logo
Driver who killed eight-month-old baby in pram has sentence reduced

Driver who killed eight-month-old baby in pram has sentence reduced

Independent17-06-2025
A driver who struck and killed an eight-month-old baby in her pram outside a hospital has had her prison sentence reduced at the Court of Appeal, in what judges described as a 'truly tragic' case.
Bridget Curtis pressed down on the accelerator of her automatic BMW 520d car after stopping outside Withybush Hospital in Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire, on June 21 2023, causing it to mount a kerb and collide with the pushchair of Mabli Cariad Hall.
Mabli, who had just said a final goodbye to her paternal grandmother Betty Hall, who was receiving end-of-life care at the hospital, sustained fatal head injuries and died in hospital days later.
Curtis, who was 69 at the time of the offence and is now 71, pleaded guilty to causing death by dangerous driving last September and was jailed for four years at Swansea Crown Court in January.
At the Court of Appeal on Tuesday, her barrister said the sentence was 'manifestly excessive' and should be reduced, stating that the case concerned a 'lapse of concentration'.
Three senior judges ruled that Curtis's sentence was 'manifestly excessive' and reduced it to one of three years, while reducing her disqualification from driving from eight years to seven and a half years.
Mr Justice Butcher, sitting with Lord Justice Bean and Judge Richard Marks KC, said: 'We say at once that this is a truly tragic case.
'We have read the very moving victim personal statements of Mabli's parents, expressing their grief at the death of their beloved baby.
'No one could fail to sympathise with them for the appalling loss that they have sustained.'
Curtis, who attended the appeal via video link from HMP Eastwood Park in Gloucestershire and sat in a wheelchair throughout, had no previous convictions at the time of the incident and had held a clean driving licence for more than 50 years.
Her sentencing hearing at Swansea Crown Court heard that on the day of the collision, she had driven her daughter to an outpatient appointment at the hospital.
When her daughter struggled to find her handbag in the rear of the car, Curtis unlocked the door and turned around to assist her.
But as she did so, she pressed down on the accelerator of her car, which had been left running and was not in park mode.
The car reached speeds of more than 29mph and travelled 28 metres in around four seconds, mounting the kerb of a grass seating area and causing Mabli to be thrown out of her pushchair.
The car only stopped when it collided with a tree, having also caused injuries to Mabli's father Rob Hall.
Mabli, the youngest of six siblings, received treatment at the Withybush Hospital, as well as hospitals in Cardiff and Bristol, dying in the arms of her parents on June 25.
Her mother, Gwen Hall, told the sentencing hearing that her daughter was 'so bright, so beautiful, so full of love and life'.
She said: 'She hadn't crawled yet. She had said 'Mama' for the first time only the day before. We had so much planned with her.
'It was nowhere near the time for her to be taken away from us. She was my baby. My eight-month-old baby.'
John Dye, for Curtis, told Swansea Crown Court that she was a mother-of-four and grandmother of 10, who was 'absolutely devastated' by the incident.
Appearing again for Curtis at the Court of Appeal on Tuesday, Mr Dye said: 'This is a tragic case, but the issue really was one of pedal confusion.'
He continued: 'Objectively, this is clearly dangerous driving, but in terms of culpability, these four seconds of driving were more akin to, maybe not a momentary lapse, but a lapse of concentration.'
Craig Jones, for the Crown Prosecution Service, made no oral submissions to the court.
Reducing the sentence, Mr Justice Butcher said: 'True it is that the appellant did not intend to cause any harm, and true also that the mistake was of a short duration, but the driving was well over the threshold of dangerousness.'
He continued that Curtis would have known that she had stopped 'in a busy area outside a hospital with potentially very vulnerable pedestrians around', and that four or five seconds 'is far from being a negligible duration'.
He added that the court accepted that Curtis's remorse was 'genuine', stating: 'It was inattention and confusion as to which pedal she was pressing that caused this tragedy.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Norfolk residents can anonymously report on drink drivers they know
Norfolk residents can anonymously report on drink drivers they know

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Norfolk residents can anonymously report on drink drivers they know

A former roads policing officer hoped an anonymous drink driving reporting tool would make people more "fearful" of driving while over the limit. Norfolk Police launched a new form which allowed residents to report someone they knew who regularly drove while under the influence of drink or drugs. The reporting tool would be trialled throughout August and, if successful, would become permanent, the force said. Ex-officer John Scruby, trustee at Campaign Against Drink Driving, said: "By reporting drink drivers, that can only be a good thing... perhaps people will be fearful they will perhaps be found out." Information from the form will be fed directly into the police control room, where it will be allocated to an officer to look into. Insp Will Drummond said: "This tool means that people can help us to remove dangerous drivers from Norfolk's roads without the worry of any potential backlash." Mr Scruby hoped there would be a "zero tolerance" approach to alcohol in the country in the future. He said: "I think the major issue is that drinking and driving is not illegal, we have been saying for donkeys years, do not drink and drive... the only way around this, I'm afraid, is a zero tolerance approach."He added that the current drink-drive limit is not easy to understand or calculate into pints and units. It came as the government was considering reducing the drink-drive limit from 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100 millilitres of breath to 22 micrograms. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Moment driver in stolen car crashes into armed police van during 100mph police chase
Moment driver in stolen car crashes into armed police van during 100mph police chase

Daily Mail​

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Moment driver in stolen car crashes into armed police van during 100mph police chase

Shocking footage shows a 100mph police chase on country roads that ended in a three-vehicle crash and jail for the driver. Marlon Henriques, 30, of Tidworth, Wiltshire, drove at speeds of over 85mph on 30mph roads while dangerously weaving in and out his lane while overtaking. After several near-misses, Henriques finally crashed into a white Citroen van - sending it flying into a hedge - before hitting the back of a police firearms vehicle. The 30-year-old had failed to stop after being caught driving at nearly double the speed limit, instead leading police on a hair-raising pursuit. Henriques, who police called one of the 'worst drivers' they'd ever seen, eventually had the tyres of his vehicle - which didn't even belong to him - punctured by a stinger device. He has now been jailed for nearly two years for his dangerous driving, which put 'numerous lives in danger'. Salisbury Crown Court heard that on June 10, Henriques, driving a black Volkswagen Arteon taken from his housemate, failed to stop for police in Bulford. He was seen overtaking two vehicles on solid white lines, and a pursuit was authorised. During the chase, officers had to reach speeds of more than 100mph to catch up with the driver. After failing to stop for officers with their blue lights and sirens on, Henriques instead overtook a vehicle on the brow of a hill - narrowly avoiding a collision with an oncoming army truck. He was also seen driving the wrong way round a roundabout to evade pursuing police vehicles. Henriques performed several further dangerous overtakes, driving at around 85mph in a 30mph zone and skipping a red light towards the A338. The pursuit continued in the direction of Marlborough and then onto Ludgershall Road, where Henriques veered onto a dirt road on Salisbury Plain. Footage shows the driver mounting a kerb to overtake a vehicle at a junction before speeding away from police cars with their sirens blaring. But as he made his way back towards Tidworth, a stinger device was successfully deployed, puncturing the two nearside tyres of Henriques' vehicle. His car is seen smashing into the back of a white Citroen van, sending it into a tree, before colliding into the rear of an unmarked armed response car that was ahead of the pursuit. After hitting the unmarked vehicle, armed officers run up to Henriques, shouting, 'Get out the car now! Show me your hands now', before detaining him in the road. He later admitted aggravated taking of a vehicle without consent, dangerous driving, driving whilst disqualified and driving without insurance and was jailed for 22 months. Henriques was also disqualified from driving for four years and 11 months. Following his sentence, Wiltshire Police Roads Policing officer PC Webster said: 'Henriques' driving is some of the worst I have seen. 'He put numerous lives in danger through his speeding and reckless overtaking, regularly driving through red lights and the wrong way around roundabouts. 'Stopping him involved excellent collaborative work between the Roads Policing Unit, neighbourhood and response officers, and I'm pleased he has now been sentenced. 'This incident took place during the middle of the day, and I want to thank all members of the public for their assistance and patience when dealing with this matter.'

Two-tier justice is a national disgrace
Two-tier justice is a national disgrace

Telegraph

time12 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Two-tier justice is a national disgrace

When Attorney General Richard Hermer told the BBC in June that it was 'disgusting' and 'wrong' to claim that Britain had a two-tier justice system, 'offensive' to the country's 'crown prosecutors' and 'courts', he was attempting to bat away a wave of criticism that sought to make the point that justice in this country is no longer blind. It did not help his point that just a few weeks before, the Sentencing Council for England and Wales had sought to make this implicit bias explicit, suggesting that some offenders should receive more lenient sentences based on their ethnicity. Even this Labour Government felt compelled to pass emergency legislation to block the move. Perhaps the most visible manifestation of two-tier justice is the treatment of Lucy Connolly, the wife of a Conservative councillor jailed after posting on social media that people could 'set fire to all the… hotels full of [asylum seekers] for all I care'. This was a stupid and reprehensible remark, fired into the void of social media with little thought as to its potential consequences. Ms Connolly entered a guilty plea, and was sentenced to 31 months' imprisonment. Had she stood her ground, she might well have walked free. Ricky Jones, a Labour councillor who made a seemingly explicit call for violence – telling a large crowd that they needed to 'cut' the 'throats' of 'disgusting Nazi fascists' and 'get rid of them all' – was cleared by a jury yesterday. There is a clear difference between a guilty plea and a jury decision. The clear disparity in outcomes, however, will further fuel criticism of a system that appears to function very differently for those from the correct part of the political spectrum. And for the cynical, there is the question of the pressure placed on Ms Connolly by the prospect of being held on remand for an extended period. This does not help with the 'community tensions' politicians are at pains to minimise. Nor does it help public acceptance of the justice system when visibly absurd outcomes mount up on a near daily basis. As Robert Jenrick has said in his interview with The Telegraph, the perception that judges 'act politically and bring their own personal politics into their job as a judge' has been immensely damaging. His proposals for tighter checks on appointments and a robust system for removals make a great deal of sense. This is particularly so in comparison with what appears to be the preferred outcome of the Government: for critics to shut up and accept that the legal system produces the right outcomes. Not only does this fail to silence criticism, it serves to further undermine faith in the law. Criticism of Britain's two-tier system will continue for as long as we get two-tier outcomes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store