BlackRock CEO thinks we might already be in a recession
As the stock market turbulence prompts fears that the U.S. could soon be in a recession, an investment management firm executive believes we're already there.
President Donald Trump 's back-and-forth approach to his tariff policy — announcing an across-the-board tax one week and then pausing it the next — has caused the markets to go wild.
In just a week's span, the market has endured historic drops — after the president unveiled his new 'Liberation Day' tariffs — and historic gains — after Trump announced a 90-day pause. But with some levies still in effect and others set to return in a few months, the gains haven't curbed fears of uncertainty over the future of the U.S. economy.
'I think we're very close, if not [already] in, a recession now,' BlackRock CEO Larry Fink warned on CNBC 's 'Squawk on the Street' on Friday.
Trump has announced that 75 countries have started negotiating regarding the tariffs, but China isn't one of them. He then imposed an additional levy on China, raising its total tariff to a very hefty 145 percent.
'I think you're going to see, across the board, a slowdown until there's more certainty. And we now have a 90-day [pause] on the reciprocal tariffs — that means longer, more elevated uncertainty,' he noted.
Fink warned of the pitfalls in the wake of the release of BlackRock's first quarterly report of 2025, in which he also highlighted the unpredictability of what's to come. 'Uncertainty and anxiety about the future of markets and the economy are dominating client conversations,' he wrote.
The BlackRock CEO isn't the only one who is concerned about the negative effects from the uncertainty over Trump's trade war.
Jon Gray, president of Blackstone Inc., told an audience at a Steers Center for Global Real Estate event Thursday: 'The longer you have periods of heightened volatility,' the higher the chance that 'something goes awry and that has some sort of domino effect.'
"I still think this is more 'sell the rip' than 'buy the dip,'' in stocks, he remarked.
Renaissance Macro head of economics Neil Dutta told Yahoo Finance on Thursday: 'Lots of problems continue. But it is nice to see the President backing off and focusing on China.' Still, he warned: 'The issue is prolonged uncertainty."
Trump's allies have insisted that there's nothing to worry about, and that certainty is on the horizon.
"You had the highest rise in stock market history [Wednesday]. Of course there's gonna be a little pullback,' Peter Navarro, Trump's trade adviser, told CNN Thursday. 'It's just normal retracement after a big day. It's no big deal."
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday that he expects after negotiating with other countries, 'we will end up in a place of great certainty over the next 90 days.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Albanese still awaiting crucial meeting with Donald Trump
Anthony Albanese is jetting off abroad to meet other world leaders, yet has been criticised for failing to secure an official meeting with Donald Trump as the US administration applies pressure on Australia's defence spending. The Prime Minister will leave Canberra on Friday to meet his 'dear friend', the Prime minister of Fiji, Sitiveni Rabuka, before then travelling on to Seattle for a meeting of world business leaders. His next stop will be the G7 summit in the mountainous Canadian town of Kananaskis where Albanese will cross paths with the US President, just days after the Pentagon announced it was launching a review into the $368bn AUKUS submarine deal. 'I look forward to working productively with world leaders to discuss how we tackle some of the most challenging issues facing Australia, our region, and the world,' Albanese said. But the Opposition has been critical of his inability to lock in a meeting with Trump, at time when the AUKUS deal hangs in the balance and Australia has not been able to get an exemption to US trade tariffs. It also comes at a time when the US President has put pressure on Australia to increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP - up from the current rate of around 2.3 per cent. Albanese has spoken over the phone twice to President Trump since he was re-elected in November last year but the pair are yet to meet face-to-face. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said on Friday morning she was 'concerned' about the US review into the AUKUS deal by Defence Under Secretary for Policy, Elbridge Colby, who she claimed was a 'a sceptic of AUKUS'. Under the $368 billion submarine program, Australia is set to acquire at least three nuclear-powered Virginia-class boats from the US in the early 2030s before a new fleet is built for delivery from the 2040s. The pact between Australia, the US, and the UK is aimed at countering China's expanding presence in the Indo-Pacific. But the Pentagon review will assess whether the deal meets Trump's 'America First' objectives. Ley acknowledged that it was 'really hard' to secure a meeting with the US President, but she insisted Albanese had failed where others had succeeded. 'Lots of other world leaders have had that meeting. We haven't,' Ley told KIIS FM. However, Trump is yet to lock in any meetings with other world leaders at the summit, The Australian reported. The G7 brings together seven of the world's largest advanced economies – Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States – and the European Union. Climate and security are expected to dominate the diplomatic talks between leaders. Australia is not a member of the G7, but Canadian prime minister Mark Carney extended an invitation to Albanese. He is expected to meet with the US president on the sidelines of the conference, where he could try to carve out a tariff exemption. Australia is facing 10 per cent tariffs on goods exported to the US and - like every US trading partner except the UK - has been hit with 50 per cent tariffs on aluminium and steel sent to America.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' to make wealthy even richer and punish poor
Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' will hand thousands of dollars to the rich and leave poorer Americans worse off, a US spending watchdog has warned. The top 10pc of households will get a windfall of $12,000 (£8,800) per year from the Bill's tax cuts, while the bottom 10pc will see a net loss of $1,600 per year because of benefits cuts, according to analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). This means the richest people in America will get a cash boost worth 2.3pc of income while the poorest households will see losses worth 3.9pc. Mr Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill Act', as the legislation is known, was narrowly passed by House Republicans last month and is currently under scrutiny by the Senate. The president has set a July 4 deadline for a final version of the Bill. The Bill has come under heavy fire for driving up America's debt burden just as economists are sounding alarm bells over the sustainability of the US debt pile. Earlier this month, Mr Trump's former 'first buddy' Elon Musk slammed the Bill as a 'disgusting abomination' that he said would saddle America with 'crushing' debt. The US lost its last triple-A credit rating in May after a downgrade from influential credit agency Moody's. According to the CBO, the measures outlined in the Bill will add $2.4 trillion to the US deficit over the next decade.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump's 'peacemaker' pledge takes big hit as Israel strikes Iran
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - On the campaign trail, U.S. President Donald Trump promised to end the world's hottest conflicts and usher in global peace, but nearly five months in, with Israel attacking Iran and bloodshed in Gaza and Ukraine unabated, those hopes are in shambles. U.S. ally Israel struck dozens of Iranian targets in a dramatic and multi-faceted attack on Thursday that analysts say threatens to eventually spiral into an all-out regional war. The strikes appear to be a snub to Trump, who had repeatedly pushed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to attack Iran, though the president himself had threatened to bomb the Gulf nation if nuclear talks failed. "Trumpian diplomacy is one of the first casualties of these attacks," said Brett Bruen, a former foreign policy adviser to Democratic President Barack Obama. "He has struggled to even get close to a ceasefire (in Gaza), let alone peace in any major conflict. Iran was looking the most promising - and Netanyahu just spoiled it." The White House, the Israeli embassy in Washington and Iran's U.N. mission did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The strikes are also a rebuke of Steve Witkoff, Trump's Middle East envoy and close aide, who has been working intensively with Iranian negotiators towards a diplomatic solution to curb its nuclear program. Witkoff had sought unsuccessfully to persuade Netanyahu to remain patient while U.S.-Iran negotiations proceeded. Those talks have been deadlocked. Some Trump allies privately acknowledge that his diplomatic efforts had been faltering even before Israel's attack. His second term in office started with what seemed like a foreign policy win. Shortly before Trump's inauguration, Witkoff worked with aides to then-President Joe Biden to secure a long-sought ceasefire in Gaza between Israel and Hamas militants. But that accord fell apart in weeks. The U.S. has also made little discernible progress toward a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, whose conflict Trump vowed to end before even taking office. And his administration has taken no visible steps toward expanding the Abraham Accords, a landmark pact brokered in Trump's first term to forge diplomatic ties between Israel and several Arab neighbors. As Trump has struggled to seal peace accords, foreign policy divisions have opened inside his own administration. Dozens of officials, from the National Security Council to the Pentagon to the State Department, have been jettisoned amid the infighting. Even before Israel's attack, several administration officials had begun to privately question if Witkoff, who lacks diplomatic experience but has emerged as Trump's top negotiator, had overstayed his welcome. As Israel's attacks unfolded on Thursday, some prominent Democrats expressed frustration that Trump had scrapped during his first term a deal between the United States, Iran and European allies forged during the Obama administration. Trump and Republicans had condemned that deal, saying it would not have kept a nuclear bomb out of Tehran's hands. Democrats fault Trump for not yet coming up with a credible alternative. "This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict," Democratic Senator Chris Murphy said in a post on X. Whether Thursday's strikes will trigger a regional conflict remains unclear. Even so, analysts said, Tehran could see U.S. assets in the region as legitimate targets. For example, Tehran-aligned Houthi rebels in Yemen could resume their bombing campaign against ships transiting the Red Sea. Also unclear is Israel's ability to permanently impede Iran's nuclear program. Analysts doubt in particular the ability of Israel to destroy Iran's Fordow enrichment plant, which is buried deep underground. While Israel could probably do extensive damage, experts say a more lasting blow would require U.S. military assistance, which U.S. officials said was not provided. Another question mark is just how effectively Tehran can respond. Israel has indicated that it has targeted several Iranian leaders in the bombing campaign, which is expected to continue in coming days. All these factors will decide if the blow to Trump's aspirations to be seen as a global peacemaker will be a terminal one, or merely a setback. "If Israel is to be taken at its word that tonight's strikes were the first round in an all-out Israeli campaign against Iran's nuclear and missile programs, Iran's regime is now knee-deep within a potentially existential, life-or-death moment," said Charles Lister, head of the Syria Initiative at the Middle East Institute. "That paints tonight's strikes in a whole new, unprecedented light and makes the risk of a major spiral of escalation far more real than what we've seen play out before."
