Chris Evans MP on the UK Government's welfare reform
It is hard to deny the welfare system in our country needs reform, but any reform must be done in the right way. I have very serious concerns about the government's proposals as they currently stand. That is why I signed an amendment to the UC and PIP Bill to stop these changes in their current form.
My concern about these plans comes from the serious impact they could have on my constituents in Caerphilly. Our area is estimated to be one of the 10 areas in the UK to be hardest hit if these changes go ahead as they currently stand.
Altogether, the proposals are estimated to impact around 13,000 people in Caerphilly, and around 190,000 across Wales. Clearly, many disabled people are at risk of losing vital income which, if lost, will push many into poverty. For those already in poverty, this will only make things worse.
The impact of poverty is considerable on adults, but even more serious on their dependent children. It has harmful consequences for people's physical and mental health, educational attainment, and in some cases will force them into situations where they are more likely to be involved in crime.
The Government is planning to increase employment support for those who might be able to work. This makes sense in principle, and it is right that anyone who wants to work and can work should be supported to do so. However, the reality is this extra employment support is only estimated to be able to help a small fraction, about 3 per cent, of those who will lose out.
I have called on the government to think again on these proposals. At the very least, they must consult with and listen directly to the people who will be affected most. The Government must change its plans to mitigate the harms that so many have pointed out.
Above all, they must do everything they can to ensure any changes to our welfare system do not push people into poverty, or increase demands on many of our already struggling public services.
Chris Evans is MP for Caerphilly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Farcical mass arrests expose Labour's failings over Palestine
Yvette Cooper has overseen a brittle form of authoritarianism which, far from preserving the status quo, is fracturing it. The Home Secretary is now reduced to suggesting that there are things the public doesn't know about the organisation, which only she does, in defence of the draconian policy. This indicates the central argument has already been lost, and the public have not been persuaded of its merits as criticism grows. The Government miscalculated by thinking the proscription would breed establishment unity and the submission of the movement. READ MORE: Police probe 'kill 'em all' banner outside Scottish asylum seeker hotel Instead, the police are being instructed to carry out farcical mass arrests that cannot be sustained by the prison and legal system. And, we see the emergence of unexpected voices of opposition, combined with a continued expansion of the Palestine movement generally. For many in the old school of the British establishment, there is something distasteful about the ban. The sight of pensioners being rounded up and carted off in police vans for the crime of holding up a sign with the words 'Palestine' and 'action' is a little too much to plausibly defend. Everyone knows that these people cannot be described as 'terrorists' with any credibility. It is absurd, and consequently, Cooper has few allies coming to her aid. But more than distaste, the British state has generally been more strategic when it comes to utilising repression. When it comes to Palestine Action, any such nuance has been thrown out of the window. This is why figures such as Andrew Neil – it is fair to say no friend of Palestine protesters – have condemned the way the episode has been handled, saying: 'Designating them as a terrorist group was just bizarre by this government. Bizarre!' Interestingly, the people who are being arrested in Parliament Square do not look or sound like the stereotype of a direct action activist. One is a retired British army officer, Colonel Chris Romberg. The 75-year-old veteran, dressed in a suit, made the point that in his view Britain was now aiding and abetting a genocide, and this was a stand he was willing to make in defence of democratic and civil rights. Sir Jonathon Porritt, a former adviser to both king and government, was also arrested and carted away. He didn't mince his words: 'This was an absolutely clear case of a government using its powers to crush dissenting voices when it is the government itself that is most reprehensible for what continues to be an absolute horror story in the world. 'What we are seeing now in Gaza has just utterly shocked people and it's completely abhorrent that we are living through a genocide on our TV screens.' We have seen all kinds of people involved in a similar way, from members of the clergy to a former professor of poetry at the University of Oxford and an 89-year-old Jewish refugee. Former Tory MP Rory Stewart has called the proscription 'mad' and points out that the prison system cannot cope with 500 people being arrested and processed – with the threat of a 14-year jail sentence – on a single Saturday afternoon. Now, Defend Our Juries is organising for 1000 people to take part on September 6. Something has got to give. To add to Cooper's woes, it is an issue which is further haemorrhaging support for the Labour Party among its own supporters. According to a recent poll, 71% of Labour members oppose the proscription. What we have then is a lethal combination – the absence of broad support; an intellectually indefensible position; a lack of infrastructure to handle the growing number of dissenters; the continued growth of the Palestine demonstrations; a legal challenge in the works. This is just the latest in a litany of failings around the issue. Under Keir Starmer, Labour have driven the UK Government into an almighty mess. They have participated in providing the political and military cover for what Cooper herself now refers to as, without a hint of irony, the 'crimes against humanity' committed by Israel in Gaza. The foundation for the banning of Palestine Action is weak, because the foundation of the whole approach to the Middle East has been wrong on every level. They know it, and we know it. And it is when a government is in that kind of a fix that they resort to bringing out the repressive functions of the state. In doing so, they have only further weakened their position. Such measures can only hope to have a chance of success if they have overwhelming public support, and a united and cohesive apparatus to see it through. Without these, the Home Secretary cuts an isolated figure. And unfortunately for her, the issue is not going away any time soon. Instead, as the atrocities continue, opposition will grow. We are now in the closing stages of the genocide. Benjamin Netanyahu is instructing the IDF to prepare for the occupation of Gaza City. There is no further argument about what the Israeli state has planned for the people there. More death and more destruction through the methods of siege and starvation, and the obliteration of the means of life. The very last people who should be deemed as terrorists are those doing what they can to stop the horror which has been unfolding daily for nearly two years. Indeed, it is the UK Government which has failed, emphatically, in its duties to prevent genocide, as instructed by the International Court of Justice. History will not be kind to those who were complicit or active in their support for this unfathomable crime. just as it will record all of those who made a stand against it.
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Treasury ‘looking at' new property taxes to replace stamp duty
Government officials are looking at a potential national property tax, which would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes, The Guardian reported. No final decision has been made, but it is thought this national tax could help build a model for local levies to replace council tax in the medium term. Buyers pay stamp duty under the existing framework, if they purchase property worth more than £125,000. The new levy would be paid by owner-occupiers on houses worth more than £500,000 when they sell their home, with the amount due determined by the value of the property and a rate set by the Government. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'As set out in the plan for change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. 'Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8 billion and cut borrowing by £3.4 billion. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance, or VAT.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves will unveil any changes to the Government's tax policy at a fiscal event, such as a budget. Former government adviser Tim Leunig has previously suggested replacing stamp duty land tax with a 'national proportional property tax' levied on house values greater than £500,000, in a paper published by the think tank Onward. At a rate of 0.54%, with a 0.278% supplement on values over £1 million, the levy 'would raise the same amount as stamp duty'. Sir Mel Stride, Conservative shadow chancellor, said: 'The Conservatives have warned that more taxes are coming and now reports are emerging that the family home is next in the firing line. 'This tax grab would punish families for aspiring to own their own home. 'Under Labour nothing is safe. Your home, your job, your pension – the Chancellor has all of it in her sights. 'Rachel Reeves will tax your future to pay for her failure.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Royal Navy should sail to Gaza to deliver aid, says MSP
Humanitarian groups, including Oxfam and Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), say they are increasingly being told they are "not authorised" to deliver aid, unless they comply with the stricter Israeli regulations. Groups risk being banned if they "delegitimise" the state of Israel or do not provide detailed information about Palestinian staff, the letter says. Israel denies there are restrictions on aid and says the rules, introduced in March, ensure that aid "reaches the population directly and not Hamas". The UN this month reported that 859 Palestinians had been killed near GHF sites since May, a figure the GHF denies. Hamas's 2023 attack killed about 1,200 people in Israel, with 251 seized and taken into Gaza as hostages. Read more: Israel's offensive has since killed nearly 62,000 Palestinians, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. It said last week that 235 people including 106 children have also died due to starvation and malnutrition. "There is absolutely nothing stopping European nations from breaking the siege," Mr Greer told The Herald. "If the British navy sailed to Gaza right now, there is nothing Israel could do to stop them. "We are allowing this starvation to take place. The aid could be put onto British naval ships and sailed to Gaza which is on the coast. "We couldn't reach the West Bank without going through the territory of another country. If you wanted to get to Gaza through the Rafa crossing you would need to get Egypt to agree if you wanted to get to the West Bank you would need Jordan to agree, but there is nothing stopping us from sailing straight to Gaza to break the siege." According to the letter by the humanitarian groups, most major international non-governmental organisations (NGO) have been unable to deliver a single truck of lifesaving supplies since 2 March. Scottish Greens MSP and leadership candidate Ross Greer (Image: Colin Mearns) They say Israeli authorities "have rejected requests from dozens of non-governmental organisations to bring in lifesaving goods", citing the new rules. More than 60 requests were denied in July alone. Aid groups' inability to deliver aid has "left hospitals without basic supplies, children, people with disabilities, and older people dying from hunger and preventable illnesses", the statement said. Mr Greer has previously called on the Scottish Government to boycott trade ties with Israel. Mr Greer wrote to the First Minister earlier this month demanding that he adopt the principles of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign, which aims to put pressure on the Israeli economy in the mould of the anti-apartheid boycott of South Africa. Read more: A Scottish Government spokesperson said ministers would 'consider' the proposal, which would see official guidance issued to businesses urging them to end trade with Israel, as was done with Russia in 2022. Mr Greer's letter to John Swinney welcomed the First Minister's acknowledgement that 'there is a genocide in Palestine', but the MSP said he disagreed with the assertion that he was 'trying to do everything I possibly can do to make sure that we apply the pressure' on Israel. Before setting out measures to implement the BDS campaign's demands, Mr Greer said: 'As we both know and have previously discussed, there is much more which the Scottish Government can be doing to put pressure on Israel to end its genocide in Palestine.' He called for the Scottish Government to scrap part of the Local Government Act 1988 to allow councils to bar companies from winning contracts if they participated in the illegal occupation of Palestinian territory. Mr Greer suggested this could be achieved through an amendment to the Community Wealth Building Bill. As well as issuing guidance to businesses recommending that they halt trade with Israel, Mr Greer suggested the Scottish Government should stop funding arms firms which have supplied Israel during the war and 'all other companies directly complicit in the occupation'. Mr Greer told The Herald: "John Swinney rightly said that what Israel is doing to Palestine is genocide and I was glad he said it. "I took issue with the fact that he said the Scottish Government is doing all that it can. That is not the case. "The moment that Russia launched the full scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 the Scottish Government issued an instruction to every business in Scotland telling them to stop all trade with Russia. They have never done that with Israel. "Israel is unequivocally committing a genocide and our government has not only failed to encourage businesses to cut ties with Israel but our government itself has not cut ties. "So what I have proposed is to take the list of companies identified by the United Nations as being directly complicit in the genocide and the illegal occupation and disqualify every one of those companies from being able to bid for public sector contracts in Scotland or being able to receive grants of public money in Scotland that we amend the local government act to allow councils to adopt their own boycott policies. "As it stands local councils are not legally allowed to essentially set boycott policies based on geography that is a legacy of Margaret Thatcher's. She wanted to make it impossible for councils in the UK to boycott South African Apartheid so she banned it. "It is still in law. So I am asking the Scottish Government, who have responsibility for this now, to remove it from the law because I think councils in Scotland should be able to boycott Russia and Israel as they are two countries committing the most horrendous war crimes at the moment. A Scottish Government spokesperson previously said: 'The Scottish Government has repeatedly called for an immediate and sustainable ceasefire, the unconditional release of all hostages and an urgent increase in humanitarian aid to Gaza. The Scottish Government will continue to press the UK Government to recognise a sovereign Palestinian state, as part of a two-state solution to secure lasting peace in the region. 'Ministers will consider and reply to Mr Greer's letter.' The Ministry of Defence was approached for comment.
