logo
Israeli Airstrikes Blunt Iranian Long-Range Ballistic Missile Threat (Updated)

Israeli Airstrikes Blunt Iranian Long-Range Ballistic Missile Threat (Updated)

Yahoo20-06-2025
Israel's campaign against Iranian ballistic missiles and their launchers appears to be having an effect. On Tuesday, Iran was able to fire 20 ballistic missiles. That is far fewer than in previous days, which had seen around 370 ballistic missiles unleashed at Israel in total, according to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). A spokesman for the IDF on Tuesday said this campaign has resulted in Iran pushing back its launchers further from Israel. Operation Rising Lion, Israel's effort to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and dismantling its military, is now in its fifth day.
You can catch up on the war between Israel and Iran in our previous coverage here.
'We have delivered significant blows to the Iranian regime, and as such, they have been pushed back into central Iran. They are now focusing their efforts on conducting missile fire from the area of Isfahan,' said Brig Gen. Effie Defrin. The Israeli Air Force (IAF) added that on Tuesday, it 'conducted intelligence-based strikes on 12 missile launch sites and storage facilities. These missiles were aimed at Israeli civilians.'
The IAF struck 12 missile launch sites and storage facilities in Iran aimed at Israeli civilians. We will continue to operate to defend our civilians. pic.twitter.com/P2oHjlggtf
— Israeli Air Force (@IAFsite) June 17, 2025
All told, Israel said it has destroyed over 200 ballistic missile launchers, 'which is a significant portion of Iran's arsenal, according to the military,' Times of Israel reporter Emanuel Fabian stated on X. 'The strikes on the launchers have disrupted Iran's attempts to fire more missiles at Israel, but the IDF assesses that Iran still has the capability to launch attacks and cause devastating harm in Israel. '
'We will remain prepared on defense. I assess that the Iranians will continue trying to harm Israel,' IDF Operations Directorate chief Maj. Gen. Oded Basiuk in a call with reporters.
Israel's operation against Iran will not end until the IDF has removed the threat of Iran's nuclear program and ballistic missiles, the military says, but refuses to provide a timeline."We continue to strike nuclear targets to deepen the achievement, according to a plan and at…
— Emanuel (Mannie) Fabian (@manniefabian) June 17, 2025
We previously reported that IDF said it had 'destroyed over 120 surface-to-surface missile launchers' since the current fighting began last Friday. 'This amounts to one-third of the surface-to-surface missile launchers possessed by the Iranian regime.'
As air superiority is assured farther east over Iran, tankers are able to push in that direction, as well. This allows for two major enhancements to Israel's air war. First off, there is more loiter time for fighters that are tasked with hunting and destroying Iran's ground-mobile long-range ballistic missile systems. This is critical as this mission set is incredibly challenging even when done over smaller distances, but having to fly all the way from Israel to Iran just to get on station means there is far less time to actually find, fix and destroy the launchers, which can be parked almost anywhere. Having tanker assets closer means aircraft have more time to stay on station to search launchers or respond to real-time intelligence on the whereabouts of the launchers. Medium altitude, long-range drones are also likely assisting in this effort.
The other part of this is that now fighters can deliver heavier direct attack payloads (bombs), and don't have to rely on less powerful standoff munitions to hit their targets, both due to more robust tanking closer to the target and the degraded air defense threat picture. We are now seeing much more powerful weapons dropped on targets in central Iran, for instance. This means Israel can go after hardened targets, such as missile caves, with bunker busters to destroy large stockpiles of the weapons, or at least trap them inside the caves and disable any fissures they can be launched from.
Israeli Air Force F-16C ready to launch for a strike on Iran, armed with a pair of 2000lb BLU-109 bunker buster JDAM guided bombs. pic.twitter.com/uN0lbAybld
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) June 16, 2025
חיל-האוויר ממשיך לתקוף כעת מטרות צבאיות במרכז איראן pic.twitter.com/pCanYoz0Mh
— Israeli Air Force (@IAFsite) June 16, 2025
These activities appear to have made a dent in Iran's ability to execute mass long-range missile launches. This is incredibly important as saturation attacks stress missile defenses to their breaking point, allowing 'leakers' to get through. Lower volume assaults are still a real danger but they can be more easily countered by Israeli and U.S. missile defenses.
The situation is something of a war of attrition over great distances. The question is will missile interceptors run out before Iran's ability to launch its own missiles does? At this time it seems Iran is on the downside of that equation, but midcourse intercept capabilities are especially limited in quantity and degradation of that defensive layer would put more stress on the terminal defense layer, even if fewer missiles are fired.
It is possible that Iran could be saving their weapons for a massive barrage, or to attack U.S. bases in a contingency, but clearly their capacity to do so is being reduced with every passing hour. Also, it's worth noting that this has to do with longer-range ballistic missiles capable of reaching Israel, not Iran's more numerous and even easier to conceal shorter-range systems.The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) is claiming a missile barrage destroyed an Israeli intelligence center in the city of Herzilyia, according to the official Iranian Press TV media outlet.
'The logistical headquarters of the Israeli Military Intelligence Unit, known as 'Aman,' has been destroyed in the latest phase of Iran's retaliatory operation 'True Promise III,'' Press TV claimed.
Israeli officials have yet to comment on these claims.
'Reports indicated that there was a direct hit in central Israel, but authorities have not yet confirmed this,' The Jerusalem Post reported. 'There was damage to property in central Israel, Israel Police added.'
Videos posted online suggest that site and another Israeli intelligence headquarters were struck as part of a barrage of 20 missiles.
WATCH: Iran targeted an AMAN base linked to Israel's 8200 intelligence unit with missile strikes. AMAN is Israel's military intelligence, and 8200 is a secretive unit focused on cyber and signals intelligence.Geolocated by Faytuks Network Geo team:1st Hit: 32.145833,… pic.twitter.com/bL8j99ycXb
— Faytuks Network (@FaytuksNetwork) June 17, 2025
Iran hit the Aman Intelligence Logistics Center at Israel's Glilot base near Tel Aviv — a strategic facility housing Unit 8200 and other core intelligence units.Mossad sites were also among the targets. pic.twitter.com/ZHZ0vlxzUi
— Shah Faisal AfRidi (@Sfaisalafridi) June 17, 2025
The IAF also released video showing it striking several surface-to-air missile (SAM) launch sites and radars located in western Iran this morning.
'In recent days, fighter jets have carried out approximately five waves of strikes aimed at diminishing Iran's air defense capabilities, establishing the IAF's aerial superiority,' IDF claimed. 'This paved the way to Tehran and additional targets deep within Iran. At the same time, remotely piloted aircraft are identifying and neutralizing launchers and radars on the ground. So far, the IAF has over than 70 Iranian air defense missile batteries.'
Many of those include road-mobile SAM systems, which pose a major threat to IAF aircraft as they can pop-up virtually anywhere at any time.
עד כה הושמדו יותר מ-70 סוללות טילי הגנה אווירית של איראן.בימים האחרונים, מטוסי הקרב ביצעו כחמישה גלי תקיפה, שתכליתם פגיעה ביכולת ההגנה האווירית של איראן, תוך יצירת עליונות אווירית לחיל-האוויר. כך נסללה הדרך לטהראן וליעדים נוספים בעומק איראן. pic.twitter.com/Xraf5TERuK
— Israeli Air Force (@IAFsite) June 17, 2025
כמו כן, חיל-האוויר תקף מהבוקר בהכוונת אגף המודיעין, מספר אתרי שיגור טילי קרקע-אוויר ומכ״מים שמוקמו במערב איראן.חיל-האוויר ממשיך לפעול בשמי איראן בהכוונת אגף המודיעין, לאיתור ולהשמדת משגרים המכוונים לעורף הישראלי. pic.twitter.com/tXvqFkVdWg
— Israeli Air Force (@IAFsite) June 17, 2025
Among the SAM sites hit by the IAF was also an Iranian HAWK/Mersad launcher in western Iran.
Western Iran; an Israeli Air Force aircraft drops a guided bomb on an Iranian HAWK/Mersad surface to air missile launcher. -1 M192 launcher and 3x missiles. pic.twitter.com/JfvkzXdfs5
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) June 17, 2025
As the war rages on, the U.S. Air Force is sending additional fighters to the region, which you can read more about in our story about that here. The fighter movements follow the arrival in Europe of more than two-dozen U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers that flew across from the United States in recent days.
There are also indications that the U.S. Navy is becoming more wary of a possible Iranian attack. Satellite imagery appears to show several Navy vessels leaving Salman Port in Bahrain. Less than 150 miles across the Persian Gulf from Iran, it would be a prime target for Tehran should it decide to lash out directly against the U.S. We reached out to the sea service and will update this story with any information they share.
Almost all vessels have sortied out from Salman Port in Bahrain, a multinational naval base on the Persian Gulf. At least 1x US Navy LCS, 2x minesweepers, both of the Royal Bahraini Navy's Perry-class Frigates, and a roughly a dozen smaller vessels have put to sea. pic.twitter.com/OphlnYLL6F
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) June 17, 2025
Though the Pentagon last night said the U.S. is not taking any offensive actions against Iran amid the plus-up of U.S. forces in the region, Trump hinted that America may have some involvement beyond the defensive measures of swatting down drones and missiles with Navy destroyers, Air Force fighters and ground-based air and missile defense systems.
'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran. Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff,'' Trump said on Truth. 'Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA.'
It is unclear what Trump meant. U.S. Central Command referred us to the White House for comment. We've reached out to the White House for more clarity and will update this story with any pertinent details provided.
Trump also said he has no immediate plans to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding,' Trump said in a post on his Truth Social network. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!'
Still, an Israeli official hinted Khamenei could be on the target list, according to a post on X by Reuters reporter Idrees Ali.
Asked if Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was also a target, an Israeli military official said: "I think it wouldn't be smart for me to address future operations."
— Idrees Ali (@idreesali114) June 17, 2025
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he is pushing for regime change.
PM Netanyahu: "We are at a historic turning point – eliminating the Iranian empire that threatens many parts of the world" pic.twitter.com/GB23wtaI6o
— Raylan Givens (@JewishWarrior13) June 17, 2025
Meanwhile, Israel's campaign against Iran's leaders continued. The IDF said for the second time since Operation Rising Lion began five days ago, it killed the Iranian Armed Forces Chief of Staff. This time it was Ali Shadmani, said to be Khamenei's closest military advisor.
For the second time in 5 days— the IDF has eliminated Iran's War-Time Chief of Staff, the regime's top military commander.Ali Shadmani, Iran's senior-most military official and Khamenei's closest military advisor, was killed in an IAF strike in central Tehran, following precise… pic.twitter.com/Bq6Z49zeCj
— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) June 17, 2025
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that new evidence indicates direct hits on Iran's underground uranium enrichment halls at Natanz, the site of Iran's main nuclear enrichment facility, following Israeli strikes on Friday. IAEA made that assessment ['b]ased on continued analysis of high-resolution satellite imagery collected after Friday's attacks.'
IAEA said there were no changes to report at Esfahan and Fordow, two other enrichment sites hit by Israel in the opening phase of Operation Rising Lion.
Iran: Based on continued analysis of high resolution satellite imagery collected after Friday's attacks, the IAEA has identified additional elements that indicate direct impacts on the underground enrichment halls at Natanz.No change to report at Esfahan and Fordow.
— IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency
(@iaeaorg) June 17, 2025
We previously reported that the head of the IAEA on Monday said that there is a possibility of both radiological and chemical contamination at Natanz. However, the IAEA added that radiation levels outside the complex are currently normal.
On the other hand, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal, a power loss after the attack on Natanz may have destroyed some of the roughly 14,000 underground centrifuges at the site. An Israeli official told the same publication that underground parts of the complex may have imploded, but this has not been verified, and this claim has been questioned by nuclear experts.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said that the sudden loss of power at the Natanz Nuclear Facility in Iran, resulting from Friday's airstrikes by the Israeli Air Force, may have destroyed some of the roughly 14,000 underground centrifuges, which are are fragile… pic.twitter.com/A4SpIpsX3X
— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) June 16, 2025
Isfahan was apparently struck again on Tuesday. Video emerged online showing explosions and smoke following an Israeli airstrike there.
Explosions and smokes rising in Iran's Isfahan after an Israeli airstrike. pic.twitter.com/oDByRo9cdy
— Clash Report (@clashreport) June 17, 2025
There is a huge challenge in trying to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon because, while infrastructure can be destroyed, the fissile material needed for a bomb is easily moved.
'Iran's 400 kilograms (880 pounds) of highly-enriched uranium could fit into as a few as 16 cylinders measuring 36-inches (91.4 centimeters) in height,' according to Bloomberg News. 'Even if Israel destroys Iran's enrichment infrastructure, the location of that material would still need to be verified.'
Former CENTCOM commander, retired Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, suggested future strikes on Fordow.
'The only thing I can say about Fordow is that I wouldn't want to be within five kilometers of it at this point,' he said.
BREAKING: Former U.S. Central Command Commander Kenneth McKenzie: "The only thing I can say about Fordow is that I wouldn't want to be within five kilometers of it at this point."What does he know that we don't? pic.twitter.com/pqhYXT86Us
— Vivid.
(@VividProwess) June 17, 2025
Iran's Cybersecurity Command has prohibited government officials and security teams from using equipment connected to communications systems, 'including phones, smart watches, portable computers, etc.,' the official Iranian Fars news agency reported. 'Dear people, be sure to minimize the use of smart devices connected to the Internet and take the necessary precautions.'
It is unclear what sparked the warning, but it is worth noting that during Israel's conflict with the Iranian-backed Hezbollah organization of Lebanon, there was a major attack in September 2024 using exploding cell phones and pagers that targeted thousands. You can read more about that here.
IRAN'S CYBER SECURITY COMMAND BANS THE USE OF ALL CONNECTED DEVICES FOR OFFICIALS AND THEIR SECURITY DETAIL – FARS NEWS -Reuters News
— Parisa Hafezi (@PHREUTERS) June 17, 2025
Meanwhile, a pro-Israel hacking group says it attacked a major Iranian bank, causing widespread outages, Axios reported.
'The attack would mark the first major cyberattack on critical infrastructure' during this war, the publication noted. 'Predatory Sparrow, an Israeli hacking group, said today that it is behind a series of cyberattacks against Iran's Bank Sepah.'
BREAKING: Iran National Cyber Security Command says Israel launched 'massive cyber war' against country's digital infrastructure.
— Clash Report (@clashreport) June 17, 2025
With heightened concerns that Iran could close the Strait of Hormuz, images of flames engulfing a ship in the region posted on social media yesterday caused a great deal of worry and speculation. However, it turns out there was a collision between two vessels, a maritime security expert told The War Zone early Tuesday morning. It was unrelated to any military action, U.K. Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said in its analysis.
The tanker Front Eagle was involved in a collision with the tanker Adalynn off the coast of the United Arab Emirates, the official told us, adding that navigational error was the most likely cause.
'Front Eagle, which is managed by Anglo-Eastern, was fully laden at the time of the collision and bound for the Chinese port of Zhoushan, while Adalynn, which appears on the Lloyd's List dark fleet list, had just departed the anchorage in ballast condition,' Lloyd's List explained.
New footage of the tanker Adalynn ablaze in the Gulf of Oman after a severe collision with the tanker Front Eagle last night. Impact area is clearly visible and violently burning. Most of the superstructure is ablaze as well. https://t.co/sfpZlGA8w9 pic.twitter.com/AqHribvRtR
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) June 17, 2025
The White House released a statement Tuesday morning it says shows how U.S. President Donald Trump has been clear about his vow that Iran will never possess nuclear weapons. The statement provides 16 instances where Trump has made comments to that effect since returning to the White House and several made on the campaign trail.
However, as The New York Times noted, Trump's messaging has been 'vacillating from a hands-off approach to embracing diplomacy to at times suggesting that he was weighing further U.S. involvement.'
'The contradictory comments have left a trail of confusion as Israelis, Iranians, and the broader Middle East try to understand whether the biggest conflict between Israel and Iran in history would escalate further and whether Mr. Trump, long opposed to foreign wars, would plunge the United States into one,' the publication explained.
'It's very puzzling,' Shira Efron, director of research at Israel Policy Forum, a New York-based research group, told the Times. 'You're seeing him say one thing and then another.'
On Friday, the first day of the war, Mr. Trump initially called Israel's attacks 'excellent' and 'very successful,' but he also said that he believed a diplomatic solution between Israel and Iran was possible.
'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' the president said. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left.'
The following day, Mr. Trump recounted a call with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, saying that both he and Mr. Putin said the battle between Israel and Iran should end. And on Sunday, he reinforced his stated position by saying Israel and Iran should make a deal.
President Trump Has Always Been Clear: Iran Cannot Have a Nuclear Weaponhttps://t.co/Gv2V9dF5KX
— U.S. State Dept – Near Eastern Affairs (@StateDept_NEA) June 17, 2025
Update: 5:36 PM Eastern –
A U.S. official gave us some clarification on Trump's social media post about airspace over Iran.
'There are no U.S. aircraft over Iran, and we are not acting in any offensive capacity,' the U.S. official told The War Zone. The official could not confirm additional aircraft movements and referred us back to a statement Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued yesterday that he directed additional U.S. assets to the CENTCOM region.
Update: 6:03 PM Eastern –
Iran has launched another barrage of missiles at Israel. Officials estimate that there were at least 15 in this volley, with no immediate reports of injuries. A short while later, Israel's Home Front Command told citizens they could leave protected spaces.
Medics are responding to reports of several missile impacts in central Israel, following Iran's latest attack.Magen David Adom says it has not received any immediate reports of injuries.At least 15 missiles were launched from Iran in the attack, according to preliminary IDF…
— Emanuel (Mannie) Fabian (@manniefabian) June 17, 2025
Iranian officials say the attacks will continue.
Iran's IRGC "True Promise-3" operation spokesperson stated tonight that the 10th wave of this operation targeted Israel's air bases from which Israeli attacks to Iran has initiated.He stated the attacks will be continuous, multi-layered and gradual. pic.twitter.com/V7P4Wrz4w4
— Mehdi H. (@mhmiranusa) June 17, 2025Video emerged online claiming to show the failed launch of an Israeli interceptor.
The failed launch of an Israeli interceptor missile during the latest Iranian attack. pic.twitter.com/ywTdI85Fkf
— Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (BlueSky too) (@Archer83Able) June 17, 2025
Tehran too has its air defenses working as Israel launches another wave of airstrikes.
Meanwhile, air defense is doing its best in Tehran. pic.twitter.com/CYMDmQlXxg
— Clash Report (@clashreport) June 17, 2025Israeli effectors working against Iranian missiles attacking Tel Aviv can be seen in the following video.
Footage of Israeli interceptors knocking down Iranian ballistic missiles over Tel Aviv tonight. pic.twitter.com/Irsgy8XA2W
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) June 17, 2025
Due to the ongoing security concerns, the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem, which was closed today, will remain closed through Friday.
US embassy closed from Wed through Friday https://t.co/APWEZ21KEI
— Laura Rozen (@lrozen) June 17, 2025
This is a developing story. Stay with The War Zone for updates.
Contact the author: howard@thewarzone.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

20 years after its landmark withdrawal from Gaza, Israel is mired there
20 years after its landmark withdrawal from Gaza, Israel is mired there

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

20 years after its landmark withdrawal from Gaza, Israel is mired there

Israel Gaza Withdrawal Anniversary TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Twenty years ago, Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip, dismantling 21 Jewish settlements and pulling out its forces. The Friday anniversary of the start of the landmark disengagement comes as Israel is mired in a nearly two-year war with Hamas that has devastated the Palestinian territory and means it is likely to keep troops there long into the future. Israel's disengagement, which also included removing four settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, was then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's controversial attempt to jump-start negotiations with the Palestinians. But it bitterly divided Israeli society and led to the empowerment of Hamas, with implications that continue to reverberate today. The emotional images of Jews being ripped from their homes by Israeli soldiers galvanized Israel's far-right and settler movements. The anger helped them organize and increase their political influence, accounting in part for the rise of hard-line politicians like National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. On Thursday, Smotrich boasted of a settlement expansion plan east of Jerusalem that will 'bury' the idea of a future Palestinian state. For Palestinians, even if they welcomed the disengagement, it didn't end Israel's control over their lives. Soon after, Hamas won elections in 2006, then drove out the Palestinian Authority in a violent takeover. Israel and Egypt imposed a closure on the territory, controlling entry and exit of goods and people. Though its intensity varied over the years, the closure helped impoverish the population and entrenched a painful separation from Palestinians in the West Bank. Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians claim all three territories for a future independent state. A unilateral withdrawal enhanced Hamas' stature Israel couldn't justify the military or economic cost of maintaining the heavily fortified settlements in Gaza, explained Kobi Michael, a senior researcher at the Misgav Institute and the Institute for National Security Studies think tanks. There were around 8,000 Israeli settlers and 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza in 2005. 'There was no chance for these settlements to exist or flourish or become meaningful enough to be a strategic anchor,' he said. By contrast, there are more than 500,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank, most living in developed settlement blocs that have generally received more support from Israeli society, Michael said. Most of the world considers the settlements illegal under international law. Because Israel withdrew unilaterally, without any coordination with the Palestinian Authority, it enhanced Hamas' stature among Palestinians in Gaza. 'This contributed to Hamas' win in the elections in 2006, because they leveraged it and introduced it as a very significant achievement,' Michael said. 'They saw it as an achievement of the resistance and a justification for the continuation of the armed resistance.' Footage of the violence between Israeli settlers and Israeli soldiers also created an 'open wound' in Israeli society, Michael said. 'I don't think any government will be able to do something like that in the future,' he said. That limits any flexibility over settlements in the West Bank if negotiations over a two-state solution with the Palestinians ever resume. 'Disengagement will never happen again, this is a price we're paying as a society, and a price we're paying politically,' he said. An early settler longs to return Anita Tucker, now 79, was part of the first nine Jewish families that moved to the Gaza Strip in 1976. She and her husband and their three kids lived in an Israeli army outpost near what is today Deir al-Balah, while the settlement of Netzer Hazoni was constructed. Originally from Brooklyn, she started a farm growing vegetables in the harsh, tall sand dunes. At first relations were good with their Palestinian neighbors, she said, and they worked hard to build their home and a 'beautiful community.' She had two more children, and three chose to stay and raise their families in Netzer Hazoni. She can still recall the moment, 20 years ago, when 1,000 Israeli soldiers arrived at the gate to the settlement to remove the approximately 400 residents. Some of her neighbors lit their houses on fire in protest. 'Obviously it was a mistake to leave. The lives of the Arabs became much worse, and the lives of the Jews became much, much worse, with rockets and Oct. 7,' she said, referring to the decades of rockets fired from Gaza into Israel and the date in 2023 of the Hamas attack that launched the ongoing war. Despite the passage of time, her family still is 'yearning and longing for their home,' she said. Several of her 10 grandchildren, including some who spent their early childhood in the Gaza settlements, have served in the current war and were near her old house. 'It's hard to believe, because of all the terrible things that happened that we predicted, but we're willing to build there again,' said Tucker. Palestinians doubt Israel will ever fully withdraw from Gaza again After Israel's withdrawal 20 years ago, many Palestinians described Gaza as an 'open-air prison.' They had control on the inside – under a Hamas government that some supported but some saw as heavy-handed and brutal. But ultimately, Israel had a grip around the territory. Many Palestinians believe Sharon carried out the withdrawal so Israel could focus on cementing its control in the West Bank through settlement building. Now some believe more direct Israeli occupation is returning to Gaza. After 22 months of war, Israeli troops control more than 75% of Gaza, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks of maintaining security control long term after the war. 'Over the past 20 years we were relieved of occupation, shelling and seeing the Jews. Now we hear that they want to occupy here again after two years of war," said Sabah Abu Audeh, a 67-year-old grandmother who was displaced to Gaza's Shati refugee camp. Aouni Timras, 55, from the Nuseirat refugee camp said he felt optimistic when Israel pulled out, thinking things would get better. 'We were hopeful but now the occupation returned for the second time,' Timras said. "What can people do? This is what we live through. We hope that there will be a truce so that people can stand up again.' Amjad Shawa, the director of the Palestinian NGO Network, said he doesn't believe Netanyahu will repeat Sharon's full withdrawal. Instead, he expects the military to continue controlling large swaths of Gaza through 'buffer zones.' The aim, he said, is to keep Gaza 'unlivable in order to change the demographics,' referring to Netanyahu's plans to encourage Palestinians to leave the territory. Israel is 'is reoccupying the Gaza Strip' to prevent a Palestinian state, said Mostafa Ibrahim, an author based in Gaza City whose home was destroyed in the current war. Missed opportunities Israeli former Maj. Gen. Dan Harel, who was head of the country's Southern Command during the disengagement, remembers the toll of protecting a few thousand settlers. There were an average of 10 attacks per day against Israeli settlers and soldiers, including rockets, roadside bombs big enough to destroy a tank, tunnels to attack Israeli soldiers and military positions, and frequent gunfire. 'Bringing a school bus of kids from one place to another required a military escort,' said Harel. 'There wasn't a future. People paint it as how wonderful it was there, but it wasn't wonderful.' Harel says the decision to evacuate Israeli settlements from the Gaza Strip was the right one, but that Israel missed crucial opportunities. Most egregious, he said, was a unilateral withdrawal without obtaining any concessions from the Palestinians in Gaza or the Palestinian Authority. He also sharply criticized Israel's policy of containment toward Hamas after disengagement. There were short but destructive conflicts over the years between the two sides, but otherwise the policy gave Hamas 'an opportunity to do whatever they wanted.' 'We had such a blind spot with Hamas, we didn't see them morph from a terror organization into an organized military, with battalions and commanders and infrastructure,' he said. The Oct. 7 attack, Israel's largest military intelligence failure to date, was not a result of the disengagement, said Harel. 'The main issue is what we did in the 18 years in between.' ___ Associated Press writers Fatma Khaled contributed from Cairo and Wafaa Shurafa from Deir al Balah, Gaza Strip. Solve the daily Crossword

South African general's unapproved visit to Iran may signal complex US relations
South African general's unapproved visit to Iran may signal complex US relations

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

South African general's unapproved visit to Iran may signal complex US relations

The move, which did not receive government backing, has drawn sharp criticism from members of South Africa's governing coalition, who described the visit as ' reckless grandstanding.' The row comes as South Africa navigates tense relations with the US, which has taken exception to the country's ties with Iran, Russia, and its strong affiliation with BRICS. According to Iranian media outlet WANA News Agency, Iran's Chief of Staff, Major General Mousavi, condemned what he called the crimes of the Israeli regime in the region—particularly genocide in Gaza—and praised South Africa's decision to file and pursue a genocide case against Israel at the International Criminal Court. General Maphwanya noted that the two countries shared common goals and always stood ' alongside the oppressed and defenceless people of the world, ' according to the Iranian publication Tehran Times. He also criticised Israel over the ongoing war in Gaza, reiterating support for the Palestinian people and telling officials his visit ' carries a political message ' from Ramaphosa's administration as per The BBC The South African government, however, has denied authorising these comments. According to the South African Defence Department, the general's statement was 'unfortunate,' while the Foreign Affairs Ministry said they ' do not represent the government's official foreign policy stance.' President Cyril Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, confirmed that the president was unaware of the trip and had not sanctioned it. ' The visit was ill-advised and, more so, the expectation is that the general should have been a lot more circumspect with the comments he makes,' Magwenya told reporters. The Democratic Alliance, a member of South Africa's governing coalition, called for General Maphwanya to be 'court-martialled.' The presidency also confirmed that President Ramaphosa intends to meet with the general to discuss the implications of what he called an 'ill-advised' trip. South Africa's waning U.S. relations South Africa's ties with Iran could likely be one of the issues that influenced President Donald Trump's decision to impose tariffs, even though they were officially justified by trade imbalances. Under Trump, US trade policy increasingly blended economic and geopolitical concerns, and Pretoria's growing engagement with Tehran through diplomatic and military discussions raised Washington's alarm. These interactions likely reinforced the perception that South Africa was aligning with a country at odds with key US strategic interests. While the visit has not yet directly altered bilateral relations, analysts warn that it could complicate South Africa's already delicate relationship with the United States, which has long expressed concerns over Pretoria's ties with Tehran and other contentious international partnerships. South Africa's Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) said in a statement that it had noted recent media reports on comments attributed to General Rudzani Maphwanya but stressed that the formulation and implementation of the country's foreign policy is the responsibility of the Presidency, supported by DIRCO. ' Consequently, any statements made by an individual or a department other than those mandated with foreign policy should not be misconstrued as the official position of the South African government. The remarks attributed to General Maphwanya, therefore, do not reflect the government's official foreign policy stance, ' it said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store