Idaho Legislature approves ban on SNAP coverage for candy, soda
A bill to ban a food assistance program from covering candy and soda is headed to Gov. Brad Little for consideration.
Idaho also needs federal approval for the proposed ban.
House Bill 109 would require the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare to seek federal approval to exclude candy and soda from foods eligible for coverage by the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP.
Idaho's bill is part of the national movement coined 'Make America Healthy Again,' or MAHA, promoted by U.S. health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the bill's cosponsor Rep. Jordan Redman, R-Coeur d'Alene has told lawmakers.
And, he said, soda is the 'number one commodity spent on SNAP.'
Business industry representatives oppose the bill. Arguing the bill wouldn't be workable, Idaho House Minority Leader Ilana Rubel, D-Boise, has said it would cause grocery stores to stop accepting SNAP.
But bill cosponsor Senate Majority Caucus Chair Ben Toews, R-Coeur d'Alene, says he's skeptical the bill would be hard on retailers. He said the bill's candy definition is used in 24 other states' sales tax laws.
The Idaho House passed the bill on a 48-20 vote on Monday, after the chamber had already narrowly approved the bill. It came back to the House after the Senate amended the bill to tweak the candy definition. The Idaho Senate passed an amended version of the bill on a 25-10 vote last week.
Idaho Senate Minority Leader Melissa Wintrow, D-Boise, critiqued the bill as another way to control poor people.
Sen. Camille Blaylock, R-Caldwell, suggested it isn't likely Idaho would make the change alone. Idaho's waiver, she argued, would join other states' requests, applying pressure for a nationwide change.
When the bill is transmitted to the governor, he has five days, excluding Sundays, to decide on it. He has three options: sign it into law, allow it to become law without his signature, or veto it.
If passed into law, the bill would take effect July 1.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Pushback has largely focused on the bill's broad candy definition, which critics say would also ban granola bars and power bars.
The bill defines candy as 'a preparation of sugar, honey, or other natural or artificial sweeteners combined with chocolate, fruit, nuts or other ingredients or flavorings' in several forms.
Under the bill, candy would not include items that contain flour or need refrigeration. The Senate amended the bill to tweak the candy definition, removing an exemption for items with more than 10% flour by weight.
The bill's soda definition also appears to be broad.
Under the bill, soda includes nonalcoholic beverages with sweeteners, artificial or natural. But the bill doesn't consider soda to be drinks with more than 50% juice, contain milk or milk substitutes, or that need preparation, such as powders or concentrates.
About 132,000 Idahoans are enrolled in SNAP, according to Idaho Department of Health and Welfare figures, receiving an average of $177 in monthly program benefits.
If the federal U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA, doesn't grant Idaho's candy/soda SNAP ban waiver, the bill says Health and Welfare 'shall request such a waiver annually until such a waiver is granted.'
The bill's fiscal note estimates it would not have a fiscal impact.
Republican legislators in Arizona, Kansas, Utah and Wyoming introduced similar bills, Stateline reported.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Petrobras chairman resigns to take position at Brazil's oil regulator
SAO PAULO (Reuters) -Brazilian state-run oil firm Petrobras said on Wednesday that chairman Pietro Mendes has resigned from the role, as well as from his seat on the board of directors. Mendes is set to become a director at Brazil's oil and gas regulator ANP, after the Senate approved his nomination earlier this week. In a securities filing, Petrobras noted that under its bylaws, the board can elect a new chairman to serve until the next shareholders' meeting.
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Pesticides put MAHA's power to the test
The New York Times reported last week that a draft of the Trump administration's upcoming MAHA report does not call for new restrictions on pesticides and describes existing procedures as 'robust.' MAHA-aligned activists recoiled. 'The MAHA draft report stating that the EPA's [Environmental Protection Agency] pesticide review process is 'robust' is the biggest joke in American history. And it's not funny. It's deadly,' Zen Honeycutt, founder of the activist group Moms Across America, wrote in a post on the social platform X. Meanwhile, a Republican-authored House Appropriations bill seeks to block pesticide labels that go beyond what the EPA uses based on its current human health risk assessment. During a markup last month, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), who chairs the Interior-Environment Appropriations subcommittee, said the measure says 'states cannot require a pesticide label that is different from the EPA label.' 'The language ensures that we do not have a patchwork of state labeling requirements. It ensures that one state is not establishing the label for the rest of the states,' Simpson said, adding that his comments were meant to be clarifying for all the ' MAHA moms that are out there that are concerned about this that have been calling.' But critics say such a move could prevent the use of updated science on pesticide labels. 'The language in here … says that EPA should only update labels according to the human health risk assessment. EPA, by law, is required to do those human health risk assessments every 15 years, but they often don't complete those in time,' said Geoff Horsfield, policy director at the Environmental Working Group. 'The way the law works currently is states have the power to do additional addendums, and that's where you see, say, a state requires an additional setback so that you can't spray within 250 feet of a school, or you're required to wear additional types of PPE [personal protective equipment],' he continued. 'Those types of restrictions are usually included in a label addendum … and those types of tweaks would be essentially prohibited by this language.' Also causing controversy is another provision related to 'forever chemicals,' toxic substances linked to diseases including cancer and have become widespread in the environment. The measure seeks to bar the EPA from enforcing a draft report that found that food from farms contaminated with these chemicals may pose cancer risks. MAHA activists have slammed both provisions, saying in a letter to President Trump that GOP support for the measures is 'unconscionable.'
NBC News
5 minutes ago
- NBC News
Tearful parents of Camp Mystic flooding victims plead for tougher safety measures
Between tears and anger, mothers and fathers of children who died at Camp Mystic in central Texas in a flood on July 4 pleaded with state lawmakers Wednesday to toughen safety at summer camps. One by one, the parents proudly described their young children's personalities, quirks and achievements before they shared their nightmare of grief, guilt and loss through tears and sobs. But they also admonished lawmakers to approve a series of reforms that could prevent such a tragedy from happening again. Their heartbreaking testimony in the bicameral committee hearing also led some senators to cry. Among the parents who testified were the mother and father of Cile Steward, the only girl still missing out of 27 children and counselors who died at the girls' camp when the Guadalupe River overflowed several feet in a matter of hours, sweeping through wooded summer camps, homes and businesses. A total of 120 people were killed in Kerr County, including those from Camp Mystic. Cile's mother, CiCi Williams Steward, told the lawmakers she had been assured that the safety of the girls at Camp Mystic was paramount. But that assurance was 'betrayed' by obvious and commonsense safety measures and protocols that were absent or ignored, she said. 'As a result, my daughter was stolen from us not because of an unavoidable act of nature, but because of preventable failures,' she said through tears. 'Cile remains somewhere in the devastation of the Guadalupe River. We remain trapped in agony until she is brought home.' Reforms proposed in legislation that the committee approved on a voice vote and that the Senate is expected to consider Thursday night 'must occur so this tragedy never happens again,' Williams Steward said. Separate legislation is being drafted to address warning systems and disaster response. All of the parents who testified and a handful of owners of other camps along the Guadalupe River said they support the disaster preparedness bill. The legislation has been dubbed the 'Heaven's 27 Camp Safety Act." 'Had the requirements of SB 1 been in place on July 4, I have no doubt that some lives, if not all lives, would have been saved,' said the committee's chairman, Charles Perry, a Republican. The legislation would apply to all campgrounds, and it would be more stringent for youth camps, the Senate said in a statement. Some of the measures the legislation calls for include a requirement that camps file comprehensive emergency plans for natural disasters and that cabins in flood plains have rooftop exits, as well as fire emergency plans, the statement said. The camps would also have to conduct evacuation drills with campers, and staff members would have to undergo annual training, the Senate said. The legislation would require emergency evacuations to higher ground when a flood warning is issued for an area. Camp Mystic said in a statement Wednesday that it could not comment on specific legislation because it was focused on recovery, but it "supports legislative efforts that will make camps and communities along the Guadalupe River safer." "The safety and well-being of every camper is our priority, and our policies and practices are designed to ensure a safe and supportive environment," it said. The parents, including some whose family members had attended Camp Mystic over generations, repeatedly criticized its operators while also saying they love the camp and want camps to continue, albeit with many more safety measures in place. 'Camp Mystic was completely unprepared for the flooding that cost my daughter her life," said Davin Hunt, father of Janie Hunt, 9, a relative of Kansas City Chiefs owner Clark Hunt. "Since that day, our life has been a living nightmare.' Davin Hunt said his daughter's death left him with gut-wrenching dreams, when he can sleep, that sometimes depict a trip to the funeral home, where he prays, 'Lord and Savior, please kill me; take my life, not my daughter, Janie." A few parents expressed anger about having learned after their children's deaths that some of the Camp Mystic structures had been removed from 100-year flood maps, allowing for exemptions from some regulations. 'We feel guilty because we sent our girls to a camp we thought was safe,' said Doug Hanna, father of Hadley, who he said was 8 years, 4 months and 22 days old. 'Don't get me wrong, we love camp. ... We thought Camp Mystic was safe. We didn't know we were sending our daughters to sleep in cabins that were removed from the flood plain through an administrative process.' Speaking about the changes the bill proposes, Perry said such exemptions or carve-outs would no longer be allowed. 'No more waivers. Just, in a nutshell, don't ask for them,' he said. 'If you are a camp owner seeking a waiver, don't come to the state seeking waivers. You're not going to get them.' The parents repeatedly said that the testimony and any legislation approved would not relieve their grief but that they hoped it would help other parents. Brent Dillon, father of Lucy Dillon, 8, urged the lawmakers to ensure that when parents entrust their children to camps they are sending them to safe camps, where operators are prepared and emergency plans are sufficient, executable and enforceable. 'Today I sit before you a broken man. When Lucy left for camp, it was the very first time she had ever slipped away from us,' Dillon said. 'We entrusted her to the camp operators, and never for a moment did we believe she would return to us in a casket.'
