Big non-banking lenders in India are gaining trust and growing fast: Fitch Ratings
New Delhi [India], June 19 (ANI): India's non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) are growing strongly, with large lenders leading the way, says Fitch Ratings.
These institutions offer a wide range of financial services, and their credit ratings depend on how strong and stable their business models and finances are.
According to Fitch, large NBFIs with a proven track record are earning more trust from investors and lenders. This growing confidence is helping them stay ahead of smaller players in the sector.
By the end of September 2024, 17 major NBFIs tracked by Fitch had increased their share of the total loan market to 38 per cent, up from 30 per cent in March 2022. These leading lenders recorded an annual loan growth rate of 20 per cent during this period, much higher than the 9 per cent growth rate of the overall NBFI sector.
These big NBFIs have also become financially stronger. Their debt-to-equity ratio -- a measure of how much they borrow compared to their own funds -- dropped from 4.5 times in 2021 to 4.3 times by mid-financial year 2025.
This improvement came from raising more capital and keeping profits within the business, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Lower debt levels help reduce the risk of financial trouble if loan repayments slow down. Fitch expects this trend to continue, with most NBFIs using their earnings to fund future growth rather than paying out large dividends.
Despite slower global economic growth, India's NBFI sector continues to expand. The sector includes a wide variety of companies offering different types of loans.
In cities, competition is tough for secured loans like home or car loans. But in rural areas, some NBFIs face less competition from banks. However, higher costs and greater credit risks in rural lending can affect profitability, depending on how well the loans are managed.
Fitch also highlights that the type of loans an NBFI focuses on plays a big role in its success. Those with deep experience and large operations in specific segments tend to have more stable and sustainable businesses.
Many NBFIs lend to non-prime customers -- people who may not get easy loans from banks -- which can help them earn higher margins, unless banks enter the same market.
Large NBFIs benefit from their size and strong market position. They usually have better access to funding, more control over pricing, and lower costs.
Those that lead in their lending areas are better able to manage risks and stay profitable, even during economic ups and downs. Companies backed by large corporate groups may also get easier access to funds and benefit from group support.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Why We Needn't Worry About Oil Prices Amidst Israel-Iran Conflict (For Now)
Oxford, England: The unexpected attack by Israel on Iran, a major oil-producing nation, may undermine anaemic global economic growth and hinder central banks' ability to cope in an already uncertain market. Iran exports up to 2 million barrels of oil and refined petroleum products per day (million barrels per day – mbd). Due to long-standing sanctions, most of this oil is sold to China at discounted prices. Normally, a sudden loss of the Iranian exports (equivalent to around 2% of global oil supply) would trigger panic. But Opec (the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) is in the process of reversing the production cuts imposed early in the COVID pandemic (and subsequently). This leaves the organisation with an unusually large spare capacity of at least four million barrels per day, most of which is held by Saudi Arabia (up to 3.5 million) and the UAE (about one million). On top of that, the International Energy Agency (IEA) holds more than 1.2 billion barrels of emergency reserves across OECD countries, ready to be deployed if needed. China, too, has significant reserves, though the line between its commercial and strategic stocks is less clear. Additionally, some 40 million barrels of Iranian oil are stranded aboard anchored ships near China, unsold due to declining industrial demand and electric vehicles hitting petrol consumption. In May, China's refinery throughput fell 1.8% year-on-year, with no signs of a swift rebound. What's more, the IEA is expecting global oil production to exceed 1.8 mbd, compared to its earlier projection of only 0.72 mbd, leaving a massive surplus of supply over demand. China has proven to be an opportunistic buyer. It did not buy the excess Iranian oil supplies at US$65 (£48) a barrel earlier this year, and whether it buys at US$75 (at the time of writing) or higher, may be a signal of how seriously it views the Middle East tensions. Meanwhile, other Asian importers have been quick to secure prompt shipments from west Africa, and have eyes on US supplies as well. Thanks to this surplus capacity and stagnant demand, the oil market's reaction has been more muted than many feared. Prices briefly spiked by US$10 but have since eased. It appears that the market is assessing whether the hostilities will escalate. If so, the impact on energy prices and inflation could be more significant. A Conflict Of Convenience It remains somewhat unclear why Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu chose this moment to strike Iran, especially in the middle of peace negotiations between Iran and the United States. In a recent interview, former Israeli leader Ehud Barak admitted that even a full-scale attack would only delay Iran's nuclear ambitions by weeks or months at best, with US support. Diplomacy, then, may remain the more effective route. This was the rationale behind the Iran nuclear deal brokered under US president Barack Obama, a deal later dismantled by Trump under pressure from Netanyahu. So, Netanyahu's endgame might be political survival and diverting attention from the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. If Iran feels sufficiently cornered, it may retaliate by shutting down the Strait of Hormuz – a strategic chokepoint through which up to 20 million barrels of oil pass daily. A lot of that oil can be diverted through alternative supply routes such as a large (6 mbd) Saudi East-West pipeline leading to the Red Sea. There is also the UAE pipeline, which avoids the Strait of Hormuz and leads to the port of Fujairah, in the Gulf of Oman. Nevertheless, the increased risk and higher shipping costs would certainly result in much higher prices at the pump. The cost of insurance for ships travelling through the Strait of Hormuz have jumped 60% since the start of the conflict. That, combined with the broader economic fallout, could have global repercussions. The World Bank recently downgraded its global growth forecast to 2.3% for 2025 – nearly half a percentage point below previous estimates. While a worldwide recession is not yet predicted, the bank warned that growth this decade could be the slowest since the 1960s. Among the leading culprits is Trump's tariff policy, which has strained global trade, reduced efficiency and effectively imposed a tax on consumers both in the US and elsewhere. The fear of inflation has led to rising long-term bond yields. Expectations of higher inflation and high bond yields, in turn, constrain central banks from stimulating the economy by cutting interest rates. This is a key tool used by the US Federal Reserve to influence the cost of borrowing throughout the US economy and thus attempt to stimulate economic activity. And in spite of the recent US-UK trade agreement, the deal includes a 10% tariff on imports from the UK – with steel still at 25%. UK economic growth had already slipped into negative territory before the conflict began. Now, with the added strain of geopolitical instability, households are bracing for higher petrol prices at the pump, sluggish wage growth and rising unemployment. The conflict in the Middle East may not have sparked a global oil crisis yet, but it certainly won't improve anyone's cost of living.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Confident of supplying 2 driverless trains a month for Bengaluru Metro's Yellow Line from August: Titagarh
Titagarh Rail Systems Limited (TRSL), which designs and manufactures driverless trains for Bengaluru Metro's Yellow Line (Electronic City) corridor, has said it will deliver its fourth train in July and two trains a month from August. Speaking to TRSL Deputy Managing Director Prithish Chowdhary said, 'We will be delivering the fourth train next month and two trains every month from August to BMRCL (Bengaluru Metro Rail Corporation Limited). We are very confident in our strength and capabilities. Our team is geared up, and we see no challenges in manufacturing as of now.' Initially set to be commissioned in 2021, the 18-km Yellow Line, connecting RV Road and Bommasandra via Electronic City, is marred by a rolling-stock supply crisis, leading to extensive delays. The coaches for the driverless Bengaluru Metro are manufactured by Chinese firm CRRC Nanjing Puzhen Co Ltd, along with TRSL, as part of the Make-in-India Initiative. The Chinese firm won a Rs 1,578-crore contract in 2019 to supply 216 coaches to BMRCL. Major challenges included visa processing for Chinese engineers in view of the Galwan valley clash, supply-chain disruptions of raw materials due to the Covid pandemic, and the adoption of new technology by Indian engineers. Explaining the reason for delay, Vijay Subramanian, CEO, Passenger Rolling Stock, TRSL, said, 'Learning gap is now history. It was more of a teething problem initially. Our technology partners were CRRC, and all procurement and resourcing came from China. We were doing complete assembly here under CRRC's supervision. We also faced difficulties bringing CRRC people from China and commissioning engineers from Korean companies due to visa issues. We lost a lot of time, but now all problems are resolved. We have a huge contingent of CRRC people (55 Chinese engineers) at TRSL today, and we are almost in a serial mode of production.' Further, company officials also attributed the delay to inspections undertaken by internal safety and quality control teams as well as CRRC and BMRCL officials before dispatching the coaches for delivery. The coaches are being designed and built to be operational for the next 35 years. Additionally, the coaches also undergo various safety and quality control tests before commissioning. It includes static, dynamic, and mainline testing involving integration of technology, synchronisation of the technology with the metro systems and trial runs on the mainline, before throwing up the line for revenue services. For the production infrastructure of Bengaluru Metro, TRSL also set aside an outlay of over Rs 1,000 crore, of which a large part has already been spent. 'We (Titagarh) had experience making aluminum coaches, which is more complex than stainless steel, so we proved our capability. Discussions with CRRC led to a strong partnership. We invested heavily in setting up the stainless steel line, robotics, jigs, fixtures, and training. About Rs 1,000 crore is the total capital outlay between 2022 and 2027, with a large part already spent,' Chowdhary said. On working with CRRC, Subramanian said, 'The key learning was the stainless steel process, robotic line, and setting up facilities using CRRC's expertise. As the world's largest rolling-stock manufacturer, CRRC's decades of knowledge were invaluable. We leveraged their insights to establish our facilities.' Meanwhile, BMRCL is also contemplating commissioning the line with the already delivered three train sets at 30-minute intervals with stops at certain stations. 'However, the operations across all 16 stations on the Yellow Line are expected between August and September, pending the delivery of additional driverless train sets and final safety approvals from the Commissioner of Metro Railway Safety,' said a BMRCL official. Sanath Prasad is a senior sub-editor and reporter with the Bengaluru bureau of Indian Express. He covers education, transport, infrastructure and trends and issues integral to Bengaluru. He holds more than two years of reporting experience in Karnataka. His major works include the impact of Hijab ban on Muslim girls in Karnataka, tracing the lives of the victims of Kerala cannibalism, exploring the trends in dairy market of Karnataka in the aftermath of Amul-Nandini controversy, and Karnataka State Elections among others. If he is not writing, he keeps himself engaged with badminton, swimming, and loves exploring. ... Read More
India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
India records highest growth in power generation after US & China in last five years: IEA
New Delhi [India], June 19 (ANI): India has emerged as a country with the third-largest growth in power generation capacity globally over the past five years, according to the latest report by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Only China and the United States surpassed India in power generation growth during this period. It said 'India has seen the third-largest growth in power generation capacity in the world after China and the United States'. The report highlighted that India's electricity demand has been rising sharply due to several factors. These include the expansion of commercial and residential spaces, increased ownership of air conditioners and other household appliances, and growing demand from industries. To meet this growing demand, power generation in the country has expanded across all energy sources. The report mentioned that a major driver of this expansion has been the strong push towards renewable energy. The report noted a significant increase in investments in clean energy, especially solar photovoltaic (PV) projects. In fact, solar PV alone accounted for more than half of the total non-fossil energy investment in India over the past five years. In 2024, as much as 83 per cent of power sector investment in the country went into clean energy initiatives. India was also the largest recipient of development finance institution (DFI) funding for clean energy in 2024. The country received around USD 2.4 billion in project-specific funding aimed at boosting clean energy generation. In terms of foreign investment, India has seen a steady rise in foreign direct investment (FDI) in the power sector. FDI reached USD 5 billion in 2023, nearly twice the level seen before the COVID-19 pandemic. This growth is partly driven by government policies that allow 100 per cent FDI in all areas of electricity generation (except nuclear power) and transmission infrastructure. However, the report also pointed out that foreign portfolio investment in India's energy sector has seen a decline in the past two years. This drop is attributed to a mix of macroeconomic and sector-specific challenges, though the long-term trend remains positive. Overall, the IEA report outlined India's strong performance in power generation and its growing focus on clean energy investment. (ANI)
