Would Floridians notice if state government shut down?
While the Florida Legislature exhibits nowhere near the level of bile-spitting, brainless dysfunction you get in Washington, they haven't exactly been a model of a sleek, responsive government machine.
For weeks, there was no budget. No hint of a budget.
Instead of getting done the one thing the Constitution says they have to get done, they've been indulging in that sure-fire negotiating tactic: insulting each other.
Then Friday: a trickle of white smoke emanating from the Capitol.
Habemus budget!
A budget framework, anyway.
It's a bit short on details, other than 'permanent sales tax exemptions targeted toward Florida families,' elimination of sales tax on commercial leases, and a boost to the state's rainy-day fund.
Money for education, health care, environmental restoration, culture, roads — little stuff like that — has yet to be spelled out. Seems House and Senate leaders will be meeting this week to thrash out details and plan, they claim, to hold a vote by June 16.
Things remain contentious, and that's not counting the wild card in the process: our congenitally angry governor.
He can veto appropriations he doesn't like or, knowing him, appropriations he thinks his legislative enemies particularly care about.
The state budget is not yet a done deal. If it's not passed by June 30, we could even have a government shutdown.
Thought experiment: Would you notice?
Bears might: Shuttered FWC offices could slow down final approval for bear hunting, passed by this year after passionate lobbying from the Davy Crockett Caucus.
State workers might: Their paychecks would be suspended.
Holders of state contracts might: They'll be in limbo.
Anyone wanting to visit a state park might: The gates will be locked.
Still, most Floridians probably wouldn't realize their government isn't working.
It often doesn't. Work, that is.
Instead of addressing our numerous problems, from unaffordable housing to unaffordable insurance to inflation to flooding, elected officials prefer to spend much of their time worrying about pronouns, boasting about helping Trump's storm troopers arrest brown folks, or trying to rename the Gulf of Mexico.
Floridians don't expect much. And not much is what we'll get.
Floridians don't expect much.
And not much is what we'll get.
The Senate wanted sales tax 'holidays' for clothes, tools, hurricane preparedness, and 'Second Amendment Summer items,' i.e. cross bows, firearms, ammo.
The House wanted to slash state sales taxes from six percent to 5.25%.
Who knows which, and in what form, these proposals will survive the process.
The governor hates all of it. He's been stomping around the state throwing tantrums about how lower sales taxes only help tourists and 'foreigners,' railing, 'I don't want to give Canadians a tax cut.'
He might not have to worry about tax relief for those sinister Canadians much longer: They're selling their Florida condos and taking vacations in Mexico and Portugal instead.
DeSantis' plan? Give every homeowner a $1,000 rebate.
Then work up to abolishing property taxes altogether.
Awesome! Lower taxes! Maybe no taxes! We hate taxes, right?
Problem is, most of us love schools, sidewalks, roads, garbage pick-up, parks, police departments, fire departments, municipal pools, good drinking water, bike paths, animal shelters, electricity, and emergency medical services.
Florida cities and counties depend on taxes to fund these. The House and Senate plan will reduce the state budget by $2.25 billion.
That's likely to hurt everybody.
No surprise. A number of measures passed this session are not exactly citizen-friendly.
One example: Given our increasingly strong hurricanes and the floods they bring, the state should encourage people to rebuild more resilient structures.
But no: A bill approved this session will block attempts to strengthen construction after storms.
The idea is to 'streamline' the process (translation: Help developers who can sue if a local government institutes 'burdensome or restrictive' rules) so you can build your house or your business or your school back under the same outdated codes that failed to protect it last time.
The bill also raises the price of flood insurance.
Nice, huh?
Another example: In a fit of good taste, the Senate refused to confirm some of DeSantis' more appalling University of West Florida board nominees, including yahoos who think the GI Bill was a bad idea or that women don't belong in higher education.
Good for them. But legislators had a chance to do even more for higher education by putting college president searches back in the sunshine where they belong.
Bills stopping the governor installing his hand-picked faith followers sailed through various committees, but in the end they were withdrawn.
Fear of a gubernatorial melt-down? Line-item vetoes of pet projects?
Presidents will still be chosen in secret subject to the whims of the governor and his tame boards of trustees.
To be fair, the Legislature did decide to forbid oil and gas drilling within 10 miles of the Apalachicola Estuarine Reserve, and passed a bill to shield state parks from the kind of boneheaded nonsense the governor wanted in 2024: You know, 'improving' the parks with golf courses, pickleball courts, and luxury hotels.
DeSantis actually realized (for once) he'd screwed up big time last year and signed the bill.
This year, he demonstrated he hadn't quite learned his lesson.
A secretive outfit calling itself Upland LLC wanted the state to give it 600 acres of preservation lands on the Guana River in St. Johns County in exchange for 3,000 acres of non-contiguous, less environmentally significant property scattered around four counties.
Apparently, that swap sounded good to DeSantis. The state Acquisition and Restoration Council served up a report claiming there was nothing special about the Guana River land, no historic sites, no amazing habitat, nothing like that — never mind the ancient Native American shell middens, wood storks, roseate spoonbills, and old oak hammocks — and rushed the required public comment meeting.
Genuine Floridians (the ones their government ignores) rose up on their hind legs and said hell, no. Loudly.
Upland, its feelings hurt, pulled out of the deal — no thanks to DeSantis and his Department of Environmental Prostitution.
Why, you ask, is this state so self-defeating?
Or, to put it another way, why can't we have nice things?
Florida has one of the most regressive taxation systems in the country, what the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy calls an 'upside down' model. The rich pay a far smaller percentage of their income than the middle classes and the poor.
If the state decides to deprive itself — us — of tax dollars, we will all suffer.
Florida's social safety net is already tattered.
Twenty percent of children live in poverty. The state ranks 40th in child health and 45th in economic well-being.
You'd think lawmakers would figure out helping to feed, educate, and take care of children is worth the money: Healthy, educated people contribute to the economy.
But children don't vote. Or write big fat campaign checks.
It's bad enough our so-called representatives can't do their jobs in a timely manner and must keep coming back for special sessions to decide which taxes to cut and by how much while simultaneously costing the taxpayer around $50,000 every day they hang around in Tallahassee.
The governor, the most mobility impaired of waterfowl, his political career in the dumpster, his wife's charity under investigation for possible money laundering, still wants to abolish property taxes.
Maybe he thinks that will give him a nice slogan to run for president on if we have an election in 2028.
The Legislature wants to curry favor with their voters by giving them a break on stuff they buy.
Everybody loves a bargain, right?
But it's not much of a bargain if your quality of life goes to hell.
Cities and counties are staring into the abyss, wondering how they'll fund everything citizens expect.
School roofs won't be repaired, parks won't be maintained, bad water pipes won't be fixed, new cops won't be hired, EMS will be cut, potholes will proliferate.
But hey, it's a small price to pay for a sales tax break on batteries and backpacks, right?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
8 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Defamation case against Fox News highlights role of its hosts in promoting 2020 election falsehoods
In short: Fox let Trump aides spread conspiracy theories despite knowing they were false because it was what their viewers wanted to hear. Fox was trying to hold on to viewers who were angry at the network for saying Biden had won the election. Fox said it was covering a newsworthy story. It accuses the London-based company, which had only Los Angeles County as a client for the 2020 election, of exaggerating its claims of damages in the hope of receiving a financial windfall. Pirro now working in the second Trump administration The focus on Pirro is noteworthy because the former Fox personality Smartmatic, relying on emails and text messages revealed as part of the case, said Pirro was using her position as a Fox host in 2020 to help Trump and persuade him to pardon her ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who was convicted of conspiracy and tax evasion. Trump pardoned him before leaving office in 2021. Advertisement In a text to then-Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel in September 2020, Pirro said, 'I'm the No. 1 watched show on news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and the party,' Smartmatic said in court papers. One of her own producers, Jerry Andrews, called Pirro a 'reckless maniac,' Smartmatic said. He texted after one of her shows in November that it was 'rife (with) conspiracy theories and bs and is yet another example of why this woman should never be on live television.' FOX Business Network anchor Maria Bartiromo, right, arrived at the White House, on March 6. Alex Brandon/Associated Press The court papers said Pirro also suggested 'evidence' of supposed fraud to Trump lawyer Sidney Powell that she could use on a television appearance — material that also was spread by Bartiromo. Bartiromo still works at Fox, and in 2020 had shows on both the news channel and Fox Business Network. The court papers uncovered messages showing her desire to help Trump: 'I am very worried. Please please please overturn this. Bring the evidence, I know you can,' she texted to Powell. Dobbs, whose business show was canceled by Fox in February 2021, texted to Powell four days after the election, saying 'I'm going to do what I can to help stop what is now a coup d'etat in (its) final days — perhaps moments,' a reference to Biden's victory. Dobbs A central figure in Fox's 'pivot' Smartmatic portrayed Pirro as a central figure in Fox's 'pivot' to deemphasize Biden's victory because it angered Trump fans. Instead, the network found that ratings jumped whenever claims of election fraud were discussed, it said. Advertisement As in the Dominion case, the discovery process helped Smartmatic find messages and statements that seem embarrassing in retrospect. For example, in early December, Fox's Jesse Watters texted colleague Greg Gutfeld that 'Think of how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL.' Fox, in a response to the newly-revealed court papers, pointed to an ongoing corruption case involving Smartmatic and its executives, including a claim by federal prosecutors that it used money from the sale of voting machines to set up a 'slush fund' for bribing foreign officials. 'The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on Fox News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech,' Fox said. 'Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.' Smartmatic has already settled similar defamation claims
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
National Guardsman ticketed for running red light in DC crash
A National Guardsman was ticketed on Wednesday after running a red light and injuring a person in a crash with a civilian vehicle in Washington, D.C. The incident, which occurred at 8th Street SE and North Carolina Ave near Eastern Market early Wednesday morning, involved a D.C. National Guard transport vehicle, according to the Joint Task Force District of Columbia (JTF-DC). 'Our priority is ensuring the well-being of all involved. We are grateful for the response of D.C. police and EMS. Safety is our top priority,' U.S. Army Col. Larry Doane, the JTF-DC commander, said in a Thursday statement about the crash. 'We will take action based on the investigation. This type of vehicle is authorized, and safety protocols are in place.' The civilian driver, per emergency responders, was trapped inside the car, rescued and transported to a local hospital with minor injuries. Earlier this month, President Trump federalized the Metropolitan Police Department and deployed National Guard troops to the nation's capital in an effort to crack down on crime. The District of Columbia and several GOP states, including Louisiana, West Virginia and South Carolina, have sent National Guardsmen to support the administration's move. Since Aug. 7, 630 arrests have been made in the District, according to a White House official. On Thursday, Trump met with federal law enforcement officials at a facility in Anacostia, touting the administration's efforts in the region. 'It's like a different place, different city,' Trump said of D.C. 'Now, I think right now it's better than it has been in years and in a couple of weeks, it's going to be far better,' he said. There are nearly National Guardsmen stationed throughout the District, the JTF-DC said in its Thursday release.
San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
South Korea's Lee must navigate the ‘Trump risk' at key summits in Japan and US
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — South Korea's President Lee Jae Myung faces a pivotal foreign policy test barely two months after taking office, with back-to-back summits in Tokyo and Washington that reflect the wider struggle of U.S. allies to navigate Donald Trump's unilateral push to redefine postwar orders on trade, security and alliances. The meetings come after Seoul and Tokyo reached trade deals with Washington that spared them from the Trump administration's highest tariffs, but only after pledging hundreds of billions of dollars in new U.S. investments. Trump's transactional approach with long-standing allies extends beyond trade to security and has fueled fears in South Korea that he will demand higher payments to support the U.S. troop presence in the country, even as he possibly seeks to scale back America's military footprint there to focus on China. The looming concerns about a U.S. retreat in leadership and security commitments come as South Korea and Japan confront growing cooperation between their nuclear-armed adversaries, North Korea and Russia, partners in the war in Ukraine and in efforts to break isolation and evade sanctions. Here is what is at stake for the Asian allies of the U.S. as they deal with an America-first president who's more unyielding than his predecessors: Asian allies pulled closer by Trump A day after confirming his Aug. 25 summit with Trump, Lee's office announced he will visit Japan on Aug. 23-24 to meet Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, a rare diplomatic setup that underscores how Trump is drawing closer two often-feuding neighbors with deep-rooted historical grievances. The meeting on Saturday in Tokyo of Lee and Ishiba — who last met on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit in June — is largely about projecting leverage as the countries seek to coordinate their response to Trump, said Choi Eunmi, an analyst at South Korea's Asan Institute for Policy Studies. 'There is now the Trump risk,' Choi said. 'There's especially a lot of uncertainty in the business sector, so they might discuss ways to ease that uncertainty … not necessarily in joint efforts to confront Trump, but within the framework of trilateral cooperation.' Yukiko Fukagawa, a professor at Japan's Waseda University, said Lee's visit to Tokyo will also be seen positively in Washington, long frustrated by its Asian allies' persistent disputes over Japan's colonial rule of Korea before the end of World War II, and the way these tensions hindered three-way security collaborations. 'Because they have to deal with increasingly challenging mutual counterparts, such as China and America, both Japan and South Korea are under pressure to set aside minor differences to cooperate on larger objectives,' Fukagawa said. Yoshimasa Hayash, Japan's chief cabinet secretary, said Lee's visit will help promote the 'stable development' of bilateral ties as their countries work together on international challenges by utilizing the 'shuttle diplomacy" of regular summits. Lee and Ishiba could discuss restarting long-stalled free trade talks and South Korea's potential entry into the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, or CPTPP, a 12-member Asia-Pacific trade pact that Ishiba has pushed to expand amid tensions over U.S. tariffs. Ishiba, who has met Trump twice in person — at the White House in February and at the G7 in Canada — could also offer Lee tips ahead of his summit in Washington. Seoul and Tokyo clearly share many crucial interests in the face of Trump's efforts to reset global trade and U.S. security commitments. They are both under pressure from Washington to pay more for the tens of thousands of American troops stationed in their countries and also to increase their own defense spending. Their vital automobile and technology industries are vulnerable to Trump's tariff hikes. They navigate a tricky balance between the U.S. and its main rival, China, a growing regional threat that is also the largest trade partner for Seoul and Tokyo. They are alarmed by North Korea's accelerating nuclear program and its deepening alignment with Russia, which could complicate future diplomatic efforts after a long stalemate in U.S.-led denuclearization talks. It makes more sense for South Korea and Japan to work with the Trump administration under a trilateral framework rather than engage Washington separately, especially given how Trump mixes security and economic demands, said Ban Kil-joo, a professor at South Korea's National Diplomatic Academy. For example, the countries could propose a trilateral scheme to support Trump's push to expand natural gas and other energy production in Alaska, rather than negotiating potential investments bilaterally, he said. 'Beyond the drilling project itself, they would need to address security, including protecting maritime routes for the LNG shipments, and that responsibility could count toward defense cost-sharing or higher defense spending,' which Trump demands, Ban said. Modernizing the military alliance Lee's meeting with Trump could include talks to flesh out the details of South Korea's $350 million investment fund for U.S. industries, centered on cooperation in shipbuilding, a sector Trump has highlighted in relation to South Korea. A more crucial topic for the leaders could be the future of their decades-long military alliance, a legacy of the brutal 1950-53 Korean War. The U.S., which keeps about 30,000 troops in South Korea to deter North Korea, has long urged Seoul to accept greater flexibility to use them for missions beyond the Korean Peninsula – a demand that has intensified under Trump. Comments by senior U.S. government and military officials suggest that, in addition to pressing South Korea to pay more for hosting American forces, the Trump administration could seek to reshape U.S. Forces Korea as part of a broader military focus on ensuring capability to respond to a conflict with China over Taiwan. That shift would mean conventionally armed South Korea taking on more of the burden against the North, while the U.S. turns its focus to China. This could affect the size and role of U.S. Forces Korea, leaving Seoul with fewer benefits but higher costs and risks at a time when the North Korean nuclear threat is growing, experts say. South Korean lawmakers have also expressed fears that Washington could ask for Seoul's commitment to intervene if a conflict breaks out in the Taiwan Strait, a tricky prospect given South Korea's reliance on China for trade and Beijing's role in dealing with North Korea. South Korea should enter the Trump summit with a clear stance on its role in regional security, Ban said, possibly supporting U.S. efforts to maintain Indo-Pacific stability and opposing changes to the status quo, but without explicitly naming China as an adversary. While potentially accepting a more flexible role for U.S. Forces Korea, South Korea should also seek U.S. commitments to ensure deterrence and readiness against North Korea aren't compromised. American troop deployments off the peninsula could be offset by increased airpower or the arrival of strategic assets like bombers, helping prevent any miscalculation by the North, Ban said. AP writer Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo contributed.
