UK Expands "Deport Now, Appeal Later" Scheme For Foreign Criminals To 23 Nations
The UK government announced Sunday that it will expand a scheme forcing some foreign nationals to have appeals against convictions heard from abroad, to prevent them delaying deportations.
The number of countries enrolled in the initiative will nearly treble to 23, with people from those nations now to be deported before they can appeal their convictions, it said.
In a separate announcement, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said she intends to change the law so most foreign criminals will be deported immediately when they receive a prison sentence.
Foreign national offenders make up around 12 per cent of the prison population, and the move could ssave money, according to Mahmood.
The steps come as Prime Minister Keir Starmer's centre-left Labour government faces intense domestic pressure over immigration, as Nigel Farage's right-wing Reform UK party surges in polls.
Farage, a longtime critic of immigration, has made the issue central to his party's messaging, alongside a focus on crime.
Starmer's government, which has slumped in popularity since taking power a year ago, has made a flurry of announcements on both policy areas in an apparent bid to counter Reform's appeal.
The interior ministry said the expansion of the pre-appeal deportation scheme will increase "the UK's ability to remove foreign criminals at the earliest opportunity".
It will also ease pressure on overcrowded prisons, it noted.
The ministry added that almost 5,200 convicted criminals with foreign passports had been removed since July 2024, claiming that represented a 14 percent year-on-year increase.
Under the "deport now appeal later" scheme, those convicted and whose human rights claims have been refused will have appeals heard from their home countries using video technology.
It has already been used for people from Tanzania, Finland, Estonia, Belize and four other countries but will be expanded to 15 additional countries.
They include European nations Latvia and Bulgaria, African countries Angola, Botswana, Kenya, Uganda and Zambia, Western allies Australia and Canada as well as India, Indonesia, Lebanon and Malaysia.
The government said ministers are discussing with other countries about joining the scheme.
"For far too long, foreign criminals have been exploiting our immigration system, remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on," interior minister Yvette Cooper said.
"That has to end. Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system," she added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
India joins UK list whose citizens can be deported before appeal
LONDON: India is among 15 countries added to a list of eight whose nationals, when convicted of crimes in the UK, will no longer be able to delay their deportation by appealing against the decision to remove them. Under a "deport now, appeal later" initiative, they will be deported and have to take part in any hearing related to any appeal against deportation remotely from India via video link. Terrorists, murderers and those serving life sentences will continue to have to serve their prison sentence in Britain before being considered for deportation. Previously, offenders from the countries in question could remain in the UK for years while they appealed being deported under human rights laws. Indians who are deported are barred from re-entering the UK. Once back in their home country, it is up to India whether they are sent to prison or freed. Until now, UK could deport foreign criminals from eight countries without appeal in the UK - namely Finland, Nigeria, Estonia, Albania, Belize, Mauritius, Tanzania and Kosovo. New countries added to the list are Angola, Australia, Botswana, Brunei, Bulgaria, Canada, Guyana, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said, "Our message is clear: if you break our laws, we will send you packing. "
The Print
19 minutes ago
- The Print
Will convey displeasure to US over Munir's nuclear threat from American soil—Centre tells House panel
MPs who attended the meeting said Misri told the Lok Sabha Committee on External Affairs headed by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor that New Delhi's position remains that BRICS was not an anti-Western grouping but should be seen instead as a 'non-Western grouping'. The committee, it is learnt, was told by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri that US President Donald Trump's imposition of steep tariff on Indian exports was not just a response to New Delhi's purchase of Russian crude oil but could also be connected to its presence in BRICS. New Delhi: The Centre told a parliamentary committee Monday that New Delhi will convey to Washington DC its displeasure over Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, delivering nuclear threats from the soil of the United States, sources told ThePrint. Sources said Misri told the MPs that India would not tolerate such nuclear blackmail. ThePrint exclusively reported on 10 August that Munir, speaking at an event in the US, said, 'we are a nuclear nation, if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' 'India's position will be conveyed to the US,' sources quoted Misri as having said. Misri is also learnt to have told the panel that the US's trade deficit with India may also have been a trigger for Trump, who first announced the imposition of 25 percent tariff on Indian exports to the US and later raised it to 50 percent citing the 'direct or indirect import of Russian oil'. The foreign secretary is learnt to have added that India will not cross certain 'red lines'—a reference to US's demand for India to open up its agriculture and dairy sectors—in its trade negotiations with Washington. 'The three issues that India believes could have acted as a trigger for Trump are purchase of Russian crude oil, trade deficit and India's presence in the BRICS multilateral grouping. India's position is very clear. Misri said New Delhi never considered BRICS to be an anti-Western bloc but believes it can be categorised, if at all, as a non-Western bloc,' an MP who was part of the meeting told ThePrint. Sources in the Indian establishment have previously argued that New Delhi's sale of processed Russian crude oil was necessitated by various European countries, who stopped importing from Moscow, becoming dependent on supplies from India. Apart from Misri, Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal was also present in the meeting that lasted over three hours. The officials told the MPs that the latest developments would not have any impact on India's 'friendship' with the US. 'Trade is just one aspect of India-US relations. There are many positives also,' one official is learnt to have told the committee. The officials added that India's trade relations, including defence purchases, would not be affected by Trump's announcements. In response to questions from MPs, they underlined that India is not trying to 'enhance' or recalibrate its relations with China or Russia in light of the US President's remarks and announcements. (Edited by Amrtansh Arora) Also Read: Proxy pushback: After Rajnath, now Gadkari & Venkaiah; BJP is running out of patience with Trump
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Should merit-cum-income policy guide filling quota posts?
NEW DELHI: In what could stir a fresh debate among SCs, STs and OBCs, Supreme Court on Monday agreed to examine an important issue - should benefit of quota in government employment and admissions to state-run institutions be first given to those members of quota-covered communities who continue to be the most socially and economically backward. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi sought response from Union government on a joint petition filed by two people, one belonging to the SC community and the other an OBC, after hearing brief arguments from advocate Reena Singh. SC had a word of caution - this is a sensitive issue requiring careful consideration. Singh said petitioners do not seek any change in quota percentage for scheduled communities. Justice Kant said many from SC, ST and OBC communities had advanced socially and economically by entering the elite categories of government employment through reservation and could provide best of education and facilities to their children. He said the time had probably come to consider whether such a class of people should continue to avail reservation at the cost of their own community members who are languishing in poverty and facing social issues. The task before the Justice Kant-led bench will not be insurmountable as a seven-judge bench judgment, authored by Justice B R Gavai, only the second member from the Dalit community to become CJI, had on Aug 1 last year permitted states to sub-categorise castes within SC communities based on degrees socio-economic backwardness and and under-representation in government jobs to ensure that the larger pie of 15% quota went to the most backward. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court had asked govts to devise suitable criteria to bar the 'creamy layer' among SCs from availing reservation. The petitioners have argued, "Candidates from affluent SC, ST and OBC families often secure reserved jobs and seats. Individuals from extremely poor backgrounds and needy aspirants seldom get a chance to get a job or admission to government colleges despite the reservation policy. This defeats the purpose of social justice and perpetuates inequality within reserved categories. "By incorporating an economic threshold within reservations, the policy would align with the broader constitutional mandate of creating an egalitarian society. Furthermore, such reforms would prevent monopolisation of benefits by a privileged few, ensuring that affirmative action remains a dynamic and effective tool for socio-economic upliftment," they argued.
