logo
‘Treat Yourself Tax' is the money hack that will kill your overspending guilt: ‘Helps you stick to your budget'

‘Treat Yourself Tax' is the money hack that will kill your overspending guilt: ‘Helps you stick to your budget'

New York Post01-05-2025

Buy the latte — but pay the price.
No, not in guilt. In savings.
The 'Treat Yourself Tax' is the latest budget-savvy hack sweeping social media, and it's got impulse shoppers doing double takes — one at the receipt, and another at their savings account.
Advertisement
The hack? Every time you splurge on something nonessential — say, a $7 iced coffee, a $30 plumping lip gloss, or a $250 'emotional support' handbag — you immediately transfer that exact amount into savings.
Spend it, save it. Guilt-free gratification.
'It's about looking at your money, figuring out what brings you joy — big or small — and building that in on purpose,' said Nadia Vanderhall, financial planner and founder of The Brands and Bands, who shared her expert take with Bustle.
Advertisement
Unlike hardcore budgets that make you feel like you're grounded for life, this one lets you live a little — and still stash cash for the future.
'This is the kind of hack that works because it's flexible and real,' Vanderhall explained. 'It helps you stick to your budget without it feeling like punishment.'
It's a concept tailor-made for a generation who knows their coffee order better than their 401(k) balance — and whose shopping carts are often fuller than their bank accounts.
But Vanderhall says this simple mental money match-up can help shoppers pause before hitting 'buy now.'
Advertisement
The deal? Whenever you drop cash on a nonessential, you also stash the same amount in savings.
Lazy_Bear – stock.adobe.com
'When you think about the tax, you start to check in with yourself and ask, 'Do I really want this or am I just stressed or bored?'' she said. 'You get more intentional with your money.'
That moment of reflection echoes other recent money-saving tips that have gone viral, like the 'screenshot hack' — where TikTokkers suggest screenshotting tempting products instead of buying them immediately, to give your brain (and budget) time to cool off.
Advertisement
And don't forget the '1% rule,' which advises that if a non-essential item costs more than that percentage of your annual income, take at least 24 hours to think before pulling the trigger.
If you make $60K, as originally shared by Glen James of My Millennial Money via CNBC, that means sleeping on any purchase over $600 — no matter how chic the trench coat.
These hacks all share a common goal: cutting spending without cutting joy.
'If you can't enjoy your money at all, it's harder to stay consistent,' Vanderhall told Bustle.
'Not enjoying it can make you resent it. It's about staying grounded and connected to your why, even when you're saving. You get to connect with your money and build a relationship.'
This viral savings trick joins the ranks of TikTok-famous hacks like the 'screenshot rule' and the '1% rule' — all designed to curb overspending without the guilt.
Robert Peak – stock.adobe.com
Best of all, the 'Treat Yourself Tax' works for any income — whether your splurge is a $4 lip balm or a $400 Dyson Airwrap.
Buy something — bank something.
Advertisement
'This gives you breathing room,' Vanderhall said. 'It's also good for impulse shoppers because now you've got a plan. No guilt, no guessing, just structure. Everyone, no matter the income, can implement this.'
Over time, you might even redefine what counts as a treat.
'The treat also doesn't have to break the bank,' Vanderhall added. 'It can be a solo movie date, that $12 mascara mini you love, or just something that makes you feel good.'
So, go ahead — treat yourself. Just don't forget to tax yourself, too.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Online shopper slammed with a $1K tariff bill after ordering from popular retailer: ‘I had no idea'
Online shopper slammed with a $1K tariff bill after ordering from popular retailer: ‘I had no idea'

New York Post

time44 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Online shopper slammed with a $1K tariff bill after ordering from popular retailer: ‘I had no idea'

One woman's online shopping spree turned into a fashion fiasco — with a hefty price tag. Amanda Ivanelli, a Florida-based family vlogger, was floored when she opened her mail and found a $1,243 FedEx bill associated with a recent ASOS order. She originally ordered 'a bunch of dresses' from the British fast fashion side but only kept one or two of them, totaling about $150. Advertisement 'I got my mail today, and I got this,' she said in a now-viral TikTok, waving the invoice. 'And I open it, and I'm like, 'It's an invoice for $1,243.'' Ivanelli suspects the surprise fee was due to import tariffs — government-imposed taxes on foreign goods that President Donald Trump imposed under a rarely used 1977 emergency law. Advertisement 'I would have never ordered from ASOS or anywhere that I know I would be charged for — I'm assuming — the tariffs,' she fumed in the clip. 'Isn't that something that should have been shown at checkout?' 'I had no idea when I checked out, I had no idea,' she went on. The Post reached out to Ivanelli for comment and more details on her experience. Advertisement Fashionistas are feeling the tariff squeeze more than ever these days. The measures targeted China, Mexico, Canada and nearly every U.S. trading partner. While a federal court blocked the tariffs in May, the Trump team is expected to appeal — and shoppers are left hanging in legal limbo. It's become like a curse word, one style-savvy New Yorker dished to The Post. Advertisement Tiffany Radulescu, a 34-year-old Brooklyn glam girl, told The Post she skips the shipping stress by jet-setting to Europe for her wardrobe hauls. One Florida mom and TikTokker was recently left gasping after finding a $1.2K FedEx bill for an ASOS haul — despite only keeping a couple of dresses and returning the rest. SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images 'I'd rather catch a flight than catch a tariff,' Radulescu quipped, revealing she regularly flies to Paris to scoop Prada, Hermès and Louboutin without worrying about getting dinged by Uncle Sam. And she's not the only one scheming to skirt the fees. Social media has become a runway of rage, with users bashing jaw-dropping duties that sometimes exceed the cost of the clothes themselves. Big brands like Walmart, Nike and Macy's have hiked domestic prices to cover the added costs, while luxury houses like Louis Vuitton and Hermès have padded US prices to keep profits intact. Even activewear giant Lululemon has been feeling it. Advertisement 'We are not immune to macroeconomic factors such as tariffs,' chief financial officer Meghan Frank said during a recent earnings call. CEO Calvin McDonald added that while Lululemon had seen some tariff relief, the brand remains 'vigilant.' Turns out Ivanelli isn't the only fashionista shopping for clothes and getting hemmed in by hidden fees.

Here's where to find the best income opportunities right now, according to TCW CIO
Here's where to find the best income opportunities right now, according to TCW CIO

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

Here's where to find the best income opportunities right now, according to TCW CIO

Investors looking for income in the current environment may want to turn to securitized products, according to Bryan Whalen, chief investment officer and portfolio manager at Los Angeles-based TCW. Right now investors are in "the waiting place" for the next few months as the direction of the economy gets sorted out, said Whalen. While the outcome is still uncertain, Whalen thinks the economy will likely weaken more than the market expects. Yet in many parts of the bond market, investors aren't being compensated for credit risk, he said. Key inflation data comes out this week, with the May consumer price index due on Wednesday and the producer price index released on Friday. "There's a chance everything's all right and it all works out and smooth landing and no landing and all [those] plane analogies. However, if that's the case, that seems to be already embedded in what you get paid to take risk in corporate bonds and high yield bonds and things like that," Whalen said in an interview with CNBC. "If it's not the case … it feels like there needs to be a repricing." The money manager is on a TCW team that oversees more than $170 billion in fixed income assets. While corporate credit is rich, securitized assets are relatively cheap, he said. The latter make up about two-thirds of the assets in the TCW Flexible Income ETF (FLXR), which Whalen co-manages. FLXR YTD mountain TCW Flexible Income ETF year to date The exchange-traded fund has a 5.9% 30-day SEC yield, as of May 31, and a 0.4% expense ratio. It aims to generate consistent income and deliver long-term capital appreciation, and is meant to serve as a complement to a traditional fixed-income portfolio rather than replace it, Whalen said. "We're trying to balance a total-rate-of-return mindset — which is [to] stay high quality, stay liquid, so that we can take advantage of bond market dislocation in the future — with still trying to deliver good income for our shareholders," he explained. "From our perspective, the best way to do that is high-quality securitized [debt], which is offering decent spread levels and decent compensation." Breaking down the portfolio The allocation to securitized assets is distributed between agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), non-agency mortgages, asset-backed securities and commercial-mortgage-backed securities, Whalen said. Agency MBS, largely from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae , is essentially the highest quality asset you can buy after Treasurys, since they are seen as indirectly or directly backed by the government, he said. Those securities are expected to benefit, "in an environment where yields are still bouncing around — and you're not going to expect that to tighten in — but you are getting paid a decent income while you wait for an eventual remediation in the price and or in the spread," Whalen said. For the trade to work, you have to have a long-term view that interest rates will come down at some point and volatility will subside, he noted. "We'll get through 'the waiting place' and we'll get to a steady-state yield curve that should also bring in, maybe, buyers that have … certainly pulled back from the market in the last few years," he added. Non-agency mortgages have less interest-rate sensitivity and therefore are not as volatile, he noted. Meanwhile, asset-backed securities are essentially a compilation of many different sub-asset classes. "Asset-backed securities really allow you to tailor the specific receivable you want to have exposure to — and then you can pick which parts of the capital structure" to get paid from, Whalen said. "For us, because we're defensively leaning, we can buy good structures at the top of the capital structure, get a floating-rate coupon for anywhere between, let's call it, about 100 basis points over SOFR." The Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, is a benchmark interest rate for bonds and loans. Within this space, Whalen likes collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), which are pools of floating-rate loans to businesses. He favors CLOs tied to single-family rental loans, data centers and assets related to the electrification of the economy. Lastly, while there is still a "fundamental dark cloud" hanging over the commercial MBS sector, partly due to the outlook for office real estate, there are still areas of opportunity, Whalen said. He specifically likes those assets that focus on a single property, rather than a pool of many properties. "When you buy these bonds, particularly at the top of the capital structure, these underlying loans don't allow a lot of prepayment risk," he said. "The prices or the spreads aren't really subject to interest rate volatility." You can also get anywhere from about 100 to 200 basis points over Treasurys for top tier portions of the capital structure, he noted.

Danny Moses of ‘The Big Short' breaks down why he likes the unloved energy sector now
Danny Moses of ‘The Big Short' breaks down why he likes the unloved energy sector now

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

Danny Moses of ‘The Big Short' breaks down why he likes the unloved energy sector now

Investor Danny Moses, who made a killing betting against mortgage-backed debt before the 2008 crash, revealed he's bullish on the unloved energy sector. The Moses Ventures founder pointed out that energy stocks' weighting in the S & P 500 benchmark is only 3% right now, compared to their historical average of 7%. "I don't see that going much lower... oil is a little bit disconnected from the value of these energy stocks," Moses said Monday on CNBC's " Power Lunch ." "These energy stocks, the last four to five years, have gone through transformational M & A. Their balance sheets are in much better shape. No one's going to tell them to drill baby drill when they don't want to. It makes much more economic sense to own these stocks." The S & P 500 energy sector has been underperforming the broader market with a 3% loss this year as crude prices declined amid OPEC+ supply increases and demand concerns. The U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude has dropped about 9% this year to roughly $65. Moses shot to fame thanks to Michael Lewis' book " The Big Short " and the subsequent Oscar-winning movie of the same name. The investor highlighted two energy stocks he likes right now — Exxon Mobil and Diamondback Energy . "ExxonMobil, to me, cheap name, relatively. Its growth rate ... pays a nice dividend, buys back stocks. Same with Diamondback," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store