logo
Pro-Yoon protests shrink substantially after impeachment verdict

Pro-Yoon protests shrink substantially after impeachment verdict

Korea Herald06-04-2025

Vows of 'revolution' against court ruling ring hollow as rallies supporting ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol draw smaller crowds
Following the Friday verdict by the Constitutional Court expelling Yoon Suk Yeol from the presidency, far-right activist and pastor Jeon Kwang-hoon called for 30 million people to gather to protest the decision.
According to police estimates, 18,000 people showed up to the Saturday protest led by Jeon. Organizers claimed it was a million, and had reported to the authorities that 200,000 were expected to participate.
A significant number of protesters filled the streets of Gwanghwamun Square in Seoul, but calls for protection of the former president have subsided substantially after the court ruling that made Yoon the second president ever to be ousted via impeachment.
Save Korea, a right-leaning Christian group that had notified the authorities of a Saturday protest of 20,000 in Seoul, cancelled the demonstration shortly after the Constitutional Court ruling. Reporters stationed at the official presidential residence in Hannam-dong -- which had been packed with Yoon supporters before the verdict -- had said the area was mostly empty as of Sunday morning.
Yoon and his wife Kim Keon Hee are to move out of the official residence to their personal residence, with the former first couple yet to state when they will vacate the premises.
At protests on March 1 in Seoul, the crowds of Yoon supporters surpassed the police-estimated 120,000 participants, with Save Korea hosting an event in Yeouido, near the National Assembly, that drew 55,000. Scores of lawmakers with Yoon's People Power Party joined the demonstrations, including multiple-term legislators Kim Gi-hyeon, Na Kyung-won, Yoon Sang-hyun and former party floor leader Choo Kyung-ho.
South Koreans both supporting and opposing Yoon's impeachment did hold rallies across Seoul on Saturday, but on a much smaller scale than before. Pro-impeachment demonstrators on Friday were seen removing the tents they had set up at Gwanghwamun Square in central Seoul for long-term demonstrations, which had been held since shortly after Yoon declared martial law on Dec. 3.
Avid supporters of Yoon still oppose impeachment
Those who attended the pro-Yoon rallies over the weekend appeared angered by the court ruling. They voiced their discontent with the National Assembly that passed the impeachment motion and the Constitutional Court for upholding it, even denying the authority of the court and the legitimacy of the upcoming election to choose a new president.
Jeon urged participants to prepare a "revolution" against what he claimed was an unjust decision by the court, telling protesters to each send text messages protesting the impeachment to 10 acquaintances. Jeon claimed that Yoon's approval rating is "actually over 70 percent," and he himself has been cleared of all charges related to Yoon's alleged insurrection.
Yoon's approval rating peaked at 53 percent in June 2022, according to Gallup Korea, but by the week after his martial law declaration in December 2024 had fallen to 11 percent. Jeon is still under investigation for suspicion of inciting the Jan. 19 attack on the Seoul Western District Court, which left scores of police officers and civilians injured.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Yoon, wife to face special counsel probes
Yoon, wife to face special counsel probes

Korea Herald

time8 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Yoon, wife to face special counsel probes

577 prosecutors, investigators allotted to look into ex-first couple President Lee Jae-myung's Cabinet on Tuesday passed bills to open three special counsel investigations into former President Yoon Suk Yeol and his wife Kim Keon Hee. The bills are intended to "end the insurrection" that the Lee administration and the ruling Democratic Party of Korea accuse Yoon of instigating with his short-lived martial law decree on Dec. 3, 2024. At the second Cabinet meeting since Lee took office last week, the Democratic Party-led bills passed into law to bring together 577 prosecutors and investigators in total to investigate the former first couple. The combined size of the legal teams involved in the investigations is comparable to a district attorney's office. With Tuesday's passage, a special counsel investigation will look into if Yoon committed either insurrection or treason by trying to impose martial law. Yoon declared martial law late in the evening of Dec. 3, only to lift it six hours later following a National Assembly resolution that opposed it. The Democratic Party contends that Yoon attempted to provoke military action from North Korea with his hawkish policies to lay the groundwork for the declaration of martial law. Yoon's Ministry of National Defense playing anti-Kim Jong-un regime broadcasts along the inter-Korean borders from June 2024 was one example of the former administration deliberately seeking military confrontation with North Korea, according to the Democratic Party. Before their resumption last year, the border broadcasts had been used by the South Korean military as a psychological warfare tactic in the past, before they were halted in 2018 under then-President Moon Jae-in. The Democratic Party also claims that Yoon sent drones across the border into North Korea in October 2024, echoing Pyongyang's accusations that the South Korean military was behind the alleged drone infiltration. Yoon allegedly attempting to instigate an armed conflict with North Korea in the run-up to his martial law decree qualifies as "treason," the Democratic Party claimed, on top of being a "rebellion against the Constitution, which is to say, insurrection." Yoon's wife Kim is set to face a separate special counsel investigation that will scrutinize allegations she was involved in the then-ruling People Power Party's nomination of candidates for a National Assembly seat in the 2022 by-election. Another special counsel investigation would revisit the death of a Marine in July 2023. Cpl. Chae Su-geun, 20, died when he was swept away in moving water during a search and rescue operation to locate flood victims in a rain-swollen river in Yecheon, North Gyeongsang Province. The Democratic Party says Yoon's presidential office tried to impede the preliminary probe into Chae's death at the time to cover up possible wrongdoing at the top. Special counsels will be given as long as 170 days to investigate Yoon and his wife. Yoon was removed from office on April 4 in a unanimous ruling by the Constitutional Court over the martial law debacle, leading South Korea to hold an early presidential election on June 3.

Petition to expel Lee Jun-seok from Assembly surpasses 500,000
Petition to expel Lee Jun-seok from Assembly surpasses 500,000

Korea Herald

time8 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Petition to expel Lee Jun-seok from Assembly surpasses 500,000

Rep. Lee Jun-seok, presidential candidate for the minor conservative New Reform Party in the June 3 election, is facing mounting public backlash over a misogynistic remark made during a televised debate, with more than 500,000 people signing a petition calling for his removal from the National Assembly. During the May 27 debate, Lee brought up a vulgar expression involving chopsticks and a part of the female body while questioning Social Democratic Party candidate Kwon Young-guk. The reference was aimed at attacking Democratic Party of Korea candidate Lee Jae-myung, alleging it had been used in an online post by Lee's son — but the backlash soon turned toward Lee himself. The remark was swiftly condemned for its explicit content and lack of relevance. As of 2 p.m. Tuesday, more than 502,000 people had signed the petition, just six days after it was posted on the National Assembly's official website on June 4. By law, petitions with over 50,000 signatures in 30 days are reviewed by a standing committee. The signatures far exceeded a previous petition filed last December seeking the impeachment of then-President Yoon Suk Yeol, which drew around 400,000 signatures following his botched Dec. 3 martial law declaration. 'The lawmaker has long promoted discriminatory and divisive rhetoric, drawing a line between so-called 'citizens' and 'non-citizens,' particularly targeting women and minorities,' the petition reads. The backlash stems not only from the remark itself, but from what many see as a reflection of Lee's broader political trajectory. His support has largely come from men in their 20s and 30s, many of whom have expressed discontent with gender equality policies in recent years. According to exit polls by three major broadcasters, he secured 37.2 percent of the vote among men in their 20s — well above Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung's 24 percent in the same group. Since the mid-2010s, gender issues have become increasingly polarizing in South Korean politics. Lee built his political identity by appealing to young men who felt marginalized by the liberal Moon Jae-in administration's progressive agenda. Lee frequently amplified issues gaining traction in male-dominated online communities — such as opposition to gender quotas, protests at women's universities and criticism of disability rights activism — reinforcing his image as a voice for those disaffected. He also pledged to abolish the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family during both the 2022 and 2025 presidential campaigns, framing it as a symbol of preferential treatment toward women. The message resonated with his core supporters but was widely criticized as socially divisive. Despite the public outcry, Lee has stopped short of a full apology. At a press briefing, he said the reference was intended to scrutinize the opposing candidate, though he acknowledged the level of public offense it caused. 'If I could go back, I wouldn't bring it up,' he said. 'I'll be more careful with my expressions going forward.' Political commentator Choi In-han said the backlash reflects more than a single misstep. 'Lee Jun-seok's rise has been driven by a politics of division, drawing lines across gender, generation and even disability,' Choi told The Korea Herald. 'This controversy is not just about a single remark, but about how his entire political approach is being evaluated.' 'Running for president in one's 40s is itself a testament to political skill,' Choi added. 'But without a sincere apology — not just softened language — his future prospects could be severely damaged.' The controversy has drawn comparisons to a similar case in 2011 involving former lawmaker Kang Yong-seok, who was accused of making sexually inappropriate remarks about female broadcasters. Kang was expelled from his party and suspended from Assembly activities for one month. He later ran as an independent in the 2012 general election but failed to retain his seat. flylikekite@

Petition to expel Lee Jun-seok from Assembly surpasses 500,000
Petition to expel Lee Jun-seok from Assembly surpasses 500,000

Korea Herald

time9 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Petition to expel Lee Jun-seok from Assembly surpasses 500,000

Rep. Lee Jun-seok, presidential candidate for the minor conservative New Reform Party in the June 3 election, is facing mounting public backlash over a misogynistic remark made during a televised debate, with more than 500,000 people signing a petition calling for his removal from the National Assembly. During the May 27 debate, Lee brought up a vulgar expression involving chopsticks and a part of the female body while questioning Social Democratic Party candidate Kwon Young-guk. The reference was aimed at attacking Democratic Party of Korea candidate Lee Jae-myung, alleging it had been used in an online post by Lee's son — but the backlash soon turned toward Lee himself. The remark was swiftly condemned for its explicit content and lack of relevance. As of 2 p.m. Tuesday, more than 502,000 people had signed the petition, just six days after it was posted on the National Assembly's official website on June 4. By law, petitions with over 50,000 signatures in 30 days are reviewed by a standing committee. The signatures far exceeded a previous petition filed last December seeking the impeachment of then-President Yoon Suk Yeol, which drew around 400,000 signatures following his botched Dec. 3 martial law declaration. 'The lawmaker has long promoted discriminatory and divisive rhetoric, drawing a line between so-called 'citizens' and 'non-citizens,' particularly targeting women and minorities,' the petition reads. The backlash stems not only from the remark itself, but from what many see as a reflection of Lee's broader political trajectory. His support has largely come from men in their 20s and 30s, many of whom have expressed discontent with gender equality policies in recent years. According to exit polls by three major broadcasters, he secured 37.2 percent of the vote among men in their 20s — well above Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung's 24 percent in the same group. Since the mid-2010s, gender issues have become increasingly polarizing in South Korean politics. Lee built his political identity by appealing to young men who felt marginalized by the liberal Moon Jae-in administration's progressive agenda. Lee frequently amplified issues gaining traction in male-dominated online communities — such as opposition to gender quotas, protests at women's universities and criticism of disability rights activism — reinforcing his image as a voice for those disaffected. He also pledged to abolish the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family during both the 2022 and 2025 presidential campaigns, framing it as a symbol of preferential treatment toward women. The message resonated with his core supporters but was widely criticized as socially divisive. Despite the public outcry, Lee has stopped short of a full apology. At a press briefing, he said the reference was intended to scrutinize the opposing candidate, though he acknowledged the level of public offense it caused. 'If I could go back, I wouldn't bring it up,' he said. 'I'll be more careful with my expressions going forward.' Political commentator Choi In-han said the backlash reflects more than a single misstep. 'Lee Jun-seok's rise has been driven by a politics of division, drawing lines across gender, generation and even disability,' Choi told The Korea Herald. 'This controversy is not just about a single remark, but about how his entire political approach is being evaluated.' 'Running for president in one's 40s is itself a testament to political skill,' Choi added. 'But without a sincere apology — not just softened language — his future prospects could be severely damaged.' The controversy has drawn comparisons to a similar case in 2011 involving former lawmaker Kang Yong-seok, who was accused of making sexually inappropriate remarks about female broadcasters. Kang was expelled from his party and suspended from Assembly activities for one month. He later ran as an independent in the 2012 general election but failed to retain his seat.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store