
Why it's so hard for young people to get a job right now – and what needs to change
For generations, young people have been told the path to opportunity is clear. Study hard, get a degree, and success will follow. This promise – central to the idea of 'meritocracy' – has shaped the aspirations and investments of millions (though in reality, access to university and employment is also shaped by factors like family income, schooling and geography).
Today, however, many graduates in the UK and elsewhere are struggling to land a job – and it's a problem which extends far beyond finding roles that match their qualifications. In some cases, graduates are being turned down for roles in supermarkets or warehouses – not because they're unqualified, but because they're seen as overqualified, too risky or surplus to requirements.
In terms of the UK economy, this isn't just a problem of job shortages. It signals a deeper breakdown in the social contract – the long-held promise that education leads to opportunity. And it exposes how the connection between learning and labour is coming undone.
As the focus of employers, higher education providers and the state has shifted towards the notion of 'employability' – the skills and attitudes that help people get and keep jobs – labour markets have become highly competitive and spoilt for choice.
At the same time, it's worth remembering that while employment remains a key concern, the value of education extends far further – shaping personal growth and civic engagement, for example.
Employability places the burden squarely on young people to become work-ready while ignoring the wider barriers they face. These include hiring algorithms, labour market saturation as graduate numbers remain high while vacancies dry up, and uneven access to opportunity.
Even with degrees and internships, many young people are finding themselves locked out of meaningful work. Research I undertook with colleagues on education-to-work transitions shows how graduates often invest heavily in becoming employable through a mix of soft skills, adaptability and professionalism. But these efforts now rarely guarantee a job.
Instead, graduates frequently enter a labour market that is both oversaturated and under-responsive. Over the past two decades, the number of graduates in the UK has grown sharply. This surge has intensified competition, pushing many into roles below their qualification level.
The UK government's Get Britain Working white paper recognises this disconnect. It also highlights the legacy effects of the COVID pandemic, especially among young people aged 16–24 who are not in education, employment or training (Neets) – of which there are now estimated to be 987,000, and rising.
But while the government's proposed youth guarantee scheme offers basic training and apprenticeships, it does little for those already in the labour market.
What's blocking the way?
Despite the emphasis on developing skills, many young people – both graduates and non-graduates – struggle to progress in the labour market. For example, the number of entry-level roles in retail, hospitality and logistics is shrinking due to rising costs, automation and algorithmic hiring systems that privilege some over others.
Recent increases to employer national insurance contributions and the national minimum wage are putting pressure on payrolls, reducing already limited opportunities for young people.
This highlights the limits of the popular narrative that effort always leads to reward. The idea that young people just need to try harder collapses under the weight of such constraints.
Businesses are also facing tight margins, as well as the problems that come with high staff turnover due to a lack of career development opportunities, as rising costs make it harder to invest in staff. But our research shows that even highly motivated graduates – those who network, gain skills, take internships and are adaptable – can struggle to get a foot in the door.
The UK employment rights bill, which is making its way through parliament, is designed to curb exploitative labour market practices. But professional bodies and trade associations warn that some employers may respond by cutting staff and reducing flexible work.
While reforms such as reframing the purpose of Jobcentres are critical in making unemployment seem unattractive, they are likely to fall short of creating sustained opportunities.
Policy paradox
All of this reveals a paradox. In trying to clamp down on job precarity, the UK government may be shutting young people out of the entry points they need, skilled or otherwise. Well-intentioned policies such as the youth guarantee and employment rights bill risk failure when the labour market often rewards privilege over merit.
Today's labour market can penalise young people twice over. First, they're expected to be employable with the right skillset. Yet even when they are, many find the door shut.
In my view, the way forward is to create new, accessible roles that reflect a broader duty of care on the part of employers, universities and policymakers. This includes building skills pathways along the lines of the Youth Futures Foundation programme, which works in deprived areas to create pathways that connect young people with support and jobs.
It also means embedding hiring practices that ensure a closer focus on someone's potential, such as blind recruitment or diverse hiring panels.
Incentivising employers to hire and value young talent could be transformative, as could forging partnerships between universities and industry which focus on building the skills needed for employment.
Government initiatives such as the Trailblazers scheme, which identifies young people at risk of falling out of education or employment, are a good start. But they could be more effective alongside a combination of digital tools that bring together mobile apps for tracking career progress, a skills dashboard, and AI career advice.
Restoring the social contract means sharing responsibility. Our research finds that employers should regularly review how they assess talent and design career pathways.
Universities should collaborate with industry to ensure graduate skills align with employer expectations. And the government must address deep-seated inequalities shaped by region, class, race and institutional prestige.
Ignoring these issues mean they will continue to largely dictate who gets in, who gets ahead, and who gets left out. A collective responsibility ensures that education is recognised not just as a route to employment, but as a cornerstone of a fair, thoughtful and inclusive society.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Eberechi Eze breaks silence on Crystal Palace's battle to keep European place - after Eagles' chiefs held crunch two-hour talks with UEFA
Eberechi Eze says it would be a 'huge shame' if Crystal Palace were kicked out of the Europa League, but he is confident the issue will be resolved. Mail Sport revealed this week that the club's participation in next season's competition is in doubt because of UEFA rules on multi-club ownership. American businessman John Textor has a stake in both Palace and French club Lyon, who have also qualified for the Europa League. Textor is now offering to sell his 43 per cent share in Palace and UEFA are expected to confirm in the next 10 days the outcome of this week's hearing in Nyon. Eze, who scored the only goal in the FA Cup final win over Manchester City, is currently training with England here in Spain, but he is aware of the situation unfolding with his club. 'I really hope that that's not the case (removed from the Europa League) and I hope that Palace do get the reward for that (FA Cup win), because of what it took to actually achieve it,' he said. UEFA ownership rules may mean they cannot compete. US businessman John Textor is majority shareholder at Lyon while Brondby are owned by Palace co-owner David Blitzer 'It would be a huge shame if that was the case, but I'm trusting that it will work out in the end. 'I'm sure it will work itself out and it should work itself out, because there are players who have worked to be in this position. 'There are fans who have been with the team throughout the whole season and experienced everything. 'It would be unfortunate, but I'm positive that it won't be the case.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Dave Brailsford to step back from Manchester United and return to Ineos
Sir Dave Brailsford is to reduce his role at Manchester United under a reshuffle being planned by minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe. Brailsford has played a major part since Ratcliffe secured his stake in United in February 2024, stepping down as team principal of the Ineos Grenadiers cycling team to take charge of footballing operations at Old Trafford and investing considerable time and energy in driving change at the club. But after a season in which United ended in 15th place, their worst Premier League finish, and lost the Europa League final against Tottenham, Ratcliffe is planning a shake-up in which Brailsford will return to his role as director of sport for the wider Ineos group, as first reported by the Times. Under the plans, the former Tour de France winner and Olympic champion Geraint Thomas is poised to take on a leadership role with the Grenadiers when he retires as a rider at the end of the year. Brailsford, 61, has overseen a major overhaul of United's operations, including a £50m redevelopment of the Carrington training ground. Ratcliffe has scaled back some of Ineos's sporting commitments, terminating its sponsorship of the New Zealand rugby team and ending his bid to win the America's Cup. However, Ratcliffe remains committed to the cycling team, who no longer hold the dominant position they did when winning the Tour de France in seven out of eight editions between 2012 and 2019. Thomas, 39, has said he will retire after the Tour of Britain in September.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
We must build Gen Z's financial confidence to unlock UK growth, says Barclays boss VIM MARU
Over the last decade, people and business in the UK have navigated staggering change including Brexit, a global pandemic and a cost-of-living crisis. During this time, Barclays has tracked shifts in UK consumer spending, which accounts for around 60 per cent of the nation's GDP, with huge potential to unlock growth. As one of the UK's largest banks with sight of 40 per cent of credit and debit card transactions, our insight paints a fascinating picture. Our data shows that the macroeconomic shocks of the past ten years have chipped away at confidence in the strength of the UK economy, which fell from 45 per cent at the end of 2015 to 28 per cent in our most recent survey in May 2025. Interestingly confidence reached its highest point in September 2016, following the Brexit referendum, at 48 per cent and (perhaps unsurprisingly) its lowest in October 2022, at 15%, following Liz Truss' 'mini-budget'. We have also seen fundamental shifts in how and where money is spent. Two thirds of UK consumers are paying more attention to their budget than they did 10 years ago. Yet discretionary spend grew by 9.2 per cent annually on average 2021-2024, outpacing essential spend, as people prioritised memorable experiences such as travel and entertainment. And we're tapping to pay, with ten times as many monthly contactless transactions compared to 2015. Changing demographics in the UK have driven these shifts and will become significantly more important over the next decade. In 2015, Gen Z, those born between 1997 and 2012, hadn't yet reached adulthood, today they are three-times more likely to be saving for a major life milestone than anyone else. Gen Z's economic influence is also rapidly increasing. We are standing on the brink of the 'great wealth transfer'. A projected $18.3tn in wealth is expected to be transferred globally by 2030, and in the decades ahead, Gen Z will be the largest beneficiaries, making them a growing economic force. Despite this, 67 per cent of Gen Z consumers feel confident in their ability to live within their means – lower than the 74 per cent national average. I view Gen Z as something of a financial paradox. They are set to come into significant wealth but lack the means to live comfortably today. Their spending is selective and purposeful, but they are also more prone to 'doom spending' – buying on impulse to soothe socio-economic anxieties. Almost two thirds of Gen Z renters would find it impossible to buy a home without help but they are also prioritising spending on fitness, travel and beauty – because if their long-term financial goals feel unattainable, why not spend on the things that bring them joy? To better achieve their financial goals and to navigate the 'great wealth transfer', Gen Z need financial confidence. First and foremost, we must improve financial literacy. According to National Numeracy, 42 per cent of 18-24 year olds seeking to improve their maths and numeracy skills say it's to better manage their money. Banks like Barclays have a responsibility to help. I'm proud that our LifeSkills programme gives young people access to financial education resources which have been used in 94 per cent of UK secondary schools. However, this is a complex issue that plays out beyond financial services and demands collaboration between different industries across the private sector and government. We must also help Gen Z to access credible, trustworthy financial advice, particularly when it comes to growing their financial resilience and wealth. Our research shows that a quarter of Gen Z plan to invest more money in the next three years, and that 46 per cent of young people use Tik Tok for financial advice. I find this alarming, given that over half of retail investors don't carry out basic checks when using finfluencers' guidance, making them vulnerable to investment scams and poor advice. It would be helpful for social media platforms to introduce a verification system to help Gen Z identify credible influencers. There is also a clear need for education and support to help Gen Z understand how to manage, invest, protect and make the most of their money. Gen Z are already defining UK spending. In five years, they will account for up to 70 per cent of the workforce. In a decade, they will be considerably wealthier than they are today. This generation is due to reshape the financial system; by building their financial confidence, we can support them to make the most of their money and lay the foundations for a growing, prosperous economy.