OVP budget delibs: Courtesy given to, expected from all agencies —Suansing
The House Appropriations panel will always extend courtesy to Vice President Sara Duterte and all heads of government agencies during the upcoming budget deliberations with high hopes that the same courtesy will be given to the House members, House Appropriations panel chairperson and Nueva Ecija Representative Mikaela Suansing said.
Suansing made the response when asked if the House will extend courtesy to the Vice President who, during last year's deliberations on the proposed 2025 budget, asked for the replacement of the presiding officer at the time, then-appropriations senior vice chairperson Stella Quimbo, after one of the House members asked the Vice President on how her office spent its confidential fund allocation in previous years.
'Under my leadership as chairperson of the committee on appropriations, I commit that all of the agencies...all of the heads of agencies will receive the respect due and commensurate with their offices. We [will] extend the same courtesy to all of the heads of agencies, and we will invite all heads of agencies to attend the budget deliberations,' Suansing said.
'I really do hope that the heads of agencies would extend the same courtesy of respect. Because all we want here, pareho lang naman po tayo ng kagustuhan na talagang masusi...maging masusi iyong deliberasyon patungkol sa budget. Para po magawa natin 'yung ganoong [masusi] na paghimay sa budget, kailangan po magkaroon tayo ng matiwasay na pagdinig. And that is highly dependent on the way that all the parties engage with each other,' she added.
(We want the same thing: a comprehensive discussion of the national budget. We can only execute a comprehensive scrutiny on the proposed national budget if we will calmly deliberate on its merits.)
The Vice President, who was impeached by the House in February mainly due to allegations of the misuse of P612.5 million worth of confidential funds and saying she had contracted someone to kill President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos, Jr., earlier said she expects the House to make cuts to the Office of the Vice President's (OVP) proposed P903-million budget for 2026.
In 2024, the House reduced the OVP's proposed 2025 budget by P1.29 billion due to the Vice President's repeated refusal to answer queries on how her office's confidential fund was spent and adverse findings of the Commission on Audit on how the OVP used its funds in years 2023 to 2024.
The COA findings include:
OVP's lease expenses increased to P53 million in 2023 from P29 million in 2022
only P600,000 out of P150 million budget for Magnegosyo Ta Day was used
each of the 10 satellite offices, except for Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (P200,000), accumulated P2.2 million in cash advances.
no clear guidelines in distribution of bags and books ('Isang Kaibigan') for students
53 schools in PagbaBAGo program (bag distribution) have no pre-determined list of beneficiaries
students have pre-signed forms confirming receipt of bags ahead of distribution
The House's reduction of the OVP budget was adopted by the Senate and eventually signed into law by the President.
Day 1
The budget deliberations for the proposed P6.7-trillion budget for 2026 is expected to start on Monday, August 18.
Set to face the House appropriations panel on August 18 is the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), the newly-formed Department of Economy, Planning, and Development )(DepDev, Department of Finance (DOF) and Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP).
These agencies make up the Development Budget Coordination Committee, which faces the House appropriations panel first as oer customary.
DBM is headed by Secretary Amenah Pangandaman, while DepDev is led by Secretary Arsenio Balisacan.
Former Senator Ralph Recto is the DOF chief, while BSP is headed by Governor Eli Remolona, Jr. — BM, GMA Integrated News
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
4 hours ago
- GMA Network
Marcos wants merchant marines proactive in supporting PH maritime efforts
President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. tasked Friday the Philippine Merchant Marine Academy (PMMA) to take proactive steps in supporting the country's maritime efforts amid tensions in the West Philippine Sea. Marcos made the directive as he visited the Training Center and equipment facilities of the PMMA in San Narciso, Zambales. The President said this as he aims to strengthen national security and further elevate education and technology in the maritime sector. During his visit, Marcos inspected the P40-million Full Mission Ship Handling Simulator. He also witnessed a live reenactment of the BRP Suluan (MRRV-4406) incident last Monday, which resulted in the collision of two Chinese vessels near Bajo de Masinloc. The President also inspected the PMMA's latest equipment and technology, together with PMMA Superintendent Commodore Joel Abutal. The PMMA recently partnered with various agencies and companies like Kpler Singapore, providing AIS and RADAR marine traffic solutions, which enable real-time vessel tracking in strategic waters. Further, Quanby Solutions also supplied military-grade aerial drones and delivered specialized training to enhance surveillance capabilities. The PMMA is also collaborating with the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) on a feasibility study for the innovative "bangka drone" project to secure future funding and deployment. Marcos has made a commitment that Philippine assets would never back out, after a Chinese vessel fired a water cannon at a Philippine ship in the West Philippine Sea (WPS). The Department of Foreign Affairs earlier expressed serious concern over "dangerous" maneuvers by China against Philippine ships in the region last Monday. To recall, the flagpole of the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) ship BRP Suluan was bent after getting hit by a warship of the PLAN during the incident. The PCG vessel sustained the damage when PLAN 164 had a collision with China Coast Guard (CCG) vessel 3104 as the two Chinese ships chased the Philippine vessel. — VDV, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
Makati Business Club, MAP join call for SC to reverse ruling on Sara's impeachment
The country's most influential business organizations, Makati Business Club (MBC) and Management Association of the Philippines (MAP), have joined legal and judicial advocates in calling on the Supreme Court to rule in favor of the House of Representatives' appeal to reverse its decision declaring the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. 'We join a nation hopeful that the Supreme Court shall steadfastly resume its role in defending the Constitution that the Filipino people have ratified at a pivotal time in our history,' the MBC, MAP, Integrity Initiative, and Justice Reform Initiative said in a joint statement on Friday. 'We beg the Court to guard against the erosion of the constitutional design that can set aside the people's sovereign will. Our fidelity must always be to the principle that no one stands above the Constitution, and no government official is supreme over the Filipino people they are sworn to faithfully serve,' the groups said. The House has filed a motion for reconsideration asking the high court to reverse its ruling junking the impeachment case against the Vice President, saying it should be allowed to perform its exclusive duty to prosecute an impeachable official, and the Senate's to try the case. In its appeal before the high tribunal, the House argued that the fourth impeachment complaint, signed off by 215 House members, is the only initiated impeachment case against the Vice President because it met the Constitutional requirement of the complaint being endorsed by at least one-third of the House members, which allowed the House to transmit the Articles of Impeachment straight to the Senate en route to the impeachment trial, bypassing Committee deliberations. Voting 13-0, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously, deeming that the Articles of Impeachment are barred by the one-year rule under Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution. Moreover, the magistrates ruled that the articles violate the right to due process. The MBC, MAP, Integrity Initiative, and Justice Reform Initiative said the 'decision of the [Supreme] Court as it stands sends a dangerous signal throughout the bureaucracy that abuse of power and corruption carry no consequence.' 'If we fail to hold the highest officials of the land accountable, how can we expect accountability from those below them?' The groups argued that the appeal filed by the lower chamber 'merits reconsideration,' due to the following: 'Deemed Initiated' is not in the Constitution One-year bar not triggered Venue for due process is specific Impeachment is to protect the people The groups explained that the high court treated the first three complaints as 'deemed dismissed' triggering the one-year bar for the initiation of the next impeachment, but, in effect, 'treated the first three complaints (counted as one) as 'deemed initiated' as well.' 'For how can there be a succeeding impeachment initiation to bar if the first has not even been initiated? This deeming effect rests on no Constitutional text because whenever the charter desires that legal effect, it states so expressly, such as on: who are 'deemed natural-born citizens' (Article IV, Section 2) ; who are 'deemed to have renounced citizenship' (Article IV, Section 4); 'deemed re-enacted' budget (Article VI, Section 25[7]); 'deemed certified' special election bill (Article VII, Section 10); 'deemed submitted for decision' (Article VIII, Section 15[2]; Article IX, Section 7); 'deemed lifted' freeze order (Article XVIII, Section 26[3]),' the groups said. 'If the framers of the Constitution intended that inaction by the House shall make an impeachment 'deemed initiated,' it would have been so indicated like the rest of the provisions above stated,' they added. With this, the groups said the Supreme Court, in its decision has said that 'complaints not properly endorsed by a member of the House within a reasonable period, even if dismissed, does not trigger the one-year bar.' They said that, 'in the same breath, the Court deems inaction by the House as a dismissal that triggers the one-year bar.' 'This, we submit, stands in tension with the Court's own reasoning: in both cases, the House did not act and yet there are different legal effects.' The MBC, MAP, Integrity Initiative, and Justice Reform Initiative said, moreover, said that the 'venue for due process is specific' as 'impeachment is neither a criminal nor administrative proceeding,' adding that 'it is a sui generis process for which the Constitution provides specific venues for due process: in the Committee on Justice for the first mode of impeachment (by verified complaint endorsed by a member of the House); or at the Senate Trial for the second mode (Impeachment by direct resolution transmitted to the Senate).' 'The Senate by stopping the impeachment initiated through the second mode, and the Court by its decision in this case as it stands, unfortunately prevented due process from happening,' the groups said. The groups further said that 'impeachment is to protect the people,' citing the Article XI, 'Accountability of Public Officers', of the Constitution which provides that the impeachment process exists to serve the public and 'not to shield a government official from the rigors of defending himself or herself, but to safeguard the people's right to demand accountability from those who wield authority supposedly on their behalf.' The groups stressed that 'without accountability, the government loses trust.' The MBC, MAP, Integrity Initiative, and Justice Reform Initiative said that if the high court's ruling is 'uncorrected,' it 'will institutionalize the flaws in our rule of law.' 'The impact is not only political, it's also economic. When investor confidence retracts, when costs of doing business rise, when the supply chain struggles, invariably, it's the consumers, the people, who will pay the price. Everyone needlessly suffers - as our history as a nation repeatedly taught us,' the groups said. — BAP, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
House hit with P16.8B budget cut in proposed 2026 budget
The House of Representatives got a P17.2 billion proposed budget for 2026 under the National Expenditure Program (NEP) which is a P16.8 billion cut from the current P34 billion budget. Based on the NEP submitted by the Department of Budget (DBM) and Management to Congress, the House was allocated P6.46 billion for personnel services and P10.74 billion for Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE). Noticeably, there was also zero allocation for Capital Outlay for the House of Representatives. All these figures were down compared with the 2025 budget, wherein the House had P7.73 billion for Personnel Services, P22.4 billion for MOOE, and P4 billion for Capital Outlay. The House's P17.2 billion proposed budget for 2026 is broken down to the following: P6.22 billion for general management and supervision P649 million for administration of personnel benefits and P10.34 billion for House of Representatives Legislative Program The House of Representatives has been led by Speaker and Leyte Rep. Martin Romualdez, cousin of President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., since 2022. For the 20th Congress, the President's son and Ilocos Norte Rep. Sandro Marcos has also been elected to serve as the House Majority Leader, the chief of the House Committee on Rules that schedules deliberations on proposed bills. Reforms In an earlier statement, Romualdez said the House will ensure that the national budget for 2026 will alleviate the lives of Filipinos. 'Bawat gastusin [ng gobyerno], dapat may pakinabang sa tao. Because a budget the people can trust is a government the people can believe in,' Romualdez said. (Government expenditures should benefit the people.) Romualdez also said that at least five significant reforms will be enforced by the House of Representatives in the scrutiny and enactment of the budget for fiscal year 2026. The House will remove the 'small committee' that collated institutional amendments, according to Romualdez. It will also open the Bicameral Conference Committee on the budget to the public and the media and civil society, people's organizations, and the private sector will also be invited to join budget hearings. Romualdez pointed out that the reforms seek to ensure full transparency and to involve the public through people's organizations, noting that the budget is the people's money. 'A budget is not just a spending plan—it is a mirror of our priorities and a measure of our accountability to the people. And because this is the people's money, the process of crafting it must be transparent, inclusive, and worthy of public trust,' Romualdez said. President Ferdinand ''Bongbong'' Marcos Jr. has urged members of Congress who will deliberate the proposed 2026 national budget to "swiftly enact" it. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
