Justice Janet Protasiewicz rejects calls to recuse herself from Act 10 public unions case
Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Janet Protasiewicz, a member of the court's liberal majority, is refusing calls from GOP lawmakers to recuse from a case challenging the collective bargaining law that she had criticized and protested in 2011 and called unconstitutional on the campaign trail.
Protasiewicz said Wednesday in an order denying the lawmakers' request that her past criticisms do not meet the benchmark for recusal.
"(The Legislature) fails to cite a single case holding that a judge's family background and/or past activities can amount to a 'significant personal interest' that disqualify her from participating in a proceeding," Protasiewicz wrote. "There is no such case. If that were the rule, then a justice related to a doctor could be disqualified from medical malpractice cases. Former NRA members could be disqualified from Second Amendment cases. Participants in free speech rallies could be disqualified from First Amendment cases. Justices who voted in elections could be disqualified from cases challenging the election results. Where would it end?"
Her order was issued the same time the court denied a motion to hear an appeal in the case before it went through lower courts.
Protasiewicz's decision comes two weeks after conservative state Supreme Court Justice Brian Hagedorn issued an order announcing he would recuse from the same case, citing his work drafting the law at the heart of the legal challenge.
In the Jan. 30 court filing, Hagedorn said he determined that "the law requires" him to recuse himself from the case involving Act 10, which was signed into law by former Gov. Scott Walker in 2011 and drew massive protests. Hagedorn provided legal counsel in both creating the legislation and later defending Act 10 once it became law when he served as Walker's chief legal counsel.
"After reviewing the filings and the various ethical rules I am sworn to uphold, I have concluded that the law requires me to recuse from this case," Hagedorn wrote.
In their Jan. 28 motion to seek Protasiewicz's recusal, Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu and Assembly Speaker Robin Vos cited Protasiewicz's past comments about the law, including telling the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel during her 2023 campaign she would consider recusing from the case if elected.
She told the Journal Sentinel in March 2023 she would "have to think about it," when asked if she would consider recusing from a potential Act 10 challenge.
"Given the fact that I marched, given the fact that I signed the recall petition, would I recuse myself? Maybe. Maybe. But I don't know for sure."
LeMahieu and Vos in the motion to the court referenced those comments and said their filing "asks her to do what she acknowledged to be right and ethical: step aside on this case."
Protasiewicz wrote Wednesday that by answering "maybe" to whether she would recuse, she "showed that I had not yet formed an opinion on the merits of any hypothetical, future Act 10 case."
The court's liberal bloc holds a 4-3 majority, and Hagedorn's recusal subtracts a conservative from that equation.
Hagedorn said in his January order that recusal from a case "should be rare — done only when the law requires it." But he added that recusal "is not optional when the law commands it."
Protasiewicz said the law does not require her to step aside. In 2023 she also rejected calls to step away from lawsuits before the court involving the state's legislative maps.
"The reality is, judges are human," she wrote. "They all have personal experiences. Some experiences may pertain to cases that come before the court. Judges come to the bench after practicing law for many years. During their legal careers, they form opinions about the law and the constitution. That does not prove that they are biased."
Molly Beck can be reached at molly.beck@jrn.com.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Janet Protasiewicz rejects calls to recuse herself from Act 10 case
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
6 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Maine can't enforce foreign election interference law that appeals court calls unconstitutional
PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Maine can't enforce a voter-approved foreign election interference law that a federal appeals court said likely violates the Constitution by limiting political donations. Voters overwhelmingly approved a ban on foreign governments and companies with 5% or more foreign government ownership from donating to state referendum races. The law is one of a handful around the country that attempt to limit foreign influence on U.S. elections. The law has been on hold pending federal lawsuits from utilities companies and media organizations that raise constitutional challenges about it. The U.S. District Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Boston said in court papers in July that it affirmed a lower-court ruling that the law likely violates the First Amendment. 'The prohibition is overly broad, silencing U.S. corporations based on the mere possibility that foreign shareholders might try to influence its decisions on political speech, even where those foreign shareholders may be passive owners that exercise no influence or control over the corporation's political spending," wrote Judge Lara Montecalvo. The matter was sent back to the lower court, where it will proceed, and there has been no substantive movement on it in recent weeks, said Danna Hayes, a spokesperson for the Maine attorney general's office, on Monday. The law is on the state's books, but the state cannot enforce it while legal challenges are still pending, Hayes said. Voters approved the law in 2023 by a margin of 86% to 14%. It followed a multimillion-dollar effort by a Canadian-owned utility to influence a project in Maine in which it's a partner. The law reflects the will of Maine residents to ensure clean elections, said Rick Bennett, chair of Protect Maine Elections, the committee formed to support the 2023 ballot initiative. He said the fight to save the law was still ongoing.
New York Post
6 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump vows federal law to override state cash bill bans; Stefanik to author legislation
WASHINGTON — President Trump pledged Monday to push through federal legislation outlawing so-called 'no cash bail' policies in states and cities across the country — with upstate Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) quickly telling The Post she will be writing the bill. 'Every place in the country where you have no cash bail is a disaster,' Trump said at a White House press conference where he announced that he was taking temporary control of DC's police department. 'That's what started the problem in New York, and they don't change it. They don't want to change it. That's what started in Chicago.' New York state in 2019 barred judges from requiring bail for most crimes, including burglary and simple assault, leading to many high-profile instances of offenders quickly finding new victims upon their release — prompting Albany to make some changes to expand judges' authority to hold suspects. 3 President Trump said Monday he will seek to legislative the end of local rules against cash bail. Yuri Gripas – Pool via CNP / MEGA 'I will be leading legislation to end [Gov.] Kathy Hochul and New York's failed bail reform once and for all to save New York and save America,' Stefanik told The Post soon after Trump spoke. 'The radical, dangerous and insane criminals and illegals-first policies must end now. We need law and order that puts America first.' 3 Rep. Elise Stefanik told The Post she will write the bill. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Trump floated potential additional measures against New York at his press conference, without going into details. 'Bad politicians started it, bad leadership started it, but that's one thing that's central, no cash bail,' Trump said. 'Somebody murders somebody and they're out on no cash bail before the day is out.' Trump vowed to force a bill through Congress, despite slim Republican majorities in the House and Senate, where 60 votes generally is needed to approve legislation. 'I'm going to have to get the Republicans to vote. Because the Democrats are weak on crime — totally weak on crime. They don't know why. They want it to stop because they get mugged too,' he said. 'We'll count on the Republicans in Congress and the Senate to vote. We have the majority, so we'll vote. We don't have a big majority but we've gotten everything, including the great big beautiful bill.' DC US Attorney Jeanine Pirro praised the concept, but added Monday that she wanted to heap pressure on the District's Council to change other laws, including the city's Youth Rehabilitation Act, which allows judges to set aside the sentences of offenders 24 and younger. 3 US Attorney Jeanine Pirro of DC slammed the DC Council and bans on cash bail. Ron Sachs – CNP / MEGA Pirro, whose office uniquely prosecutes both federal and local crime, noted that gunman Javarry Peaks, 19, was sentenced to probation last month by DC Superior Court Judge Rainey Branch — despite being filmed shooting a fellow bus passenger in the chest. 'I convict someone of shooting another person with an illegal gun on a public bus in the chest [with] intent to kill,' Pirro said. 'I convict him and you know what? The judge gives him probation, says you should go to college. We need to go after the DC Council and their absurd laws.'
New York Post
6 minutes ago
- New York Post
Adams backer hosts GOP mayoral nominee in Hamptons for impromptu fundraiser
Big-time Eric Adams backer John Catsimatidis hosted Republican mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa for an impromptu Hamptons fundraiser — as the billionaire businessman pushes an 'Anyone But Zohran' movement targeting the socialist frontrunner. Sliwa was the guest of honor Saturday at Catsimatidis' 'Hamptons Business Power Breakfast' — a regular Southampton meeting of influential New Yorkers — that has also recently hosted the incumbent mayor and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo. 'I appreciate everyone who invited me out to share our plan to fix New York City and bring common sense back to City Hall,' Sliwa said to The Post. John Catsimatidis hosted GOP nominee Curtis Sliwa at a Hamptons breakfast. Dennis A. Clark Cats is pushing the charge against Zohran Mamdani, and told the crowd on Saturday, 'ABZ, anyone but Zohran.' Matthew McDermott His campaign confirmed a haul of more than $21,000 from the jaunt out east on Long Island. 'When the movers and shakers join together with regular, working-class New Yorkers behind this campaign, it's a clear sign we're on the path to defeating Zohran Mamdani and turning this city around,' Sliwa said, referring to the Democratic mayoral nominee. Catsimatidis praised Sliwa's performance on Monday, telling The Post the event turned into an impromptu fundraiser for the GOP nominee for mayor. 'Curtis did exceptionally well,' he said. 'People at the end… volunteered and made a contribution. That was not the original intent.' The Guardian Angels founder turned heads when he entered the room, and some attendees didn't initially recognize him as he ditched his signature red beret — which he's been doing more frequently on the campaign trail. The event was co-hosted by Alex Karloutsos, a Greek Orthodox priest who received the Presidential Medal of Honor in 2022. More than 100 other movers and shakers in Big Apple politics attended, including former New York Lieutenant Governor Betsy McCaughey, former NYPD Police Commissioner Ray Kelly. Catsimatidis told the room that business leaders and others need to unite to stave off a mayoralty of Zohran Mamdani, who stunned the politicos in June when he delivered an embarrassing defeat to Cuomo in the Democratic primary. 'ABZ….Anybody but Zohran Mamdani,' the radio host and supermarket magnet told the crowd. The Gristedes owner said he wants to continue to urge people that 'socialism doesn't work in our city.' Sliwa will square off with Queens Assemblyman Mamdani in November when Cuomo, Adams and another independent Jim Walden will also be on the ballot. Recent polls still have Mamdani as the frontrunner in the general election, with Cuomo sitting in second and Sliwa in third.
