ATC sends Mahrang, BYC activists on 10-day physical remand
In March, Mahrang and other BYC members were arrested for 'attacking' the Quetta Civil Hospital and 'inciting people to violence'; a day after the group faced a police crackdown for protesting against alleged enforced disappearances.
The BYC is a Baloch advocacy group working against enforced disappearances since 2018. Mahrang is currently held at the Hudda District Prison in Quetta under a March 22 Maintenance of Public Order (MPO); a law that empowers authorities to arrest and detain individuals suspected of posing a threat to public order.
Aside from Mahrang, other BYC organisers who were sent on a 10-day remand today include Sibghatullah Shah, Beberg Baloch, Ghaffar Baloch, Gulzadi and Beebow Baloch.
Mahrang's sister, Nadia Baloch, appealed in June against the rejection of a petition pleading against her detention under the MPO. The appeal before the Supreme Court contended that the high court order was contrary to the Constitution, law and facts.
The petition alleged that her repeated unlawful detention and labelling her as a sympathiser of militants was a planned effort by the respondents to stop her from raising her voice for missing persons.
The same month, the Kech chapter of the BYC launched a three-day hunger strike in front of the Turbat Press Club in protest of the arrests of the leadership. Constitutional petitions seeking the release of the activists were rejected by the Balochistan High Court in May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
17 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Is PTI a movement or an ideology?
Listen to article To determine why PTI is not finding success it is important for the PTI to find an honest answer to the above dilemma. It calls itself a 'movement' but acts as a political party like any other. That remains the first dichotomy in how it is structured and how it thinks. A movement can base itself on ideology and at an opportune moment clad itself in the garb of a political entity to succeed if power shall define success. Some political entities will originate as political entities clothed in traditional electoral process and consequences. China's Mao Tse Tung was an ideologue who began a movement to a defined political end. Over a couple of years, he led the movement to victory and replacement of an order that he and his followers fundamentally disagreed with. It seems the PTI fast forwarded to power without internalising the purpose first. Pakistani politics is less of ideology and more of power grab. That much is clear and hence the various mutations of how politics is shaped in this country and what external factors determine how it will play itself out in governance and policy formulation. It is equally true that political parties hardly enthuse or embrace a political philosophy and act more like a tribe which associates with each other for the common purpose of accessing power to deliver tribal or personal interests. Hence there is larger importance and value of enablement by external entities than the political process to find power. The arbiters in the process assume disproportionate weight in an exercise which in essence should reflect a level of acceptance with the people, in whose name power is exercised. But then that is too much of principle and adherence to rules and laws enshrined in the Constitution which are mostly set aside in a political culture based on expedience than purpose. A perfect example of how we might judge a political journey exhibits itself in the neighbouring country. India has three main streams of politics reflected in its three major parties at the national level. Congress, the matriarch of Indian politics carries within it the dynamics of dynasty, and the politics it has practiced through decades. Gandhi may have begun a movement which got converted into a political thought over time to which many Indians gravitated. From Gandhi to Nehru, it may have seemed a generational passing-on of the baton but Nehru's long stint at power after independence and a few hits and misses after it settled in the Nehru family to carry the torch forward. Somewhere along the way a political purpose was defaced by a singular objective of gaining and holding on to power to which all other members of Congress Party submitted and subscribed. Today the party brazenly reflects the attributes of a political tribe where authority resides in the leadership belonging to the Gandhi family to which all others defer. It is equally brazenly claimed across South Asia that the mental make-up of the populace is more inclined to seeking dynastic exclusivity in their political leadership - euphemism for convenience of relevance and acceptability. And then there is the BJP enveloping RSS ideational philosophy based on Hindu exclusivism which then has been used to define nationalist identity through a political process. It has a leadership cadre and its own internal process of enjoining leadership upon whoever they choose to assign the responsibility. Narendra Modi was a tea-seller who rose in the ranks of the RSS to move laterally into first the chief minister-ship of Gujarat and then the prime minister-ship of India. Those invested with the BJP/RSS philosophy generationally transfer the values and beliefs constituting ideology from one to the next. What is left for the world to see for academic reasons is whether governance of a diverse political entity as India has a reverse effect on ideology, or if ideology mutates to deal with the challenges of governance in a diversly constituted polity. Most right-wing parties generally exhibit strict adhesion and submission to ideology. Adolf Hitler perhaps is the most eminent example of an ideologue who mutated to a political system that wreaked havoc in pursuit of an ideology of exclusivism. The third example is that of the Aam Admi Party led by Arvind Kejriwal. The roots of the party lain in an anti-corruption civil society movement of Anna Hazare. A movement gave birth to a political entity around principles of clean governance and eliminating graft from within the system. In the presence of the two major parties, the Congress and the BJP, it could not establish an electoral impact on a nation-wide scale but was the first party to form outside the state system with nation-wide aspirations. It was successful in winning repeated elections in Delhi which has traditionally been a Congress haunt. Allegations against Kejriwal and weak performance in the 2024 elections have lowered the stock of the party and its political prospects. A party formed on high ideology of clean and effective governance has been adversely impacted by challenges of contemporary governance. Ideology stood forsaken for political expedience — the reverse of what it was meant to be. The party is another example of insufficient time to imbibe and internalise the principles to form an abiding creed of sufficient believers. Without the usual cycle of commitment to the intended belief system or embedding its purpose in its structures and processes it turned into a routine political entity, losing both its base and its popularity. Although the PTI had a longer ingestion period, it could not establish a well-founded purpose either in slogan or in ideational expression. It had a weak intellectual definition. In comparison Zulfikar Ali Bhutto did a stellar job in giving a populist slogan as well as in intellectual interpretation of its purpose. In politics all parties descend below their aspirational standards and normalise over time but the PPP in Pakistan was lucky to continue evolving itself in ideational measures to sustain its appeal and romance. The PMLN tried to mimic the process for its own sustenance but succumbed rather quickly to the expedience of power. It has thus become a typical power-centred political entity. The PTI continues to struggle to define itself. It can neither easily find power nor can it underpin its intellectual purpose. Fighting the establishment — read military — cannot fill in for either ideology or an intellectual underpinning. ZAB had martial law to contend against which gave him relevance and longevity. Nawaz Sharif was a product of martial law. Imran Khan's politics is to offer himself as an alternate to either. That is neither power-based electoral politics nor an ideational pursuit especially if you are at loggerheads with the same principles. If PTI appears confused and lost, there is good reason to it.
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
WhatsApp logs expose Rs20m extortion plot by Armaghan
Listen to article Investigators have traced WhatsApp messages and calls demanding Rs20 million in ransom money from Mustafa Amir's mother, during his disappearance, to prime suspect in the case Armaghan, it emerged on Thursday. Police said they have incorporated co-accused Shiraz Bukhari's detailed statement on the extortion in the final charge sheet. On Thursday, the IO submitted before an anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Karachi that a forensic exhumation confirmed Amir had no traces of drugs in his system, dispelling earlier rumours and sharpening focus on the motive and timeline of his killing. Prosecutors will present the full array of digital and forensic evidence including WhatsApp logs, financial records and vehicle-seizure documents at the upcoming hearing, as the case moves toward trial. Read: Mustafa Amir case: ATC extends Armaghan's physical remand Mustafa Amir, a 23-year-old BBA student, went missing on January 6, 2025, after visiting a call-centre established in a bungalow in Defence House Authority's (DHA) Khayaban-e-Momin area. Investigators claim Armaghan assaulted Amir with an iron rod, bound his body, placed it in a car boot, drove to Hub, and set both the vehicle and its occupant ablaze before returning to Karachi. On March 11, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) handed over Armaghan to police for further seven days physical remand. The case investigation officer (IO) seized his laptop and mobile phone, believed to contain crucial evidence. Read more: Mustafa Amir murder case: Money laundering charges filed against Armaghan By April 5, the police had identified two of Armaghan's employees Rahim Bakhsh and Abdul Rahim, who hailed from Bahawalpur and were on the run. They found six SIM cards registered under their names - one of which was used by Armaghan - and linked a WhatsApp account with the name 'Supreme Financial Associates' to the extortion plot. Bank accounts opened in the suspects' names funded Armaghan's laundering scheme, and both remain wanted, said police. On June 2, a local court granted bail to Armaghan's father, Kamran Asghar Qureshi, in an illegal-arms case, setting bail at Rs100,000. Four FIRs registered against him remained active after police recovered weapons from his possession. Later in July, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) filed a case under money-laundering charges against Armaghan, stating that he ran illegal call-centres since 2018 that generated US$300,000–500,000 per month, laundered through cryptocurrency. Officials froze eight luxury vehicles purchased with those proceeds.
Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Internet firewall: Govt defends controversial rollout in NA
ISLAMABAD: Amid fierce criticism over the multi-billion-rupee internet firewall installation, the federal government on Wednesday staunchly defended the controversial rollout, insisting it is essential to protect the country's digital infrastructure from escalating cybersecurity threats. In a written response to a question raised in National Assembly by MNA Muhammad Jawed Hanif Khan, the Minister for Information Technology and Telecommunication, Shaza Fatima Khawaja, emphasised the firewall's role in protecting citizens' data and complying with legal mandates under Article 19 of the Constitution. 'The internet is central to economic activity in the era of the fourth industrial revolution,' Khawaja said. 'Safeguarding the data of citizens, institutions, and entities is of paramount importance.' The firewall, quietly installed last year, blocks access to websites deemed objectionable under Pakistani law, including content violating morality, national security, or public order. Civil society groups and digital rights advocates have criticised the lack of transparency surrounding the firewall's deployment, warning it represents unprecedented surveillance rather than mere content filtering. Industry insiders say the firewall operates at upstream internet gateways, using deep packet inspection and traffic rerouting to monitor and restrict online content in real time. Users and service providers have noted disruptions, particularly on WhatsApp and Facebook, while IT businesses cite degraded connectivity. Officials describe the firewall as a 'web management upgrade,' but digital rights organisations like Bytes for All view it as a full-scale surveillance apparatus. The country's Internet infrastructure remains underdeveloped compared to regional peers, hampered by weak fibre networks and low broadband penetration. Critics argue the firewall prioritises governmental control over genuine cybersecurity improvements. Khawaja reiterated that the firewall is based on constitutional provisions allowing restrictions on freedom of expression for national security and public order, highlighting the government's commitment to protecting the country's digital space while navigating complex legal and ethical challenges. Separately, the House approved two amendments to criminal law removing the death penalty for tearing a woman's clothes and for contacting hijackers. The amendments, presented by Law Minister Azam Tarar in the National Assembly, are part of the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Bill 2025. The first reduces punishment for tearing a woman's clothes, previously punishable by death under Section 354A – a provision introduced during late military dictator Gen Zia-ul-Haq's regime and criticised for misuse. 'The death penalty for this offence is being removed, and a lesser sentence imposed,' Tarar said. The second amendment abolishes the death penalty under Section 402C for anyone meeting or contacting hijacking suspects. This section was introduced under former president late Pervez Musharraf. The amendments faced opposition from Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) MNA Aliya Kamran during the debate; however, the amendments were passed by a majority vote. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
