US Vice President JD Vance set to stay at 'luxurious' estate on Ayrshire visit
US Vice President JD Vance is set to stay at a "luxurious" estate in Ayrshire this week after taking in The Cotswolds while on holiday in the UK.
Mr Vance is understood to be arriving at Prestwick Airport tomorrow, Wednesday, August 13 before making his way to the "historic and luxurious" Carnell Estates near Crossroads in East Ayrshire.
The estate is known for its private hospitality and previously hosted Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie and family while filming for World War Z which took place in Glasgow in August 2011.
Pitt and family stayed in the 16th century manor at Carnell and rented a train to take them from Glasgow to the estate.
Owned by Michael Findlay, the Carnell Estates have been in the family's hands since the 1300s and are run by Mr Findlay and his partner Adrienne Eastwood.
Described as "very much as a private house rather than an hotel", the 14th century tower and "historic and luxurious" mansion house is often used by corporate think tanks, golfers and shooting groups as well as being a wedding venue.
Police Scotland have said that they are planning for a visit from the US Vice President during his holiday in the UK.
While in England, Mr Vance took time to meet with Foreign Secretary David Lammy in Kent where bilateral talks were held at Chevening House and the pair engaged in carp fishing.
Donald Trump spent five days in Scotland at the end of July.
Trump hosted Prime Minister Keir Starmer and First Minister John Swinney on his visit which saw him play golf at his Turnberry resort on the Ayrshire coast.
During his visit, Trump also presented a gift to Ms Eastwood which the estate shared a photograph of on social media.
The Carnell Estates were contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
The surreal deal according to author Douglas Murray.
He recently found himself discussing politics with an American podcaster, who advocated being a realist in matters of international affairs. Murray languidly shrugged off such a claim, pointing out that it would be rare to find a commentator who is NOT a realist in such matters. For as Douglas pointed out, 'almost nobody says he's a surrealist.' Murray did concede that Salvador Dali considered himself one, though, 'that didn't really catch on very widely.' The name game Global politics, continued. Chatting with a pal in the local boozer, reader Alan Jones happened to mention that faithful and feisty Robin to Donald Trump's Batman… JD Vance. 'I've always wondered,' mused the pal, 'If JD Vance is related to the writer JD Salinger.' A perplexed Alan replied: 'You do realise that's not how it works, right?' Dusty dealings Philosophical thought of the day from Derek Moore, who says: 'When you clean a vacuum cleaner, you become the vacuum cleaner.' The Browning version Our more cynical readers probably assume that today's youngsters indolently waste their every waking hour hypnotised by TikTok videos. Nothing could be further from the truth, for the modern youth is as driven and dynamic as any previous generation. Reader Sue Graham was on a train and overheard two teenage girls chatting. Said one to the other: 'I'm tanning tonight and I'm tanning tomorrow.' Her friend found it impossible to hide her admiration as she answered: 'Wow! You do keep busy, don't you?' A true tale Another Glasgow conversation containing a great deal of profundity. Paul Murray was in Waterstones bookshop on Sauchiehall Street where a man and woman were chatting. Reproduced below, in full blazing Technicolor, is a snippet of their dramatic dialogue… Man: This week's been a week. (Thoughtful pause.) In fact, I'd go so far as to say this year's been a year. Woman: Oh my God… so true! Speak your truth Gavin, speak your truth. Birdy blast blues Mystified reader Kevin Devine gets in touch to ask the Diary: 'Why do people always moan about the start of the grouse season?' The Herald Diary is published twice a week - on Thursday and Saturday mornings. Do you have a tale to tell? Contact The Diary on 07375 137824 or thediary@
Daily Mirror
12 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Strictly Come Dancing bosses 'taking inspiration from I'm A Celeb' with 'risk'
EXCLUSIVE: Strictly Come Dancing's latest line-up has been met with criticism ahead of the latest series of the BBC show, and a PR expert has hinted at tactics bosses have used Strictly Come Dancing has been involved in a number of scandals of late and fans have been left less than impressed with the latest celebrity line-up. While viewers of the BBC show have called the latest batch of famous faces "underwhelming," the inclusion of Tom Skinner had them in uproar. The former star of The Apprentice was met with huge backlash following the announcement he is to take to the dance floor. It comes as some of his controversial views online have been called out in recent weeks. He has also opened up about his relationship with US vice president JD Vance. But a PR expert believes that while bosses made a surprise call by including the reality TV star, she also admitted it could be a "tactic" to gain more headlines. It comes as Strictly star La Voix commits to a huge live show during the competition. PR Carla Speight said of Tom's inclusion: "After all the scandals from the last series of Strictly, I'm surprised we've got a new series. This time round, it appears they've taken inspiration from the team behind I'm A Celebrity and booked a polarising character to grab the headlines, and it's worked. "Given that there's been scandal after scandal in recent years for the BBC, alongside mass accusations of being biased and drama over the years behind the glittery scenes of the Ballroom favourite, I'm genuinely surprised we have a new series. "This time round, they should have played it safe in a bid to regain trust with celebrities with bigger profiles, but instead they decided to go for more drama." She went on: "From a PR strategy perspective, they had two choices: play it safer, risking a decline in viewing figures, in order to attract bigger stars in the future with some investment and good PR. Or book a polarising cast member, who appeases the right in the hope it softens them and reduces the volume of people questioning their license fees. Tom Skinner is ideal for that, though I doubt the longstanding fans of the supposedly family-friendly show will be pleased to watch him if he makes it past the first episode." Carla also revealed that his relationship with Vance could strengthen the motive behind his booking. However, she said: "I wonder if this could end up being a step and a shimmy too far right for the Strictly team to handle. Strictly's loyal LGBTQ+ and female viewers won't be impressed by this at all, given what's happening in the US and what's happened behind the scenes of previous series of the BBC flagship show. "It is surprising that the BBC bosses approved his casting, as they should be focusing on rebuilding the Strictly brand after all the abuse and misconduct reported in recent years. But instead, they've opted for taking the same tactics as a rage-baiting YouTube clip. "An institution, with loyal fans who expect better of them, resorting to this tactic could be a sign that this is the last Tango for the hit series." Further adding her view on the addition of Tom, Carla went on: "There's been an immediate uproar over his booking, but then that's probably what the bosses were hoping for. Rage baiting is a simple tactic to guarantee headlines, and the US will pick it up, too, given Tom's recent affiliations. "For Tom, that's great news; he'll gain more followers both in the UK and the US who share the same views. It's also a win for Strictly bosses as they're everywhere now and trending online, but at what cost in the long term?" She concluded by saying that "only time will tell" if this is a good move for the show.
Telegraph
14 hours ago
- Telegraph
Perverted liberalism has led to neo-Marxism, perverted patriotism may yet lead to neo-fascism
It is, on balance, helpful, that the current American president and vice-president are both interested in Britain. We are one of the few allies not deliberately antagonised by the Trump administration. This is a Brexit benefit. Yesterday, Donald Trump had things to do in Anchorage, Alaska, but last month he was in Aberdeenshire, and next month he will be over here for his second state visit. JD Vance, the vice-president, ended the week staying on an estate in Ayrshire, after spending a few days near Adlestrop in the Cotswolds, scene of Edward Thomas's much anthologised pastoral poem about a summer railway station where nothing happens. What draws these two powerful men here? Mr Trump likes – and owns – golf courses, and his mother came from the Hebrides. He seems to prefer her Scottish roots to his father's German ones, and he is in love with the British monarchy. Mr Vance has Scottish roots, too, but his quest seems more cultural, intellectual and political. He was mixing a family holiday (accompanied by a few non-political old mates) with discussions about ideas with his English friend, Dr James Orr, a Cambridge theologian, and Danny Kruger, the Conservative MP who recently made a powerful parliamentary speech in favour of Christianity in Britain. He saw the billionaire businessman Sir Paul Marshall, owner of The Spectator and patron of several conservative and Christian causes. The vice-president entertained and was entertained by Tom Skinner – patriotic Essex man, former market trader and star of The Apprentice, whose catchword is 'Bosh' – and a much more famous public entertainer, currently from Clacton, called Nigel Farage. Through the good offices of George Osborne, a surprising ally, given Mr Osborne's Remainer, globalist views, Mr Vance also met assorted Conservatives – Robert Jenrick, Chris Philp, Laura Trott and the rising star of the party's new intake, Katie Lam. It was a mark of how even Tory centrists feel the need to trim to the Atlantic wind that the journalist Daniel Finkelstein was among the guests. Lord Finkelstein's column this week was a fine read for Kremlinologists, as it sidled cautiously closer to Mr Farage. There is something attractive about Mr Vance's quest for ideas. Although it can be tactless (and may be intended to be), his readiness to propagate them is refreshing too. Since the days of Theodore Roosevelt, who invented it, the 'bully pulpit' has been the property of the US president. Mr Trump, however, is more bully than pulpit, and Mr Vance, a Catholic convert, is a most articulate preacher. He is searching, like so many, for a conservatism which goes deeper than economics and pays greater heed to those left behind by social change and discriminated against by modern public doctrine. He is influenced in this by the National Conservatism movement in the United States. In developing these views, Mr Vance and Maga allies identify 'woke' as their main internal opponent. They see woke doctrines, advancing under the camouflage of liberal tolerance, as neo-Marxist attempts to set different groups, tribes and classes against one another and to dissolve the proud historical identity of the nation state. This is an even more incendiary subject in America than in Britain but, goodness knows, it is hotting up here, chiefly because of this century's huge increase in immigration encouraged under both main parties. Mr Vance has expressed this vividly: 'I think the people whose ancestors fought in the Civil War have a hell of a lot more claim over America than the people who say they don't belong today.' He seeks allies for a comparable message here and, in more directly political terms, for the best political vehicle. He is contemplating a different party configuration on the Right. At present, he sees Reform, if allied with 'sound' Tories, as the likelier means than the present Conservative Party. I have my doubts about the practicality of that, and the wisdom of foreign politicians, Anglophile though they may be, getting involved. But what I want to discuss today is not party-political manoeuvring. It is the philosophical and moral ways in which the Vance Anglosphere crusade – given the militant Christian roots involved, the word 'crusade' may be apposite – could all go wrong. I write as someone who wants it to go right. The first danger – though I agree that Christianity is the most important single root of our institutions, our civil society and our shared culture – arises because there is usually something unscrupulous about using Christianity as a political weapon. Look at how politics in the Muslim world is corrupted by Islamist ideology and you will see the analogy. The second danger is that the anti-wokeists may replicate on their side what they so dislike about their opponents. Just as woke people try to smear all conservatives as racists, so some conservatives smear all wokeists as unpatriotic traitors. Many Maga supporters are doing this already, especially online. They lament how the 'mutual loyalty' of American society has been gashed by political correctness, but they are not doing much to bind up the wounds. Like that of woke, their rhetoric attracts people who enjoy hating other people. If perverted liberalism leads to neo-Marxism, could not perverted patriotism lead to neo-fascism? Take, for example, Dr Orr's recent advocacy of the slogan 'Faith, Flag and Family'. All three are indeed good things, but he, an intelligent and well-educated man, must know how similar are these words to the propaganda of Vichy France (' Famille. Travail. Patrie '). One well-known Vichy poster contrasted an attractive, well-built house founded on these principles with a crumbling one built on 'capital', 'Jewishness', 'democracies' and other supposed evils. Does that not worry him? It should. In the United States, sometimes assisted by people as prominent as Tucker Carlson, anti-Semitism, which in the past 30 years has become increasingly the property of the Left, is being reclaimed by elements on the Right. A good index of bad trends of thought is what some on the Right say about Ukraine. There are, of course, reasonable arguments to make for peace talks, but note the omissions. Neither President Trump nor his vice-president ever says that Putin's invasion struck against the 80-year peace of all Europe, which depends on inviolable borders. Neither draws attention to Putin's more minor but significant provocations and infiltrations in most other eastern European nations. Note, too, the shifting of blame – most strikingly on to President Zelensky himself, whose crime seems to have been to refuse to run away as the Russian tanks rolled towards Kyiv – and also on to the West in general (a persistent claim made by Nigel Farage). Finally, note how the wilder attacks on wokeism in the West invoke Putin almost as the goodie. On the BBC in May, Dr Orr appeared with the Liberal Democrat MP, Max Wilkinson. Complaining (rightly) about growing free speech restrictions in this country, Dr Orr said, 'A lot more people have got into trouble in the UK for free speech offences than in Putin's Russia.' When challenged for this astonishing statement, he 'gladly' promised to send Mr Wilkinson the evidence to back it up. He has never done so. If Maga people are sincere, as I believe they are, in wishing to reassert the self-determination of independent nation states and disapproving of imperial 'forever wars', why do they excuse Putin's Russia and disparage Ukraine's battle to maintain the rights of nationhood? How did the national conservatism of Edmund Burke get muddled up with the Putinist opportunism of Viktor Orban's government in Hungary?
