logo
Would Floridians notice if state government shut down?

Would Floridians notice if state government shut down?

Yahoo6 days ago

Florida's Old Capitol and New Capitol, viewed from the Leon County Courthouse on March 21, 2022. (Photo by Michael Moline/Florida Phoenix)
While the Florida Legislature exhibits nowhere near the level of bile-spitting, brainless dysfunction you get in Washington, they haven't exactly been a model of a sleek, responsive government machine.
For weeks, there was no budget. No hint of a budget.
Instead of getting done the one thing the Constitution says they have to get done, they've been indulging in that sure-fire negotiating tactic: insulting each other.
Then Friday: a trickle of white smoke emanating from the Capitol.
Habemus budget!
A budget framework, anyway.
It's a bit short on details, other than 'permanent sales tax exemptions targeted toward Florida families,' elimination of sales tax on commercial leases, and a boost to the state's rainy-day fund.
Money for education, health care, environmental restoration, culture, roads — little stuff like that — has yet to be spelled out. Seems House and Senate leaders will be meeting this week to thrash out details and plan, they claim, to hold a vote by June 16.
Things remain contentious, and that's not counting the wild card in the process: our congenitally angry governor.
He can veto appropriations he doesn't like or, knowing him, appropriations he thinks his legislative enemies particularly care about.
The state budget is not yet a done deal. If it's not passed by June 30, we could even have a government shutdown.
Thought experiment: Would you notice?
Bears might: Shuttered FWC offices could slow down final approval for bear hunting, passed by this year after passionate lobbying from the Davy Crockett Caucus.
State workers might: Their paychecks would be suspended.
Holders of state contracts might: They'll be in limbo.
Anyone wanting to visit a state park might: The gates will be locked.
Still, most Floridians probably wouldn't realize their government isn't working.
It often doesn't. Work, that is.
Instead of addressing our numerous problems, from unaffordable housing to unaffordable insurance to inflation to flooding, elected officials prefer to spend much of their time worrying about pronouns, boasting about helping Trump's storm troopers arrest brown folks, or trying to rename the Gulf of Mexico.
Floridians don't expect much. And not much is what we'll get.
Floridians don't expect much.
And not much is what we'll get.
The Senate wanted sales tax 'holidays' for clothes, tools, hurricane preparedness, and 'Second Amendment Summer items,' i.e. cross bows, firearms, ammo.
The House wanted to slash state sales taxes from six percent to 5.25%.
Who knows which, and in what form, these proposals will survive the process.
The governor hates all of it. He's been stomping around the state throwing tantrums about how lower sales taxes only help tourists and 'foreigners,' railing, 'I don't want to give Canadians a tax cut.'
He might not have to worry about tax relief for those sinister Canadians much longer: They're selling their Florida condos and taking vacations in Mexico and Portugal instead.
DeSantis' plan? Give every homeowner a $1,000 rebate.
Then work up to abolishing property taxes altogether.
Awesome! Lower taxes! Maybe no taxes! We hate taxes, right?
Problem is, most of us love schools, sidewalks, roads, garbage pick-up, parks, police departments, fire departments, municipal pools, good drinking water, bike paths, animal shelters, electricity, and emergency medical services.
Florida cities and counties depend on taxes to fund these. The House and Senate plan will reduce the state budget by $2.25 billion.
That's likely to hurt everybody.
No surprise. A number of measures passed this session are not exactly citizen-friendly.
One example: Given our increasingly strong hurricanes and the floods they bring, the state should encourage people to rebuild more resilient structures.
But no: A bill approved this session will block attempts to strengthen construction after storms.
The idea is to 'streamline' the process (translation: Help developers who can sue if a local government institutes 'burdensome or restrictive' rules) so you can build your house or your business or your school back under the same outdated codes that failed to protect it last time.
The bill also raises the price of flood insurance.
Nice, huh?
Another example: In a fit of good taste, the Senate refused to confirm some of DeSantis' more appalling University of West Florida board nominees, including yahoos who think the GI Bill was a bad idea or that women don't belong in higher education.
Good for them. But legislators had a chance to do even more for higher education by putting college president searches back in the sunshine where they belong.
Bills stopping the governor installing his hand-picked faith followers sailed through various committees, but in the end they were withdrawn.
Fear of a gubernatorial melt-down? Line-item vetoes of pet projects?
Presidents will still be chosen in secret subject to the whims of the governor and his tame boards of trustees.
To be fair, the Legislature did decide to forbid oil and gas drilling within 10 miles of the Apalachicola Estuarine Reserve, and passed a bill to shield state parks from the kind of boneheaded nonsense the governor wanted in 2024: You know, 'improving' the parks with golf courses, pickleball courts, and luxury hotels.
DeSantis actually realized (for once) he'd screwed up big time last year and signed the bill.
This year, he demonstrated he hadn't quite learned his lesson.
A secretive outfit calling itself Upland LLC wanted the state to give it 600 acres of preservation lands on the Guana River in St. Johns County in exchange for 3,000 acres of non-contiguous, less environmentally significant property scattered around four counties.
Apparently, that swap sounded good to DeSantis. The state Acquisition and Restoration Council served up a report claiming there was nothing special about the Guana River land, no historic sites, no amazing habitat, nothing like that — never mind the ancient Native American shell middens, wood storks, roseate spoonbills, and old oak hammocks — and rushed the required public comment meeting.
Genuine Floridians (the ones their government ignores) rose up on their hind legs and said hell, no. Loudly.
Upland, its feelings hurt, pulled out of the deal — no thanks to DeSantis and his Department of Environmental Prostitution.
Why, you ask, is this state so self-defeating?
Or, to put it another way, why can't we have nice things?
Florida has one of the most regressive taxation systems in the country, what the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy calls an 'upside down' model. The rich pay a far smaller percentage of their income than the middle classes and the poor.
If the state decides to deprive itself — us — of tax dollars, we will all suffer.
Florida's social safety net is already tattered.
Twenty percent of children live in poverty. The state ranks 40th in child health and 45th in economic well-being.
You'd think lawmakers would figure out helping to feed, educate, and take care of children is worth the money: Healthy, educated people contribute to the economy.
But children don't vote. Or write big fat campaign checks.
It's bad enough our so-called representatives can't do their jobs in a timely manner and must keep coming back for special sessions to decide which taxes to cut and by how much while simultaneously costing the taxpayer around $50,000 every day they hang around in Tallahassee.
The governor, the most mobility impaired of waterfowl, his political career in the dumpster, his wife's charity under investigation for possible money laundering, still wants to abolish property taxes.
Maybe he thinks that will give him a nice slogan to run for president on if we have an election in 2028.
The Legislature wants to curry favor with their voters by giving them a break on stuff they buy.
Everybody loves a bargain, right?
But it's not much of a bargain if your quality of life goes to hell.
Cities and counties are staring into the abyss, wondering how they'll fund everything citizens expect.
School roofs won't be repaired, parks won't be maintained, bad water pipes won't be fixed, new cops won't be hired, EMS will be cut, potholes will proliferate.
But hey, it's a small price to pay for a sales tax break on batteries and backpacks, right?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Never use violence': Camp Pendleton Marines could be deployed to LA protests as governor continues to push back
‘Never use violence': Camp Pendleton Marines could be deployed to LA protests as governor continues to push back

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Never use violence': Camp Pendleton Marines could be deployed to LA protests as governor continues to push back

SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — President Trump is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles after two days of clashes between immigration authorities and demonstrators following several raids across the city, and the Secretary of Defense has put Camp Pendleton Marines on high alert to be deployed if needed. Governor Newsom has been vocal Saturday, taking to X to push back against President Trump's orders to deploy the state National Guard, saying, in part, 'This is the wrong mission and will erode public trust. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully.' Federal agents conducting immigration raid in Los Angeles County; protest quickly erupts While protestors and federal immigration authorities in riot gear continued to clash Saturday and tear gas and smoke filled the air on and off, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, posted on X Saturday night he was mobilizing the National Guard immediately to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles, and placed active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton on high alert to be mobilized 'if violence continues.' Governor Newsom responded on X, saying, 'the Secretary of Defense is now threatening to deploy active-duty Marines on American soil against its own citizens. This is deranged behavior.' It began Friday when ICE and federal immigration authorities raided several businesses in the Los Angeles area and people took to the streets to push back. Large groups of protestors gathered near the site of the raids on Friday and again on Saturday. Trump deploying California National Guard over governor's objections to LA to quell protests Law enforcement in riot gear and gas masks were seen blocking streets, firing tear gas and smoke bombs as protestors continued to gather, in some cases throwing cement pieces and firing off fireworks. Watch a live feed of the scene of ICE activity in Paramount here. Viewer discretion is advised. This is developing. Stay with FOX 5/KUSI for the latest updates Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

What to know about Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to LA protests

time35 minutes ago

What to know about Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to LA protests

President Donald Trump says he's deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles to respond to immigration protests, over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. It's not the first time Trump has activated the National Guard to quell protests. In 2020, he asked governors of several states to send troops to Washington, D.C. to respond to demonstrations that arose after George Floyd was killed by Minneapolis police officers. Many of the governors he asked agreed, sending troops to the federal district. The governors that refused the request were allowed to do so, keeping their troops on home soil. This time, however, Trump is acting in opposition to Newsom, who under normal circumstances would retain control and command of California's National Guard. While Trump said that federalizing the troops was necessary to 'address the lawlessness' in California, the Democratic governor said the move was 'purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' Here are some things to know about when and how the president can deploy troops on U.S. soil. Generally, federal military forces are not allowed to carry out civilian law enforcement duties against U.S. citizens except in times of emergency. An 18th-century wartime law called the Insurrection Act is the main legal mechanism that a president can use to activate the military or National Guard during times of rebellion or unrest. But Trump didn't invoke the Insurrection Act on Saturday. Instead, he relied on a similar federal law that allows the president to federalize National Guard troops under certain circumstances. The National Guard is a hybrid entity that serves both state and federal interests. Often it operates under state command and control, using state funding. Sometimes National Guard troops will be assigned by their state to serve federal missions, remaining under state command but using federal funding. The law cited by Trump's proclamation places National Guard troops under federal command. The law says that can be done under three circumstances: When the U.S. is invaded or in danger of invasion; when there is a rebellion or danger of rebellion against the authority of the U.S. government, or when the President is unable to 'execute the laws of the United States,' with regular forces. But the law also says that orders for those purposes 'shall be issued through the governors of the States.' It's not immediately clear if the president can activate National Guard troops without the order of that state's governor. Notably, Trump's proclamation says the National Guard troops will play a supporting role by protecting ICE officers as they enforce the law, rather than having the troops perform law enforcement work. Steve Vladeck, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center who specializes in military justice and national security law, says that's because the National Guard troops can't legally engage in ordinary law enforcement activities unless Trump first invokes the Insurrection Act. Vladeck said the move raises the risk that the troops could end up using force while filling that 'protection' role. The move could also be a precursor to other, more aggressive troop deployments down the road, he wrote on his website. 'There's nothing these troops will be allowed to do that, for example, the ICE officers against whom these protests have been directed could not do themselves,' Vladeck wrote. The Insurrection Act and related laws were used during the Civil Rights era to protect activists and students desegregating schools. President Dwight Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas, to protect Black students integrating Central High School after that state's governor activated the National Guard to keep the students out. George H.W. Bush used the Insurrection Act to respond to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of white police officers who were videotaped beating Black motorist Rodney King. National Guard troops have been deployed for a variety of emergencies, including the COVID pandemic, hurricanes and other natural disasters. But generally, those deployments are carried out with the agreements of the governors of the responding states. In 2020, Trump asked governors of several states to deploy their National Guard troops to Washington, D.C. to quell protests that arose after George Floyd was killed by Minneapolis police officers. Many of the governors agreed, sending troops to the federal district. At the time, Trump also threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act for protests following Floyd's death in Minneapolis – an intervention rarely seen in modern American history. But then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper pushed back, saying the law should be invoked 'only in the most urgent and dire of situations.' Trump never did invoke the Insurrection Act during his first term. But while campaigning for his second term, he suggested that would change. Trump told an audience in Iowa in 2023 that he was prevented from using the military to suppress violence in cities and states during his first term, and said if the issue came up again in his next term, 'I'm not waiting.' Trump also promised to deploy the National Guard to help carry out his immigration enforcement goals, and his top adviser Stephen Miller explained how that would be carried out: Troops under sympathetic Republican governors would send troops to nearby states that refuse to participate, Miller said on 'The Charlie Kirk Show,' in 2023. After Trump announced he was federalizing the National Guard troops on Saturday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said other measures could follow. Hegseth wrote on the social media platform X that active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton were on high alert and would also be mobilized 'if violence continues.'

Travel ban may shut door for Afghan family to bring niece to US for a better life

time39 minutes ago

Travel ban may shut door for Afghan family to bring niece to US for a better life

IRMO, S.C. -- Mohammad Sharafoddin, his wife and young son walked at times for 36 hours in a row over mountain passes as they left Afghanistan as refugees to end up less than a decade later talking about their journey on a plush love seat in the family's three-bedroom suburban American home. He and his wife dreamed of bringing her niece to the United States to share in that bounty. Maybe she could study to become a doctor and then decide her own path. But that door slams shut on Monday as America put in place a travel ban for people from Afghanistan and a dozen other countries. 'It's kind of shock for us when we hear about Afghanistan, especially right now for ladies who are affected more than others with the new government,' Mohammad Sharafoddin said. 'We didn't think about this travel ban.' President Donald Trump signed the ban Wednesday. It is similar to one in place during his first administration but covers more countries. Along with Afghanistan, travel to the U.S. is banned from Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Trump said visitors who overstay visas, like the man charged in an attack that injured dozens of demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado, earlier this month, are a danger to the country. The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, which isn't included in the ban. The countries chosen for the ban have deficient screening of their citizens, often refuse to take them back and have a high percentage of people who stay in the U.S. after their visas expire, Trump said. The ban makes exceptions for people from Afghanistan on Special Immigrant Visas who generally worked most closely with the U.S. government during the two-decade war there. Afghanistan was also one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Trump suspended refugee resettlement on his first day in office. It is a path Sharafoddin took with his wife and son out of Afghanistan walking on those mountain roads in the dark then through Pakistan, Iran and into Turkey. He worked in a factory for years in Turkey, listening to YouTube videos on headphones to learn English before he was resettled in Irmo, South Carolina, a suburb of Columbia. His son is now 11, and he and his wife had a daughter in the U.S. who is now 3. There is a job at a jewelry maker that allows him to afford a two-story, three-bedroom house. Food was laid out on two tables Saturday for a celebration of the Muslim Eid al-Adha holiday. Sharafoddin's wife, Nuriya, said she is learning English and driving — two things she couldn't do in Afghanistan under Taliban rule. 'I'm very happy to be here now, because my son is very good at school and my daughter also. I think after 18 years they are going to work, and my daughter is going to be able to go to college,' she said. It is a life she wanted for her niece too. The couple show videos from their cellphones of her drawing and painting. When the Taliban returned to power in 2021, their niece could no longer study. So they started to plan to get her to the U.S. at least to further her education. Nuriya Sharafoddin doesn't know if her niece has heard the news from America yet. She hasn't had the heart to call and tell her. 'I'm not ready to call her. This is not good news. This is very sad news because she is worried and wants to come,' Nuriya Sharafoddin said. While the couple spoke, Jim Ray came by. He has helped a number of refugee families settle in Columbia and helped the Sharafoddins navigate questions in their second language. Ray said Afghans in Columbia know the return of the Taliban changed how the U.S. deals with their native country. But while the ban allows spouses, children or parents to travel to America, other family members aren't included. Many Afghans know their extended families are starving or suffering, and suddenly a path to help is closed, Ray said. 'We'll have to wait and see how the travel ban and the specifics of it actually play out,' Ray said. 'This kind of thing that they're experiencing where family cannot be reunited is actually where it hurts the most.' The Taliban have criticized Trump for the ban, with their top leader Hibatullah Akhundzada saying the U.S. was now the oppressor of the world. 'Citizens from 12 countries are barred from entering their land — and Afghans are not allowed either,' he said on a recording shared on social media. 'Why? Because they claim the Afghan government has no control over its people and that people are leaving the country. So, oppressor! Is this what you call friendship with humanity?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store