, creating conditions for this, including air travel,' according to the Russian Foreign Wonsan-Kalma tourist zone is at the center of Kim's push to boost tourism as a way to improve his country's troubled economy. However, prospects for the tourist complex aren't clear, as North Korea appears unlikely to fully reopen its borders and embrace Western tourists anytime soon.- EndsTune InTrending Reel
India Gazette
6 hours ago
- India Gazette
India seeks WTO nod for retaliatory tariffs on US
NEW DELHI, India: India has submitted a revised proposal to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in Geneva to implement retaliatory tariffs on the United States. This action comes in response to the U.S. government's decision to double tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum. Reports indicate that India submitted the updated proposal to WTO members at its own request. On March 12, 2025, the U.S. increased import duties on aluminum, steel, and related goods to 25 percent, which the Trump administration then raised to 50 percent on June 3. India's response aligns with WTO regulations that permit member countries to suspend concessions when affected by safeguard measures. According to the revised proposal, India's planned suspension of trade concessions could impact U.S. goods worth approximately US$3.82 billion—a substantial increase from the earlier estimate of $1.91 billion in May. This figure reflects the estimated value of Indian exports affected by the U.S. measures, which total around $7.6 billion. India has indicated that it may impose higher tariffs on select U.S. products. However, the final tariff rates and product lists remain flexible, allowing India to adjust depending on the escalating impact of the U.S.'s trade actions. The dispute stems from the U.S.'s initial move in 2018, when it imposed a 25 percent tariff on certain steel products and 10 percent on aluminum, citing national security concerns. In response, India raised tariffs in 2019 on 28 U.S. products, including almonds and walnuts, and also filed a complaint with the WTO. This current development comes amid ongoing negotiations for a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) between the two countries. An Indian delegation is scheduled to visit Washington next week to continue trade discussions.
New Indian Express
7 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Key issues that could jeopardise India-U.S. trade talks
The India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) is yet to see the light of day. The July 9 deadline — marking the end of the 90-day exemption period for the imposition of reciprocal tariffs by the US — just passed by without a deal. Now, a new deadline has emerged: August 1. India was the first country to initiate Free Trade Agreement (FTA) talks with the US after its newly elected President Donald Trump threatened high tariffs on countries running trade surpluses with Washington. With a trade deficit of over $40 billion in favour of India, Trump repeatedly took jabs at India, dubbing it the 'Tariff King'. While India began negotiations aiming to 'pacify' Trump, whose unpredictable stance on tariffs and trade unsettled many, it soon became clear that the US was seeking far more than symbolic gestures. As talks progressed, India toughened its position on several issues, leading to the current stalemate. In a last-ditch effort ahead of the new deadline, a team of Indian negotiators is likely to visit the US soon to iron out the remaining differences. While dates are yet to be finalised, the team may travel to Washington next week. Meanwhile, India's stance appears to have shifted — indicating it would rather have no deal than accept a bad one. Contentious issues There are multiple sticking points between the two countries, with the most contentious being tariffs on agriculture, dairy products, automobiles & auto components, and steel. Beyond tariffs, the US is also reportedly pushing for large-scale commercial deals involving oil and LNG, civilian and military aircraft from Boeing, helicopters, and nuclear reactors. Washington may additionally be urging New Delhi to ease FDI restrictions in multi-brand retail, benefiting companies like Amazon and Walmart. India, for its part, is determined to safeguard the livelihood of its farmers and over 8 million dairy cooperative members, as well as protect MSMEs and labour-intensive sectors from potential adverse impacts of the deal. Agriculture & related concerns The pressure on Indian negotiators to protect farmers' interests is immense. According to Ajay Srivastava, founder of GTRI, agricultural goods make up less than 5% of US exports to India, yet Washington is aggressively pushing on this front. He warns that any tariff concessions could embolden the US to later demand dilution of India's minimum support prices (MSP) and public procurement systems — pillars of India's food security framework. Ashwani Mahajan, National Co-Convener of the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch (SJM), sees this as a major red flag. 'International prices of agricultural goods are half of the MSP provided by India. Any compromise on agricultural goods in the trade talks could jeopardise the livelihoods of thousands of farmers,' he says. A March report by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) flagged India's farm subsidies, particularly the MSP system for rice and wheat, as distorting global prices and disadvantaging US farmers. Currently, Indian farm exports to the US face a modest 5.3% tariff, while US farm exports to India are hit with a much steeper 37.7% tariff — a 32.4% gap. At a proposed 26% reciprocal tariff, Indian agri exports could be more heavily taxed in the US, while lowering tariffs on US farm imports might flood Indian markets with cheaper goods. Disagreements on dairy sector On dairy, the US argues that India's GM-free feed certification and facility registration protocols effectively amount to a ban on American dairy imports. Indian rules prohibit imports of animal products fed on animal-derived feed — for example, butter from cows fed meat — due to deep religious sensitivities. India considers this policy non-negotiable. Pushback on GM crops The US has also been pressing India to allow imports of GM crops such as soybean meal and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) for animal feed, a demand that has faced growing opposition in India. Initially, the Indian government did not strongly oppose the idea of some tariff cuts on farm goods or even selective GM imports. A Niti Aayog report earlier this year argued that the US would remain a key market for India's surplus food exports, suggesting that a 'strategic opening for US imports' could help secure broader export gains. The report even proposed importing GM soybean seeds under a controlled model, where seeds would be crushed at coastal facilities, oil sold domestically, and soymeal (with GM traits) exported to avoid domestic contamination. However, experts cautioned that enforcing tight control on GM material would be nearly impossible given India's weak regulatory oversight, fragmented supply chains, and informal markets. 'Once GM products enter the country, there is a high risk they will leak into domestic agriculture, raising serious concerns over food safety, environmental impact, and potential export bans from countries that don't accept GM contamination,' one expert noted. Following public outrage, Niti Aayog quietly withdrew the report. Auto components The US has already slapped a 25% tariff on auto and auto components. While India's passenger vehicle exports to the US are minimal (just 0.21%), auto components make up 28% of India's total exports to the US. This high tariff thus poses a serious threat to revenues of Indian component manufacturers. According to an ICRA report, the recent US tariff hikes could add roughly `9,000 crore in costs across the supply chain, ultimately to be borne by US consumers, importers and Indian exporters. 'The extent to which Indian auto component exporters absorb this burden will depend on their competitiveness and the price elasticity of exported products,' ICRA noted. India has since notified the World Trade Organization (WTO) of its intention to impose retaliatory tariffs on select US auto parts, targeting exports valued at approximately $2.9 billion annually, with the duties expected to yield an additional $723 million. Steel & aluminium Similarly, the US has imposed a steep 50% tariff on steel and aluminium, directly impacting India. In FY2025, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel and aluminium products to the US, including $587 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related products. These exports are now vulnerable to sharply higher tariffs, threatening profitability. India has already filed a formal notice at the WTO outlining plans to impose retaliatory tariffs on US goods. Domestically, the US move has also resulted in a surge of cheaper Chinese imports into India, prompting New Delhi to impose a 12% safeguard duty on steel imports. However, a 50% tariff is seen as unsustainable, and Indian negotiators have reportedly raised the issue with Washington. Beyond tariffs: Other friction points The BTA negotiations are not confined to tariffs alone. The USTR report cited earlier also highlighted India's restrictive digital trade rules, weak intellectual property enforcement, and opaque procurement practices as key hurdles for US businesses. The USTR flagged India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) for restricting cross-border data transfers and mandating data localisation. As mentioned earlier, agriculture subsidy remains another key point of difference between the two countries. While India has expressed interest in striking a mini deal before the August 1 deadline that focuses solely on tariffs, it remains to be seen if the US is willing to temporarily set aside more contentious issues such as IP and farm subsidies. In the case of a no deal, India would be hoping the US levies a lower tariff (lower than 26% announced earlier) on its goods exported to the US.
