
The rampant federal fraud that DOGE has done little to stop
International criminal groups are stealing as much as a trillion dollars a year from U.S. government programs but DOGE has done little to address the problem, according to a new report by a private anti-fraud firm.
'It's the government's dirty little secret—this has been an ongoing effort by nation states and other criminal organizations for years,' said Jordan Burris, vice president of Socure, an identities management firm, a former White House official. 'We've been able to confirm that these coordinated attacks are pilfering government programs and doing so at a velocity that is relentless.'
Socure's new report found that U.S. government programs are being attacked by international criminal groups in China, Russia, Egypt, Poland and several other nations—and that international fraudsters were responsible for up to 12% of all applications for government services and loans. The core problem is a failure to properly identify recipients.
'For far too long, fraud has been seen as the cost of doing business in government. But this is a fallacy,' says the new report, which NBC News obtained in advance of its publication. 'As Washington prioritizes efficiency, one of the most significant opportunities to reduce government waste, fraud, and abuse remains under-addressed: strengthening our digital identity verification systems.'
A Trump Administration official speaking on behalf of DOGE told NBC News that DOGE is trying to implement new technology and private sector solutions to stop improper payments. But he said those efforts have been met with criticism, such as a plan to modernize computer code in the Social Security Administration.
'Doge is taking common sense approaches that have been done in the private sector and we get criticized for cutting people's benefits,' the official said. 'We are making basic changes to try to prevent fraud, we've made tremendous progress and we are well on our way to uprooting fraud in our government once and for all.'
Hundreds of billions stolen
NBC News reported in 2022 that hundreds of billions of dollars were stolen from pandemic relief programs by foreign criminal groups using false identities. They included expanded unemployment relief and the employer loans and grants associated with the Paycheck Protection Program.
But anti-fraud experts say the same thing has been happening for years to regular government programs, from Federal Emergency Management Agency hurricane relief to Medicare.
A report by the Government Accountability Office last year pegged annual losses to fraud at between $233 billion and $521 billion annually. Burris and other experts say the true number if likely far higher.
"You can only measure what you can see when it comes to identity fraud,' said Burris, who previously worked in the White House as the chief of staff in the Office of the Federal Chief Information Officer from 2017 to 2021. 'Frankly, the government does not have the right visibility. And so if you were to ask me, I would say that number--you can double and/or triple it.'
Another fraud expert, Linda Miller, told CBS's 60 Minutes she believes the losses reach between $550 and $750 billion a year.
DOGE's work so far
Burris and other experts credit Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency for bringing attention to the issue of fraud in federal programs. But they say Musk has misunderstood the real vulnerabilities—focusing on foreign aid spending with which he disagrees and making baseless allegations of government employees with unexplained wealth.
Experts say the vast majority of fraud in federal programs involves so-called improper payments — money paid in benefits to people or entities who pose as an eligible recipient using a stolen or fake identity. It's a problem that banks and private companies such as Amazon and Walmart have largely solved. Experts say it persists in government not because of corrupt bureaucrats but due to incompetence and inertia, experts say.
'Criminals are using the stolen identities of Americans to pilfer federal and state government programs at a record pace,' according to the new report from Socure,. 'New AI enabled technologies allow bad actors to use increasingly sophisticated fraud tactics to siphon billions away from programs.'
'Researchers from Socure have tracked fraud rings originating in China, Russia, and around the world,' the report adds. 'And these criminals are getting more sophisticated, deploying techniques such as the creation of synthetic identities, faster and in greater volume than ever before.'
DOGE has highlighted examples of improper payments by the federal government, but there has so far been no effort to bring in new technology that might stop them, according to Burris and another anti-fraud expert.
'The problem is that no one has actually acted on it, and with the politicization of fraud, I still see no signs of them actually taking any concrete action to change course,' Burris said.
The Socure report highlighted examples of suspected fraud rings defrauding government programs, without naming the specific programs. The criminals—two international and one domestic--used stolen identities to apply for government benefits, fabricated business names and internet domains, disguised their IP addresses through VPN providers, and submitted suspicious or mismatched phone numbers and emails, the report says.
Failure to act
In most cases, Burris said, federal agencies are not using the kinds of techniques employed by private companies to detect such fraud.
'Today, in many agencies, if someone calls into a call center and says that I'm locked out of my account, many of them will allow them to get access to their account by saying `hey, we'll let you change your name and your password on here,'' Burris said.
'They'll probably ask them something to the effect of, 'hey, can you tell me your name? Can you tell me social security number? Can you perhaps answer this question about a car that you probably had once upon a time?' The person on the other end of the phone will do so,' based on easily obtainable stolen information.
Banks and other private companies, by contrast, use artificial intelligence and analytical tools to check for anomalous behavior. Examples include someone claiming to be calling from Connecticut who is actually in China or asking to add a bank account that has never been associated with the presumed beneficiary.
'DOGE claims that this is something that's front and center for them,' Burris said. 'I look forward to seeing what they actually do to try to curb some of these issues.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Donald Trump and Elon Musk feud is very dangerous for the President
The political alliance between Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk has disfigured US politics. Musk helping bankroll Trump's second election victory was an example of money buying power. Being handed a job as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to cut spending was also wrong on a number of levels. It reeked of a massive favour to a donor and led to the dodgy practice of unaccountable allies of Musk cutting government programmes. But both individuals are ego maniacs and it was only a matter of time before they fell out spectacularly. Musk is unhappy at a Trump tax bill he believes will be financially ruinous. Sniping then led to Musk making the incendiary claim the president's name appears in the notorious Jeffrey Epstein files. Few things are more damaging reputationally than being linked to the late Epstein - just ask Prince Andrew. This developing feud between Trump and his former pal Musk is dangerous for the President. The Tesla co-founder has power and influence, both politically and in the corporate world, and he seems intent on doing damage. A positive step for the world would be if both men cancelled themselves out through their bickering. The US is known as a land of opportunity but we are in a situation where a small number of billionaires wield disproportionate power. People like Musk should be paying more in tax and held to account for the cuts he was allowed to make in government. Trump is already a lame duck president and Americans must look to a time when he is no longer in charge. Weapons in court The proliferation of weapons on our streets is bad enough. But it beggars belief that thousands of blades, guns and bullets have been seized in Scottish courtrooms in the last year as our investigation reveals. The motivation of those who would attempt to enter a court while armed is not clear. Do they think they need protection or is it to dish out retribution? Whatever the reason, it is vital courts are safe places for justice to be carried out without fear for anyone's safety. People should be able to expect to attend court as an employee, witness or accused without being worried about the threat of violence. Those sinister or stupid enough to believe they can carry weapons into a court of law should be left in no doubt their conduct is unacceptable. They should be hammered by the courts they seek to undermine.


NBC News
6 hours ago
- NBC News
'Jane' gives tearful testimony about 'hotel nights' at Diddy's direction
A former girlfriend of Diddy's going by the pseudonym 'Jane' wept on the witness stand today as she described drug-induced sexual encounters with male escorts while she traveled the world with the music mogul. The marathon sex sessions, described by her as 'hotel nights' and similar to 'freak offs,' were organized at Diddy's direction, could last multiple days, and involved drugs and baby oil, she said. Through tears, she testified that she didn't know why she couldn't outright tell Diddy to stop and that he would give her 'multiple doses' of ecstasy per night to keep her awake. On her birthday in Miami in 2023, she testified, she had sex with multiple men as Diddy watched. Jane previously testified that Diddy was paying her rent and reiterated today that he continues to. She is one of four accusers referred to in the government's indictment that alleges Diddy ran his business empire as a criminal enterprise and exploited the women through his financial support. 'It's true that at any moment he could just do that if he wanted to,' Jane testified, 'cut me off.' 🔎 The view from inside By Adam Reiss and Jing Feng Diddy sat with his hands clasped in front of him as Jane testified, while attorneys for both the prosecution and defense appeared riveted by her on the stand. Diddy's demeanor is in the spotlight after Judge Arun Subramanian yesterday scolded his defense team for allowing him to make facial expressions toward the jury. Subramanian said it was 'absolutely unacceptable' and warned that if it happens again, he may remove Diddy from the courtroom. In other news: An attorney for Jane complained to Subramanian that media outlets are trying to expose her identity. The attorney accused the outlets of livestreaming and posting related articles, and asked the court to 'stop these attempts to violate the court's order' not to name her. The judge said he would consider issuing a media gag order if someone is found to have violated the rules. Next week: Jane is expected to return for more questioning by the prosecution before the defense begins its cross-examination. PSA: Every night during Diddy's trial, NBC's 'Dateline' will drop special episodes of the 'True Crime Weekly' podcast to get you up to speed. 'Dateline' correspondent Andrea Canning chats with NBC News' Chloe Melas and special guests — right in front of the courthouse. Listen here. 🎧


Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court keeps DOGE records blocked in watchdog group's challenge
June 6 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court extended on Friday its block on judicial orders requiring the Department of Government Efficiency to turn over records to a government watchdog group that sought details on the entity established by President Donald Trump and previously spearheaded by his billionaire former adviser Elon Musk. The court put on hold Washington-based U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper's orders for DOGE to respond to requests by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington for information about its operations. The judge concluded that DOGE likely is a government agency covered by the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The brief, unsigned order said that portions of one of the judge's decisions "are not appropriately tailored" and that "separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal Executive Branch communications." The court sent the case back to a lower appeals court to narrow the judge's directives. The court's three liberal justices - Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson - dissented from Friday's decision. In a separate case, the Supreme Court on Friday permitted DOGE broad access to personal information on millions of Americans in Social Security Administration data systems while a legal challenge plays out. DOGE has played a central role in Trump's efforts to downsize and reshape the U.S. government including by slashing the federal workforce and dismantling certain agencies. The watchdog group, called CREW, said its intention was to shed light on what it called DOGE's secretive structure and operations. Musk formally ended his government work on May 30 and his once-close relationship with Trump has since unraveled publicly, a split that followed Musk's recent attacks on the president's sweeping tax and spending bill and played out dramatically on social media on Thursday. CREW sued to obtain an array of records from DOGE through the FOIA statute, a law that allows the public to seek access to records produced by government agencies. It sought information on DOGE's activities over its role in the mass firings and cuts to federal programs pursued since the Republican president returned to office in January. The Trump administration contends that DOGE is an advisory entity and not subject to FOIA. In response, CREW sought information to determine whether DOGE is subject to FOIA because it wields the kind of authority of an agency independent of the president. Cooper ruled in April that DOGE must turn over some records sought by CREW and that the group was entitled to question DOGE official Amy Gleason at a deposition. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined on May 14 to put Cooper's order on hold. The administration urged the Supreme Court to act, saying that the judge's orders intruded on the powers of the executive branch and compromised the ability of a wide array of advisers to provide candid and confidential advice to the president. CREW told the justices that siding with the administration in the dispute would give the president "free reign" to create new entities that would "functionally wield substantial independent authority but are exempt from critical transparency laws." In one of his decisions, Cooper said DOGE's operations have been marked by "unusual secrecy." In another, the judge said that the language of Trump's executive orders concerning DOGE suggests that it is "exercising substantial independent authority."