Is Trump's trade policy in turmoil? What happens to his tariffs now that the court has struck them down?
The
US Court of International Trade
's decision to block the tariffs that US president Donald Trump imposed under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act
(IEEPA) on imports from almost every country in the world 'throws the president's trade policy into turmoil,' according to a former US trade official, as per a report.
Uncertainty for Trade and Supply Chains
An ex-US trade official who is now vice president at the Asia Society, Wendy Cutler said, 'Partners negotiating hard during the 90-day tariff pause period may be tempted to hold off making further concessions to the U.S. until there is more legal clarity,' quoted AP.
ALSO READ:
What is TACO Trade? The term that angers Donald Trump every time it's mentioned
According to the report, even companies would have to reassess the way they operate their supply chains, perhaps "speeding up shipments to the United States to offset the risk that the tariffs will be reinstated on appeal," wrote AP.
Court Rules Against Donald Trump's Emergency Tariffs
A federal court with a three-judge panel gave the verdict that the US president overstepped his authority as he invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to declare a national emergency and justify his high tariffs, reported AP.
Live Events
ALSO READ:
As U.S. court blocks tariffs, here are ways Donald Trump could find a workaround after suffering a major blow
Trump's tariffs have been challenged in at least seven lawsuits, and in the recent ruling, the trade court combined two of the cases, one brought by five small businesses and another by 12 US states, as reported by AP.
A professor of trade policy at Cornell University, Eswar Prasad, highlighted that "For now, the trade court's ruling destroys the Trump administration's rationale for using federal emergency powers to impose tariffs, which oversteps congressional authority and contravenes any notion of due process,' quoted AP. Prasad also mentioned, 'The ruling makes it clear that the broad tariffs imposed unilaterally by Trump represent an overreach of executive power," as quoted in the report.
FAQs
What does this mean for presidential powers?
The ruling limits how far a president can go in using emergency powers to reshape trade policy without Congress.
Are all of Trump's tariffs now blocked?
No. The ruling affects broad-based tariffs imposed under IEEPA, but steel, aluminum, and auto tariffs based on national security reviews remain intact.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Oil slips on US stockpile build, Saudi Arabia price cuts
TOKYO - Oil prices slipped in early trade on Thursday after a build in U.S. gasoline and diesel inventories and Saudi Arabia's cut to its July prices for Asian crude buyers. Brent crude futures fell 21 cents, or 0.3%, to $64.65 a barrel at 0047 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude lost 29 cents, or 0.5%, dropping to $62.58. Oil prices closed around 1% lower on Wednesday after official data showed that U.S. gasoline and distillate stockpiles grew more than expected, reflecting weaker demand in the world's top economy. [EIA/S] Adding to the weakness, Saudi Arabia, the world's biggest oil exporter, cut its July prices for Asian crude buyers to nearly the lowest in two months. The price cut by Saudi Arabia, key oil producer within OPEC - the oil producing group that includes members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies such as Russia - follows the OPEC move over the weekend to increase output by 411,000 barrels per day for July. The strategy of OPEC group leaders Saudi Arabia and Russia is partly to punish over-producers and to wrestle back market share, Reuters has reported. Meanwhile, Canada prepared possible reprisals and the European Union reported progress in trade talks as new U.S. metals tariffs triggered more disruption in the global economy and added urgency to negotiations with Washington. "Uncertainty fuelled by President Trump's shifting stance on tariffs has intensified fears of a global economic slowdown," analyst Ole Hansen at Saxo Bank said in a note. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Lex Greensill Set to Testify in $440 Million Credit Suisse UK Trial
Lex Greensill will testify in court for the first time since the high-profile collapse of his trade finance firm, as a $440 million Credit Suisse lawsuit against SoftBank Group Corp. gets underway. Evidence from the embattled financier will be the centerpiece of a month long London trial that starts on Thursday over investor losses in a failed startup. Credit Suisse is seeking damages from SoftBank alleging that a series of transactions with Greensill deprived its investors of $440 million in funds. Greensill is scheduled to appear at the civil trial next week alongside other witnesses including former chief executive officer of Credit Suisse's investment bank Eric Varvel. The implosion of Greensill Capital in March 2021 saw Credit Suisse freeze and wind down a $10 billion group of funds that the Swiss bank had marketed to clients as safe investments. Greensill's demise was one of several major scandals that knocked confidence in the Swiss lender, left clients with hundreds of millions of dollars of losses and ultimately led to its forced takeover by UBS. Meanwhile, SoftBank's Vision Fund wrote down its own $1.5 billion holding in Greensill to close to zero. UBS Group AG is pursuing the London claim on behalf of its former Swiss rival in a bid to recover funds for investors trapped in the supply chain finance vehicles. The bank has looked to settle several high profile legacy legal headaches it inherited from Credit Suisse, extricating itself from a sprawling civil suit over Mozambique tuna bonds and more recently a US tax probe. The fallout from Greensill's collapse has spawned multiple legal fights around the world. Lex Greensill himself is fighting moves by the UK government to have him disqualified as a director, while his firm's own administrators filed a civil case against him in April. His spokesperson didn't respond to a request for comment. The London suit is set to consider the way that Greensill restructured its relationship with Katerra Inc., a US-based construction company in which SoftBank was a major investor. Credit Suisse alleges SoftBank concocted the restructuring in 2020 so that it could pull its own money out of the firm, knowing full well that Greensill, already in free-fall, would be unable to repay the $440 million it owed to Credit Suisse. SoftBank will counter that Credit Suisse case has always been an attempt to shift blame 'for its own poor investment decisions.' The allegations are 'entirely without merit,' it said previously. Softbank's lawyers argued that the $440 million funds were provided by the Vision Fund on the basis that it would be used to repay the Credit Suisse notes. UBS said the bank 'will continue to pursue all paths to maximize financial recovery of the Supply Chain Finance Funds, acting in the interests of all our stakeholders.' This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump's travel ban: Who is impacted? List of countries facing US action from June 9
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday revived one of the previous policies of his first term, announcing that citizens from 12 countries would be barred from entering the United States, with additional restrictions imposed on travellers from seven others, most of which are mainly Muslim nations. In a video shared on social media, Trump linked the newly announced travel ban to Sunday's terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, arguing that it highlighted the risks posed by individuals who overstay their visas. The suspect in the attack, however, is from Egypt — a country not included on Trump's restricted list — and, according to the Department of Homeland Security, had overstayed a tourist visa. Trump justified the ban by claiming that certain countries have 'deficient' screening and vetting processes or have consistently refused to repatriate their citizens. His decision heavily draws on an annual report by Homeland Security, which tracks visa overstays among tourists, business travellers, and students entering by air or sea, focusing on nations with particularly high overstay rates. 'We don't want them,' Trump said. The order, often referred to as the 'Muslim ban' or the 'travel ban', was reworked amid legal challenges until the Supreme Court upheld a version in 2018. The ban impacted various categories of travellers and immigrants from Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Syria and Libya, as well as North Koreans and certain Venezuelan government officials and their families. Trump has defended the initial ban on national security grounds, arguing it was intended to protect the country and was not based on anti-Muslim bias. However, Trump had called for an explicit ban on Muslims during his first campaign for the White House. Here are the 12 countries placed under the ban and the seven placed under travel restrictions: Banned from US travel: Afghanistan, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, the Republic of the Congo, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Restricted to US travel: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. The proclamation signed by Donald Trump will come into force on 9 June 2025, at 12:01 AM EDT, a cushion that may avoid the chaos that unfolded at airports nationwide when a similar measure took effect with virtually no notice in 2017. Trump, who signalled plans for a new ban upon taking office in January, appears to be on firmer ground this time after the Supreme Court sided with him. The travel restrictions apply to foreign nationals from the designated countries who: Are outside the United States as of 9 June, and Do not possess a valid visa on that date. However, the proclamation clarifies that any immigration or non-immigrant visa issued before 9 June will remain valid and will not be revoked under this order. Some, but not all, 12 countries also appeared on the list of banned countries in Trump's first term. The proclamation restricts entry for immigrants and those on specific temporary visas—B-1, B-2, B-1/B-2, F, M, and J visas—from the following countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. 1. Lawful permanent residents (green card holders) of the US. 2. Dual nationals travelling on a passport from a non-restricted country. 3. Diplomats with valid non-immigrant visas. 4. Athletes and their immediate relatives attend events like the Olympics or other major sports competitions. Immediate family immigrant visas. Afghan Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs). Special Immigrant Visas for U.S. government employees. Immigrant visas for persecuted ethnic and religious minorities from Iran. The ban includes exceptions for Afghans holding Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs), typically granted to those who worked closely with the US government during the two-decade war in Afghanistan. It is to be further noted that Afghanistan was among the top sources of resettled refugees, with approximately 14,000 arrivals in the 12 months leading up to September 2024. It's a stark contrast to Trump's earlier outlook— he had suspended refugee resettlement on his very first day in office during his previous term. 'To include Afghanistan — a nation whose people stood alongside American service members for 20 years — is a moral disgrace. It spits in the face of our allies, our veterans, and every value we claim to uphold,' said Shawn VanDiver, president and board chairman of #AfghanEvac. Trump wrote that Afghanistan 'lacks a competent or cooperative central authority for issuing passports or civil documents, and it does not have appropriate screening and vetting measures'. He also cited its visa overstay rates. Haiti, which avoided the travel ban during Trump's first term, was also included for high overstay rates and large numbers who came to the US illegally. Haitians continue to flee poverty and hunger, and political instability deepens while police and a UN-backed mission fight a surge in gang violence, with armed men controlling at least 85 per cent of its capital, Port-au-Prince, as reported by AP. 'Haiti lacks a central authority with sufficient availability and dissemination of law enforcement information necessary to ensure its nationals do not undermine the national security of the United States,' Trump wrote. The Iranian government has yet to respond to its inclusion on the list. The Trump administration labelled Iran a 'state sponsor of terrorism', barring visitors except those already holding visas or entering the US on special visas granted to minorities facing persecution. The travel ban stems from an executive order issued by Trump on 20 January, directing the Departments of State, Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence to prepare a report on 'hostile attitudes' toward the US and assess whether entry from certain countries posed a national security threat. International aid groups and refugee resettlement organisations roundly condemned the new ban. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, as reported by The Associated Press. Other Middle Eastern countries on the list—Libya, Sudan, and Yemen—are all engulfed in ongoing civil conflicts with territories controlled by rival factions. Sudan is currently experiencing active warfare, Yemen's conflict remains largely stalemated and Libya's armed factions continue to clash. (With inputs from Associated Press)
