logo
RFK Jr. Insists He Hasn't Fired 'Any Working Scientists' ― After Firing Hundreds Of Them

RFK Jr. Insists He Hasn't Fired 'Any Working Scientists' ― After Firing Hundreds Of Them

Yahoo15-05-2025

WASHINGTON ― During a Senate committee hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) had a strange clash with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over the massive cuts he's overseen at his agency, including to personnel.
'You made it very clear here today you have no knowledge whatsoever of the absolutely amazing scientists and researchers who you have callously fired,' said Alsobrooks.
'I didn't fire any working scientists,' Kennedy said.
'That, sir, is not true either,' replied Alsobrooks.
'It is true,' repeated Kennedy
'It is not true,' Alsobrooks said, moving on.
He made the same claim when the Maryland senator later brought up a 30-year program he axed at his agency, the Safe to Sleep campaign, along with all of its staff. He said it again to Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), the chairman of the committee, at the start of the hearing.
'The cuts we have made to date are administrative cuts. As far as I know we have not fired any working scientists,' said Kennedy. 'There are some people who were scientists that were doing IT or administration ... who did lose their jobs. But in terms of working scientists, our policy was to make sure none of them were lost and that that research continues.'
That sounds nice. But also it is not true. Kennedy has been firing hundreds, if not thousands, of scientists and researchers doing critical work at various agencies under HHS. It's not even as if he's been doing this in secret; it's been widelyreported for months.
Under his direction, the National Institutes of Health, the world's top biomedical research agency, axed 1,200 employees in February. A doctor behind award-winning research on Parkinson's disease was among the leading NIH scientists pushed out in April. Top scientific leaders at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and at the Food and Drug Administration were reassignedto remote Indian Health Service regions. Key scientists working on the bird flu at the Center for Veterinary Medicine were fired, as were nearly a dozen in-house senior scientists at NIH who worked on neuroscience.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month carried out mass firings that included a group of scientists who researched traumatic brain injury. Still more CDC scientists were fired after their entire lab tracking STIs and hepatitis outbreaks was axed.
It's not clear if Kennedy is intentionally lying about not firing scientists or doesn't understand the scope of damage he's causing to the work of HHS, or if this a matter of semantics. Maybe he's bristling at the verb 'fire' to describe how he has been aggressively dismissing scientists from their employment or ordering scientists to give up their jobs.
An HHS spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Alsobrooks said Kennedy is just lying, even as it's so absurdly obvious.
'I think that RFK Jr. clearly believes that the more he tells a lie, the more it becomes the truth,' she told HuffPost on Thursday.
Kennedy's claim that HHS scientists have all kept their jobs 'flies in the face of the reality that there are hundreds of scientists from the NIH, CDC and FDA who have lost their jobs as a part of his plan to overhaul the department.'
The Maryland senator should know. NIH is based in her state, and she's been hearing from scientists ― constituents ― for months who have lost their jobs or grants at various HHS agencies. She heard from some of those fired scientists after Wednesday's hearing, when Kennedy insisted he hadn't fired them.
'One is working specifically – or was working, before his untimely termination – on Parkinson's, and the other was working on doing some critical research around hepatitis,' said Alsobrooks. 'They heard the lie, you know, or the misrepresentation, should we call it, when he said working scientists had not been fired when they, in fact, have been.'
HuffPost heard from some fired federal scientists after Kennedy's hearing, too. One, who'd been an epidemiologist working on infectious diseases, said they were fired by Kennedy along with their entire team, which was dozens of epidemiologists and health scientists.
'RFK seems unaware of what programs were actually affected by the [Reduction in Force],' said this scientist, who requested anonymity to speak freely.
Asked what they made of Kennedy's repeated claims that he hadn't fired any 'working scientists,' this fired scientist simply said, 'It is not true.'
'This has consequences for public health as the programs are suddenly eliminated or severely reduced,' they said. 'It also severely affects the thousands of scientists who suddenly lost our careers and faced a challenging job market with so many public health cuts damaging our field.'
A local chapter of the American Federation of Government Employees, a union that represents more than 700,000 federal employees and D.C. government workers, caught Kennedy's comments, and pushed back with data and charts.
'We find that approximately 1,586 civil servants affected by the RIF were scientists, medical professionals, veterinary professionals, engineers, and other STEM leaders,' reads a Wednesday post on AFGE Local 2883's website. 'These cuts were scientific, not administrative and not 'fraud, waste, and abuse.''
Their website offers lots of data related to HHS cuts, including on personnel cuts at CDC. One chart, for example, offers a rough estimate on the number of health scientists who have been fired as of mid-March: 605.
Alsobrooks said she hopes that any fired federal scientists who heard Kennedy's claims know that she and other senators see through his nonsense and plan to keep highlighting the damage he's causing.
'We know the truth,' she said. 'That's what these hearings are about, exposing these mistruths and letting the public understand the consequences of the disastrous decisions and dangerous decisions made by Secretary Kennedy. And we're going to continue to do that.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Horse trading session has arrived at N.H. State House
Horse trading session has arrived at N.H. State House

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Horse trading session has arrived at N.H. State House

Both the New Hampshire House of Representatives and Senate worked late into the night Thursday as they tried desperately to revive bills that the other branch didn't want. The political game of chicken is expected to continue this week when the two bodies return to session to create committees of conference that will be charged with trying to work out differences between competing versions of a bill. This stage in the budget process signals that the 2025 session, barring a negotiating meltdown, will conclude in the coming weeks. Once named, the conference committees will have until June 19 to come up with an agreement that the Legislature must act upon by June 26. Both bodies must vote to create these panels with three state senators and four House members. Any agreement requires all conferees to sign onto the proposal; it then returns to the House and Senate for an up-or-down vote, meaning lawmakers at that final meeting are unable to amend it in any fashion. The two-year state budget is the biggest and most consequential of the disputes, with the Senate last week approving its measure that spent nearly $250 million more than the House-approved version. All of this one-upmanship resulted in some strange bedfellows, like when the Senate voted to add to a bill increasing the penalty for wrong-way driving (HB 776) and a Senate-passed bill to declare the Virginia opossum the state marsupial (SB 30). Sen. Donovan Fenton, D-Keene, thanked his colleagues for this act taken because the House put his own bill at risk when, earlier this month, it had tacked onto it new penalties for improper application of fertilizer. Senate Democratic Leader Rebecca Perkins Kwoka of Portsmouth couldn't resist a punning quip. 'I'm glad the senator from Dist. 10 (Fenton) has not played dead on his bill,' she joked. The House responded last week, adding to a bill raising the personal allowance that residents of nursing homes are allowed to keep (SB 118) the House-passed bill that would allow medically eligible patients to grow their own marijuana rather than have to buy it at alternative treatment centers at market costs. House keeps pushing cannabis agenda Rep. Gary Daniels, R-Milford, tried to convince his colleagues to drop this last-ditch effort. 'The Senate has rejected every single cannabis bill the House has sent it. Do we really want to put a good bill at risk by insisting this be included?' Daniels asked rhetorically. Rep. Wendy Thomas, D-Merrimack, a cancer survivor, said as an eligible patient she takes marijuana every day and that the underlying personal allowance issue is already contained in versions of the state budget. The House voted 215-103 to keep the marijuana bill as part of the House position. Not all of these gambits succeeded. Rep. Judy Aron, R-Acworth and chairman of the House Environment and Agriculture Committee, had wanted to add to legislation that designated Coos County as an economically distressed area to (SB 180), an unrelated bill from her committee to enhance state rules regarding the approval of future landfills that the Senate had rejected (HB 707). The House voted 166-163 against that idea, choosing to keep the Coos County economic bill clean. In one of its last moves, the Senate voted to add onto a temporary youth operator driver's license bill (HB 612) its legislation to declare the third week in September each year "New Hampshire Service Dog Week." Moments earlier, the House had voted, 179-144, to kill that service dog bill (SB 198). "We don't need a special holiday in order to say, 'Good dog,'" said Rep. Erica Layon, R-Derry. Here are some other issues that are likely to need more negotiation before they are settled: • Mandatory Minimums (SB 14): This Gov. Kelly Ayotte-priority bill that cleared the Senate set stiff mandatory prison terms for offenders selling large amounts of fentanyl and for anyone convicted of selling drugs that causes someone else's death. The House changed it to give a judge broad latitude to approve a lesser punishment if the offender meets certain criteria. The House also added to this bill a measure the Senate rejected to decriminalize possession of up to three-quarters of an ounce of psilocybin, otherwise known as magic mushrooms. This change would bring the mushrooms in line with how state law decriminalizes marijuana possession. • Risk Pools (SB 297): Secretary of State David Scanlan convinced the Senate to adopt a bill that gave his office greater power over groups that manage insurance coverage for units of government. The House instead rejected Scanlan's approach in favor of letting these risk pools decide if they would rather come under the regulation of the Insurance Department. • Tenancy Law Changes (HB 60): The House approved this bill that would permit landlords to give notice to any tenant 60 days notice that they would not be extending their lease and require tenants be evicted if they resisted this move. The Senate adopted this proposal but it would only kick in once the state had a 4% vacancy rate; currently this tight housing market has less than one-half of 1% vacancy in it. klandrigan@

Zelensky says he understands Putin ‘much better' than Trump
Zelensky says he understands Putin ‘much better' than Trump

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Zelensky says he understands Putin ‘much better' than Trump

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Ukrainian officials understand Russian leader Vladimir Putin 'much better' than President Trump, who has repeatedly said Putin wants peace, even as he rejects U.S. proposals for a ceasefire. 'With all due respect to President Trump, I think it's just his personal opinion,' Zelensky told Martha Raddatz on ABC's 'This Week' in an interview that aired Sunday morning. 'Trust me, we understand the Russians much better, the mentality of the Russians, than the Americans understand the Russians. I know for sure Putin doesn't want to stop the war.' Zelensky also took issue with Trump's comments in the Oval Office this week comparing Ukraine and Russia to children fighting. 'We are not playing in the park with the Russians like two boys, two kids. Putin is not a kid,' Zelensky said. 'So we can't compare, and we cannot say, 'OK, let them fight for a while.'' 'And it's not about President Trump,' he added. 'Anyone living thousands of miles away can't fully understand the pain, even parents who live in Ukraine cannot feel the pain of those who lost their children.' Ukraine stunned Russia last weekend with drone attacks on Russian air bases, which it said destroyed dozens of bombers. The drones were smuggled into Russia on 18-wheeler trucks, which were parked near military bases and remotely opened ahead of the attack. Trump spoke with Putin on Wednesday, telling reporters that Russia planned to retaliate for the drone strikes. Russia killed five people in Ukraine in drone attacks the next day. Raddatz asked Zelensky if he believed Trump thinks Russia is winning the war. 'I think he's publicly said about it, and I know that he shared this information with some people around him, and I think the separation — and I said it a lot of times, it's not true. It's not a victory when you spent, really spent 1 million people,' he said. Zelensky added that Trump 'must' impose stronger sanctions on Russia. Trump this week said he had yet to look at Sen. Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) Russia sanctions bill, which is co-sponsored by more than 80 senators, but the president said senators would not move without his blessing. Senators in both parties are itching for the green light. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters that the bill could hit the floor during the current four-week work period. '[The White House is] still hopeful they'll be able to strike some sort of a deal, but … there's a high level of interest here in the Senate on both sides of the aisle in moving on it,' he said. 'I think a genuine interest in doing something to make clear to Russia that they need to come to the table … I think that would have a big impact.' The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store