logo
[Lee Kyong-hee] Suspend reality: Yoon's last stand

[Lee Kyong-hee] Suspend reality: Yoon's last stand

Korea Herald23-02-2025
Atop his desk, President Yoon Suk Yeol had a sign that read, 'The buck stops here.' It is a replica of the desk sign used by Harry S. Truman, the US president during the Korean War. Yoon often was photographed explaining the sign to guests, but after his botched attempt to impose martial law and subsequent impeachment, he clearly did not adhere to those four words.
The last Constitutional Court hearing on Yoon's impeachment is scheduled for tomorrow. So far, the impeachment trial tracks the plot of a tragicomedy. Gloom and anger shroud the proceeding, but Yoon is mounting a defense that is so thin it is laughable. In a nutshell, Yoon wants us to believe that our reaction to his declaration of martial law in December is unwarranted because it was simply a political maneuver.
'Why is all this fuss? You know nothing happened,' Yoon insisted, accusing the witnesses of testifying to events surrounding his martial law decree. 'I feel as if all this is like chasing the shadow of the moon on a lake,' he said, even borrowing a poetic phrase.
Yoon has argued that he intended his late-night surprise action to be a warning to the 'anti-state' opposition forces abusing their majority power to impede his policy agenda. He said he was ready to respect the National Assembly's vote to revoke martial law, which was why he lifted his order in just several hours. To believe Yoon's argument, the nation would need to apologize to him for being gullible: Sorry. We thought you were serious!
Everybody knows Yoon is spinning an alternate reality like a sci-fi writer, trying to pass the buck to everyone else. Last December, gripped in dread and disbelief, we were glued to real-time broadcasts of soldiers and police officers blocking legislators from entering the National Assembly and casting votes to overturn the martial law decree. Was that nothing but part of your pretend plan, Mr. President?
At least three witnesses remained consistent in testifying that they personally received orders from Yoon over the phone that night. The orders were to 'drag out' lawmakers from the National Assembly main chamber by all possible means, which included breaking doors and turning off utilities, or to arrest key political figures. They are Kwak Jong-geun, commander of the Army Special Warfare Command; Hong Jang-won, first deputy director of the National Intelligence Service; and Cho Ji-ho, commissioner-general of the National Police Agency. They are now either arrested on charges of being involved in an insurrection or fired for violating regulations against political activity.
Yoon has adamantly denied having given such orders. He claims that these individuals misunderstood his instructions to 'maintain order at the National Assembly' or 'assist the military intelligence in rounding up communist spies.' Nonetheless, testimonies by field commanders at separate investigations and National Assembly hearings align with those of these witnesses, starkly contradicting Yoon's assertions.
Yoon has also accused witnesses of conspiring with opposition lawmakers to fabricate insurrection charges against him. This attempt to deflect responsibility places numerous people, in uniform or not, at the risk of facing criminal accusations, let alone destroying their careers.
The Constitutional Court has months to decide the case, but a ruling is likely in just weeks. It is expected to uphold Yoon's impeachment to formally remove him from office with a unanimous vote of all the eight judges. In the 10 hearings so far, all the essential charges against Yoon have been sufficiently established: He violated the Constitution by circumventing legal processes to declare a state of national emergency justifying his martial law decree, misusing military force and attempting to disband the legislature.
In his final statement tomorrow, Yoon would do well to do what he has not done yet: offering a heartfelt apology for his grave misjudgment in opting for martial law as a political breakthrough, seriously undermining democracy and national prestige, and consequently jeopardizing the livelihoods of many people. It would be yet another fatal mistake if he attempts to rally his supporters to push them further into radical riots.
Yoon faces his criminal trial on insurrection charges, which can lead him to life in prison or capital punishment. Scores, or probably hundreds, of military and civilian personnel will also undergo trials for cooperating in his ill-conceived action willingly or unwillingly.
At the same time, Yoon's scandal-ridden wife, Kim Keon-hee, will likely become embroiled in the proceedings as well. There has been rampant speculation that Yoon's abrupt martial law declaration was aimed at preventing a special counsel investigation into his wife's alleged wrongdoings. The speculation is backed by the testimony of Kim Bong-sik, commissioner-general of the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency, at a Constitutional Court hearing. He said that Yoon hinted at his 'family situation' as a reason for imposing martial law.
The scars incurred from the moral impudence and political incompetence of a former prosecutor and his power-hungry wife will remain a lofty challenge for the nation to overcome. It will finally be a moment of truth to probe into what is wrong with our politics and politicians, as well as our prosecutorial system, charting the future course of our wounded democracy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

49 January courthouse rioters found guilty
49 January courthouse rioters found guilty

Korea Herald

time8 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

49 January courthouse rioters found guilty

A Seoul court on Friday found 49 people guilty for their participation in a January courthouse riot related to former President Yoon Suk Yeol, with one of them receiving a five-year prison term. The Seoul Western District Court handed down the sentences to the individuals indicted en masse for their involvement in the riot at the same court building on Jan. 19, prompted by the court's decision to extend Yoon's detention over his Dec. 3 declaration of martial law. The guilty sentences ranged from a 2 million-won ($1,423) fine to a prison term of up to five years. A 19-year-old, surnamed Shim, received the heaviest sentence of five years for trespassing at the court building through a broken window, assaulting a police officer and attempting to commit arson. "A heavy sentence is inevitable as (the defendant) also attempted arson by buying a lighter from a nearby convenience store, posing serious harm to the judiciary and endangering public safety," the court said. The court also sentenced a 48-year-old surnamed Lee to three years in prison on charges of damaging a judge's office door after entering the courthouse during the riot. Another defendant surnamed Yoo was sentenced to a four-year term for assaulting a police officer and breaking a glass door. "(These acts) not only damage the legitimacy of the judiciary as given by the Constitution, but they also discourage independent judgment by justices and greatly set back the rule of law in our society," the court said.

Pro-labor, broadcast reform bills to be put to vote next week
Pro-labor, broadcast reform bills to be put to vote next week

Korea Herald

time12 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Pro-labor, broadcast reform bills to be put to vote next week

Several contentious bills, including one pro-labor bill and three aimed at reducing government influence over public broadcasters, will be put to a vote at the National Assembly next week after a parliamentary standing committee approved them on Friday. The Assembly's Legislation and Judiciary Committee, led by the ruling Democratic Party of Korea, voted in favor of passing the three broadcasting bills and the pro-labor bill dubbed the 'Yellow Envelope Law' during a meeting. All four bills are sponsored by the ruling party and the liberal Lee Jae Myung administration. With 16 of the 18 committee members in attendance, all bills passed after 10 voted in favor, with six abstentions. Of the total 18 members, 10 are lawmakers of the ruling party, including the committee's chair, Rep. Lee Choon-suak of the Democratic Party. Seven are main opposition People Power Party lawmakers, while one is a member of the minor progressive Rebuilding Korea Party. Committee members belonging to the People Power Party vocally protested during Friday's vote. Democratic Party members, however, refused to hold a debate over the bills despite the main opposition's request. The bills will be put to a vote during a parliamentary plenary session scheduled for Monday. The People Power Party announced plans to launch a filibuster to delay the passage of the legislation. The 'Yellow Envelope Law' is a revision to the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act that focuses on restricting companies from claiming damages against legitimate disputes involving labor unions. The nickname stems from the donations that the public sent to support SsangYong Motor workers in 2014, after they were laid off and faced court orders to compensate their employer for the damages made to company properties during a strike. South Korean business lobby groups, the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea and the European Chamber of Commerce have all voiced concerns that the passage of the bill could prompt foreign companies to withdraw from the Korean market. Meanwhile, the amendments to the Broadcasting Act, the Foundation for Broadcast Culture Act and the Korea Educational Broadcasting System Act aim to increase the number of board directors at public broadcasters KBS, MBC and EBS, respectively. The set of bills quintessentially seeks to reform the governance structure of the public broadcasters by reducing the government and the National Assembly's power to name the board directors. The opposition claims the restructuring aims to reinforce the influence of labor unions. All four bills were previously vetoed by former President Yoon Suk Yeol when he was in office, after the Assembly at the time, led by then-main opposition Democratic Party, passed them.

[Lee Byung-jong] Boss politics in Korea and US
[Lee Byung-jong] Boss politics in Korea and US

Korea Herald

timea day ago

  • Korea Herald

[Lee Byung-jong] Boss politics in Korea and US

Despite vastly different political histories, South Korea and the United States are beginning to resemble each other in one critical respect: the rise of boss politics. This style of personality-driven leadership, defined by charismatic control over political parties and unwavering loyalty from supporters, has become increasingly evident in both countries. It marks a shift from institutional politics to one dominated by individual influence — where dissent is punished and power is concentrated around a singular figure. Boss politics is hardly new to South Korea. Since democratization in the late 1980s, charismatic political leaders have held sway over their parties through tightly controlled political machines. The 'Three Kims' — former Presidents Kim Young-sam, Kim Dae-jung and former Prime Minister Kim Jong-pil — dominated the political landscape for decades. Their power was rooted in regional loyalties and an ability to distribute resources, positions and nominations. Political funding and National Assembly candidate selections were tools for consolidating authority, and loyalty was often valued over competence. Dissenters were purged, and sycophancy was rewarded. Though the era of the Three Kims formally ended in the early 2000s, their legacy lives on. Presidents from both conservative and progressive camps have continued the practice of consolidating power within their parties. Patronage networks remain strong, where personal connections and allegiance are often more critical than experience or ability. Former President Yoon Suk-yeol, who was eventually impeached, was criticized for appointing close friends and former prosecutor colleagues to key posts, suggesting that meritocracy took a back seat to loyalty. President Lee Jae Myung, currently in office, presents a mixed picture. While his first cabinet includes respected professionals, it also features loyalists known for their unwavering support. His political rise — from a mayor of a small city to national prominence — was largely fueled by a fiercely devoted base comprising 30 to 40 percent of the electorate. This "concrete base" has not only protected Lee during legal and political challenges but has also aggressively targeted his critics, especially online. During the 2024 parliamentary elections, for instance, many of Lee's intraparty rivals lost their seats, while his allies cruised to victory thanks to mobilized grassroots support. A similar political dynamic exists across the Pacific. In the United States, President Donald Trump has established near-total control over the Republican Party through his Make America Great Again movement. Trump's influence is so powerful that few in the GOP dare to oppose him publicly. The fate of former Rep. Liz Cheney — a senior Republican and daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney — illustrates the point. After denouncing Trump's false claims about the 2020 election, she was removed from her leadership role and lost her reelection bid. The message was clear: Loyalty to Trump trumps loyalty to the party or constitutional principles. Those who remain loyal to Trump are often rewarded. He has handpicked candidates for elections and installed allies in key government roles. Notable examples include Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News contributor who wholeheartedly supported Trump's foreign policy. Federal Attorney General Pam Bondi is a former Florida attorney general who served on Trump's impeachment defense team. Critics argue that these appointments prioritized personal loyalty over qualifications or institutional knowledge. Trump's governance philosophy is grounded in the belief that elected officials should wield unquestioned authority over the government. He has long railed against the so-called 'Deep State,' a term he uses to describe career bureaucrats whom he views as obstructing his policy goals. Determined to avoid what he sees as sabotage, Trump is pursuing a sweeping overhaul of the civil service, including mass firings and agency shutdowns — all with the goal of ensuring full compliance from the bureaucracy. To a somewhat lesser extent, President Lee Jae Myung shares Trump's views on the power of elected officials over appointed ones. In a lecture to newly appointed government managers last month, Lee said, 'Bureaucrats should follow the will of elected power — namely, the president. That is the principle of democracy, because elected officials most directly represent the people's will.' Reflecting that philosophy, his administration is considering a major structural shift: moving the government's budgetary authority from the Ministry of Strategy and Finance to the presidential office or the prime minister's office, a change that would significantly increase executive control over national policy. Both Korea and the US operate under presidential systems, where a strong executive is a constitutional feature. Yet, equating presidential strength with unchallenged authority risks undermining the bureaucracy's role. Professional civil servants bring institutional memory, expertise and continuity, which are essential for effective governance — especially in complex, policy-heavy areas like health care, defense and climate change. Frequent leadership changes already lead to inconsistent policymaking. In South Korea, for example, nuclear energy policy has swung back and forth depending on which party is in power, creating confusion among stakeholders and inefficiencies in long-term planning. Similar instability can be seen in US foreign policy and environmental regulations, which have shifted dramatically between administrations. Charismatic political leaders with devoted followings may appear to be political titans. In the short term, their dominance over party structures and policymaking may seem unshakable. But effective governance is not about control — it's about collaboration. Presidents Trump and Lee both enjoy strong support from passionate political bases, enabling them to dominate their parties. However, long-term success in government depends less on fervent followers and more on capable, independent institutions. Boss politics might secure elections. But only bureaucratic integrity and institutional professionalism can secure lasting national progress.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store