logo
Had a belly full. Could Chinese swimmers have eaten 5 kilos of food en route to failed doping test?

Had a belly full. Could Chinese swimmers have eaten 5 kilos of food en route to failed doping test?

The head of the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency told senators that Chinese swimmers would have had to eat around 11 pounds (5 kilograms) of food to test for the amounts of the performance enhancer that resulted in the much-debated positive drug tests from 2021 that were later disregarded.
'It's unbelievable to think that Tinkerbell just showed up and sprinkled it all over the kitchen,' Travis Tygart said in a Senate hearing Tuesday focused on the World Anti-Doping Agency's response to the doping case.
A key part of that case was WADA's acceptance of the explanation from Chinese authorities that the swimmers had been contaminated by traces of the drug Trimetazidine (TMZ) in a hotel kitchen.
USADA scientists analyzed data from a report commissioned by WADA to come up with the amount of food (5 kilos) or liquid (4.9 liters) the athletes would have had to have consumed to test positive at the levels they did.
WADA officials declined to participate in the hearing, which spokesperson James Fitzgerald called 'another political effort led by Travis Tygart … to leverage the Senate and the media in a desperate effort to relitigate the Chinese swimming cases and misinform athletes and other stakeholders.'
Also testiying was former U.S. drug czar, Rahul Gupta, whose decision at the start of this year to withhold $3.6 million in funding — the biggest single chunk that WADA receives on an annual basis — furthered a long-running feud between U.S. and WADA authorities.
The Senate subcommittee holding the hearing is considering a bill that would give the head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy — the so-called drug czar — permanent authority to withhold those funds, without needing year-to-year permission from Congress.
In his prepared testimony, Gupta compared WADA's governance challenges to a used car.
'You expect that the car has been thoroughly inspected, that it's safe and roadworthy,' he said. 'But as soon as you drive it off the lot, the brakes fail and the engine sputters — and only then do you learn that the dealership has a history of skipping inspections altogether.'
Gupta and Tygart recommended a host of reforms for WADA, most of which revolve around ensuring independence, which they say cannot be accomplished under the current model that calls on the International Olympic Committee to supply half of WADA's money.
Gupta also pressed for the United States to regain a seat on WADA's executive committee that it lost in the aftermath of the dues flareup.
Also testifying was Katie McLaughlin, a member of the U.S. 4×200 freestyle team that won a silver medal at the 2021 Olympics. The Americans finished second to a Chinese team that had two swimmers whose positives were erased after WADA declined to look further into the contamination case.
'It was devastating, honestly,' McLaughlin said of hearing the news about the doping case. 'I was taken aback and heartbroken. I spent a lot of my career trusting in the powers that be, and it was really sad to find out that's someone who could not be trusted, meaning WADA.'
The investigator WADA hired to look into the Chinese doping case ruled that WADA had acted reasonably in not pursuing the Chinese case but still called it 'curious' that the agency did not further pursue facts that didn't line up with the normal handling of contamination cases.
Fitzgerald, the WADA spokesperson, said the agency did, in fact, address some of the concerns in the report, especially about the way contaminations cases are handled.
Thursdays
Keep up to date on sports with Mike McIntyre's weekly newsletter.
'As highlighted by the Chinese cases and many others, the issue of contamination is real and growing and it is crucial that WADA and its partners address it head on,' he said.
Tygart led off his testimony claiming the Chinese case had potentially impacted 96 medals from the 2021 and 2024 Olympics.
WADA argued with that, with Fitzgerald reiterating the agency's long-held legal position that, given the complexities of the evidence, had it taken appeals to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, it would have lost all of them.
___
AP Summer Olympics: https://apnews.com/hub/2024-paris-olympic-games

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. resumes student visa applications under new social media vetting rules
U.S. resumes student visa applications under new social media vetting rules

Global News

timean hour ago

  • Global News

U.S. resumes student visa applications under new social media vetting rules

The U.S. State Department said Wednesday it is restarting the suspended process for foreigners applying for student visas but all applicants will now be required to unlock their social media accounts for government review. The department said consular officers will be on the lookout for posts and messages that could be deemed hostile to the United States, its government, culture, institutions or founding principles. In a notice made public Wednesday, the department said it had rescinded its May suspension of student visa processing but said new applicants who refuse to set their social media accounts to 'public' and allow them to be reviewed may be rejected. It said a refusal to do so could be a sign they are trying to evade the requirement or hide their online activity. The Trump administration last month temporarily halted the scheduling of new visa interviews for foreign students hoping to study in the U.S. while preparing to expand the screening of their activity on social media, officials said. Story continues below advertisement Students around the world have been waiting anxiously for U.S. consulates to reopen appointments for visa interviews, as the window left to book their travel and make housing arrangements narrows ahead of the start of the school year. On Wednesday afternoon, a 27-year-old Ph.D. student in Toronto was able to secure an appointment for a visa interview next week. The student, a Chinese national, hopes to travel to the U.S. for a research intern position that would start in late July. 'I'm really relieved,' said the student, who spoke on condition of being identified only by his surname, Chen, because he was concerned about being targeted. 'I've been refreshing the website couple of times every day.' 8:35 Students face uncertain future as Trump-Harvard litigation battle gets underway Students from China, India, Mexico and the Philippines have posted on social media sites that they have been monitoring visa booking websites and closely watching press briefings of the State Department to get any indication of when appointment bookings might resume. Story continues below advertisement 'Under new guidance, consular officers will conduct a comprehensive and thorough vetting of all student and exchange visitor applicants,' the department said in a statement. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'To facilitate this vetting' applicants 'will be asked to adjust the privacy settings on all their social media profiles to 'public,'' it said. 'The enhanced social media vetting will ensure we are properly screening every single person attempting to visit our country.' In internal guidance sent to consular officers, the department said they should be looking for 'any indications of hostility toward the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles of the United States.' Jameel Jaffer, executive director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, said the new policy evokes the ideological vetting of the Cold War when prominent artists and intellectuals were excluded from the U.S. 'This policy makes a censor of every consular officer, and it will inevitably chill legitimate political speech both inside and outside the United States,' Jaffer said. 2:35 Columbia University student Mohsen Mahdawi freed on bail, plans to challenge U.S. deportation International students in the U.S. have been facing increased scrutiny on several fronts. Story continues below advertisement In the spring, the Trump administration revoked permission to study in the U.S. for thousands of students, including some involved only in traffic offenses, before abruptly reversing course. The government also expanded the grounds on which foreign students can have their legal status terminated. As part of a pressure campaign targeting Harvard University, the Trump administration has moved to block foreign students from attending the Ivy League school, which counts on international students for tuition dollars and a quarter of its enrollment. Trump has said Harvard should cap its foreign enrollment at 15%. The Trump administration also has called for 36 countries to commit to improving vetting of travelers or face a ban on their citizens visiting the United States. A weekend diplomatic cable sent by the State Department says the countries have 60 days to address U.S. concerns or risk being added to a travel ban that now includes 12 nations.

LILLEY: Carney's team putting up roadblocks to trade deal with U.S.
LILLEY: Carney's team putting up roadblocks to trade deal with U.S.

Toronto Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

LILLEY: Carney's team putting up roadblocks to trade deal with U.S.

Supply management bill, Digital Services Tax angering Americans across political spectrum Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inbox Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump engage in a meeting at the White House in Washington, D.C., Tuesday, May 6, 2025. Photo by Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS Canada's leadership can't help but shoot itself in the foot when it comes to negotiating a new trade deal with the Americans. We continue to cling to a digital services tax that has angered all sides in Washington and Tuesday passed a bill making it illegal to negotiate anything related to supply management. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Why not just flip the bird at the Americans and quit negotiating now? On Tuesday, the Senate passed Bill C-202, a bill brought forward by the Bloc Quebecois that makes it a law that negotiators at the Department of Foreign Affairs are not allowed to put supply management on the table. That means no negotiations for quotas, prices for quotas or market access to the chicken, egg or dairy sector are allowed as part of any trade deal. Before we get into why this is such a horrible idea, consider that the sponsor of this bill is Yves-Francois Blanchet, the leader of the Bloc Quebecois. Canada's trade policy has now been surrendered, handcuffed you might say, by the leader of the party that wants to break up Canada and who claims that Canada is not a real country. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Now, lots of Canadians would hop up and down and say they don't want American milk in Canada and that they want to keep supply management. The truth is the Americans are not looking to sell us milk for sale in a carton and they don't want to end supply management. Read More What the Americans are looking for is greater access to supplying our market with either cheese or industrial milk for cheese production. They thought they had negotiated greater access through the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, but then Canadian officials blocked them immediately and the Biden administration took us to a trade tribunal claiming we were violating the trade agreement. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. They won one round at the tribunal, we won another and the trade dispute continues. Now, we've made it law that dairy can't be discussed in trade negotiations. We are tying our hands behind our backs in trade talks to make fewer than 10,000 dairy farmers happy, while annoying every other industry. Kyle Larkin, executive director of the Grain Growers of Canada, blasted MPs and senators for making Bill C-202 the first bill passed by Parliament at a time when everyone says they want to grow Canada's economy and expand international trade. 'With critical trade negotiations and renegotiations ahead, including with our largest trading partner, the United States, passing Bill C-202 sends the wrong message internationally,' Larkin said. 'For grain farmers who rely on access to international markets, the result will be less ambitious trade agreements, fewer export opportunities, and slower economic growth at home.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It's not just other farmers who are annoyed with the dairy farmers, others in the industry are upset but don't think they can speak up publicly against the powerful dairy cartel. RECOMMENDED VIDEO On the Digital Services Tax, Canadian investors – including pension funds that many of us rely on – could take a big hit if this tax isn't repealed. At a time when we are jumping up and down about the Americans imposing unfair and unjustified tariffs and costs on our goods and services, we are doing the same with the DST. This tax targets American tech companies we all use — like Amazon, Google, Facebook, Netflix and Airbnb — and will require them to pay big money to Ottawa. The Americans, on both sides of the aisle, oppose this tax and see it as unfair and an attack on their tech companies. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It will also impact many Canadian small and medium-size businesses, those selling products on Amazon, those advertising on Google or Facebook or people driving for Uber; they will all end up getting hit with the cost of this tax. Not only is the tax levy going to cost these tech companies and the small businesses that rely on them, but it is retroactive to Jan. 1, 2022, and the first payments are due at the end of this month. The DST is a major trade irritant for the Americans and it is not just an issue for Trump, but like dairy is something that upsets the Democrats as well. On both issues, the Americans believe that we are in violation of our existing trade agreements. Yet as we ask for special treatment and favours on tariffs, we are offering little in return in the eyes of the Americans. If this persists, we won't be getting a trade deal with the Americans or seeing tariffs lifted anytime soon. NHL Canada Editorial Cartoons Soccer Canada

Senate passes bill to protect supply management from any future trade deals
Senate passes bill to protect supply management from any future trade deals

Ottawa Citizen

time3 hours ago

  • Ottawa Citizen

Senate passes bill to protect supply management from any future trade deals

OTTAWA — The Bloc Québécois' long and often rocky road to protect supply management from any concessions in future trade negotiations has come to a successful end. The Senate has adopted Bill C-202, making it the first bill set to receive royal assent in the new session of Parliament. Article content 'We won,' said Bloc Leader Yves-François Blanchet enthusiastically, hours after the Senate adopted his party's bill. Article content Article content Article content C-202 sought to amend the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Act to prevent the minister from 'making a commitment' that would increase the tariff rate quota for dairy, poultry, or eggs in trade negotiations. It would also prevent tariff reductions on these products when they are imported in excess. Article content Article content The Bloc wanted to strengthen the long-standing federal government policy to maintain Canada's supply management system, including its production control, pricing mechanisms and import controls. Article content The House of Commons unanimously passed the bill last week and the Senate did so 'with division' on Tuesday evening. Article content 'The notion of unanimity really weighed heavily. It was all parties and the unanimity of elected officials. So, everyone who speaks for Canadians and Quebecers was in favour,' Blanchet said at a press conference. Article content Article content Bloc Québécois MP Yves Perron has been championing this bill for over five years. In an interview with the National Post, Perron expressed his pride. Article content Article content 'We have just demonstrated that the Bloc Québécois serves a purpose. I think we are capable of moving forward on issues and on a scale that is extremely positive for Quebec, but also positive for the rest of Canada,' he said. 'And the rest of Canada has finally understood this.' Article content But the Grain Growers of Canada argued that 'Parliament chose to prioritize one group of farmers over another,' while the Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance said it was 'deeply concerned' by the adoption of 'a flawed piece of legislation that sets a troubling precedent, undermining Canada's longstanding commitment to the rules-based international trading system.' Article content Even if the Senate passed the bill, many senators still had some reservations on Tuesday. In a speech in the Senate, Alberta Sen. Paula Simons expressed concerns about what Bill C-202 means for national unity because it was from a Bloc MP, which advocates for the separation of Quebec from the rest of Canada.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store