logo
Round-trip vs one-way: Which airfare trick really saves you money?

Round-trip vs one-way: Which airfare trick really saves you money?

USA Today09-07-2025
As a travel reporter who specializes in airlines, I often get asked how to find the best deal on airfare. More than once, friends have asked whether there's any benefit in buying a round-trip ticket versus two one-way tickets.
Unfortunately, airline pricing can be extremely opaque and unpredictable, and my advice usually boils down to: if it feels like a good deal, you should buy it.
'The main thing I would say is I think when it comes to, if folks feel frustrated when they're buying airline tickets, there's a good reason for that,' Lindsay Owens, executive director of Groundwork Collaborative, a Washington-based economic policy think tank, told me. 'The airline industry is really the pioneer of some of the most ruthless and deceptive pricing practices. It's not surprising that people feel really powerless and frustrated when they're purchasing airline tickets.'
Owens is working on a book called 'Gouged: The End of a Fair Price in America,' which includes research about airline pricing. She said airlines pioneered what we think of today as 'dynamic pricing,' and the current, confusing hierarchy of airfares is by design.
So, are there deals to be had? Yes, but you may never be sure if you're getting the best possible price.
Round-trip vs. one-ways: Which is better?
One of the big 'hacks' people ask me about is whether it's better to buy a round-trip itinerary or two one-way tickets.
Friends who work in airline revenue management have told me that, in general, round-trip pricing can be a little lower, but it's not always a guarantee.
'In general, you're going to save money on roundtrips compared to two one-ways across the board,' Owens said.
For example, if you're looking to buy a ticket from Washington to San Juan on Aug. 20, returning on Aug. 27, you'll pay $20 less on JetBlue if you buy it as a round-trip itinerary, rather than as two one-way tickets. (At least at the time of writing, airline prices can change at any time.)
Airlines price one-way tickets higher for a variety of reasons, including wanting to make sure they maximize profits in case the traveler decides to take another airline for the return trip. Also, according to Owens' research, carriers generally predict that one-way ticket purchasers are less price sensitive, either because they're more likely to be traveling for business, or because they're taking an emergency trip.
'International travel is where the most extreme price differentials between one-way and round trips remain,' she said. 'Someone who's booking a one-way flight internationally is a little different than someone who is booking a two-way flight internationally, the sense is they're less price sensitive.'
Owens also pointed out that there can be a large disparity between carriers in their pricing strategies. Legacy airlines like American, Delta and United are more likely to provide some discounts on round-trip itineraries, while lower-cost carriers like Southwest, JetBlue, Breeze and others are more likely to price their tickets on a one-way basis.
How airlines set prices
If I could tell you this with any definitiveness, I'd be working in airline revenue management.
'It's opaque because there's really no pure logic behind it other than whatever competition is occurring today, so that's a very hard thing to explain to people,' William J. McGee, senior fellow for aviation and travel at the American Economic Liberties Project, told me. 'They are constantly gaming the system to see every last dollar they can get out of every flight. They price based on what they can get away with.'
According to McGee, before airlines were deregulated in 1978, they set airfares under supervision from the Civil Aeronautics Board based solely on the cost to operate the route. Since deregulation, airlines have had a lot more leeway in setting fares, which has made pricing much harder for travelers to predict.
One old rule of thumb for airlines was that a Saturday night stay at the destination often denoted a leisure trip, which unlocked cheaper fare buckets. But now, McGee said, that guidance seems to be losing its staying power, thanks partly to remote work.
'The lines have blurred more because, I think, quite frankly, Americans are working harder these days,' he said. 'I'm not ready to say at this point that the Saturday night stayover discount is dead. It may not be as robust as it was.'
Airlines consider any number of factors when setting prices now, from day of the week and departure time to demand on the route and competition.
'Broadly speaking, what airlines are trying to do is charge the maximum amount they can to fill every flight,' Owens said.
Carriers often don't release all the seats for sale at once, meaning even available inventory isn't necessarily an indicator of where prices are likely to head on a given flight.
Last week's Cruising Altitude: Why your flight sometimes feels too hot or too cold
Advice for booking
'The golden rule is be flexible,' McGee said. 'If you tweak the day that you're going, if you tweak the airport that you're going to, and if you tweak the hour of the day, it can be remarkable how big the differences are.'
McGee and Owens both agreed that the best thing travelers can do to find a good deal on airfare is to shop around, and be willing to make small adjustments to their itinerary if they want to find the best possible price.
'To the extent that comparison shopping is possible, that's always a good option. The best way to ensure the pricing is a combination of being able to be flexible about all aspects of your travel. Flexible departure day, flexible return day,' Owens said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Construction Company Achieves 650% Revenue Growth With Payroll4Construction
Construction Company Achieves 650% Revenue Growth With Payroll4Construction

Associated Press

timea few seconds ago

  • Associated Press

Construction Company Achieves 650% Revenue Growth With Payroll4Construction

STRONGSVILLE, OH / ACCESS Newswire / August 18, 2025 / Lawler Construction, a Cleveland-based commercial remodeling company specializing in groceries, schools and churches, has dramatically improved payroll efficiency since implementing Payroll4Construction, the construction payroll service from Foundation Software. The family-owned business, which has grown from $2 million to $15 million in annual revenue, credits the integrated payroll solution as essential to managing their expanding workforce. Jim Lawler has worked with Foundation Software since founding his construction company in 2006. He first implemented FOUNDATION® accounting software to establish consistent job costing and payroll processing right at the start. However, as the crew grew, he struggled to keep up with his increasing payday duties. He quickly turned to the services offered by Payroll4Construction. 'Payroll4Construction took our payroll burden right off our plate,' said Tom Lawler, Vice President of Lawler Construction. 'We've grown almost every year since I joined, and all the payroll services, plus that integration with FOUNDATION, saves us countless hours every week. We can do a lot more in our day now.' The payroll experts at Payroll4Construction manage W-2s, direct deposits, checks, handling taxes and compliance requirements that previously required significant manual effort. The time savings are incredible,' explained Tom Lawler. 'What used to take us hours of manual calculations and paperwork now happens automatically. We can focus on growing our business instead of wrestling with payroll compliance.' After nearly two decades of partnership, the Lawler family continues to rely on both FOUNDATION and Payroll4Construction as essential business tools. 'The payroll integration between the systems has been game-changing for us,' said Tom Lawler. 'It's not just about saving time - it's about having confidence that everything is done correctly and compliantly.' Read the full Lawler case study to see the complete journey. Payroll4Construction, LLC Payroll4Construction is a payroll solution just for contractors. Payroll4Construction can help manage certified payroll reporting, complete multi-jurisdictional processing, handle union tracking, cut checks, issue direct deposits and more. For information, visit call (800) 949-9620 or email [email protected]. Lawler Construction Founded in 2006, Lawler Construction is a family-owned commercial remodeling company serving the Greater Cleveland area, specializing in projects for grocery stores, schools, libraries and churches. Explore there services at Contact InformationTracie Kuczkowski VP of Marketing (800) 246-0800 x 7933Samantha Ann Illius Marketing Relations Coordinator and Influence Specialist (800) 811 5926 x 4823 SOURCE: Payroll4Construction press release

Newsmax settles defamation suit by Dominion Voting Systems for $67M
Newsmax settles defamation suit by Dominion Voting Systems for $67M

UPI

timea few seconds ago

  • UPI

Newsmax settles defamation suit by Dominion Voting Systems for $67M

A Newsmax banner hangs at the entrance of the New York Stock Exchange before the closing bell on Wall Street on March 31. The conservative media company's stock price jumped more than 700% in its first day of trading on the NYSE. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 18 (UPI) -- Newsmax on Monday agreed to pay $67 million to Dominion Voting Systems in a defamation suit against the conservative media company over its 2020 presidential election coverage. The announcement came as President Donald Trump on Monday reiterated his criticism of certain voting machines and mail-in ballots. Newmax announced the agreement in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in which the two sides mutually agreed to resolve the litigation. Dominion, a private company based in Denver, provides voting equipment to jurisdictions in 28 states. The systems include touchscreen screens and paper ballot scanning devices. The settlement will be paid in installments over three years, which the company said it "expects to fund through revenues." Newsmax, which went public in March with an initial public offering of $10 per share for $75 million, has a market capitalization of $1.56 billion. Last September, Newsmax agreed to a settlement with another voting machine company, Smartmatic, before a trial. The settlement of $40 million wasn't disclosed until March. In 2021, Dominion filed suit against Newsmax, seeking $1.6 billion and alleging certain statements made in Newsmax's coverage about the election were defamatory. "We are pleased to have settled this matter," a Dominion spokesperson told CNN, declining to comment further. "The judiciary's willingness to punish news organizations for reporting on matters of urgent national debate undermines the role of the press in a free society," Newsmax said in a news release. After Joe Biden was declared the winner against Donald Trump in November 2020, Newsmax hosts and guests falsely claimed the election results were fraudulent and specifically took aim at voting machines. Newmax didn't disclose whether there would be an on-air apology or acknowledgement about false claims that voting results were incorrect. "Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020," the company said in a statement. "We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism." Newsmax said it determined that Delaware Court Judge Eric Davis, who was presiding over the case, would not provide a fair trial in which the company could present standard libel defenses to a jury. He presided over the voting machine company's defamation suit against Fox News, in which $787 million was awarded in April 2023 in a suit settlement. Davis, who was appointed by a Democratic governor, Jack Markell, in 2010, earlier this year ruled that Newsmax aired defamatory statements about the company. He said a jury would decide if the lies were intentional and if so how much would be awarded. "From the very beginning, Judge Davis ruled in ways that strongly favored the plaintiffs and limited Newsmax's ability to defend itself," Newsmax said. The judge indicated that he likely would refuse to allow the jury to hear that Fox News had already paid Dominion $787 million. Newsmax also noted Dominion was permitted to comb through extensive communications, including personal emails, cellphone text messages and other documents of reporters and company executives unrelated to the case. "The Delaware Court under Judge Davis effectively enforced a confiscation of our property because our reporting was not always sympathetic to Joe Biden," Newsmax CEO Christopher Ruddy said. Newmax, which is the fourth-highest-rated network of all major pay TV providers, became a public company in March and is listed on the Nasdaq. Its main offices are in New York City and Boca Raton, Fla. The company reaches more than 40 million Americans regularly through Newsmax TV, the Newsmax App, website and publications. Trump, who continues to claim he won the 2020 election despite being told otherwise in court cases and audits, blasted the use of mail-in ballots and voting machines on Monday morning in a post on Truth Social. "I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly "Inaccurate," Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election," Trump posted. Trump, who became a resident of Palm Beach in Florida in September 2019, has sometimes voted via absentee ballot, which is essentially the same thing as mail-in ballots. His legal residence previously was New York City. Trump also spoke against the U.S. voting system during his appearance with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House. "Mail-in ballots are corrupt," he said. "You can never have a real democracy with mail-in ballots."

Aleon Metals Files for Bankruptcy to Seek New Owner
Aleon Metals Files for Bankruptcy to Seek New Owner

Wall Street Journal

time9 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Aleon Metals Files for Bankruptcy to Seek New Owner

Aleon Metals, a metals recycler and processor, filed for bankruptcy to find a new owner after having struggled to stabilize the business due to operational issues and volatile commodity prices. The Freeport, Texas-based private company, which specializes in extracting valuable metals from spent catalysts used in petroleum refining, filed its chapter 11 petition on Sunday with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Houston. WSJ Pro Bankruptcy previously reported the company's retention of Morrison & Foerster as its restructuring counsel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store