logo
Why this is a golden age for Jewish theatre

Why this is a golden age for Jewish theatre

Telegraph29-05-2025
My Jewish mother does not go to the theatre often. But when she does, she sees Fiddler on the Roof. She has seen it so many times she could understudy any character at a moment's notice. In fairness she did attend a Pinter play once, but walked out at the first infamous Pinter Pause thinking it was the interval.
Naturally she was ecstatic when the Open Air Regent's Park theatre revived Fiddler last year, even more so when a transfer to the Barbican (which has just opened) was announced. Garlanded with 13 nods at this year's Olivier awards, Jordan Fein's production matched the record set by Hamilton for the most nominations for a single show. Not bad for what Philip Roth once derided as 'shtetl kitsch.'
In fact, Fiddler is not the only Jewish show to have become a critical hit in the past year. Principal among these was Mark Rosenblatt's Giant at the Royal Court, a fire-breathing study of Roald Dahl's virulent anti-Semitism; then there was Patrick Marber's production of What We Talk About When We Talk About Anne Frank, Nick Cassenbaum's After the Levoyah and the Marber-directed Nachtland.
The popularity of Jewish-orientated shows seems incongruous when juxtaposed with skyrocketing anti-Semitism post October 7th. 2024 saw the second-highest recording of reported anti-Semitic incidents in a single calendar year according to the Community Security Trust, a charity which represents the UK's Jewish population.
'There have been countless examples of problems in the creative industries with soft boycotts and discrimination to anything with links to Israel' says literary agent and producer Neil Blair.
'I'm sure that Jewish writers have been scared to express their Jewishness as they fear they won't get published. It's been a tough time to be a proud Jew.'
London theatre has seen numerous high-profile incidents of anti-Semitic controversies. Ken Loach 's 1987 production of Perdition was pulled from public performances at the Royal Court before the first preview. Historians declared Jim Allen's play historically unsound and deeply anti-Semitic. In 2011 Caryl Churchill's Seven Jewish Children also premiered to a chorus of opprobrium from across the British-Jewish community, once again at the Court. A recent new production produced by actor Brian Cox revived the contentious debate over the extent to which it straddles the murky line between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism.
'And look what happened with Rare Earth Mettle' says Blair. Once again attached to the Court, Al Smith's 2021 play sparked outcry over 'Hershel Fink' an Elon Musk-inspired character with an unmistakably Jewish name seemingly imbued with anti-Semitic traits, even though the character was not written to be Jewish. The original name surfaced in preview performances before it was changed. The production still went ahead.
'It's astonishing that the theatre had initially claimed that they didn't realise Fink is a Jewish name,' says Blair. A consequent internal report found that despite the fact that the name had been twice flagged as potentially offensive in the play's development and rehearsal period the creative team kept the name. The theatre would go on to apologise 'unreservedly.'
Jewish creatives have played a significant role in theatre since the early 20th century. Immigrants from Russia and Eastern Europe laid the artistic foundation stones of Broadway and the Jewish influence could be seen not only in explicitly Jewish shows like Fiddler, but also in productions which mirror the dynamics of the Jewish diaspora. Stories of overcoming the odds and forging a new home in America parallel the immigrant struggles of artists such as George Gershwin and Irving Berlin.
Neither has there been a shortage of Jewish voices in the West End. Harold Pinter and Tom Stoppard are arguably the two most influential dramatists of the 20 th century, then there are directors such as Peter Brook and Jonathan Miller, and even critics, Milton Shulman and Bernard Levin, the so-called kosher butchers.
But it would be rare to see Jewish artistic self-expression in mainstream spaces that paralleled Broadway. The theatrical tradition in London was already richly established, with its own inheritance, traditions, and artistic canon. Jewish dramatists, usually second-generation immigrants, had to assimilate their storytelling, allowing it to lurk only beneath the surface. This was certainly the case with Harold Pinter.
While the linguistic rhythms of Pinter's early work mirror the broken English of Eastern European immigrants, it's detectable on a narrative level too. Pinter drew from his childhood in Hackney for The Homecoming. Ruth can be easily interpreted as a non-Jewish woman marrying into a Jewish household overseen by a paranoid patriarch. Pinter took inspiration from a childhood friend who 'married out' – a transgressive violation considered to be a personal and cultural betrayal. Initial drafts set the action in the East End and referred to an unseen character named 'Berkowitz,' eventually exorcised from the final draft.
Recent success at the Oliviers signals a paradigm shift in Jewish on-stage representation as dramatists openly interrogate the idiosyncrasies of contemporary Jewishness on mainstream stages. Rising anti-Semitism, war in Israel, consequent tension within the community are fertile dramatic soil ripe for theatrical exploration. Audiences, both Jewish and non-Jewish, are listening.
'Intelligent pieces of theatre are striking a chord because audiences want nuanced debate' says Tracy-Ann Oberman whose reworked version of The Merchant of Venice relocated the action to London's East End in 1936 under the looming shadow of Mosley's black shirts. After an initial run at the Watford Palace Theatre it embarked on a national tour as well as two West End runs.
'It's been on a journey for two and half years; the positive responses and interest from audiences across the country has warmed my heart,' she says.
Oberman admits that its commercial success was unexpected, especially when compared with traditionally lucrative hits such as Fiddler on the Roof. Like Giant it was conceived before October 7 th but came to take on a new meaning in light of growing anti-Semitism.
'The Merchant of Venice showed what anti-Semitism looked like in 1936, that came to resonate with the rise of anti-Jewish racism today, especially how a lot of the vernacular about anti-Zionism bleeds into anti-Semitism' says Oberman. 'People understand that nothing is as black and white as some would have us believe. Art is the best way to show that.'
Since the Hershel Fink debacle at the Royal Court, Oberman is adamant there has been significant progress around boosting awareness of Jewish culture. Questions over authentic casting and cultural appropriation are more prominent to the extent that the costume designer of the new production of Oliver! rang Oberman to run by ideas for Fagin's costume to ensure respect of cultural sensitives.
'The fact that he was willing to make that call with me was a huge step forward. If this is a Golden Age, then it's one of renewed understanding and consideration towards Jewish culture,' she says. As a consequence, Oberman has noticed more writers and artists wearing their Jewishness proudly on their sleeve. Perhaps other creative industries could take a leaf out of theatre's book.
The ultimate test for this golden age is if Giant transfers to New York - not outside the realm of impossibility after its Olivier success. It is currently playing at the Harold Pinter Theatre – my mother has bought a ticket at my behest.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Toxic Avenger review – strong cast struggles to revive stale horror franchise
The Toxic Avenger review – strong cast struggles to revive stale horror franchise

The Guardian

time23 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The Toxic Avenger review – strong cast struggles to revive stale horror franchise

The 1980s schlock-splatterfest franchise, originating from the famously low-budget, low-morale Z-list horror studio Troma, is now rebooted with an impressive cast and unimpressive script; it gets its somewhat delayed premiere at Edinburgh, two years after its completion. (It's billed as a world premiere, though a presumably different version screened at a couple of film festivals in 2023.) The original film was about a cringing nerd, sexually humiliated by bikini-clad women and brutalised by jocks, who then falls into a bin of bubbling toxic waste and is transformed into a hideously disfigured bulbous monster wreaking a terrible vengeance on all the bullies. This new version is not more progressive exactly, but the scantily-clad-babe factor, so important in bargain-bin 80s movies, has been dialled down. Now it is Peter Dinklage as our antihero, playing Winston, a humble janitor at a creepy corporation pumping out the poisonous waste – although Dinklage only has to act as himself in the film's initial scenes. After the big transformation it's another actor body-doubling his part in a green monster suit while Dinklage phones in his dialogue from the voice studio. Jacob Tremblay plays Winston's poignantly lonely and vulnerable teen son Wade (another factor that the 1980s original did not consider relevant or necessary) while Taylour Paige plays heroine JJ Doherty, who is out to take down the amoral corporation led by a slimy plutocrat, gamely played by Kevin Bacon with much panto villainy. He has a submissive brother-slash-helpmeet resembling the animated baddie Gru, played by Elijah Wood, and his uptight office assistant is played by Julia Davis. However this solid roster of acting talent can't do much about how frankly uninteresting and unfunny The Toxic Avenger is most of the time. As satire or spoof of both superhero movies and scary movies it is abysmally obsolete, and on its own terms as horror-comedy it achieves neither scares nor laughs. But in fairness, there are some good gags in Sunil Patel's cameo as a sorrowing doctor who has to break the news to Winston about his condition. The Toxic Avenger screened at the Edinburgh film festival, and is in Australian cinemas from 28 August and UK and Irish cinemas from 29 August.

Revealed: The most popular baby names in YOUR area - as figures suggest up to 9% of boys now get called Muhammad in parts of country
Revealed: The most popular baby names in YOUR area - as figures suggest up to 9% of boys now get called Muhammad in parts of country

Daily Mail​

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Revealed: The most popular baby names in YOUR area - as figures suggest up to 9% of boys now get called Muhammad in parts of country

The Daily Mail's new search tool reveals the most popular boys' and girls' names in your area. Simply type in your postcode below to find out. Our tool – built with Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures released last month – also lists the ten most common names across your wider region. For example, Alexander topped the tables for boys born in Kensington and Chelsea. Across London as a whole, however, Muhammad was by far the most popular, with 1,044 boys given that name. Noah (595) ranked second. Daily Mail analysis suggests nearly 9 per cent of boys born in parts of England and Wales last year were named Muhammad. Muhammad, or the slightly different spelling of Mohammed, was the most common name in 33 of 318 authorities. It was trumped only by Oliver, which was crowned the most popular in 109 areas. This is despite Muhammad being the most popular name nationwide. The same ONS data, spanning England and Wales, revealed 5,721 boys were given the specific spelling of Muhammad in 2024. That marked an increase of 23 per cent in a year. Noah came in second, with Oliver in third, just as they did in 2023. In Pendle, just outside Bradford, the same statistics suggested 8.9 per cent of boys born in 2024 were named Muhammad – the highest rate in England and Wales. Blackburn with Darwen (8.6 per cent) and Bradford (7.4 per cent) followed in second and third spot. The figures were calculated using separate birth statistics published by the ONS. The ONS only shared the most popular name for each authority, meaning the exact number of boys born called Muhammad is unknown in the majority of areas. Moshe, a Hebrew name referring to the biblical figure of Moses, proved the most popular boys' name in the London borough of Hackney. Nineteen boys were given this name – or a one per cent share of the 1,865 live male births recorded there in 2024. Mohammed, a different spelling to the one crowned most popular in 2024, entered the top 100 boys' names for England and Wales 100 years ago, debuting at 91st in 1924. Its prevalence dropped considerably in the lead up to and during WW2 but began to rise in the 1960s. That particular iteration of the name was the only one to appear in the ONS' top 100 data from 1924 until Mohammad joined in the early 1980s. Muhammad, now the most popular of the trio, first broke into the top 100 in the mid-1980s and has seen the fastest growth of all three iterations since. The name means praiseworthy' or 'commendable' and stems from the Arabic word 'hamad', meaning 'to praise'. The spelling is shared with the founder of Islam – the prophet Muhammad. Other spellings listed in the ONS report include: Mohamad, Muhamad, Muhamed, Mohammod. Hyphenated variations include Muhammad-Ibrahim and Muhammad-Adam. Increasing sizes of Muslim communities across the UK fuelled by immigration, as well as the popularity of sporting figures such as Mo Farah and Mohamed Salah are likely to have sparked the increase. The ONS only provides figures based on the exact spelling and do not group names, as some groupings are subjective and not straightforward. For example, if multiple spelling were grouped under one umbrella name, Theodore (8th in 2024, 2,761 and Theo (12th in 2024, 2,387) would be far above Noah. 2023 marked the second time just one spelling of the Muhammad topped the charts on its own. For girls, Olivia took the top spot again, with 2,761 namings making it the undisputed queen of girls names for nine years running. Amelia came in at number two for the second year in a row, with 2,448 namings and Lily, which sat in fourth spot last year, ranked third (2,185). Royal names have continued to fall in popularity on the whole. George ranked sixth with 3,257 babies being given the name and William came in 27th. Louis came in 47th for boys and Charlotte ranked 23rd for girls. Names given to baby boys less than five times in 2024 include Yanky, Teddy-Bear, Awesome and Beckham. Names given to baby girls less than five times include Orchid, Poem, Sicily and Everest.

Fresh royal family row as King's cousin launches astonishing attack on his 87-year-old mother and accuses her of being 'lazy': RICHARD EDEN'S DIARY
Fresh royal family row as King's cousin launches astonishing attack on his 87-year-old mother and accuses her of being 'lazy': RICHARD EDEN'S DIARY

Daily Mail​

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Fresh royal family row as King's cousin launches astonishing attack on his 87-year-old mother and accuses her of being 'lazy': RICHARD EDEN'S DIARY

Lord Ivar Mountbatten seems to have taken a leaf out of Prince Harry 's book. For the television personality has chosen to attack his family in public. Lord Ivar, 62, who became the first member of the extended Royal Family to enter into a same-sex union in 2018, has given an astonishing interview in which he admits he does not like his mother, the Marchioness of Milford Haven, whom he accuses of being 'lazy'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store