House Ethics report finds AOC ‘impermissibly accepted gifts' related to 2021 Met Gala appearance
The House 'gift rule' prohibits lawmakers from knowingly accepting gifts, including favors, discounts, or services, with some exceptions.
In a report released Friday, the committee said that Ocasio-Cortez 'proactively took steps to comply' with House rules, including using personal funds to rent apparel that would typically be gifted or loaned to Met Gala attendees.
But the report states that, 'despite Representative Ocasio-Cortez's significant attempts, the Committee found that she failed to fully comply with the Gift Rule by impermissibly accepting a gift of free admission to the 2021 Met Gala for her partner and by failing to pay full fair market value for some of the items worn to the event.'
The ethics panel said it did not find evidence that Ocasio-Cortez 'intentionally underpaid' for costs related to the event, and that 'in many instances,' she had relied on a campaign staffer to handle discussions of payment and the advice of her counsel to determine the amounts.
But the committee said it found evidence suggesting that the designer may have 'lowered costs in response to statements from Representative Ocasio-Cortez's staff, and that payments to vendors were significantly delayed and, in several cases, did not occur' until after the Office of Congressional Conduct began an investigation.
The committee called on Ocasio-Cortez to 'make additional payments of personal funds to compensate for the fair market value of certain expenses.'
A spokesperson for Ocasio-Cortez said that the congresswoman intends to 'remedy the remaining amounts.'
'The Congresswoman appreciates the Committee finding that she made efforts to ensure her compliance with House Rules and sought to act consistently with her ethical requirements as a Member of the House. She accepts the ruling and will remedy the remaining amounts, as she's done at each step in this process,' her chief of staff Mike Casca said in a statement provided to CNN.
The ethics committee also released a separate report related to Rep. Mike Kelly, a Pennsylvania Republican, and allegations that his wife may have bought stock in a steel company based on confidential or nonpublic information he learned in his role as a congressman.
The committee said that it reviewed allegations referred by the Office of Congressional Conduct and 'did not find evidence that he knowingly or intentionally caused his spouse to trade based on insider information.'
But the report said that the panel 'did not receive full cooperation from Mrs. Kelly and was therefore unable to determine whether her stock purchase was improper.'
The report concluded by saying that 'Representative Kelly should ensure that he and Mrs. Kelly divest of all shares of Cleveland-Cliffs before taking any further official action relating to the company.'
CNN has reached out to Rep. Kelly's office for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
Texas House speaker ‘confident' that redistricting bill will be passed in a 'timely manner'
Texas House of Representatives Speaker Dustin Burrows discusses the state of the redistricting bill that would add five more House seats to Texas on 'The Story.'
New York Times
a minute ago
- New York Times
Eric Adams Assembles Religious Leaders to Bless His Candidacy
Mayor Eric Adams of New York City says he is a man of God, and on Tuesday morning, at an event billed as the 'largest citywide religious endorsement ceremony in New York history,' he sought to prove his point. Standing among New Yorkers in saffron robes, white robes, turbans, kurtas, skullcaps, collars, black hats and even, aberrantly, a cowboy hat, Mr. Adams argued that he could not have lived through the three and a half years of his first term in office without his belief in God. 'You don't survive this without faith,' Mr. Adams said. Those three and a half years have been nothing if not tumultuous. Mr. Adams took office as the city was emerging from the coronavirus pandemic, and soon faced an influx of more than 200,000 migrants whom he was legally required to shelter. He was indicted on federal charges of bribery and fraud, and mounted an ultimately successful campaign to get the Trump administration to abandon the charges. He saw half of his deputy mayors resign after the Justice Department moved to dismiss the charges, in what both the prosecutor who brought them and the judge who dismissed them described as an apparent quid pro quo, an agreement reached in exchange for Mr. Adams's help with the president's deportation agenda. And through it all, he has endured, openly describing himself as the divinely ordained leader of a city where crime has begun to fall, in keeping with national trends, and where he has (with some exceptions) championed pro-growth housing strategies in a bid to make apartments more affordable. It is an endurance he has taken to touting as an asset, frequently drawing a contrast with Andrew M. Cuomo, the former governor, who resigned from office after the attorney general of New York found that he had sexually harassed 11 women, allegations he denies. Mr. Adams 'delivers,' read the sign adorning his lectern on Tuesday. 'Never quits.' Mr. Adams, a registered Democrat, is now facing an unusual predicament for the mayor of a city where Democrats outnumber Republicans six to one. After opting out of the Democratic primary, seemingly because he knew he could not win it, Mr. Adams is now running for re-election as an independent. The polls consistently suggest his path to victory is a long shot. In November, he will face off against Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist from Queens who won the June Democratic primary and who has a formidable polling lead; Mr. Cuomo, who lost the primary to Mr. Mamdani and is now running as an independent; Curtis Sliwa, the Republican nominee and founder of the Guardian Angels; and Jim Walden, a lawyer running as an independent. The advisory for Tuesday's event promised an unusual, if hard-to-verify, spectacle: the mayor of New York City holding 'the largest multifaith endorsement event ever,' one featuring 'pastors, priests, rabbis, imams, sheikhs, lamas, Rastafarians and gurus.' People in religious garb were certainly in abundance on the steps of City Hall on Tuesday morning, though it was unclear if they comprised a congregation of historical proportions. Men blew shofars to call the media event to order, and the proceedings began with a prayer from Bishop Chantel Wright, an ally of the mayor's who wore a white robe and a gold cross. She compared Mr. Adams to biblical figures, including Moses — 'We lift up his arms the same way that Aaron did for his leader,' she said — and to Gideon, whose small army vanquished a far larger one, thanks to the hand of God. 'We are your army,' Bishop Wright said. 'We are the ones who are going to be the credible messengers that get the word out that, yes, you are a man of integrity.' And she alluded to Mr. Adams's frequent condemnation of the news media, which he derides as dishonest and claims is unwilling to cover him fairly. 'Although the press may never say anything good about you,' she said, 'we will open up our mouths like trumpet and Zion, and we will tell of the goodness that you've done for this city.' Sikh, Buddhist and Rastafarian leaders spoke, as did Michael Landau, a rabbi who said the mayor was 'at the very pinnacle of integrity, decency, honesty, wisdom and intelligence,' and credited his 'moral clarity' on Israel. (Mr. Adams has been an ardent defender of Israel during its war in Gaza, in sharp contrast to Mr. Mamdani.) An imam, Izak-El Pasha, described Mr. Adams as a 'great man.' 'This is good news being brought, good news that we have a man here who comes up through the ranks, who was born here in this great city, knows the ups and downs, knows the crevices and the corners,' he said. 'He is not a man that tells lies,' Mr. Pasha said, ignoring Mr. Adams's history of tall tales and difficult-to-pin-down stories. 'He is not a man that exaggerates the circumstances.' Several of Mr. Adams's longtime associates were also in the mix, including Winnie Greco, the mayor's former aide who resigned months after federal agents searched her homes; and Fernando Cabrera, Mr. Adams's former senior adviser whose prior embrace of anti-gay positions caused controversy. When, finally, Mr. Adams took to the lectern, accompanied by chants of 'four more years,' he warned reporters that he would not be taking any questions because he was not going to let them ruin his day. 'After I speak, I'm bouncing,' he said. 'And you're not going to tarnish the good news of today.' Then he asked for a 'special prayer': 'Lay hands on our media,' he said. 'Heal them. Put honesty in their hearts.'
Associated Press
a minute ago
- Associated Press
What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins
WASHINGTON (AP) — News that Attorney General Pam Bondi is moving to criminally investigate the Obama-era origins of the Trump-Russia investigation means that one of the most studied, and politically polarizing, chapters of modern American history will be under the microscope yet again. Here's a look at what's known and not yet known about the latest Justice Department revelation: A saga with a long backstory Perhaps no issue continues to aggravate President Donald Trump more than the assessment by intelligence officials that Russia interfered in the 2016 election on his behalf and the investigation by law enforcement into whether his campaign colluded with Moscow to tip the outcome of the contest. Robert Mueller, the former FBI director tapped as special counsel by Trump's first Justice Department to investigate, found that Russia had waged a multi-prong operation in Trump's favor and that the Republican president's campaign welcomed the aid. But Mueller did not find sufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign. As president for a second time, Trump has made no secret of his desire to use the Justice Department as a weapon of retribution against perceived political adversaries he sees as having smeared him, including by calling for Obama-era officials to be jailed. And his administration, now more broadly and across multiple agencies, has been engaged in a effort to reopen the long-accepted conclusion — including among prominent Republicans — of Russian interference and to scrutinize the officials involved in reaching that assessment. A Bondi grand jury directive Bondi, a Trump loyalist, has directed Justice Department prosecutors to present evidence related to the Russia inquiry to a grand jury. Grand juries are tools used by prosecutors to issue subpoenas for records and prosecutors and to produce indictments based on the evidence they receive. The bar is low for an indictment given that the presentation of evidence by prosecutors is one-sided, though grand juries do have the option to decline to indict and have done so in the past. A person familiar with the matter confirmed Bondi's directive to The Associated Press but key questions remain. It was not disclosed, for instance, which prosecutors are pursuing the investigation, where the grand jury that might hear evidence is located and whether and when law enforcement officials might seek to bring criminal charges. The Justice Department, in an unusual statement last month, appeared to confirm the existence of an investigation into former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director James Brennan but provided no details or specifics. Potential targets of probe remain unclear It's not clear who might be targeted in the investigation, but the Trump administration has been aggressively challenging intelligence community conclusions about Russia's actions and intentions that had long ago seemed settled. It's been a welcome diversion for the administration as it confronts a wave of criticism from Trump's base and conservative influencers over the handling of records from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. In the last month, Trump administration officials and allies have released a series of documents aimed at casting doubt on the extent of interference and at portraying the original Russia investigation as an Obama administration frame-job. The documents have been hailed as incontrovertible proof of a conspiracy, but a close inspection of the records shows they fall well short of that. Among the documents released by Tulsi Gabbard, the administration's director of national intelligence, are emails from 2016 showing that Obama administration officials recognized in 2016 that Russians had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in favor of Trump. But the absence of evidence that votes were switched — something the Obama administration never alleged — has no bearing on the ample evidence of other forms of Russia interference, including a hack-and-leak operation involving Democratic emails and a covert social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and spreading disinformation. Last week, Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released a previously classified annex of a 2023 report by John Durham, the special counsel appointed by the first Trump administration to hunt for government misconduct in the Russia probe. The annex included a series of emails, including one from July 2016 that was purportedly sent by a senior staffer at a philanthropic organization founded by billionaire investor George Soros, that referred to a plan approved by then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to falsely link Trump to Russia. But Durham's own report took pain to note that investigators had not corroborated the communications as authentic and said the best assessment was that the message was 'a composites of several emails' the Russians had obtained from hacking — raising the likelihood that it was a product of Russian disinformation. Fresh scrutiny has also centered around the intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference, which was published in January 2017. An annex in a classified version of the assessment contained a summary of the so-called Steele dossier — a compilation of opposition research that included uncorroborated rumors and salacious gossip about Trump and Russia. The latest in a series of investigations Just as Russian interference has been heavily scrutinized, so too has the U.S. government's response to it. Multiple government reports, including not only from Mueller but also a Republican-led Senate intelligence committee that included current Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have documented Russia's activities in sweeping details. To be sure, reports from the Justice Department inspector general and Durham also identified significant flaws in the FBI's Russia investigation, including errors and omissions in applications the Justice Department submitted to a secretive surveillance court to eavesdrop on a national security adviser to the 2016 Trump campaign. But Durham found no criminal wrongdoing among government officials, bringing three criminal cases — two against private citizens that resulted in acquittals at trial and a third against a little-known FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to doctoring an email. It is unclear if there is any criminal wrongdoing that exists that Durham, who launched his investigation in 2019 and concluded it four years later, somehow missed during his sprawling inquiry.
