UK parliament votes to decriminalise abortion, repeal 19th century law
The British parliament on Tuesday voted to decriminalise abortion in the United Kingdom and Wales in order for the women to avoid being investigated by the police for ending their pregnancies under the legislation which dates back to the mid 19th century. The majority vote to decriminalise the procedure is the biggest change in abortion laws being brought in the UK and Wales in the past 60 years.
Abortion has remained a legal practice in the UK and Wales for the last 60 years but up to 24 weeks and after the approval of two doctors. Women are liable to face criminal charges that carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment if they end a pregnancy after 24 weeks under the Victorian-era law.
But as the parliament voted with 379 voting in favour, and 137 voting against, the amendment brought by the Labour parliamentarian Tonia Antoniazzi, passed in a free vote of MPs and now, any woman who terminates her pregnancy after the 24 weeks period would not be at risk of being investigated by the police.
No woman facing one of the hardest moments of her life should face a criminal investigation. Today we have the opportunity to change that.
I urge colleagues to support New Clause 1 and stand up for compassion and justice. pic.twitter.com/UKtN8Eu36w
— Tonia Antoniazzi (@ToniaAntoniazzi) June 17, 2025
However, the amended law states that it will still penalise anyone who assists a woman, including medical professionals, in getting the abortion done outside of the legal framework as mentioned in the amended law passed by the parliament.
In Britain, criminal convictions of breaking abortion law is rare but the number of prosecutions has increased after the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic when the law was amended and it was allowed to take abortion pills at home to end pregnancies within 10 weeks of conception.
Labour Member of Parliament Tonia Antoniazzi said the current abortion law has been used to investigate at least 100 women in the past five years, including those who had given birth prematurely or were forced into abortion by abusive partners.
'Each one of these cases is a travesty enabled by our outdated abortion law. This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end,' she told the parliament, Reuters reported.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump administration blocked from cutting local health funding for four municipalities
A federal court has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from clawing back millions in public health funding from four Democrat-led municipalities in GOP-governed states. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It's the second such federal ruling to reinstate public health funding for several states. US District Judge Christopher Cooper in Washington, DC, issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday sought by district attorneys in Harris County, Texas, home to Houston, and three cities: Columbus, Ohio, Nashville, Tennessee, and Kansas City, Missouri. The decision means the federal government must reinstate funding to the four municipalities until the case is fully litigated. "The federal government cannot simply ignore Congress and pull the plug on essential services that communities rely on," Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee said. "Today's decision ensures we can keep doing the work that protects our residents - from tracking disease outbreaks to providing vaccinations and supporting vulnerable families." Their lawsuit, filed in late April, alleged $11 billion in cuts to US centres for disease control and prevention programs had already been approved by Congress and are being unconstitutionally withheld. They also argued that the administration's actions violate department of health and human services regulations. The cities and counties argued the cuts were "a massive blow to US public health at a time where state and local public health departments need to address burgeoning infectious diseases and chronic illnesses, like the measles, bird flu, and mpox." The cuts would lead to thousands of state and local public health employees being fired, the lawsuit argued. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The local governments, alongside the American federation of state, county and municipal employees union, wanted the court to reinstate the grants nationwide. But Cooper said in his preliminary injunction that the funds can only be blocked to the four municipalities and in a May 21 hearing expressed skepticism about whether it could apply more widely. The funding in question was granted during the Covid-19 pandemic but aimed at building up public health infrastructure overall, Menefee said in a statement in April. The four local governments were owed about $32.7 million in future grant payments, Cooper's opinion notes. The federal government's lawyers said the grants were legally cut because, "Now that the pandemic is over, the grants and cooperative agreements are no longer necessary as their limited purpose has run out." They used the same argument in the case brought by 23 states and the District of Columbia over the HHS funding clawback. Menefee said the cuts defunded programs in Harris County for wastewater disease surveillance, community health workers and clinics and call centres that helped people get vaccinated. Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein said the cuts forced the city to fire 11 of its 22 infectious disease staffers. Nashville used some of its grant money to support programs, including a "strike team" that after the pandemic addressed gaps in health services that kept kids from being able to enrol in school, according to the lawsuit. Kansas City used one of its grants to build out capabilities to test locally for Covid-19, influenza and measles rather than waiting for results from the county lab. The suit details that after four years of work to certify facilities and train staff, the city "was at the final step" of buying lab equipment when the grant was canceled. Representatives for HHS, the CDC and the cities did not immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
36 minutes ago
- First Post
Peace or war? What Trump's ‘unconditional surrender' message to Iran means
Donald Trump has escalated the rhetoric against Iran, demanding for an 'unconditional surrender'. The remarks fuel speculation that America could join Israeli military action by providing bunker-busting bombs or other support. Others note that the comments are a part of Trump's mixed messaging campaign and could be his way of pressuring Tehran into a deal read more US President Donald Trump speaks with reporters while flying aboard Air Force One en route from Calgary, Canada to Joint Base Andrews. AP It's been almost a week since tensions between Israel and Iran escalated — military and residential sites have been pummelled and the death toll keeps mounting on both sides. But on Wednesday, the biggest bomb (not an actual one) was lobbed by US President Donald Trump when he called for Iran's 'unconditional surrender'. Trump made a series of comments that signalled America's possibility of entering the war just a day after he left the G7 summit in Canada early to focus on the war. The US president's latest comments on the Israel-Iran conflict is part of his mixed messaging about what he wants from Iran and just how involved the United States is or will be. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But what has Trump now said? What does it mean for the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict? We try to decode it all. Trump's 'unconditional surrender' call to Iran On Tuesday (June 17), Trump escalated his rhetoric against Iran, issuing a threat on social media against its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and taking credit for having 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran'. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there – we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social. He followed up with a second post a few minutes later, writing: 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' Interestingly, these strong messages from the US president came just a day after he cut short his G7 visit to Canada and on his way back to Washington warned 'everyone in Tehran to evacuate'. After US President Donald Trump's stern warning, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei responded with a post of his own, 'In the name of the noble Haidar, the battle begins.' Smoke rises from a fire, as the Israel-Iran air war continues, in Tehran, Iran. Reuters Trump mulling to join the conflict According to several news reports, Trump's increasingly muscular comments against Tehran are an indicator of deepening American involvement in the West Asian crisis perhaps by providing the Israelis with bunker-busting bombs to penetrate Iranian nuclear sites built deep underground or offering other direct US military support. The New York Times has reported that Trump is weighing whether to use B-2 aircraft to drop bunker-busting bombs on Iran's underground nuclear facilities. Notably, Trump held an emergency meeting in the Situation Room of the White House. The meeting, which lasted an hour and twenty minutes, was held to discuss whether the US should join Israel to strike Iranian nuclear sites. As per a CBS news report, there isn't a full agreement among Trump's closest advisors. Moreover, the US is deploying more fighter aircraft to West Asia and extending the deployment of other warplanes. The deployments include F-16, F-22 and F-35 fighter aircraft. A US defence official also added that the Pentagon was redeploying the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group to West Asia 'to sustain our defensive posture and safeguard American personnel'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, experts note that America's direct involvement in the conflict is a 'scary proposition'. US involvement would completely change the way the war is being waged by Iran,' said Dr Dara Conduit, a fellow and lecturer in political science at the University of Melbourne, to BBC. 'It would remove any ability for Iran to back down,' she said, adding that Iran would be forced into attacking US interests in West Asia. Men react as smoke rises following an Israeli attack on the IRIB building, the country's state broadcaster, in Tehran, Iran. Reuters Trump's mixed messages on Israel-Iran conflict For many watchers of the Israel-Iran conflict, Trump's comments on Tuesday are part of his ongoing mixed messaging. As Shira Efron, director of research at Israel Policy Forum, a New York-based research group, told the New York Times, 'It's very puzzling. 'You're seeing him say one thing and then another.' Meanwhile, Sky News in an analysis noted that the latest remarks by the US president are an extreme version of maximum pressure diplomacy. For instance, on Friday, the first day of the war, Trump initially called Israel's attacks 'excellent' and 'very successful,' but also said that he believed a diplomatic solution between Israel and Iran was possible. Then days later, on June 15, Trump said Iran would 'like to make a deal. They're talking. They continue to talk.' And on the following day during his visit to Canada for the G7 Summit, he told reporters that Iran was 'basically at the negotiating table. They want to make a deal. And as soon as I leave here we're going to be doing something.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, that quickly changed and on early Tuesday, he suggested that negotiations were going nowhere. 'They should have done the deal,' Trump said on Air Force One on his way back from Canada. 'I told them, 'Do the deal.' So I don't know. I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate.' Moreover, the Israel-Iran conflict and America's direct involvement has also led to deep divisions within Trump's core support base . Individuals such as former news anchor Tucker Carlson have urged that Washington doesn't enter this fight to which Trump responded, 'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, 'Iran can not have a nuclear weapon'.' But Trump's second, Vice President JD Vance, has defended the US president's Iran policy. He said Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment,' but that he is 'only interested in using the American military to accomplish American people's goals.' He reiterated that Iran 'can't have a nuclear weapon.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
How Does Team Sheikh Hasina Work In Exile? Inside The IT Cell Of Awami League
Last Updated: The primary job of the IT Cell is to run five social media platforms of Awami League—Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram and Telegram This week, in London's Chatham House, Chief Adviser to the interim Bangladesh government, Md Yunus, recounted how he almost pleaded with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to restrain former Bangladeshi PM Sheikh Hasina from communicating with her support base in Bangladesh or across the world. 'I said to PM Modi: 'You want to host her? I can't force you to abandon that policy, but please help us in making sure she doesn't speak to Bangladeshi people the way she is doing as the whole of Bangladesh gets very angry.' India is not doing what I asked. Modi's answer was: 'It is social media, we can't control it.' What can you say? It's an explosive situation. You can't just walk away by saying it's social media," Yunus recounted as he desperately tries to dry up any information on Awami League—the party of the now-exiled Hasina. But how does a party, whose entire cadre base are either too intimidated in the country to react or the leadership in exile, function? Most importantly, how does the communication work when the party itself has been banned in Bangladesh recently? 'Though there was just 40 per cent voter turnout in the last election, Awami League won 224 out of 300 contested parliamentary seats. You cannot dismiss such a prevalent political discourse of Bangladesh, all of a sudden," argues Bangladeshi journalist Sahidul Hasan Khokon. So, how does the Awami League stay afloat while its top leadership is in exile? Sources within the party say that soon after August 5, 2024, when Hasina had to flee to Ghaziabad's Hindon Airport, the Awami League fell back to what it calls the 'Covid-19 era set-ups'. The backbone of the set-up was former minister of state for information and broadcasting, Mohammad A Arafat, who is now based out of Kolkata. He set up Awami League's busiest nerve centre in the outskirts of Kolkata in Newtown area. The primary job of the IT Cell is to run five social media platforms of Awami League—Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram and Telegram. Facebook remains its biggest mass-connect platform, where it has 3.9 million followers. On Twitter, it has seen a sudden spike ever since last year, say sources and the follower count has crossed 6,58,000. On YouTube, it has 4,66,000 followers, while a nascent effort on Instagram has garnered just 12,000 followers. However, what remains the medium of choice for Hasina to communicate is Telegram. Though a Telegram channel is also open for general cadres and supporters, which has more than 93,000 subscribers and counting, content is pushed like the latest one highlighting the arrest of ISKCON's Chinmoy Prabhu calling it 'deeper crisis in minority rights", appealing to the Hindu voters of Bangladesh who have been traditionally loyal with Hasina. 'Every day, Sheikh Hasina meets the support base of Awami League that is left behind in Bangladesh. She interacts for three to five hours every day on average. So far, she has been interacting with the district committees. Apart from the few days of Eid, she hasn't taken a break as such. We record the entire conversation and extract the operative portion that can inspire our cadres, using it as content on different social media handles. We then push them on the social," explains Arafat. A person who is aware of how the whole ecosystem of Awami League IT Cell works, adds that Hasina has completed 63 out of 64 district committees so far. The break Arafat was referring to was when Hasina managed to spend six days with her son Sajeeb Wazed Joy. Sources say he came on a US passport after the Bangladesh interim government cancelled his passport. While Arafat holds the fort in Kolkata, Joy holds the fort in Washington DC. Sources say six to seven individuals work in the Kolkata team while three to four work in the Washington DC team under Joy. top videos View all 'We have teams in London, Brussels and the Middle East as well. But they are not necessarily party workers. Many of them are also from the diaspora who feel strongly about their country and the party's ideological standings. So, they extend their helping hand," adds Arafat. But the inevitable question—How is Sheikh Hasina doing? Smiles Arafat. 'She is reading a lot. She believes we will triumph (over Yunus)." About the Author Anindya Banerjee Anindya Banerjee, Associate Editor brings over fifteen years of journalistic courage to the forefront. With a keen focus on politics and policy, Anindya has garnered a wealth of experience, with deep throat in ...Read More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Awami League bangladesh dhaka Muhammad Yunus Sheikh Hasina Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 18, 2025, 09:35 IST News world How Does Team Sheikh Hasina Work In Exile? Inside The IT Cell Of Awami League | Exclusive
