Iran abandons Houthis under relentless US bombardment
A senior Iranian official said the move aimed to avoid direct confrontation with the US if an Iranian soldier was killed.
The official said Iran was also scaling back its strategy of supporting a network of regional proxies to focus on the direct threats from the US instead.
Tehran's primary concern, the source said, was 'Trump and how to deal with him'.
'Every meeting is dominated by discussions about him, and none of the regional groups we previously supported are being discussed,' the source said.
There have been near-daily attacks on the Houthis from the US since group chat messages from senior Trump officials discussing the strikes were leaked to the media last month.
The strikes, which Donald Trump described as 'unbelievably successful', have destroyed important military targets and killed commanders.
A Pentagon spokesman said more warplanes would be sent to the region but did not provide specific details.
However the US's 124th Fighter Wing announced late last month it was sending 'multiple' A-10 Thunderbolt II ground-attack aircraft and 300 airmen to the Middle East.
A Russian military expert in Sanaa, the capital of Yemen, is also believed to be advising the Houthis on how to carry out their attacks while preventing them from targeting Saudi Arabia.
The kingdom has bombarded Houthi forces in Yemen since intervening in its civil war in 2015, and has hosted high-level talks between the US and Russia over a potential ceasefire in Ukraine.
The Houthi rebels have said they have been attacking US warships in the Red Sea, including the aircraft carrier USS Harry S Truman, which has been leading efforts to strike the rebel group.
No ships have been hit yet, but the US Navy said the Houthi fire was the heaviest its sailors have faced since World War II.
The USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier, currently in Asia, is also on its way to the Middle East to support Truman.
The regime source in Iran said: 'The view here is that the Houthis will not be able to survive and are living their final months or even days, so there is no point in keeping them on our list.
'They were part of a chain that relied on Nasrallah [the former secretary-general of Hezbollah] and Assad, and keeping only one part of that chain for the future makes no sense.'
Mr Trump has been ratcheting up pressure on Iran to come to the table and discuss limiting its nuclear programme. Last week Mr Trump moved stealth B-2 bombers to the US-UK Diego Garcia military base in the Chagos Islands.
The US position on Iran and the Middle East has radically shifted since Mr Trump came into power.
Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa programme at the Chatham House International Affairs Think Tank, said the increase in US strikes on Yemen was the Trump administration's attempt to distance itself from the previous administration.
Joe Biden removed the Houthis' designation as a terror organisation in 2021 – a decision Mr Trump reversed in January.
'Trump is trying to prove that he is more effective at ending and solving conflicts than the Biden administration was,' said Ms Vakil.
'[The strikes are] connected to the maximum pressure campaign that he has endorsed and he wants to simultaneously send a message to Iran and to the axis of resistance that his administration is going to take a bolder approach to destabilising regional activities.'
Mahmoud Shehrah, a former Yemeni diplomat and current associate fellow at the Chatham House, said the US had a 'defensive strategy' against the Houthis during Joe Biden's time in office.
From Amman, Jordan's capital city, Mr Shehrah told The Telegraph: 'The previous miscalculation about the Houthis in the US had made Trump carry heavier strikes against them now and [the US] have started to target individuals and key actors of them.'
He said weapons the Houthis possess are more sophisticated, which makes them more powerful than other non-state actors in Iran's proxy groups across the Middle East.
Mr Shehrah added: 'After the collapse of Hezbollah and Assad's regime, the Houthis are now on the front line and they have been conducting very intensive attacks – they are escalating and taking adventure because it makes their political life longer in Yemen, according to their own calculation.'
'They get missiles and drones from Iran and rebrand them with Houthi names because they don't want to show they have links with Iran because of domestic propaganda.'
Israel's successes against Hamas and Hezbollah, key nodes in Iran's network of proxies, have created an opportunity to weaken the Islamic regime's influence.
Analysts also believe Iran's failed missile strikes on Israel last year have damaged Iran's ability to present a credible deterrence against external attacks, and also weakened the morale of its allies.
Israel's military has destroyed much of Hamas' infrastructure in Gaza, and inflicted heavy losses on Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Iran also failed to protect Bashar al-Assad, the former Syrian president and a key ally, against a rapid rebel offensive that overthrew the dictator in December.
With Hezbollah's influence diminished, the Houthis have tried to take its place in leading the fight against Israel.
Since the Hamas-led Oct 7 attacks on Israel in 2023, the Houthis have improved their tactics and missile capabilities and built a strong public image.
They control Sanaa, print money, collect taxes, divert aid, smuggle drugs, sell weapons to terror groups in Africa and disrupt international shipping routes in the Red Sea.
They also have a geographic advantage. Yemen's mountainous terrain, similar to Afghanistan, helps them hide stockpiles of missiles and drones in caves and underground.
Mr Shehrah said: 'They are not experienced like Hezbollah but are more aggressive and more dangerous at the same time – Abdul Malik al-Houthi has an ambition of leading the axis of resistance.
'Yemeni streets are full of anger – the Houthis are not paying salaries and have absolute taxation with zero representation so the social base for the Houthis is not very strong, that's why they rely on the Gaza war.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
26 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Russia drone attack kills seven including toddler as Zelensky and Trump set for crunch White House meeting
'Ukrainians are fighting for their land, for their independence. Now, our soldiers have successes in Donetsk and Sumy regions. I am confident that we will defend Ukraine, effectively guarantee security, and that our people will always be grateful to President Trump, everyone in America, and every partner and ally for their support and invaluable assistance. Russia must end this war, which it itself started. And I hope that our joint strength with America, with our European friends, will force Russia into a real peace.'
Spectator
26 minutes ago
- Spectator
Why Putin wants Donetsk
Will Ukraine's fate depend on Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka and Kostiantynivka? These may not be household names, but they are the four key 'fortress cities' in the remaining portions of Donetsk region that Vladimir Putin is reportedly demanding as the price for peace. Although the details are still unclear, it seems that the framework for a peace deal agreed in outline between Putin and Trump would see the Russians agreeing to freeze the current front line. They could maybe even hand back some small sections of the Sumy and Kharkiv regions they have conquered in return for Kyiv surrendering the much larger portion of Donetsk region it still holds. This would be a bitter pill to swallow on so many levels. It is not just that the area in question – around 30 per cent of the region, over 6,000 square miles – is so much larger than the territory which would be liberated in Trump's vaunted 'swap'. It is also because of its strategic value. Within that region lies the so-called 'fortress belt', made up of the aforementioned well-defended cities and several other towns and settlements running north to south along the N-20 Kostyantynivka-Slovyansk highway. Given that Kyiv would inevitably and understandably fear some renewed Russian aggression, whatever the terms of any deal, it becomes all the more important for them to have those defensive lines on their side of the front line. Besides, this is territory now soaked in the blood of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers and also of symbolic importance: Slovyansk is the city seized by Russian nationalist Igor 'Strelkov' Girkin when, in his own words, he 'pulled the trigger' on the risings that generated the undeclared war in the Donbas that in due course led to the 2022 invasion. In those circumstances there may even be some question as to whether the military would even accept orders to withdraw. Nonetheless, Putin does seem to have reshaped the debate. By making it about whether or not this surrender is acceptable, he has in effect made the West acknowledge that the existing occupied territories are lost. Perhaps some day, whether through military or political means, they may be regained, but there is no credible theory of victory that sees Kyiv regaining them in the foreseeable future that does not rest on some unlikely deus ex machina like a Russian economic collapse or Putin's imminent demise. Besides, Putin's line is presumably that ultimately this territory is lost to Kyiv anyway – whether it takes a month, a year, or longer, someday his forces will grind their bloody way through the fortress belt. A refusal to deal now just means more death and misery all round before the inevitable. Putin may be wrong and may prove willing to abandon this demand, but he will not do so easily or cheaply. Territorial conquest was never Putin's real objective, so much as the subjugation of Ukraine. Given that he never anticipated that he was getting himself into a major, expensive and open-ended war though, Putin may be willing to take a deal that he can still trumpet as a triumph at home. However, Ukraine may also feel it wins a victory of sorts if it is able to gain the kind of meaningful security guarantees and reconstruction assistance to become a truly sovereign, democratic and stable nation, outside Moscow's sphere of influence. This, after all, is where the really difficult negotiations are likely to remain. That chunk of Donetsk matters, but it is the environment in which Ukrainians will rebuild their country that will be crucial. Putin will want to leave them undefended and divided (indeed, a small part of the reason for his demand for Donetsk is precisely to force Zelensky either to doom his people to more war or take a monstrously unpopular decision in the name of peace). The question is how far Ukraine's allies are willing to offer those serious and credible guarantees and to force Putin to swallow them. They may be tempted to stick to their hollow mantras that 'Putin cannot be allowed to win'. Ukrainians, fighting at the front and hiding from Russian drones in air-raid shelters, have every right to choose to hold out and resist any such ugly deal. Given that Ukraine's European allies are clearly (and rightly) unwilling to put their own soldiers directly into harm's way, though, one could question the morality of their seeking to encourage Zelensky to stand firm simply to avoid confronting the grubby moral compromises peace would demand.
Daily Record
26 minutes ago
- Daily Record
BBC Breakfast breaking news report leaves fans fuming as they say 'stop wasting my licence fee'
BBC Breakfast fans have been left fuming after the show was paused for a breaking news segment as viewers switched off their TVs and complained 'stop wasting my licence fee'. The programme aired segments live from Washington D.C. where US president Donald Trump was meeting with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian president Vladimir Putin. Keir Starmer is also joining the world leaders in the States to 'flesh out the details with other European leaders'. BBC reporters were live in Kyiv to cover the ongoing war in Ukraine as the summit takes place, while political correspondent Joe Pike was live in Westminster to discuss the news. However, as BBC Monitoring Russian editor Vitaly Shevchenko spoke to viewers via video link, fans were left furious. One complained: 'Why do you employ so many staff? Aren't we allowed to see the same person twice? "You are wasting my licence fee. He's told us what we already know.' Another chimed in: 'Stop with your BS and biased reporting. Two Tier Keir couldn't negotiate peace between three disgruntled rent boys […] he's to diplomacy as you are to the truth,' before adding the hashtag #DefundTheBBC. A third angry viewer remarked: "BBC Breakfast and Sky News must have the same editors, both constantly showing clips of Trump bullying Zelensky in February and both read out verbatim nonsense posted by Trump on Truth Social. No wonder [he] loves UK media." It comes amid rising fears regarding Trump's 'friendliness' with Putin, the Express reports. Despite demanding an immediate ceasefire, in person he downplayed the need for sanctions targeting buyers of Russian oil. He told reporters: 'The best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' It comes just two days after another episode of BBC Breakfast sparked some backlash on Friday, August 15. The segment came when Only Fools and Horses legend Sir David Jason appeared on the show for an "uncomfortable" interview with host Naga Munchetty. The actor, 85, appeared on the programme to promote his upcoming tour, An Evening With Sir David Jason, and to share anecdotes from his 60-year career. David did not hold back when it came to flirting with Naga throughout the segment and fans were left unimpressed by his "creepy" comments. While trying to recall a story he was telling, David trailed off and said:'Yes I was, but… you… it's Naga, I can't resist, [I can't] take my eyes off her.' The actor said he could not go into too much detail about his upcoming tour as he said: "I'm not going to give anything away because I've been told not to." Munchetty asked the actor: 'Do you always do as you're told?' Jason teased: 'Naga, please! Yes, I will. For certain people,' before joking: 'Not you, Charlie.'
