
Criminals are more likely to re-offend in Australia. It may be down to one factor
The 40-year-old was released on parole after four and a half years and struggled to adjust to everyday life after leaving the routine of his life in prison. Getting a job proved even more difficult.
I applied for everything really … and I've got a resume, I've got an extensive working history, and nobody would give me a crack.
Vincent Siahaan believes many people struggle to adjust to life outside prison. Source: Supplied "I did sit for some interviews, and I'd have to tell them that I'd need to take some time off each week to see my parole officer, and they'd say 'that's fine, we'll get back to you'. But no-one did," Siahaan says. He says he was fortunate his wife had a job and was able to cover their living expenses, but many of his friends did not have this option. He says many of them have reoffended, particularly those who were unable to find work or did not have a reliable support system to help them turn their lives around.
Before his first-hand experience, Vincent says he had not understood why people were repeat offenders.
I just couldn't understand how stupid you must be to just come in and out … you get a second, third, fourth chance. And I just didn't understand it until I got out myself. "It's hard if you have no support, it's hard if you don't have a roof over your head," he says.
"It's hard if you don't have money, a car, what are you meant to do? How many times are you supposed to take rejection?".
Australia's high recidivism rates Lorana Bartels is a professor of criminology at the Australian National University and director of the Justice Reform Initiative, a non-partisan advocacy organisation that works to reduce the imprisonment rate in Australia. She says Australia's rate of recidivism is very high by international standards. "One common measure [of calculating recidivism rates] is what proportion of people who are in prison have been in prison previously," she says.
"It's a measure used in many countries around the world, and our rate here in Australia is about 60 per cent, and in many countries it's more like 20 per cent."
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, in 2024, there were 44,403 people in prison in Australia. Of these, 26,679 people had been imprisoned before. Bartels says certain demographics, such as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and people from rural and remote areas, are statistically more likely to return to custody. "[They are] often returning to areas with lower employment prospects, poorer health opportunities, greater housing and economic stress; these are all things that are associated with a higher recidivism rate," she says.
"For someone coming out of prison, if they don't have housing, if they don't have a job, if they can't read and write, if they have untreated mental health and alcohol and drug issues … the chances of them managing to stay out of prison are pretty low."
The 'most effective factor' in reducing recidivism While the reasons for convicted criminals re-offending are complex, there are key factors that appear to make a difference in people staying out of the system.
Nicole Dwyer is the CEO of Workskil Australia, a not-for-profit supporting people facing barriers to employment.
Dwyer says the organisation is working with around 3,000 former offenders across the country. "The three big issues for people leaving prison and why they go back in are: They can't find access to housing — that's probably one of the biggest issues at the moment, especially with the housing crisis," she says. "They also [often] don't have any connection with family and friends, so they're fairly isolated, and they can't find employment. "If you can crack those three things, we find you can reduce re-offending substantially." Of these factors, Dwyer says employment is the most effective in preventing recidivism
She believes having access to support services and employment programs can make a difference.
Bartels agrees and says employment "occupies a number of hours of the day, it gives the person money, it gives them a social identity". "Many people who have been in the system for a long time, they may not know any [other] way of life other than committing crime and hanging out with other people who commit crime," she says.
"So being involved in stable legal employment is a really important way to start creating a new non-offending identity."
'Something to prove' Mitchell Harnwell, 30, spent nearly four years going in and out of the prison system while struggling with drug addiction.
He says he applied for jobs and attended several interviews, but struggled to find an employer who would hire him due to his criminal history. Eventually, he returned to selling drugs.
When you need money to pay bills, you do what you need to do to get by.
"It was easier to make a phone call and start selling again, and then with selling it becomes using, and it's the same cycle," he says.
Mitchell Harnwell struggled to find a job after being released from prison. Source: Supplied Harnwell was eventually able to get clean, and found a job through a friend whose employer knew about his history and was open to giving him a chance. Having a job provided him not only with an income, but also structure and stability, and helped him stay busy and "keep out of trouble".
He believes many former prisoners can make good employees, particularly for physically demanding jobs, as they are used to following a routine and have a good fitness level after training in prison.
We come out fit, you're used to working hard, and a lot of time, you've got something to prove, so you work extra hard. Finding a new identity With his wife's support, Siahaan became a certified personal trainer and set up his own business. Now, he is in the process of setting up a charity and advocating for more support for former inmates.
He has set up a community organisation, Inside Out, connecting former inmates with prospective employers, and has been overwhelmed with the response.
Like Harnwell, Siahaan says work opportunities can help those in need of routine and stability after leaving prison. "Inside there is structure … everyone knows their place, and then you get out here and it's sort of like you lose your identity," he says. "When I came out, I felt lost … and that's why a job is so crucial, because it sort of gives you a purpose or identity." While he says the reasons for recidivism are complex, he believes employment is one of the biggest factors.
"You won't be as inclined to stray if you have people holding you accountable and you have something to wake up to every morning — but a lot of people don't get that chance."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
South Africa ODI bowler reported over suspect action
South Africa's spinning allrounder Prenelan Subrayen has been reported over a suspect bowling action after the Proteas' victory in the first one-day international against Australia. The 31-year-old offspinner, who took the key wicket of Travis Head early on before taking 1-46 in his 10 overs, had been making his ODI debut in the 98-run win in Cairns on Tuesday. But in the match officials' report, concerns were cited about the legality of his bowling action. With Subrayen now having to face an independent assessment of his action at an ICC-accredited testing facility within 14 days, the news is a blow to the Proteas who are already having to cope without injured star paceman Kagiso Rabada. After losing the T20I series 2-1, the Proteas are eyeing revenge in the ODI series with two matches still to be played in Mackay on Friday and Sunday. It was only two months ago that Subrayen also earned his first Test appearance against Zimbabwe in Bulawayo, and he was immensely proud and emotional after the honour of receiving his first ODI cap in Cairns. Subrayen has previously had plenty of scrutiny over his action, starting well over a decade ago. In December 2012, Cricket South Africa (CSA) placed him under rehabilitation after two separate independent tests showed his action to be illegal, but he was cleared to bowl again in January 2013 after re-testing. Subrayen was subsequently reported twice the following two years during matches, before he was eventually cleared to resume bowling after having his action examined at South Africa's national performance centre in March 2016.


Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
South Africa ODI bowler reported over suspect action
South Africa's spinning allrounder Prenelan Subrayen has been reported over a suspect bowling action after the Proteas' victory in the first one-day international against Australia. The 31-year-old offspinner, who took the key wicket of Travis Head early on before taking 1-46 in his 10 overs, had been making his ODI debut in the 98-run win in Cairns on Tuesday. But in the match officials' report, concerns were cited about the legality of his bowling action. With Subrayen now having to face an independent assessment of his action at an ICC-accredited testing facility within 14 days, the news is a blow to the Proteas who are already having to cope without injured star paceman Kagiso Rabada. After losing the T20I series 2-1, the Proteas are eyeing revenge in the ODI series with two matches still to be played in Mackay on Friday and Sunday. It was only two months ago that Subrayen also earned his first Test appearance against Zimbabwe in Bulawayo, and he was immensely proud and emotional after the honour of receiving his first ODI cap in Cairns. Subrayen has previously had plenty of scrutiny over his action, starting well over a decade ago. In December 2012, Cricket South Africa (CSA) placed him under rehabilitation after two separate independent tests showed his action to be illegal, but he was cleared to bowl again in January 2013 after re-testing. Subrayen was subsequently reported twice the following two years during matches, before he was eventually cleared to resume bowling after having his action examined at South Africa's national performance centre in March 2016.

ABC News
7 hours ago
- ABC News
Matt Wright's friend denies committing perjury to protect the Netflix star, NT Supreme Court jury hears
Matt Wright's friend has denied committing perjury out of loyalty to the celebrity croc wrangler after accusations he became "tangled in [his] own lies" during the trial. Mr Wright has pleaded not guilty in the Northern Territory Supreme Court to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice in the aftermath of a fatal 2022 helicopter crash. Catch up on today's live coverage of Matt Wright's Supreme Court trial. The crash killed his Netflix co-star Chris "Willow" Wilson and badly injured pilot Sebastian Robinson but Mr Wright is not accused of any wrongdoing in relation to the accident itself. Instead, prosecutors allege he tried to frustrate the investigation that followed in a bid to cover up shoddy record keeping in his chopper business, including by asking Mr Robinson to doctor flight records. On Wednesday, Mr Wright's employee and friend Tim Johnston told the court his boss had become "irate" and was "at 11 out of 10" after finding out he had taken items from Mr Robinson's Brisbane hospital room after the crash. Mr Johnston told the jury he was in Brisbane on holiday when a mutual friend, Jai Tomlinson, asked him to "pick something up" from Mr Robinson's mother, Noelene Chellingworth, but he had "no idea" what it was. "How do you pick something up that you don't now what it is?" Crown prosecutor Jason Gullaci SC asked. "You ask someone for it and grab it and pick it up," Mr Johnston replied. "How did you know what you were picking up?" "That was not for me to know, I was asked to pick something up." Mr Johnston said after Ms Chellingworth handed him a "folded-up A4 bit of paper" he went outside Mr Robinson's room and asked the injured pilot's brother if there was "anything else you want me to take back". "He had a little backpack there and in his backpack there was a book and a phone and various other things," he said. "He got them both out but he didn't want to give me the phone." Mr Johnston said he then took the diary and piece of paper and went to catch a taxi but called Mr Wright before leaving the hospital grounds. "I told him what I'd brought back and mate, he went, he got very irate, very irate," he said. "About what?" Mr Gullaci asked. "Taking the diary," Mr Johnston replied. "I can't recall in detail what he said but I know when Matt gets irate and he was at 11 out of 10 that day. "He told me that I've done the wrong thing and I need to get it back up to Noelene." After the lunch break, Mr Gullaci suggested it was actually Mr Wright who had instructed Mr Johnston to collect the items and asked him if "you understand what perjury is". "Are you still prepared to tell lies for Matt Wright in that scenario?" he asked. "I have never been prepared to tell lies for Matt Wright," Mr Johnston replied. "I'm putting to you directly that what you want to do, and out of loyalty and out of friendship I can understand it, you want to protect Mr Wright at all costs?" "Disagree." "And you are prepared to tell blatant lies if in your mind it protects Mr Wright?" "No." Mr Gullaci also suggested there were "critical differences" between the account Mr Johnston gave in a pre-trial hearing in July and his evidence on Wednesday. "That's because you became tangled in your own lies," Mr Gullaci suggested. "Disagree," Mr Johnston replied. Mr Tomlinson also took the stand on Wednesday and denied ever asking anyone to "go and collect some items" from Mr Robinson before visiting him in hospital with Mr Wright. "At any point before your visit, had you done any of those things, that is, ask anyone to go there and get particular items from Mr Robinson?" Mr Gullaci asked. "No," Mr Tomlinson replied. The trial continues in Darwin on Thursday when Mr Tomlinson will resume his evidence.