logo
The US Marines are prioritising the non-jumpjet version of the F-35 stealth jet

The US Marines are prioritising the non-jumpjet version of the F-35 stealth jet

Telegraph14-02-2025

Without much fanfare, the US Marine Corps made a critical decision recently – one that should boost the ability of its fighter squadrons to wage a major air war in the western Pacific region.
With the stroke of a pen, the Corps significantly altered the mix of Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth fighter variants it's acquiring. Instead of buying 353 vertical-landing F-35Bs and just 67 carrier-capable tailhook F-35Cs as previously planned, now the Marines will buy 280 F-35Bs and 140 F-35Cs: enough for 12 F-35B squadrons and eight F-35C squadrons, each with 12 jets.
The Corps announced the change in the latest edition of its annual aviation plan.
There are already around 180 F-35Bs and 50 F-35Cs in USMC service. More of the $100-million, supersonic planes arrive every year from Lockheed's Texas factory.
The F-35B was designed to operate from the US Navy's 800-foot amphibious assault ships which don't have catapults or arrester wires and so require jump-jet capability; the F-35C was always meant to fly from the fleet's 1,000-foot aircraft carriers. The F-35C, also in service with the US Navy, boasts a bigger wing, more fuel capacity and more capacious weapons bays than the F-35B, which must accommodate a downward-blasting engine driven fan and other heavy, bulky equipment that lends it its vertical landing capability. The F-35C is also cheaper to buy and to operate, being less complex.
The Marine Corps embarks fighter detachments, or even whole squadrons, aboard both ship types – and also deploys both the F-35B and F-35C for operations from austere bases on land.
Early on, the Marines planned to equip just a few squadrons with F-35Cs in order to honor a longstanding agreement with the Navy to integrate Marine jets with Navy carrier air wings for occasional front-line carrier cruises. The F-35B, not the F-35C, was going to define Marine air power through the 2020s and beyond.
But the changing balance of power in the western Pacific clearly changed the Marines' thinking. After a generation of breakneck modernization, the Chinese air force and navy now match – if not exceed – the US Air Force and US maritime services in key metrics. The Chinese have more warships and more twin-engine stealth fighters.
In the event of war with China, the Marines expect a hard fight for control of the air over the Taiwan Strait and the 'first island chain' stretching from Japan to The Philippines. What one Marine squadron leader described as the 'time-distance-fuel problem' complicates US planning.
There are precious few US bases within unrefuelled fighter range of the likeliest battlefields around Taiwan. The main one, Kadena air base in Okinawa – 470 miles from Taiwan – is expected to come under heavy bombardment by Chinese missiles in the opening hours of a war in the region.
To avoid concentrating their warplanes at one vulnerable base, the Pentagon plans to disperse the planes across a network of austere island airstrips. But few would be closer to the action than Kadena. An F-35B ranges just 500 miles with bombs and missiles in its internal bays. An F-35C ranges farther: perhaps as far as 600 miles.
The F-35C's extra range helps mitigate the time-distance-fuel problem – and may partially explain the Marines' growing fondness for the type.
But the greater volume of the F-35C's weapons bays might be even more attractive to the Corps than the extra range. The F-35 is stealthiest when it carries all its munitions internally. In its stealthiest mode, the F-35B carries just four AIM-120 medium-range air-to-air missiles. The F-35C can, with a few planned tweaks, pack six AIM-120s internally.
The F-35C can fit the new AGM-88G anti-radar missile in its bays; the F-35B can't.
In shifting to the F-35C, the Marine Corps is signalling its concern over the growing sophistication of Chinese forces in the western Pacific – and also its intention to meet those Chinese forces with its best planes flying from the most secure bases with the best weapons carried in the stealthiest mode.
The Marines are, in other words, taking no chances.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US law firm Seyfarth to exit Shanghai in latest China market retreat
US law firm Seyfarth to exit Shanghai in latest China market retreat

Reuters

time5 hours ago

  • Reuters

US law firm Seyfarth to exit Shanghai in latest China market retreat

June 5 (Reuters) - Law firm Seyfarth Shaw is planning to close its Shanghai office later this year, as major U.S. law firms continue to reduce their footprints in the Chinese legal market. The Chicago-founded firm, which has about 900 lawyers globally and is known for its labor and employment work, will continue to serve clients in the region by consolidating its presence in Hong Kong, a firm spokesperson said in a statement on Thursday. Seyfarth's website lists six lawyers in Shanghai, where it opened in 2013, and several of the lawyers are co-located in Hong Kong or elsewhere. The team advises clients on cross-border transactions, among other areas such as real estate and employment, according to the website. Large U.S. law firms for more than two years have been shuttering offices in Shanghai, Beijing and Hong Kong amid muted deal activity, geopolitical tensions and growing pressures on foreign businesses in the country. Earlier this year, firms including Wilson Sonsini, Cleary Gottlieb and Winston & Strawn have said they would close offices in at least one of those locations. The United States and China struck a 90-day deal on May 12 to roll back some of the triple-digit, tit-for-tat tariffs they had placed on each other since President Donald Trump's January inauguration. Though stocks rallied, the temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship. Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday agreed to further talks between the countries to hash out differences on tariffs. The highly anticipated call came amid accusations between Washington and Beijing in recent weeks over "rare earths" minerals in a dispute that threatens to tear up the fragile truce in the trade war between the two biggest economies.

Wise latest to unveil plans to switch main listing from London to New York
Wise latest to unveil plans to switch main listing from London to New York

Glasgow Times

time5 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

Wise latest to unveil plans to switch main listing from London to New York

The money transfer firm which listed in London in July 2021, said the move would 'help us accelerate our mission and bring substantial strategic and capital market benefits to Wise and our owners'. It wants to drive greater awareness of the brand in the US, which it said was the 'biggest market opportunity in the world for our products'. A primary listing on Wall Street would also give it 'better access to the world's deepest and most liquid capital market', it added. It said the change would benefit the group by 'expanding the pool of investors able to invest in Wise, in particular US domestic institutional and retail investors, the largest global constituent of investors, many of whom are currently unable to hold our shares'. Under the plans, the firm would be dual listed, with a secondary listing in London as part of its 'ongoing commitment to the UK'. Kristo Kaarmann, co-founder and chief executive of Wise, said: 'The UK is home to some of the best talent in the world in financial services and technology, and we will continue to invest in our presence here to fuel our UK and global growth.' It deals another blow to London's beleaguered stock market after a raft of companies have ditched their primary listing in London, including Paddy Power owner Flutter, mining group BHP, building materials group CRH and construction rental firm Ashtead, while a growing number of UK listed firms have also been bought out by foreign rivals or taken private. And on Wednesday, Glencore-backed metal investment firm Cobalt scrapped its plans to list in London, just two days after drugs company Indivior said it would cancel the secondary listing it had retained in London, having already switched its main listing to the US last year. Chinese fast fashion giant Shein has also reportedly ditched London for Hong Kong for its upcoming blockbuster initial public offering (IPO). Wise, which was launched in 2011 under original name TransferWise, said it was not turning its back on the UK. It said: 'Our confidence in UK talent and the tech ecosystem here remains undimmed. 'One-fifth of our employees are based in the UK and we plan to continue hiring and investing in our UK team.' The group said it would call a shareholder meeting in the coming weeks for investors to vote on the proposal.

Now China's ultra-cheap EVs are scaring China
Now China's ultra-cheap EVs are scaring China

Economist

time6 hours ago

  • Economist

Now China's ultra-cheap EVs are scaring China

China's ability to make electric vehicles (evs) cheaply has caused angst in countries with big carmakers, prompting governments to investigate China's subsidies for the sector and to erect trade barriers. Now, though, it is China's own government that is worrying about how cheap its producers' evs are. The race to the bottom shows no sign of letting up, and the industry has become emblematic of some of the broader problems facing the economy. On May 23rd China's biggest ev manufacturer, byd, caused shockwaves when it slashed the cost of 22 electric and hybrid models. Now the starting price of its cheapest model, the Seagull, has fallen to a mere 55,800 yuan ($7,700). The move came just two years after byd had originally unveiled the electric hatchback, at a then astonishingly low cost of 73,800 yuan. The latest move triggered official concern about how low prices could go in the world's largest car market. On May 31st China's industry ministry told Xinhua, the state-run news agency, that 'there are no winners in the price war, let alone a future.' The ministry vowed to curb cut-throat competition, which it said harmed investment in r&d, and could cause safety problems. On June 1st People's Daily, the Communist Party mouthpiece, argued that low-priced, low-quality products could harm the reputation of 'made-in-China' goods. The backlash comes as leaders crack down on unproductive, self-harming competition between firms and local governments that has created overcapacity and lowered profits. Their moves are part of a broader effort to rebalance the economy. 'Recent developments suggest the old supply-driven model remains intact,' Robin Xing, Morgan Stanley's chief China economist, wrote in a note. byd's shares fell after the price cuts and the official pronouncements, amid concerns that the price war will be unsustainable. But to cling to market share, other carmakers cut their own prices. Wei Jianjun, chairman of Great Wall Motor, one of the largest, called the industry unhealthy and invoked the collapse of the property market as a cautionary tale. 'Now, the Evergrande of the automobile industry already exists, but it just hasn't exploded yet,' he told Sina Finance, a news outlet, referring to the world's most-indebted developer. A byd executive responded that Mr Wei's comments were 'alarmist'. The situation is not helped by the fact that there are 115 Chinese ev brands, according to Jato Dynamics, a research firm. Only a few, including byd, make any money and are expected to survive in the long run. Brutal price wars are a common affliction across Chinese industries. By the end of last year's third quarter, nearly 25% of China's listed firms were in the red, more than double the proportion five years ago. Panic in Detroit Consolidation will take time and will be painful. byd is well positioned, given its scale and vertical integration. The firm controls everything from mining rights of minerals it needs to build its own batteries to cargo ships for transporting its cars to foreign markets. In November it sparked fears of even fiercer competition when it pressed suppliers to cut prices by 10%. Suppliers may now be squeezed further. That could mean layoffs and less money for car workers to spend, at a time when the government is playing up the need to boost weak domestic demand to help absorb the shock of the trade war with America. An increasingly tough market at home will fuel Chinese car exports. Reuters reports that byd plans to sell over half of its cars overseas, especially in Latin America and Europe, by 2030. That would be a big jump. China accounted for about 90% of the firm's 4.3m car sales last year. But the higher prices that evs command abroad could offset the ever-smaller margins in China. And it is making inroads in spite of stronger trade headwinds. In April, despite the eu's increased tariffs on Chinese evs, byd sold more of them in Europe than Tesla, an American rival, for the first time. Though the price war is at its worst in China, its ramifications will be felt worldwide. Cheaper evs would be a silver lining, but that will be little comfort for governments already anxious about China exporting overcapacity to their markets. More trade tensions are inevitable. ■

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store