Angus Robertson's secret Israel meeting minutes revealed
Then a piercing cry rang through the auditorium. 'Your party is mingling with genocidal deputy ambassadors,' a young woman shouted.
The event was swiftly ended, and the protester hustled out. She might well have been disappointed to see the First Minister on stage. Until days before, the man whom she accused of 'mingling' with the Israeli government, Angus Robertson, had been due to appear instead.
The photograph of Robertson with the beaming Daniela Grudsky, Israel's deputy ambassador to the UK, had that month rocked the Scottish Government and created a schism within the SNP.
READ MORE: 'Time to take action': What it was like at the national Palestine demo in Edinburgh
Robertson faced loud calls to quit his role as the Cabinet Secretary for External Affairs. Critics argued the meeting was a 'breach of trust' when Israel stood accused of grave breaches of international law in Gaza, and with its prime minister then under investigation by the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Israel denies claims it is committing war crimes or perpetrating genocide in Gaza, and rejects the jurisdiction of the ICC, which issued an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu on war crimes charges in November 2024.
A year on, despite the intense furore around the meeting, the public still knows little on how it came about or what was discussed.
Now The Ferret can shed new light on the affair, revealing details of previously withheld internal emails, WhatsApp chats and partial minutes of the meeting. They show ministers, advisers and officials across Swinney's government were entangled.
And we can reveal that while publicly stating that the 'UK is in danger of being complicit in killing innocent civilians', behind the scenes, the Scottish Government tried to set up an earlier meeting with Swinney and the ambassador and was talking itself up as a 'critical friend' of Israel.
In response to this story, Robertson told The Ferret that under the 'abhorrent circumstances' Gazans face 'at the hands of the Israeli government', the Scottish Government is 'unequivocal that it would not be appropriate to meet with the Israeli government' until 'real progress has been made towards peace'.
Our findings come after a 10-month freedom of information (FoI) battle, which involved challenges to the Scottish Information Commissioner and claims from the Scottish Government that releasing details of the meeting could damage UK-Israeli relations and even be seen as 'antisemitic'.
Swinney 'actively sought a meeting' with Israeli ambassador
On May 8, 2024, John Swinney took office as Scotland's First Minister. For his predecessor, Humza Yousaf, the Palestinian cause had been close to home – his own parents-in-law had been visiting relatives in Gaza when the Israeli bombardment began in the wake of the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, which killed about 1200 people. More than 250 hostages were also taken.
Swinney quickly faced criticism over a perceived lack of action on the issue. The Scottish Greens called on the new First Minister 'to demonstrate that Scotland's solidarity with the people of Palestine extends to action, not just words' and, in response, the Government reiterated Yousaf's call for a ceasefire and for the UK Government to ban arms exports to Israel.
Swinney followed up with a tweet on May 27, stating that the 'humanitarian catastrophe' in Gaza was 'one of the greatest moral issues of our time'.
But secret emails show that just a week later, on June 3, a Scottish Government official emailed the Israeli Embassy, looking to speak to 'someone urgently to make arrangements' for a meeting between Swinney and Israeli ambassador Tzipi Hotovely (below), while she was in Scotland.
The embassy's Israel-Scotland affairs officer advised this visit was no longer going ahead because of 'sudden security threats', but that the ambassador was 'eager to meet with the First Minister virtually'.
Later that day, the embassy emailed a 'list of attendees' for a meeting which included Hotovely, the embassy's head of civil society Hodaya Avzada, and the Israel Scotland affairs officer. Some other names are redacted.
Asked about these exchanges, the Scottish Government said the meeting referenced in the 'list of attendees' did not go ahead and no meetings with representatives of the Israeli government took place before August 8.
But Scottish Labour MSP Mercedes Villalba argued this was evidence Swinney's government had 'actively sought a meeting with a representative of a state whose prime minister is now wanted by the ICC for crimes against humanity'.
On July 30, a Scottish Government official's phone pinged with a WhatsApp message from embassy official Avzada. 'Hope you're well?' she asked. 'We should get back to you today re DCM [deputy chief of mission] visit,' the official replied. 'Apols for delay.'
Discussions had progressed, and a trip to Scotland was being arranged for the deputy ambassador – or DCM – Daniela Grudsky. 'It is next week and the schedule is filling,' Avzada said.
Less than two hours later, an official emailed Angus Robertson, copying in Swinney, recommending that he meet with Grudsky – and warning of 'sensitivities' over the Gaza war. Azvada asked via WhatsApp if there was 'any chance we could meet' Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes as well, but was told: 'FM isn't available, so Mr Robertson is the right interlocutor.'
'Transparency takes up so much time'
As soon as the meeting was firmed up for August 8, discussions turned to communications management. 'We'd normally issue a short statement for transparency's sake,' the Scottish Government official told Avzada. 'But let me know if you have any security considerations, esp around timing.'
It was agreed there would be no announcement of the meeting until the Monday following, August 12. Avzada made sure to double-check that the embassy could issue the tweet that would ultimately ignite the whole controversy, and was told: 'Yeah that's fine.'
READ MORE: 55 arrested in Westminster as protests grow over Palestine Action ban
The Scottish official then told Avzada: 'You'll be aware we are usually inundated with freedom of information requests. Practically every meeting our ministers have is FOI'd. We redact sensitive information, but the bar is high, and we have to justify it. The FOIs are usually inspired by comms but if we don't issue something, we're criticised for being secretive!'
The official added: 'Transparency is obviously a good thing, but it takes up such a lot of our time.'
In her official response, Avzada said the embassy did 'not consent' to the release of information about meetings, 'in order to allow the fruitful and open discourse between Israel and the United Kingdom'. This would later be echoed, almost word for word, by the Scottish Government in its reasoning for denying The Ferret's FOI requests.
Subsequent emails show that the Scottish Government provided further updates on FOI requests to the Israeli Embassy after the meeting, which reiterated its position that no information should be released.
Amnesty International told The Ferret that it appeared the Scottish Government already had 'one eye' on the challenges that requests for transparency would create for them, even before the meeting took place.
Meanwhile, Talat Yaqoob, an equality campaigner and researcher who has worked in the Scottish Parliament, said it was 'extraordinary that a foreign government would get any say over what the Scottish public is permitted to know about the work of its own elected officials'.
'Freedom of information law exists to enable accountability – it is not something to attempt to circumvent or over-complicate,' she added.
The Scottish Government said it had complied fully with the Scottish Information Commissioner and pointed out that information can be withheld under freedom of information law if it could substantially prejudice relations between the UK and another country.
'Critical friends'?
After public anger had erupted around the meeting, Swinney tweeted on August 14 that it had been 'accepted on the basis it would provide an opportunity to convey our consistent position on the killing and suffering of innocent civilians in the region'.
But the Scottish Government had already put out a statement saying that the attendees had also discussed 'areas of mutual interest, including culture, renewable energy, and engaging the country's respective diasporas'.
In the redacted minutes released to The Ferret, much of the section on 'Israel/Scotland relations' is blacked out. But the minutes do state: 'The Scottish Government's position remained that the Palestinian people had the right to self-determination and that a secure Israel should be able to live in peace and security. There was value in dialogue between Scotland and Israel as critical friends.'
While Swinney publicly referenced the 'killing and suffering of civilians', the minutes suggest that Robertson adopted a more reserved tone with Grudsky, noting that 'every effort must be taken to reduce civilian casualties'.
MSP Villalba claimed the minutes showed the Scottish Government's private attitude to Israel was 'quite different' to its public stance.
She added that her constituents were organising weekly protests against what they see as UK complicity in the war in Gaza. They would be asking whether Robertson still believed Scotland could be 'critical friends' with a country currently facing genocide allegations at the International Court of Justice, Villalba claimed.
In a 'profound apology' issued to delegates at the SNP conference on September 1, after heavy criticism from within the party, Robertson said one of the Government's priorities for the meeting was to express its support for an 'end of UK arms being sent to Israel'. But there is no mention of this in the minutes released.
Yaqoob said it was a failure of leadership that arms sales do not appear to have been addressed. She said the apparent omission was a 'dereliction of duty' given the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
The aftermath
At 2.37pm on August 12, the Scottish Government posted about the meeting on its international division's Twitter/X account. Barely anyone noticed – perhaps unsurprising, given the account only has 4500 followers.
At 5.36pm, Grudsky posted her own now infamous tweet, complete with the picture of the pair by an art deco fireplace in St Andrew's House. She said they had discussed 'the unique commonalities between' Scotland and Israel and 'emphasised the urgent need to bring back our 115 hostages'. There was no mention of a ceasefire call. 'Looking forward to co-operating in the fields of technology, culture and renewable energy,' Grudsky added.
Over the next few days, dissent began to bubble in the SNP ranks. Backbench MSPs Kevin Stewart, Christine Grahame and Emma Roddick all put their heads above the parapet.
On August 14, Swinney issued his statement on Twitter/X, but Robertson himself laid low. A Scottish Government official emailed the Edinburgh Book Festival to give 'a quick heads up that FM will now be attending' the event with Drakeford – instead of Robertson.
On the morning of Monday, August 19 – with the 'ongoing public controversy' having continued to rage over the weekend – Swinney called Robertson in for a meeting. 'They discussed the history of the issue and noted the public remarks of MSPs, MPs and commentators,' records released to The Ferret reveal.
'They reflected on the need to address the concerns raised by the meeting around the Scottish Government's position on the relationship with the Israeli government. In particular, they noted the need to be more clear that the Scottish Government did not believe that 'normal' relations with the Israeli government were currently possible given the events in Gaza and the position of the ICC.'
They also agreed it was time for Robertson to break his silence – and issue his original apology. This was circulated among officials and redrafted by international relations deputy director John Primrose, and Swinney's special adviser, Jack Middleton.
In the wake of the controversy, the Government ruled out further meetings with Israeli diplomats until progress has been made in Gaza peace talks.
But arms firms supplying Israel continue to receive subsidies from the Scottish Government. It is only thanks to repeated FOI requests from The Ferret and other media outlets that this information has entered the public domain.
And there are details of the meeting between Grudsky and Robertson, which remain hidden from public view, including the discussions they held about the other topics which are redacted in the minutes released.
'It is squarely in the public interest to have absolute clarity on whether the cabinet secretary presented a strong challenge to the deputy ambassador over war crimes and violations of international law in Gaza when they met,' said Amnesty's Liz Thomson.
'Just months before that meeting took place, Amnesty asked Robertson for a clear framework on how human rights considerations inform international engagement and raised concerns that the Scottish Government's action wasn't matching its rhetoric. Such guidance is clearly needed to inform all external affairs activity.'
Labour's Villalba was more direct. 'We need answers – and we need them now,' she said.
READ MORE: RECAP: Activists defy Labour with illegal pro-Palestine T-shirts at Edinburgh demo
In a statement provided to The Ferret, Robertson, said: 'Close to 60,000 people have been killed in Gaza [some estimates say the death toll is higher] – many more are now being left to starve at the hands of the Israeli government.
'Civilians who queue to access what little humanitarian aid is permitted to enter Gaza are frequently shot at and killed by Israeli Defence Forces.
'The rhetoric of Israeli politicians has become increasingly extreme in recent months.
'Under such abhorrent circumstances, the Scottish Government is unequivocal that it would not be appropriate to meet with the Israeli government.
'This will remain our position until real progress has been made towards peace and Israel co-operates fully with its international obligations on the investigation of genocide and war crimes.'
At the Book Festival that night, Swinney said that devolution had 'strengthened the self-confidence of Scotland'. Over two decades of self-government, Scotland has become more visible on the international stage.
But to critics, the Robertson affair has exposed serious gaps in transparency and accountability about how – and with whom – Scotland does diplomacy.
The Embassy of Israel in London did not respond to requests for a comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Free childcare crisis as surge in demand leaves Labour with funding black hole
Ministers have been warned the childcare sector is at risk of 'collapse' after a boom in demand for free care left a major government scheme in financial peril. A plan to expand free childcare for British families is set to cost the government an extra £1bn per year at a time when ministers are grappling to fill the gaping black hole in public finances. Labour has not spelled out how the funding gap will be filled, but experts predict the shortfall will create 'substantial pressure' on the government and could put the entire childcare sector under threat. In an exclusive interview with The Independent, Bridget Phillipson insisted the unexpectedly high take-up – a quarter higher than predicted – was a 'good problem to have' and would not leave children without places. But the education secretary could not guarantee that parents would get a space at their local nursery in September, when the scheme expands to offer eligible children aged nine months and older 30 hours a week of free childcare. Industry leaders said parents would be left 'disappointed' while nurseries warned a a lack of staff meant they were already struggling to deliver the government's pledge. CEO of the Early Years Alliance Neil Leitch told The Independent: 'One thing is absolutely clear: if 80 per cent of all hours delivered are government hours, and those hours are inadequately funded, the infrastructure will collapse over a period of time. 'I can't say it will be one year or five years, but you can bet your bottom dollar if you don't give somebody enough money to deliver a service, at some point they stop.' Figures published in March show the number of people newly entitled to free childcare was 26 per cent higher than originally estimated – 379,000 compared to 302,000. This meant that the Department for Education spent £2bn on the policy last year, up from a planned £1.6bn. But this is only set to grow as further hours of free childcare are rolled out. According to the highly-respected Institute for Fiscal Studies, the cost of extending free childcare to under-3s could end up costing £1bn more a year than previously expected, from 2026/7 onwards – up from around £4bn to approximately £5bn. A boost to funding announced in Rachel Reeves' Spending Review, of £640 million, would 'go some way to filling this gap… (but) could still leave substantial pressure from higher-than-expected take-up', the IFS said. Associate director Christine Farquharson said the DfE will still likely face 'difficult choices' within its budget and may have to 'trim back' spending in other areas to meet its childcare commitments. 'They have a fixed pot of money. When one thing becomes more expensive, that puts more pressure on other areas of the [education] budget,' she told The Independent. Ms Farquharson said predictions for how many parents would take up the free hours were 'complex' but added: 'It does seem like [the Tories] underestimated take-up pretty systematically.' It is just one of many financial decisions facing the chancellor ahead of the autumn Budget after planned welfare cuts, aimed at saving £5bn annually, were reversed. Ms Reeves is being pushed to bend her rules on borrowing or to rise taxes to keep public finances on track. The free childcare policy was launched in December 2023 with great fanfare under former Tory chancellor Jeremy Hunt. The first stage was put in place from September 2024, when the government extended 15 hours a week of free term-time childcare to working parents with a child aged nine months and over. From September, that will be extended to 30 hours a week . Labour say they were left a 'pledge without a plan' when they entered government. Ministers have been working to massively expand the number of nursery spaces and staff but the task has been made more difficult by the fact that, unlike schools, many nurseries are private providers. But industry leaders warned that, with 8 in 10 of all nursery hours soon set to be paid for by the government, the infrastructure was at risk of 'collapse' without more money. The sector has already been forced to absorb huge additional costs in recent years, including April's national insurance rise, it warned. Childcare in the UK is one of the most expensive in the world, according to the OECD. Mr Leitch added: 'What we have to bear in mind is that we've already got a recruitment and retention crisis. The reality is, many settings don't have the people to be able to accommodate those additional hours. So I'm afraid there will be parents that will be disappointed.' Sarah Ronan, the director of the Early Education and Childcare Coalition, said the IFS was right to sound the alarm, adding that if the government did not match demand with funding it is leaving providers with 'no choice' but to limit the number of places they offer – or raise fees. 'The harsh reality is that if providers don't do that, they'll face closure and then we'll have an even worse crisis on our hands,' she said. Purnima Tanuk, the executive chair of the National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA), said the government's ambitions 'will be put at risk if there is not sufficient investment in early years.' She added that 'almost 70 per cent of nurseries told us that staff shortages mean they cannot offer the children's places they have room to deliver'. Munira Wilson, the Lib Dem education spokesperson, said providers had been left 'hanging by a thread and parents (are) facing the prospect of childcare deserts'. 'The government need to ensure that the funding for childcare hours matches the actual costs of delivery,' she said. Official statistics released last week showed a 7.2 per cent increase in early years staff, the largest annual rise since the series began. The Department for Education would not be drawn on where any extra money might come from. But Ms Phillipson insisted she was unafraid of the policy's popularity. She urged families to check what they are are entitled to, adding: 'I want as many parents as possible to take up the offer. It allows parents to juggle work and family life, but it also sets up children to succeed And the demand that parents are showing is a good problem to have, because it also brings economic dividends as well. 'If people are able to work, or work a few more hours… that helps us all as a society as well and it gets economic growth going'. Ms Phillipson has previously warned that, as the policy expands again in September, parents in the first wave might not get their first choice of nursery. Asked if she could say that all parents who want a space would get one, she told The Independent: 'What I can't guarantee is that it will be as close to home as they would like or it will be their first choice, but we're confident that the roll out will go well in September.' Ms Farquharson did add that the higher uptake of free childcare could ultimately be a good sign for the economy, even if it is more expensive in the short term. 'This higher uptake might mean that we're getting a lot more parents moving into paid work because of these entitlements than first predicted,' she said. 'If the goal for this policy is to drive growth, then this would be a fantastic success story.' However, the extent to which that is the case will only become apparent over the next few years, she said. A DfE spokesperson said: "High-quality, affordable childcare plays a vital role in our Plan for Change, which is why early years funding will rise to over £9 billion next year helping us meet our target of getting tens of thousands more children each year ready for school. 'We're backing families with this record investment including a £75 million grant this year to support providers in delivering more places and a 45 per cent uplift in early year pupil premium, building on the real difference this is making for families as highlighted by the Coram survey who say costs for some has halved.'
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Doge reportedly using AI tool to create ‘delete list' of federal regulations
The 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) is using artificial intelligence to create a 'delete list' of federal regulations, according to a report, proposing to use the tool to cut 50% of regulations by the first anniversary of Donald Trump's second inauguration. The 'Doge AI Deregulation Decision Tool' will analyze 200,000 government regulations, according to internal documents obtained by the Washington Post, and select those which it deems to be no longer required by law. Doge, which was run by Elon Musk until May, claims that 100,000 of those regulations can then be eliminated, following some staff feedback. A PowerPoint presentation made public by the Post claims that the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) used the AI tool to make 'decisions on 1,083 regulatory sections', while the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau used it to write '100% of deregulations'. The Post spoke to three HUD employees who told the newspaper AI had been 'recently used to review hundreds, if not more than 1,000, lines of regulations'. During his 2024 campaign, Donald Trump claimed that government regulations were 'driving up the cost of goods' and promised the 'most aggressive regulatory reduction' in history. He repeatedly criticized rules which aimed to tackle the climate crisis, and as president he ordered the heads of all government agencies to undertake a review of all regulations in coordination with Doge. Asked about the use of AI in deregulation by the Post, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said 'all options are being explored' to achieve the president's deregulation promises. Fields said that 'no single plan has been approved or green-lit', and the work is 'in its early stages and is being conducted in a creative way in consultation with the White House'. Fields added: 'The Doge experts creating these plans are the best and brightest in the business and are embarking on a never-before-attempted transformation of government systems and operations to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.' Musk appointed a slew of inexperienced staffers to Doge, including Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old who was previously known by the online handle 'Big Balls'. Earlier this year, Reuters reported that Coristine was one of two Doge associates promoting the use of AI across the federal bureaucracy.
Edinburgh Reporter
31 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Ten people arrested following Forth Road Bridge protest
Ten people have been arrested following a protest on the Forth Road Bridge on Friday, 25 July, 2025. The protest organised by Greenpeace UK involved a number of activists who suspended themselves from the bridge using ropes and was reported to police around 1.05pm. Five men, aged between 35 and 40, and five women, aged between 25 and 42, were arrested in connection and further enquiries are ongoing. Police said that the bridge was re-opened around 11am. Amy Cameron, Programme Director at Greenpeace UK said: 'We've achieved what we set out to. By blocking INEOS, we've drawn global attention to the company's bottomless appetite for plastic production, false solutions and profit for its billionaire boss Jim Ratcliffe. 'Their feeble suggestion that recycling and managing waste can hand them a free pass to go on producing more plastic forever is laughable. It comes from the same industry playbook as the health benefits of smoking and carbon offsetting. 'The plastic pollution problem is just too massive. Less than 10% of plastic is currently recycled globally, and this is set to rise to just 17% by 2060, while the amount of plastic we're producing is set to triple. The only solution is to address the problem at source which means securing a strong Global Plastics Treaty that imposes legally-binding caps on plastic production. 'INEOS are cutting jobs at Grangemouth while trying to open a massive new plastics plant in Belgium, leaving Scottish workers high and dry. If Jim Ratcliffe really cared about skilled jobs in Scotland he'd invest his billions in supporting his workers to transition into the green industries of the future, instead of throwing money at Formula 1 racing teams and football clubs.' 'Contrary to INEOS' claims, the protest was both safe and caused minimal disruption. The climbers are all highly-trained and spent weeks rehearsing this action to ensure it was safe. They were supported at all times by rescue climbers and support boats. The Forth Road Bridge carries low volumes of bus, bicycle and pedestrian traffic and was closed by Police Scotland – not by the protest directly.' Like this: Like Related
