New Covid-style test for womb cancer could soon be available on NHS
Women who are experiencing signs of womb cancer can soon be offered a less invasive test to rule out disease after it was given the green light for use in the UK.
Traditionally, women with signs of womb cancer would need a transvaginal ultrasound scan or a hysteroscopy – where a tube with a camera in it is used to look inside the womb – to confirm or rule out womb cancer.
But the new test, WID-easy, uses some of the same technology used in Covid PCR (polymerase chain reaction) tests. It will involve a simple swab, which is sent off to a laboratory for analysis. Scientists then look for changes in the DNA that indicate whether womb cancer is present or not.
If the test indicates that a woman has womb cancer, then the woman would need a biopsy to confirm or rule out the diagnosis.
The new test, by University College London (UCL) spinout company Sola Diagnostics, has been approved for use in the UK by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) for women over the age of 45 who have abnormal uterine bleeding.
This means that it is immediately available to private clinics, and it is hoped that it will one day be made available for widespread use on the NHS.
Commenting on the potential roll out of the new test Athena Lamnisos, chief executive of The Eve Appeal, says: "Currently in the UK, the tests to investigate abnormal bleeding and check for womb cancer can cause stress and discomfort. The usual test is a hysteroscopy, which many find painful and invasive.
"A test which is less painful and more acceptable is to be welcomed by many. The WID-easy test could enable the many thousands of women who experience abnormal bleeding, and where cancer needs to be ruled out, to potentially avoid painful tests like hysteroscopies and have their minds put at rest sooner, saving them from unnecessary stress."
The new test comes as a leading health expert warned women could be ignoring some potential key symptoms of womb cancer, due to a lack of awareness about what to look out for.
Research has revealed that more than 22,000 women in the UK are diagnosed with gynaecological cancer every year – that's around 60 diagnoses every day and more than 400 women a week.
One of the five gynaecological cancers is womb cancer (aka uterine or endometrial cancer). According to Cancer Research UK, around 9,800 women are diagnosed with womb cancer every year, making it the fourth most common cancer in UK women.
Despite affecting so many, few women are aware of the potential symptoms, but having an awareness about womb cancer and other gynaecological cancers could mean the difference between an early diagnosis and leaving it too late.
Yahoo UK previously spoke to Valentina Milanova, women's health expert and founder of gynae health company, Daye, to throw a light on some of the most common symptoms of womb cancer women should be looking out for.
From painful sex, to unexpected vaginal bleeding and irregular menstruation, Milanova believes if more women could spot these signs, they might get diagnosed and receive treatment sooner.
Womb cancer, also known as endometrial or uterine cancer, is cancer that affects the womb. According to the NHS, the womb (uterus) is where a baby grows during pregnancy.
Most womb cancer usually starts in the lining of the womb (endometrium).
Womb cancer typically presents with the following symptoms:
Unusual vaginal bleeding, typically happening in between periods, after menopause, after sex or urination.
Irregular menstruation, defined as unforeseen changes to the patient's menstrual cycle, heavier and longer periods, or breakthrough bleeding in between periods.
Pelvic pain, which is often trivialised and ignored, but can be a symptom of gynaecological cancers.
Painful sex is another symptom that women are taught to normalise, but can be a symptom of womb cancer.
Pelvic pain and pressure are typically a symptom of endometrial cancer progressing.
Larger uterus, which is seen in some cases where the endometrial cancer is causing an enlarged lower abdomen/pelvis.
But Milanova says it is important to note that while these are common symptoms of womb cancer, they can also be caused by various other conditions that are not cancerous, such as hormonal imbalances, uterine fibroids, or polyps.
"This is one reason why some patients may miss or dismiss these symptoms initially," she adds.
According to Milanova there are several reasons why many women and assigned female at birth (AFAB) individuals may miss symptoms including:
Menopause: Postmenopausal bleeding is often a red flag for womb cancer, but some patients may not realise they have reached menopause and therefore disregard the bleeding as a warning sign.
Assuming it's normal: Due to the trivialisation of gynaecological pain, many women may assume that irregular periods or changes in menstrual bleeding are normal, which would lead to them not seeking medical attention.
Mistaking endometrial cancer for something else: Symptoms like pelvic pain or weight loss can be attributed to various non-cancerous conditions, leading to a delay in seeking a cancer diagnosis.
Fear: The fear of a cancer diagnosis or denial of potential health issues can lead some individuals to delay seeking medical help.
While we don't know what causes most womb cancers, there are some factors that could increase your risk of developing it.
Age: Womb cancer is most common in postmenopausal women, with the majority of cases diagnosed after age 50.
Hormonal Factors: Excess oestrogen exposure, either due to obesity or certain medical conditions like polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), can increase the risk.
Obesity: Obesity is a significant risk factor for womb cancer because it can lead to increased oestrogen levels.
Diabetes: Some studies suggest a link between type 2 diabetes and an increased risk of womb cancer.
It's important for every patient, especially those in the high-risk categories, to be aware of the symptoms of womb cancer and seek medical support if they experience any concerning signs.
Early detection and treatment can significantly improve the outcome for individuals with womb cancer.
Read more about womb cancer:
Symptoms of the 5 gynaecological cancers women should never ignore (Yahoo Life UK, 7-min read)
Woman, 58, who thought she was 'in menopause' diagnosed with womb cancer (Birmingham Live, 3-min read)
New womb cancer treatment to benefit hundreds of patients each year (PA, 3-min read
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Authorities expose secret pipeline fueling endangered species trade: 'An important threat to the biodiversity ... and the wider region'
Protecting animal species from exploitation and extinction requires accurate information about the animals and how humans are interacting with them. Sometimes, that information is hard to get, as is the case for North Korea due to its lack of open communication with the rest of the world. However, a recent study published in the journal Biological Conservation sheds light on North Korea's wildlife — and, unfortunately, the situation is dire, University College London reported. The information in the report came from interviews with North Korean defectors directly involved in the illegal wildlife trade, including hunters, buyers, and middlemen, gathered between 2021 and 2022. This group revealed that despite North Korea's system of protected habitats and protected species, it is extremely common for endangered animals to be hunted for meat, skins, traditional medicine ingredients, and other resources. Some of the animals and parts are traded within North Korea, with the rest crossing the border to China. The North Korean government itself is involved in illegal wildlife trade, which violates both its own laws and international law regarding the treatment of endangered species. Lead author Dr Joshua Elves-Powell said in the UCL report: "The widespread harvesting of North Korea's wildlife, driven by the economic limitations of the North Korean state and the shortages of food, medicine, and basic goods experienced by many of its citizens, is an important threat to the biodiversity of North Korea and the wider region." Protected animals like Amur tigers, Amur leopards, Asiatic black bears, long-tailed gorals, and Eurasian otters are among the species of most concern in this report. But after an economic collapse and famine in the 1990s, it's likely that almost every mammal species heavier than half a kilogram (just over a pound) has been affected to some extent, UCL reported. As this data makes clear, many people in North Korea are relying on the animals in the country for food or their livelihoods. Unfortunately, wildlife is not an unlimited resource. The more those animal populations are pushed toward extinction, the more the people involved will suffer. Species that are lost can never be recovered, and populations that are damaged may take many years of conservation efforts to restore. It doesn't just impact the animals within North Korea's borders. Normally, animals should be able to cross the border freely, interbreeding and searching for food. Populations near the border will be impacted by the activities that happen on only one side, as there will be fewer individuals to maintain genetically diverse populations. The study authors called on China to crack down on buyers and put economic pressure on North Korea to stop the illegal wildlife trade. As the market for the majority of illegal animal parts that leave North Korea, China has the power to shut down demand. Do you think people should be allowed to keep exotic animals as pets? Yes No It depends on the animal It depends on the person Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
First bacteria we ever meet can keep us out of hospital
The first bacteria our bodies meet – in the hours after we're born – could protect us from dangerous infections, UK scientists say. They have shown, for the first time, that good bacteria seem to halve the risk of young children being admitted to hospital with lung infections. The researchers said it was a "phenomenal" finding and could lead to therapies that boost good bacteria in babies. Our early encounters with microbes are thought to be crucial in how our immune system develops. We come out of the womb sterile, but this doesn't last for long. All the nooks and crannies of the human body become home to a world of microbial life, known as the microbiome. More than half your body is not human Microbiome podcast: The Second Genome Researchers at University College London and the Sanger Institute investigated the earliest stages in our body's colonisation by bacteria, fungi and more. They collected stool samples from 1,082 newborns in the first week of life. The team then performed a massive genetic analysis on all the DNA in the samples to work out exactly which species were present and how common they were in each child. They then tracked what happened to those babies, using hospital data, for the next two years. One particular early inhabitant of the human body, Bifidobacterium longum, seemed to have a protective effect. Only 4% of babies with this species would spend a night in hospital with a lung infection over the next two years. Babies with different starter-bacteria were two-to-three times more likely to need to stay in hospital. It is the first data to show the formation of the microbiome affects the risk of infection. "I think it's really phenomenal. It's amazing to be able to show this. I'm excited," Prof Nigel Field, from UCL, told the BBC. The most likely culprit for children ending up in hospital is respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), but what joins the dots between this and B. longum? That is the "million dollar question" for Prof Field. We know B. longum starts off digesting breast milk which both contains food for the baby and encourages good bacteria. The exact details have not yet been worked out, but either the bacteria themselves or the compounds they make by digesting food are interacting with the immune system "and are influencing the way in which the immune system matures and is able to recognise friend from foe," according to Prof Field. The protective bacteria were found only in babies that came into the world via a vaginal delivery rather than a caesarean. Even then they were not discovered after every vaginal delivery. The researchers say their findings do not justify the practice of vaginal seeding, where some new parents smear babies with a swab taken from the vagina. How method of birth alters babies' bacteria The good bacteria seem to be coming from the end of the mother's digestive system, an idea known in the field as the "first lick". "I feel pretty confident in saying that vaginal seeding is not a good thing," said Prof Field. However, the long-term ambition is to come up with microbial therapies – like a probiotic yogurt – that could be given to babies to set their microbiomes on a healthy path. Prof Louise Kenny, from the University of Liverpool and a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist, said: "A caesarean section is often a life-saving procedure, and can be the right choice for a woman and her baby." She said that while the benefit was seen only in babies born vaginally, it was not in every child born that way so "further research is needed to create a full, nuanced picture".
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
First bacteria we ever meet can keep us out of hospital
The first bacteria our bodies meet – in the hours after we're born – could protect us from dangerous infections, UK scientists say. They have shown, for the first time, that good bacteria seem to halve the risk of young children being admitted to hospital with lung infections. The researchers said it was a "phenomenal" finding and could lead to therapies that boost good bacteria in babies. Our early encounters with microbes are thought to be crucial in how our immune system develops. We come out of the womb sterile, but this doesn't last for long. All the nooks and crannies of the human body become home to a world of microbial life, known as the microbiome. More than half your body is not human Microbiome podcast: The Second Genome Researchers at University College London and the Sanger Institute investigated the earliest stages in our body's colonisation by bacteria, fungi and more. They collected stool samples from 1,082 newborns in the first week of life. The team then performed a massive genetic analysis on all the DNA in the samples to work out exactly which species were present and how common they were in each child. They then tracked what happened to those babies, using hospital data, for the next two years. One particular early inhabitant of the human body, Bifidobacterium longum, seemed to have a protective effect. Only 4% of babies with this species would spend a night in hospital with a lung infection over the next two years. Babies with different starter-bacteria were two-to-three times more likely to need to stay in hospital. It is the first data to show the formation of the microbiome affects the risk of infection. "I think it's really phenomenal. It's amazing to be able to show this. I'm excited," Prof Nigel Field, from UCL, told the BBC. The most likely culprit for children ending up in hospital is respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), but what joins the dots between this and B. longum? That is the "million dollar question" for Prof Field. We know B. longum starts off digesting breast milk which both contains food for the baby and encourages good bacteria. The exact details have not yet been worked out, but either the bacteria themselves or the compounds they make by digesting food are interacting with the immune system "and are influencing the way in which the immune system matures and is able to recognise friend from foe," according to Prof Field. The protective bacteria were found only in babies that came into the world via a vaginal delivery rather than a caesarean. Even then they were not discovered after every vaginal delivery. The researchers say their findings do not justify the practice of vaginal seeding, where some new parents smear babies with a swab taken from the vagina. How method of birth alters babies' bacteria The good bacteria seem to be coming from the end of the mother's digestive system, an idea known in the field as the "first lick". "I feel pretty confident in saying that vaginal seeding is not a good thing," said Prof Field. However, the long-term ambition is to come up with microbial therapies – like a probiotic yogurt – that could be given to babies to set their microbiomes on a healthy path. Prof Louise Kenny, from the University of Liverpool and a consultant obstetrician and gynaecologist, said: "A caesarean section is often a life-saving procedure, and can be the right choice for a woman and her baby." She said that while the benefit was seen only in babies born vaginally, it was not in every child born that way so "further research is needed to create a full, nuanced picture".
