logo
The Literary ‘It' Girl Who Continues to Fascinate

The Literary ‘It' Girl Who Continues to Fascinate

New York Times14-05-2025

'Childhood is an image, which we decorate,' Françoise Sagan wrote in her autobiography, 'Réponses.'
Ms. Sagan, born Françoise Delphine Quoirez, was only 18 when her first novel, 'Bonjour Tristesse,' published in 1954, caused a sensation across the globe. But she was not just a literary wunderkind: The teenage author became an object of worldwide press fascination (Pope Paul VI denounced the novel as 'an example of irreligosity'), and the caricature of those years would haunt her.
From the get-go, many recognized Ms. Sagan as a genuine talent, with critics likening her to the fellow literary enfant terrible Colette. In Le Figaro, the French novelist François Mauriac called her a 'charming monster,' but conceded that 'talent bursts on the first page. This book has all the ease, all the audacity of youth without having the slightest vulgarity.' The philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre deemed her the real thing, and 'Bonjour Tristesse' went on to win the Prix des Critiques in 1954.
While the author's own life encompassed the full spectrum of adult tragedies and pleasures — as well as 20 books — in the popular American imagination, her image seems curiously bound up with youth: 'it' girl; French girl. Today, we might add 'nepo baby' because of her parents' social connections — her father was a prosperous industrialist, her mother from an old landowning family.
Naturally, this reputation conferred skepticism. (The fact that by age 21 her father had managed her earnings into a tidy fortune could not have helped.) There were those who were not shocked, yet unimpressed by what they regarded as a pampered daughter of the bourgeoisie, with middling talent and a great publicist. (This paper dismissed Ms. Sagan, calling 'Bonjour Tristesse' an 'immature little novel, mainly a catalogue of moods experienced under the strain of a father-complex by a fairly precocious French girl.' )
'My feeling is that she represents something important in the French literary and cultural imagination,' said the novelist Tash Aw. 'There's also something about the setting of 'Bonjour Tristesse' that is so quintessentially French that it stays in the popular imagination even if people have never read the book.'
The book is the story of a teenage girl and one eventful summer in the south of France, a coming-of-age novel that combines cleareyed insight with a vivid evocation of youth. The mixture of the well-educated bourgeois schoolgirl — Ms. Sagan took her pen name from Proust and her debut's title from Paul Valery — and frank discussion of adultery proved a potent combination. In a rapidly changing France, readers thrilled to a novel that expressed the ambivalence of generational shift; the rest of the world, long obsessed with a dynamic stereotype of French sophistication, was equally entranced by this prototypical, modern, politically engaged French girl.
First adapted for the screen by Otto Preminger in 1958, the film starred David Niven and Jean Seberg, forever conflating the author in the public imagination with the artless allure — and iconic haircut — of Ms. Seberg. A new adaptation was released this month, helmed by Durga Chew-Bose in her directorial debut — with the blessing of the author's son, Denis. 'Some people told us we were adapting their national anthem,' Ms. Chew-Bose said.
Throughout her career, Ms. Sagan was defiant, facing interviewers with a brittle sophistication. 'All my life, I will continue obstinately to write about love, solitude and passion among the kind of people I know,' she told an interviewer for The Transatlantic Review. 'The rest don't interest me.' These kinds of people would come to include louche luminaries like Truman Capote and Ava Gardner. Indeed, to her critics, the spigot of novels, plays, memoir, pop song lyrics and screenplays may have had more than a whiff of the dilettantish.
'I think that feeling of being very young and utterly world-weary is both a recipe for chic and, to use a word I hate, relatable,' said the writer and translator Leslie Cahmi. 'Of feeling one's way blindly and realizing that the adults are just as lost as you are. Sagan's postwar French prosperity is haunted by a faint perfume of existentialist desperation.'
Ms. Sagan certainly seemed to capture something: the jaded French bourgeoisie, in love, surrounded by interiors and style. Her books paint a vivid picture of a milieu she knew intimately. And in a world before autofiction, her best writing had tight and disciplined plotting. 'Nothing is more unreal than certain so-called realist novels — they're nightmares,' she told The Paris Review.
To the author Claire Messud, 'Bonjour Tristesse' — and the furor surrounding its young author — spoke to larger cultural tendencies: 'French culture's intense desire, tendency (at that time at least, in the '50s) to celebrate adolescent female brilliance, however briefly.'
Car crashes, youthful divorces from playboys, multiple affairs of variable happiness and substance abuse took their toll. Ms. Sagan was, the critic Bertrand Poirot-Delpech commented with relish, 'a bird fallen from the nest on which modern cannibalism cut its teeth and won't give up.' She found contentment and stability with the fashion stylist Peggy Roche, but after Ms. Roche's death she once again struggled with substance abuse; she died at 69 from a pulmonary embolism.
But somehow the timelessness of 'Bonjour Tristesse' — and perhaps, the legend of its author — endures, urgent and relevant. As Ms. Chew-Bose put it, 'I think any story told from the pod of a young woman trying to sort through the turmoil of coming-of-age will always feel modern to me.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hallmark Leading Ladies Alison Sweeney And Ashley Williams Team Up To Explore Barcelona In Two-Part Movie
Hallmark Leading Ladies Alison Sweeney And Ashley Williams Team Up To Explore Barcelona In Two-Part Movie

Forbes

time2 hours ago

  • Forbes

Hallmark Leading Ladies Alison Sweeney And Ashley Williams Team Up To Explore Barcelona In Two-Part Movie

'Nobody was really sure exactly how it was going to work. You know, it's really rare to have two women as the true leads of a Hallmark movie. That doesn't happen a lot.' Alison Sweeney is talking about when she and Ashley Williams pitched their idea for a pair of Spain-set films to the network. Sweeney and Williams have each starred as the leading lady in several Hallmark movies, but they hadn't worked together in one. And, even more rare is the concept of having two leading ladies sharing the main storyline. This is just what happens in not one but two films featuring the actresses. In To Barcelona, With Love, Sweeney plays Erica, an American expat living in Barcelona who translates novels into Spanish. Anna (Williams) is the American author of the book Barcelona, Mi Amor that became a big hit after Erica's translation. When Anna comes to Barcelona for a book signing event, her arrival not only catches the attention of local bookstore owner Nico but also threatens to bring to light Erica's secret – that she took liberties with her translation to improve the story. As the two women navigate their relationship, they end up ultimately helping each find true happiness. In the follow up, To Barcelona, Forever, set five months later, Erica and Anna are happily navigating new chapters in their lives. Now friends, they find themselves traveling outside the city of Barcelona to a charming village where a misunderstanding leads to unexpected romance for one of them. Also a first for Hallmark, both films were shot entirely on location in Barcelona, Spain, and surrounding areas. Along with Sweeney and Williams, who also serve as producers on the project, Alejandro Tous and Miguel Brocca co-star in the films. Sweeney clarifies the concept of the movies a bit, saying, 'From the very beginning we always saw this as a story about the friendship between these two women and their bond. But of course, the romance that they each experience on their own is an important part too.' She says that for both she and Williams, 'So often when we do these movies, we're playing opposite a handsome, wonderful, charismatic man, which is fun, and its own journey,' but she expresses that both are happy about, 'getting to be sitting across from another leading lady.' 'It's just a different experience,' she explains. 'It feels very honest getting into the rawness and the realness of what happens between two women who are doing all kinds of things on their way to becoming friends. So it's a really different energy and a different dynamic than what people might call a 'standard' Hallmark movie.' In an interesting twist, Sweeney, commenting on working with Williams said that her favorite part of the collaboration was, 'not always agreeing about everything.' 'When you have someone just as invested as you in something, but they see something a different way, I'm so happy to have that conversation with an equally strong point of view that is not the same as mine, because I really thought mine was the only way, and now I'm hearing her point of view, and that's so much better. The movie is better because of everything we didn't agree about; those things that we really worked on to find the best solution.' Williams agrees, adding, 'Yeah, getting to go to Ali and say. 'I'm not sure about this,' and having her say, 'yeah, let's fix it,' was so great. It was just wonderfully validating to have a partner like that.' However, Sweeney says that things weren't 'perfect' all the time. 'The hardest part about working with Ashley is that I wanted to laugh all the time. She's just so funny, sometimes it was hard for me to be professional.' While they did let the laughter flow, Williams says that the two women were able to bring the drama as needed. 'There were a lot of moments in this when we really had to show conflict between our characters, and neither of us held back. And it was kind of fun because there are obstacles in this friendship, and it gets emotional and heated, and we really went for it in those scenes.' Speaking about the second film, Sweeney says that the intent was 'not to make a sequel or like the same movie again.' 'I think that's a really important as storytellers ourselves, but also just as fans of TV. I've watched lots of movies, and I watched the sequels, and I don't want to see the same movie again. I want to see a different movie. I want to see what happens next with these characters. So I think that was a really fun challenge; to find the story as producers and then as actors to keep these characters fresh for the audience, but in new circumstances.' Pointing out another reason to watch the films, the pair muse over the beauty of Spain on display, which Sweeney says, 'really is a character in the movies. So many beautiful places. Every scene is like a stunning postcard.' Also unique to these productions is that the Sweeney and Williams have produced a companion podcast, entitled Mi Amor, with Ali Sweeney + Ashley Williams. It started simply enough, says Sweeney, with, 'At the end of each day, we would drive back to the where we were staying and during that trip we would just talk a lot about what had happened that day. It was so fun. So then I thought, 'Okay, well, let's just do this with microphones and record it.'' 'To be clear, it's a homemade podcast,' says Williams with a laugh. 'It's just me and Ali with our little headphones on our computers, seeing if we can make a podcast. I really like that about it, that It's sort of made with scotch tape and paper clips.' Even given the low-tech production of it, Williams says that the podcast does give a great deal of insight into, 'the making of the movies, and what we were thinking as we were doing everything.' All of this seems to be a theme permeating not only their work together but highlighted in their films as well — that it's all about recognizing the moments that matter. 'It's the little stuff, nuances and details that happen in-between those, like, tentpole things that happen. That's what life is,' says Sweeney. 'It's all those little moments that happen unexpectedly, or maybe missed opportunities, and things like that. That's really what's fun about telling stories — when you do something and people can they see themselves in a particular moment. That's a win for us when we feel like we've created a situation that you would find yourself in and you understand it. And I think that's what we've done in these stories. 'To Barcelona, With Love' premieres Saturday, June 7th at 8pm. ET/PT on Hallmark Channel, and 'To Barcelona, Forever' debuts Saturday, June 14th at 8pm ET/PT on Hallmark Channel. The podcast, Mi Amor, with Ali Sweeney + Ashley Williams, can be found here.

The Long-Awaited First Look at Andy Serkis' ‘Animal Farm' Teases Seth Rogen's Barnyard Boss
The Long-Awaited First Look at Andy Serkis' ‘Animal Farm' Teases Seth Rogen's Barnyard Boss

Gizmodo

time2 hours ago

  • Gizmodo

The Long-Awaited First Look at Andy Serkis' ‘Animal Farm' Teases Seth Rogen's Barnyard Boss

While the George Orwell tale with the most resonance in 2025 is undoubtedly 1984, Animal Farm—first published in 1945 as a comment on the Russian Revolution of 1917—still has plenty to say in the present day. The very first clip from Andy Serkis' long-anticipated animated version of the story is here, and it gives us a first look at Seth Rogen's Napoleon informing the younger pig Lucky (voiced by Stranger Things' Gaten Matarazzo) that 'Things aren't always what they seem, and I'll help you decide what's right!' Given that Napoleon is a stand-in for Stalin in Orwell's story, that doesn't bode well for the future of the barnyard. (Kieran Culkin's Squealer gets a little comic relief moment at the very end of the scene.) Check out the clip, debuted by Variety ahead of Animal Farm's premiere next week at the Annecy Animated Film Festival. Despite Animal Farm's well-known origins as a political satire, Serkis noted back in 2012 when this project was first revealed that 'We're keeping it fable-istic and [aimed at] a family audience. We are not going to handle the politics in a heavy-handed fashion. It is going to be emotionally centered in a way that I don't think has been seen before. The point of view that we take will be slightly different to how it is normally portrayed and the characters. We are examining this in a new light.' That said, 13 years is a long time ago. Evolution happens. Revolution becomes more urgent. After all, Animal Farm was initially touted as being a motion-capture production; as you can see from the clip, the finished product is CG animated instead. Quoting from the film's press materials, Variety notes that Serkis explained 'I didn't want pantomime performances. I wanted internalized emotion, each close-up had to carry weight … It's a political fairytale that needed to feel both painterly and real.' And the themes indeed may be edgier than Serkis initially teased; the Animal Farm press notes have him describe his film as 'Wolf of Wall Street meets Bronx Tale, through the eyes of a pig.' The official synopsis: 'When a group of farm animals rebel and kick their neglectful farmer off the land, life is good and the dream of a free, equitable future is within sight. But power struggles among some of literature's most infamous characters ensue, and the realities of living in a world designed for mankind complicate and corrupt the satirical and allegorical, Animal Farm.' The rest of the Animal Farm cast includes Serkis himself, as well as Woody Harrelson, Glenn Close, Steve Buscemi, Laverne Cox, Jim Parsons, Kathleen Turner, and Iman Vellani. There's no theatrical date set yet, but later in 2025 feels like a safe bet.

Danny Boyle Explains 28 YEARS LATER Is the "Opposite" of What You'd Expect from a Zombie Sequel — GeekTyrant
Danny Boyle Explains 28 YEARS LATER Is the "Opposite" of What You'd Expect from a Zombie Sequel — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time2 hours ago

  • Geek Tyrant

Danny Boyle Explains 28 YEARS LATER Is the "Opposite" of What You'd Expect from a Zombie Sequel — GeekTyrant

If you're expecting 28 Years Later to go big in the way most sequels do with more infected, more explosions, global stakes, director Danny Boyle has a curveball for you. The long-awaited follow-up to his game-changing 2002 film 28 Days Later isn't trying to outdo the apocalypse. It's trying to understand what's left after it. Speaking to IGN, Boyle revealed that he and writer Alex Garland initially flirted with the typical sequel playbook. 'In fact, Alex wrote one script at one point, but they were kind of what you'd expect, and by that I mean things that you expect from a sequel, like the virus is weaponized by a military or a government or a shady [organization]... That kind of thing. And neither of us were very taken by it.' Instead of following the infection across continents in a World War Z -style expansion, Boyle and Garland made a sharp U-turn. They chose to pull the focus inward. 'We began to discuss this idea of doing a much bigger project, which was a series of films that sort of did the opposite of spreading it to Europe and the world.' This reflective approach lines up with what Boyle believes horror can do best by holding up a mirror. 'We turned back and looked at ourselves and we thought … it was very much like an England [type] film. So we kind of narrowed it down. We did the opposite of what you'd expect and it was because we had a lot to think about.' That "thinking" touches on the real-world fractures that have emerged in the years since 28 Days Later first hit theaters. Boyle mentions Brexit and the UK's shifting identity, hinting that this new chapter won't just be about rage-infected hordes, but about how a nation processes trauma. 'That's what you use these films for. They're not lectures or anything like that, but they do reflect, or there is a reflection in them, of where you are and what's happened to you really as individuals and as people." The sequel stars Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, and Ralph Fiennes, and centers on a group of survivors who've been living in relative isolation on a remote island. When they return to the mainland, they're confronted not just with the infected, but with the haunting question of what's changed, and what hasn't. If 28 Days Later redefined what a zombie film could be in the early 2000s, 28 Years Later is looking to flip the genre on its head once again, this time with an eerie calm and a deeper question at its core. 28 Years Later opens in theaters June 20, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store